Skip to main content
Download PDF

The uncoupling protein 1 gene, UCP1, is expressed in mammalian islet cells and associated with acute insulin response to glucose in African American families from the IRAS Family Study

BMC Endocrine Disorders volume 7, Article number: 1 (2007) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Variants of uncoupling protein genes UCP1 and UCP2 have been associated with a range of traits. We wished to evaluate contributions of known UCP1 and UCP2 variants to metabolic traits in the Insulin Resistance and Atherosclerosis (IRAS) Family Study.

Methods

We genotyped five promoter or coding single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 239 African American (AA) participants and 583 Hispanic participants from San Antonio (SA) and San Luis Valley. Generalized estimating equations using a sandwich estimator of the variance and exchangeable correlation to account for familial correlation were computed for the test of genotypic association, and dominant, additive and recessive models. Tests were adjusted for age, gender and BMI (glucose homeostasis and lipid traits), or age and gender (obesity traits), and empirical P-values estimated using a gene dropping approach.

Results

UCP1 A-3826G was associated with AIRg in AA (P = 0.006) and approached significance in Hispanic families (P = 0.054); and with HDL-C levels in SA families (P = 0.0004). Although UCP1 expression is reported to be restricted to adipose tissue, RT-PCR indicated that UCP1 is expressed in human pancreas and MIN-6 cells, and immunohistochemistry demonstrated co-localization of UCP1 protein with insulin in human islets. UCP2 A55V was associated with waist circumference (P = 0.045) in AA, and BMI in SA (P = 0.018); and UCP2 G-866A with waist-to-hip ratio in AA (P = 0.016).

Conclusion

This study suggests a functional variant of UCP1 contributes to the variance of AIRg in an AA population; the plausibility of this unexpected association is supported by the novel finding that UCP1 is expressed in islets.

Peer Review reports

Background

Uncoupling proteins are mitochondrial inner membrane electron carriers [1]. Uncoupling protein 2 (UCP2) inhibits glucose stimulated insulin secretion, and models of type 2 diabetes are associated with increased expression in islets [2]. Polymorphisms in the uncoupling protein genes UCP1 (4q31.21) and UCP2 (11q13.4) have been associated with a number of measures of glucose homeostasis and adiposity. These include associations between UCP2 G866A and A55V and glucose-induced insulin secretion [3–5], as well as obesity and metabolism [6–8]. Associations with obesity, weight gain and metabolism [9–12] have been reported for UCP1 variant A3826G, often acting synergistically with β3-adrenergic receptor W64R, and UCP1 A64T has also been associated with obesity [10]. In addition, UCP1 A-3826G and M229L have been found to be associated with type 2 diabetes [11, 13].

Given the importance of UCP1 and UCP2 genes in metabolism, we chose to evaluate the five promoter or coding variants in these two genes previously associated with metabolic phenotypes (above) for associations in families from the Insulin Resistance and Atherosclerosis (IRAS) Family Study. The IRAS Family Study has recruited extended African American and Hispanic families [14], and extensive phenotypic data on measures of glucose homeostasis, adiposity, and lipids have been collected on participants. On detection of a significant association between UCP1 SNPs and acute insulin response to glucose (AIRg), we investigated the expression patterns of this gene in mammalian pancreas.

Methods

Subjects

The IRAS Family Study design, recruitment and phenotyping have been described in detail [14]. Studies were conducted using protocols approved by the human subjects committees at each participating institution and all participants provided informed consent. Briefly, multi-generational African American and Hispanic families were initially recruited from probands of the original IRAS cohort [15]. Ascertainment of the proband was based on the sample size of available family members (with a target of four living full siblings and five living offspring of these siblings) and a range of glucose tolerance. Ascertainment was supplemented with additional large non-IRAS families recruited from the general population. Families were not selected based on any phenotypic criteria. Participants were from clinical centers in Los Angeles, California (African American), San Luis Valley, Colorado (rural Hispanic), and San Antonio, Texas (urban Hispanic). The clinical examination included height, weight, waist and hip circumferences, fasting blood draw, computerized tomography (CT) scanning for assessment of abdominal fat area, and medical history interview. A total of 287 African American individuals (18 families; family size ranged from 4 to 51 family members) from Los Angeles, 318 Hispanic individuals (12 families; family size 4 to 39 members) from San Luis Valley and 493 Hispanic individuals (33 families; family size from 6 to 30 members) from San Antonio were included in the analyses (Table 1).

Table 1 IRAS Family Study participant characteristics
Full size table

Glucose homeostasis traits

The following traits related to glucose homeostasis were tested for association with the UCP1 and UCP2 SNPs genotyped: fasting plasma glucose; fasting plasma insulin; acute insulin response to glucose (AIRg); and insulin resistance, expressed as the insulin sensitivity index (SI). Glucose values were obtained after a minimum 8 hour fast. Plasma glucose and insulin levels were measured at the University of Southern California, using the glucose oxidase technique on an autoanalyzer and the insulin dextran-charcoal immunoassay [16]. Insulin sensitivity was assessed by the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT), using a reduced sampling protocol [17]. Glucose in the form of a 50% solution (0.3 g/kg) and regular human insulin (0.03 μ/kg) were injected through an intravenous line at 0 and 20 min, respectively. Blood was collected at -5, 2, 4, 8, 19, 22, 30, 40, 50, 70, 100, and 180 min. Insulin resistance, expressed as the insulin sensitivity index (SI), was calculated by mathematical modeling methods (MINMOD) [18]. Acute insulin response to glucose (AIRg) was defined as the mean insulin increment in the plasma insulin concentration above the basal in the first 8 min after the administration of glucose. Glucose values were obtained after a minimum 8 hour fast, and diabetes was diagnosed using the American Diabetes Association criteria of fasting plasma glucose value ≥ 126 mg/dL and/or current use of anti-diabetic medications. Individuals with diabetes were excluded for analyses of glucose homeostasis traits. One hundred eighty-five participants had impaired fasting glycemia (fasting glucose > 100 mg/dL).

Lipid traits

Lipid traits tested for association with UCP1 and UCP2 SNPs included: triglyceride; HDL-C; LDL-C; and total cholesterol levels. Plasma was separated from blood collected after a 12 h fast, and stored at -70°C prior to analysis. Total cholesterol and triglyceride were measured using enzymatic methods. LDL-C was calculated using the Friedewald equation [19] if triglyceride was < 400 mg/dL or otherwise by ultracentrifugation. HDL-C was measured using the direct method [20].

Obesity and adiposity traits

Obesity traits used for association analyses included: waist circumference; waist-to-hip ratio (WHR); BMI; visceral adipose tissue (VAT); and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Height, and waist and hip circumferences were measured to the nearest 0.5 cm, and weight to the nearest 0.1 kg. BMI was calculated as weight (kg)/height (m)2. Abdominal fat mass was measured at the L2/L3 and L4/L5 vertebral region by CT. Scans were read at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Department of Radiology, for VAT and SAT. Bowel fat was subtracted out from the VAT, and L4/L5 measures used in these analyses. A small number of participants were missing L4/L5 data but had L2/L3 data; for these participants L4/L5 data was imputed from the L2/L3 data using a simple linear model.

UCP1 and UCP2 genotyping

Total genomic DNA was purified from whole blood using the PUREGENE DNA Purification kit (Gentra Systems, Minneapolis MN). Genotyping was conducted using a MassARRAY system (Sequenom, San Diego CA) [21]. Primer sequences for UCP1 A-3826G, A64T, M229L, and UCP2 G-866A and A55V, designed using SpectroDESIGNER software (Sequenom, San Diego CA), are available on request.

Statistical analyses

Relationship testing and genotyping error checking

As part of the broader IRAS Family Study efforts, pedigrees were genotyped by the Mammalian Genotyping Service (MGS), Marshfield WI, using 383 microsatellite markers. Each pedigree was examined for consistency of the stated family structure with the genome scan data using PREST, version 2.01 [22, 23]. In the 63 pedigrees used in this investigation, a total of 28 likely misspecified familial relationships were modified from 18 families. Genotypes that showed inconsistency with Mendelian inheritance were identified using PedCheck, version 1.1 [24], and inconsistent genotypes converted to missing. All SNPs were checked for consistency with Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE).

Linkage disequilibrium

We estimated the degree of linkage disequilibrium (LD) between SNPs using the standardized measure of D' [25], where the joint probability of haplotype was estimated by the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm and the respective allele frequencies were estimated based on maximum likelihood estimates [26].

Association analyses

To explore associations among SNP polymorphisms and quantitative measures, the marginal models incorporating generalized estimating equations (GEE1) [27] were used. This approach has been widely used in longitudinal data analysis [28] and can account for the dependency between correlated measures within a family. The method allows separate modeling of the regression of quantitative measures on SNP polymorphisms and other covariates, and the association among quantitative measures within each family. An advantage of this method is that one need not to specify the distribution of the outcome variable, just the relationships between the marginal mean and variance, and between the marginal mean and covariates. Another advantage is that even though the correlation model among the related outcome measures may be specified incorrectly, the association model between the outcome and covariates can still obtain a robust result. Here familial correlation was accounted for using a sandwich estimator of the variance and exchangeable correlation. A family of power transformations conditional on the covariates age, gender, and BMI [29] was explored. To minimize the heterogeneity of variance, the phenotypes were transformed to best approximate the normality assumptions. We computed four tests of association for each SNP: the overall test of genotypic association with two degrees of freedom, as well as the statistical contrasts defined by three genetic models – dominant, additive, and recessive. Age, gender and BMI were included as covariates, except for measures of adiposity where analyses were conducted with and without BMI as a covariate. Marginal regression coefficients have the same interpretation as those from an analysis using unrelated individuals. Potential influential points and outliers have been checked. The analyses were stratified by center and performed using SAS software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

To avoid the potential increase of type I error rate, we estimated empirical pvalues for significant single SNP GEE association analyses (P < 0.05 using the general model, with mode of inheritance subsequently explored). We used the gene dropping approach implemented in Mendel, version 5.7 [30], to simulate 10,000 datasets based on the IRAS Family Study pedigree structure under the null hypothesis of no association between phenotype and genotype data. The empirical p-value was determined as the proportion of simulated data sets with statistics more extreme than the observed value. Only empirical p-values are presented since this approach is more conservative and adjusts for deficiencies in the large sample approximation of the GEE method.

Two-marker (UCP1 and UCP2) and three-marker (UCP1 only) haplotypic associations were evaluated in each population separately using quantitative pedigree disequilibrium tests (QPDT) [31].

RT-PCR

Reverse Transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) was performed using the SuperScript First Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), as described by the manufacturer, using 1 μg total human pancreas RNA (Ambion, Austin, TX). Two μl cDNA were subsequently amplified in a total reaction volume of 50 μl containing 0.2 mM dNTP, 1.5 mM MgCl2, and 200 nM of each forward and reverse primer. Primers were specifically designed in regions of low homology with the other UCP genes and flanking one or more introns. For human UCP1 the following primers were used: forward primer 5'-TGGAATAGCGGCGTGCTTG-3' (located in exon 1), and reverse primer 5'-CTCATCAGATTGGGAGTAG-3' (exon 4), expected to produce a product of 489 bp. For human UCP2, these primers were used: forward 5'-TCTACAATGGGCTGGTTGC-3' (exon 2) and reverse 5'-TGTATCTCGTCTTGACCAC-3' (exon 5), with an expected product size of 495 bp. Control primers were for β-actin, supplied in the SuperScript First Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). Each reaction was denatured at 95°C for 2 minutes, amplified using 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 seconds, 60°C for 45 seconds, and 72°C for 30 seconds, and underwent a final extension at 72°C for 3 minutes. Samples were electrophoresed on a 1% agarose gel, products visualized under UV light, and compared against a Ready-Load 1 Kb Plus DNA Ladder (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Bands were extracted using a QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit microcentrifuge protocol (Qiagen Sciences, Valencia, CA) and sequenced on an ABI PRISM 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) using Big Dye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kits (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).

Total RNA was extracted from MIN-6 or αTC 1.6 cells and reverse-transcribed to cDNA. 10 ng of cDNA was used in a 25 μl PCR reaction with AmpliTaq Gold Polymerase, using the following amplification conditions for Ucp2: 95°C for 10 min, Hot-start, then 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 sec, annealing at 60°C for 30 sec and amplification at 72°C for 30 sec. The same amount of cDNA was used in 25 μl PCR reaction with AmpliTaq Gold Polymerase to detect Ucp1. PCR conditions for Ucp1 were: 95°C for 10 min, Hot-start, followed by 3 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 sec, annealing at 54°C for 10 sec, extension at 72°C for 30 sec; another 3 cycles at 95°C for 30 sec, 56°C for 15 sec and 72°C for 30 sec, and finally 35 cycles at 95°C for 30 sec, 58°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 30 sec. After the last cycle, samples were incubated for 5 min at 72°C. 15 μl of amplified products were then resolved on a 1% agarose gel, and DNA bands visualized under UV. Primers used to amplify mouse Ucp1 and Ucp2 products were UCP1-M F1, 5'-TATCATCACCTTCCCGCTG-3' (exon 1) ; UCP1-M R1, 5'-GTCATATGTTACCAGCTCTG-3' (exon 4), product size 505 bp; UCP2-M F2, 5'-TCTACAATGGGCTGGTCGC-3' (exon 4); UCP2-M R5, 5'-CAAGCGGAGAAAGGAAGGC-3' (exon 8), product size 608 bp. The quality of MIN-6 and αTC1.6 cDNA was confirmed by PCR amplification of cyclophilin (data not shown).

Immunohistochemistry

Formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded Macaca fascicularis (monkey) pancreas was sectioned at 4 μm, and commercially obtained normal human (BioChain, Haywood, CA) and normal mouse pancreatic tissue sections (BioChain, Haywood, CA) were used. Triplicate slides for each species were used for the localization of (1) insulin, (2) UCP1, and (3) insulin and UCP1. After sections were deparaffinized, two sets of slides were incubated with Guinea pig anti-porcine insulin (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA) at 1:100 for 60 minutes at 34°C, then incubated with biotinylated anti-rabbit at 1:20 (BioGenex, San Ramon, CA) for 10 minutes at 34°C, and finally incubated for 20 minutes at 37°C with Streptavidin-β-Galactosidase at 1:250 (Gibco-BRL, Gaithersburg, MD) and visualized using Gal-X. After performing antigen retrieval, insulin-stained as well as unstained sections were incubated with goat anti-UCP1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) at 1:100 for one hour at room temperature, incubated 10 minutes at 34°C in biotinylated rabbit anti-goat (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) at 1:250, then incubated with Streptavidin-Alkaline phosphatase (BioGenex, San Ramon, CA) at 1:20 for 10 minutes at 34°C. Vector Red substrate (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) was used for visualization, and sections were counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin. A MicroProbe system (Fisher Scientific, Kent, WA) using capillary action, and commercially purchased TRIS diluent and wash buffer (Biomeda, Foster City, CA) with 0.1% Tween 20 to serve as a surfactant and 0.5% casein to block non-specific binding of proteins were used.

Results

Study sample

Characteristics of the three IRAS Family Study populations are shown in Table 1. The mean ages of the participating family members were 43.8 ± 14.8 years (Los Angeles), 40.3 ± 14.0 years (San Luis Valley) and 43.6 ± 14.8 years (San Antonio), with 52.2–60.0% female participants. Using the Los Angeles population as the reference group, the mean age of the San Luis Valley participants is significantly lower than the Los Angeles participants (p = 0.0057). The prevalence of diabetes in the San Antonio participants is higher than in the Los Angeles sample (p = 0.046) and the mean AIRg in the San Antonio sample is significantly lower than that of the Los Angeles population (p = 0.024). A higher AIRg in African American participants, when compared with Hispanic participants, has been reported previously for this study population [23, 32, 33]. The mean waist measurement in San Antonio family members (p = 0.043) is significantly greater than that of the Los Angeles participants; and the mean WHR in San Antonio (p = 0.0004) and San Luis Valley (p = 0.0028) samples are significantly higher than that of the Los Angeles sample. The mean HDL in San Antonio (p < 0.0001) and San Luis Valley (p = 0.0057) families are both significantly lower than in the Los Angeles families.

HWE, linkage disequilibrium between SNPs, and allele frequencies

All SNPs were consistent with HWE, except for UCP1 A-3826G in the San Antonio Hispanic population (P = 0.034 for unrelated founder individuals, n = 73). There was a single inconsistency (for UCP1 A64T in an individual from the San Luis Valley) among genotypes from 50 individuals included as blind duplicates, producing a genotyping error rate of 0.4% and a concordance rate of > 99%. UCP1 SNPs were in high LD, with D' > 0.90 for all pairwise comparisons across all three populations using unrelated founders, except for A64T and M229L in the SA founders where D' = 0.80. LD between the two UCP2 SNPs was high, with D' > 0.97 across all three populations. Genotype frequencies are shown in Table 2. UCP1 SNPs A64T and M229L were relatively rare, and recessive effects of these SNPs were disregarded in this study.

Table 2 Genotype frequencies for UCP1 and UCP2 SNPs in populations from the IRAS Family Study
Full size table

Association between UCP1 and AIRg

A significant association was observed between UCP1 A-3826G and AIRg in African American families (GEE empirical P = 0.006, dominant model; Table 3). There was borderline evidence for an association between A-3826G and AIRg in Hispanic families from San Luis Valley, Colorado (GEE empirical P = 0.054, dominant model). Although the initial GEE analysis provided evidence of an association between A64T and AIRg in African Americans (unadjusted p < 0.001, general model; P = 0.038, additive model), this result was driven by the presence of two minor allele homozygotes with high AIRg values and was not supported by simulation-based empirical p-values (P = 0.116, general model; P = 0.110, additive model). Haplotypic association analyses of these two SNPs using QPDT [31] were not significant (data not shown).

Table 3 Significant association results between UCP1 and UCP2 SNPs and traits in populations from the IRAS Family Study
Full size table

Other significant associations

Four other significant associations were detected (Table 3), with the majority related to measures of adiposity. UCP2 A55V was associated with waist circumference (P = 0.045) and UCP2 G-866A with WHR in AA (P = 0.016), although only in analyses unadjusted for BMI (but adjusted for age and sex). UCP2 A55V was also associated with BMI in SA (P = 0.018), and UCP1 A-3826G was associated with HDL-C levels in SA families (P = 0.0004) after adjustment for age and sex. Even though associations with UCP2 A55V were across different populations, the direction of effects was consistent, with the 55V/55V genotype associated with both greater waist circumference and higher BMI.

RT-PCR of UCP1 and UCP2

Results of the RT-PCR analyses using total human pancreatic RNA are shown in Figure 1. There was no product visible when the protocol was carried out without the addition of RT enzyme (-RT control; Figure 1, lanes 3 and 4), indicating no detectable contamination with genomic DNA. A band representing the UCP1 product (489 kb) can be seen in Figure 1, lane 6. The identity of this band as the expected UCP1 product was confirmed by sequencing. A second spurious band is also seen in lane 6 at 381 bp. This product was also sequenced and BLAST searches [34] indicated 98% homology to a region of the SAR1 gene on 10q22.1. There is only 13% homology between this product and the UCP1 product, however there is an 8-base region in the UCP1 forward primer and a 6-base sequence in the UCP1 reverse primer that are identical to regions in the SAR1 gene. These sequences immediately flank the SAR1-like sequence obtained and may have served as an anchor to allow amplification. We never detected UCP1 expression in the absence of the SAR1 band. As expected, a 495 kb band derived from UCP2 is present in Figure 1, lane 7 and its origin was also confirmed by sequencing. Expression of UCP1 was also detected at low levels in the murine beta cell line MIN-6 (Figure 2, lane 2), but was absent in the murine glucagon-secreting cell line αTC1.6 (Figure 2, lane 6).

Figure 1
figure1

UCP1 is expressed in human total pancreatic RNA: cDNAs prepared in the absence or presence of reverse transcriptase (RT) from total human pancreas RNA, were used for PCR with the indicated primers. The lane containing 1 Kb Plus DNA Ladder (M), and positions of UCP1 (489 bp) and UCP2 products (495 bp) in the lanes corresponding to RT+ cDNA are indicated.

Full size image
Figure 2
figure2

Ucp1 is expressed in an insulin producing cell line: cDNAs prepared in the absence or presence of reverse transcriptase (RT) from total RNA isolated from MIN-6 and αTC1.6 cells, were used for PCR with the indicated primers. The lane containing 100 bp marker (M), and positions of Ucp1 and Ucp2 products are indicated. A band corresponding to Ucp1 (505 bp) can be clearly seen in the lane corresponding to RT+ MIN-6 cDNA. Expression of Ucp2 (608 bp) can be seen in both insulin and glucagon producing cell lines.

Full size image

Immunohistochemistry of pancreatic sections

Results of the IHC experiments are shown in Figure 3. UCP1 protein was detected in pancreatic tissue sections from Macaca fascicularis (monkey), human, and mouse, and co-localized with insulin in the islet cells of all three species. As anticipated from its known mitochondrial localization, UCP1 protein was only observed in the cytosol.

Figure 3
figure3

UCP1 and insulin co-localize in mammalian islet cells. Pancreas sections from monkey (Macaca fascicularis), human, and mouse (indicated at left, together with magnification) were stained using immunohistochemistry with anti-UCP1 (left); anti-Insulin (middle); or double-stained with anti-UCP1 and anti-Insulin (right). Sections stained with anti-UCP1 were visualized with Vector Red, resulting in pink staining of the islet cells, seen in the left panel for each species. Gal-X visualization of anti-Insulin produced a light blue stain of islet cell cytoplasm, seen in the middle panel for each species. Co-localization (overlay) of both anti-UCP1 (pink) and anti-Insulin (light blue) stains produced the purple staining of the islets seen in the third panel for each species. Examples of islet cells with cytoplasmic staining for the proteins of interest are indicated by the arrows.

Full size image

Discussion

As anticipated, associations were detected between genotyped SNPs and metabolic traits, particularly with measures related to adiposity: UCP2 SNPs with waist circumference, BMI and waist-to-hip ratio, although significance levels for these associations were modest (Table 3). An association between UCP1 A-3826G and HDL-C levels in SA families (P = 0.0004) was also detected. The association between UCP1 A-3826G and AIRg in the AA families from the IRAS Family Study was unexpected, since UCP1 has not been reported to be expressed in the pancreas.

In both the original IRAS cohort [35], and the IRAS Family Study [32], AIRg was found to be higher in non-diabetic African Americans than non-Hispanic whites or Hispanics. Carrying either the UCP1 3826G allele or the rare 64T allele increases AIRg (although the latter association was not statistically significant). The higher frequency of 3826G in the African American families investigated appears to at least partially explain the higher AIRg values. We did not find significant association with AIRg using haplotype analysis of the two UCP1 SNPs, and there is insufficient power in the present study design to investigate whether the presence of the two SNPs in trans show an interaction. Interestingly, threonine is present at position 64 in dog, mouse, rat, hamster, rabbit, Arabidopsis and Solanum Ucp1, and also present in human UCP2 and UCP3, although alanine is the more common amino acid in UCP1 of humans. It is not known what effect substituting a hydrophilic amino acid (threonine) for a hydrophobic residue (alanine) at this position has on protein function, especially in relation to insulin secretion.

While UCP2 is expressed in a variety of tissues [36], UCP1 expression was believed to be largely restricted to brown adipose tissue (BAT) [36–38]. However, expression of ucp1 in mouse brain, skeletal muscle [39] and uterus [40], and rat thymus [41] have been reported. The rapid insulin response measured by AIRg is generally believed to be a measure of beta cell function, and we therefore sought to explain the biological impact of UCP1 on AIRg by investigating the expression of this gene in the pancreas. Detection of UCP1 expression in human pancreas by RT-PCR is a novel finding. We confirmed the presence of UCP1 in human pancreas by IHC and found the UCP1 protein co-localized with insulin in the islets. Further, RT-PCR of the murine beta cell line MIN-6 demonstrated the presence of UCP1 expression in beta cells, while UCP1 mRNA could not be detected in the murine alpha cell derived line αTC1.6.

UCP2 is known to be expressed in pancreatic islets, where it is upregulated by glucolipotoxic conditions, and increased UCP2 expression decreases glucose-stimulated insulin secretion [42, 43]. Even though UCP2 G866A has been reported by others as influencing glucose-induced insulin secretion [3–5], we did not see any association between this SNP and AIRg. Over-expression studies of ucp1 in INS-1 cells have shown that ucp1 upregulation also suppresses insulin secretion [44], while studies of adipose tissues indicated that the promoter -3826G allele decreases UCP1 expression [45]. Assuming the same impact on expression is true in human beta cells, this would be consistent with the increased first-phase insulin response (or lack of suppression) seen individuals from Los Angeles and San Luis Valley with one or two copies of the UCP1 -3826G allele.

The polygenic regulation of AIRg, and implication from expression studies that other sequence variants are likely to influence UCP1 expression [45], may explain the more modest effects (San Luis Valley) or lack of association (San Antonio) seen between UCP1 A-3826G and AIRg in the two Hispanic populations.

Associations between UCP2 SNPs and waist or WHR were modest and have not been reported previously, although UCP2 G-866A and A55V have been reported as associated with BMI [46–48], and G-866A associated with obesity [8] and adipose tissue levels [4]. The -866A allele is associated with enhanced UCP2 mRNA expression in adipose tissue [8], possibly via PAX6 transactivation [49]. However, commonly reported associations between obesity and the UCP1 SNPs genotyped were not detected. The reported association between UCP1 A-3826G and obesity in Spanish women [50] was not observed in Hispanic families, possibly due to different environmental interactions. The smallest P-value for this SNP with the 2 degree-of freedom general test of association and measures of obesity was P = 0.14 for BMI in San Luis Valley women.

Interestingly, the same UCP1 SNP associated with high AIRg in AA, 3826G, was also significantly associated with higher HDL-C levels in the Hispanic SA families, although it should be noted that this SNP deviated from HW proportions (P = 0.034) in the 73 founders in this population. In a study of 312 Japanese women, there was a non-significant trend for women carrying the 3826G allele to have higher HDL levels than non-carriers, in both premenopausal (P = 0.14) and postmenopausal (P = 0.29) groups [51]. However a study of 118 obese Polish subjects showed 3826G/G homozygotes (n = 17) had significantly lower levels of HDL-C than AA homozygotes (n = 63) (P = 0.004) [52], opposite to the results observed in the SA families of the IRAS Family Study.

Tests of association for additional traits (such as hypertension and coagulation factors) that were not part of our a priori hypotheses for either UCP1 or UCP2 were conducted during automated analytical procedures. After Bonferroni correction for 5 SNPs × 21 traits × 4 models + 4 haplotypic analyses, none of the reported associations would maintain significance. However, all tests can not be considered entirely independent due to correlations between SNPs and across phenotypes, so this approach may be overly conservative. Additionally, we did not consider the inheritance models unless the general test of association was significant. While a trend between UCP1 3826G and higher HDL-C levels detected in the SA population has been reported previously [51], clearly replication of the association between this SNP and AIRg in other populations will be needed to confirm this finding.

Conclusion

We have confirmed the previously-reported association between UCP1 A-3826G and HDL-C levels in a Hispanic population from the IRAS Family Study. We also found a novel association between UCP1 A-3826G and AIRg in an African American population, and detected UCP1 expression in primate and mouse islet cells. These results suggest that UCP1 may have a previously unsuspected role in first-phase insulin release. Further studies of the influence of variants of the UCP1 gene on AIRg in other populations, and investigations of the interplay between UCP1 and UCP2 on glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, are warranted.

Abbreviations

UCP:

uncoupling protein

AIRg :

acute insulin response to glucose

QPDT:

quantitative pedigree disequilibrium test

HWE:

Hardy Weinberg equilibrium

References

  1. 1.

    Ledesma A, de Lacoba MG, Rial E: The mitochondrial uncoupling proteins. Genome Biol. 2002, 3: REVIEWS3015-10.1186/gb-2002-3-12-reviews3015.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Chan CB: Endogenous regulation of insulin secretion by UCP2. Clin Lab. 2002, 48: 599-604.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sesti G, Cardellini M, Marini MA, Frontoni S, D'Adamo M, Del Guerra S, Lauro D, De Nicolais P, Sbraccia P, Del Prato S, Gambardella S, Federici M, Marchetti P, Lauro R: A common polymorphism in the promoter of UCP2 contributes to the variation in insulin secretion in glucose-tolerant subjects. Diabetes. 2003, 52: 1280-1283. 10.2337/diabetes.52.5.1280.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Wang H, Chu WS, Lu T, Hasstedt SJ, Kern PA, Elbein SC: Uncoupling protein-2 polymorphisms in type 2 diabetes, obesity, and insulin secretion. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2004, 286: E1-7. 10.1152/ajpendo.00231.2003.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sasahara M, Nishi M, Kawashima H, Ueda K, Sakagashira S, Furuta H, Matsumoto E, Hanabusa T, Sasaki H, Nanjo K: Uncoupling protein 2 promoter polymorphism -866G/A affects its expression in beta-cells and modulates clinical profiles of Japanese type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes. 2004, 53: 482-485. 10.2337/diabetes.53.2.482.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Walder K, Norman RA, Hanson RL, Schrauwen P, Neverova M, Jenkinson CP, Easlick J, Warden CH, Pecqueur C, Raimbault S, Ricquier D, Silver MH, Shuldiner AR, Solanes G, Lowell BB, Chung WK, Leibel RL, Pratley R, Ravussin E: Association between uncoupling protein polymorphisms (UCP2-UCP3) and energy metabolism/obesity in Pima indians. Hum Mol Genet. 1998, 7: 1431-1435. 10.1093/hmg/7.9.1431.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Astrup A, Toubro S, Dalgaard LT, Urhammer SA, Sorensen TI, Pedersen O: Impact of the v/v 55 polymorphism of the uncoupling protein 2 gene on 24-h energy expenditure and substrate oxidation. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999, 23: 1030-1034. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801040.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Esterbauer H, Schneitler C, Oberkofler H, Ebenbichler C, Paulweber B, Sandhofer F, Ladurner G, Hell E, Strosberg AD, Patsch JR, Krempler F, Patsch W: A common polymorphism in the promoter of UCP2 is associated with decreased risk of obesity in middle-aged humans. Nat Genet. 2001, 28: 178-183. 10.1038/88911.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Dalgaard LT, Pedersen O: Uncoupling proteins: functional characteristics and role in the pathogenesis of obesity and Type II diabetes. Diabetologia. 2001, 44: 946-965. 10.1007/s001250100596.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hamann A, Tafel J, Busing B, Munzberg H, Hinney A, Mayer H, Siegfried W, Ricquier D, Greten H, Hebebrand J, Matthaei S: Analysis of the uncoupling protein-1 (UCP1) gene in obese and lean subjects: identification of four amino acid variants. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1998, 22: 939-941. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800725.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Heilbronn LK, Kind KL, Pancewicz E, Morris AM, Noakes M, Clifton PM: Association of -3826 G variant in uncoupling protein-1 with increased BMI in overweight Australian women. Diabetologia. 2000, 43: 242-244. 10.1007/s001250050036.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Salopuro T, Lindstrom J, Eriksson JG, Valle TT, Hamalainen H, Ilanne-Parikka P, Keinanen-Kiukaanniemi S, Tuomilehto J, Laakso M, Uusitupa M: Common variants in beta2- and beta3-adrenergic receptor genes and uncoupling protein 1 as predictors of the risk for type 2 diabetes and body weight changes. The Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. Clin Genet. 2004, 66: 365-367. 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2004.00313.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Mori H, Okazawa H, Iwamoto K, Maeda E, Hashiramoto M, Kasuga M: A polymorphism in the 5' untranslated region and a Met229-->Leu variant in exon 5 of the human UCP1 gene are associated with susceptibility to type II diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 2001, 44: 373-376. 10.1007/s001250051629.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Henkin L, Bergman RN, Bowden DW, Ellsworth DL, Haffner SM, Langefeld CD, Mitchell BD, Norris JM, Rewers M, Saad MF, Stamm E, Wagenknecht LE, Rich SS: Genetic epidemiology of insulin resistance and visceral adiposity. The IRAS Family Study design and methods. Ann Epidemiol. 2003, 13: 211-217. 10.1016/S1047-2797(02)00412-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Wagenknecht LE, Mayer EJ, Rewers M, Haffner S, Selby J, Borok GM, Henkin L, Howard G, Savage PJ, Saad MF: The insulin resistance atherosclerosis study (IRAS) objectives, design, and recruitment results. Ann Epidemiol. 1995, 5: 464-472. 10.1016/1047-2797(95)00062-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Herbert V, Lau KS, Gottlieb CW, Bleicher SJ: Coated charcoal immunoassay of insulin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1965, 25: 1375-1384.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Steil GM, Volund A, Kahn SE, Bergman RN: Reduced sample number for calculation of insulin sensitivity and glucose effectiveness from the minimal model. Suitability for use in population studies. Diabetes. 1993, 42: 250-256. 10.2337/diabetes.42.2.250.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Pacini G, Bergman RN: MINMOD: a computer program to calculate insulin sensitivity and pancreatic responsivity from the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1986, 23: 113-122. 10.1016/0169-2607(86)90106-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS: Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972, 18: 499-502.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Sugiuchi H, Uji Y, Okabe H, Irie T, Uekama K, Kayahara N, Miyauchi K: Direct measurement of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in serum with polyethylene glycol-modified enzymes and sulfated alpha-cyclodextrin. Clin Chem. 1995, 41: 717-723.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Buetow KH, Edmonson M, MacDonald R, Clifford R, Yip P, Kelley J, Little DP, Strausberg R, Koester H, Cantor CR, Braun A: High-throughput development and characterization of a genomewide collection of gene-based single nucleotide polymorphism markers by chip-based matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98: 581-584. 10.1073/pnas.021506298.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    McPeek MS, Sun L: Statistical tests for detection of misspecified relationships by use of genome-screen data. Am J Hum Genet. 2000, 66: 1076-1094. 10.1086/302800.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Rich SS, Bowden DW, Haffner SM, Norris JM, Saad MF, Mitchell BD, Rotter JI, Langefeld CD, Wagenknecht LE, Bergman RN: Identification of quantitative trait loci for glucose homeostasis: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS) Family Study. Diabetes. 2004, 53: 1866-1875. 10.2337/diabetes.53.7.1866.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    O'Connell JR, Weeks DE: PedCheck: a program for identification of genotype incompatibilities in linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 1998, 63: 259-266. 10.1086/301904.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Devlin B, Risch N: A comparison of linkage disequilibrium measures for fine-scale mapping. Genomics. 1995, 29: 311-322. 10.1006/geno.1995.9003.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lange K: Mathematical and statistical methods for genetic analysis. 1997, New York, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Zeger SL, Liang KY: Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics. 1986, 42: 121-130. 10.2307/2531248.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Diggle PJ, Heagerty PJ, Liang KY, Zeger SL: Analysis of longitudinal data. 2002, New York: Oxford University Press, 2

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Neter JWW, Kutner MH: Applied linear statistical models, regression, analysis of variance, and experimental design. 1990, Homewood, IL, Richard D. Irwin, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lange K, Cantor R, Horvath S, Perola M, Sabatti C, Sinsheimer J, Sobel E: Mendel version 4.0: A complete package for exact genetic analysis of discrete traits in pedigrees and population data sets. Am J Hum Genet. 2001, 69 Supplement.: A1886-

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Dudbridge F: Pedigree disequilibrium tests for multilocus haplotypes. Genet Epidemiol. 2003, 25: 115-121. 10.1002/gepi.10252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wagenknecht LE, Langefeld CD, Scherzinger AL, Norris JM, Haffner SM, Saad MF, Bergman RN: Insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion, and abdominal fat: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study (IRAS) Family Study. Diabetes. 2003, 52: 2490-2496. 10.2337/diabetes.52.10.2490.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Mitchell BD, Zaccaro D, Wagenknecht LE, Scherzinger AL, Bergman RN, Haffner SM, Hokanson J, Norris JM, Rotter JI, Saad MF: Insulin sensitivity, body fat distribution, and family diabetes history: the IRAS Family Study. Obes Res. 2004, 12: 831-839.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ: Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990, 215: 403-410.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Haffner SM, Howard G, Mayer E, Bergman RN, Savage PJ, Rewers M, Mykkanen L, Karter AJ, Hamman R, Saad MF: Insulin sensitivity and acute insulin response in African-Americans, non-Hispanic whites, and Hispanics with NIDDM: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. Diabetes. 1997, 46: 63-69. 10.2337/diabetes.46.1.63.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Ricquier D, Bouillaud F: The uncoupling protein homologues: UCP1, UCP2, UCP3, StUCP and AtUCP. Biochem J. 2000, 345 Pt 2: 161-179. 10.1042/0264-6021:3450161.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Nicholls DG, Locke RM: Thermogenic mechanisms in brown fat. Physiol Rev. 1984, 64: 1-64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Nicholls DG: A history of UCP1. Biochem Soc Trans. 2001, 29: 751-755. 10.1042/BST0290751.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Lengacher S, Magistretti PJ, Pellerin L: Quantitative rt-PCR analysis of uncoupling protein isoforms in mouse brain cortex: methodological optimization and comparison of expression with brown adipose tissue and skeletal muscle. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2004, 24: 780-788. 10.1097/01.WCB.0000122743.72175.52.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Nibbelink M, Moulin K, Arnaud E, Duval C, Penicaud L, Casteilla L: Brown fat UCP1 is specifically expressed in uterine longitudinal smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 47291-47295. 10.1074/jbc.M105658200.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Carroll AM, Haines LR, Pearson TW, Brennan C, Breen EP, Porter RK: Immunodetection of UCP1 in rat thymocytes. Biochem Soc Trans. 2004, 32: 1066-1067. 10.1042/BST0321066.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Zhang CY, Baffy G, Perret P, Krauss S, Peroni O, Grujic D, Hagen T, Vidal-Puig AJ, Boss O, Kim YB, Zheng XX, Wheeler MB, Shulman GI, Chan CB, Lowell BB: Uncoupling protein-2 negatively regulates insulin secretion and is a major link between obesity, beta cell dysfunction, and type 2 diabetes. Cell. 2001, 105: 745-755. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00378-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Chan CB, De Leo D, Joseph JW, McQuaid TS, Ha XF, Xu F, Tsushima RG, Pennefather PS, Salapatek AM, Wheeler MB: Increased uncoupling protein-2 levels in beta-cells are associated with impaired glucose-stimulated insulin secretion: mechanism of action. Diabetes. 2001, 50: 1302-1310. 10.2337/diabetes.50.6.1302.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Nakazaki M, Kakei M, Ishihara H, Koriyama N, Hashiguchi H, Aso K, Fukudome M, Oka Y, Yada T, Tei C: Association of upregulated activity of K(ATP) channels with impaired insulin secretion in UCP1-expressing insulinoma cells. J Physiol. 2002, 540: 781-789. 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013048.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Esterbauer H, Oberkofler H, Liu YM, Breban D, Hell E, Krempler F, Patsch W: Uncoupling protein-1 mRNA expression in obese human subjects: the role of sequence variations at the uncoupling protein-1 gene locus. J Lipid Res. 1998, 39: 834-844.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Pinkney JH, Boss O, Bray GA, Bulmer K, Coppack SW, Mohamed-Ali V: Physiological relationships of uncoupling protein-2 gene expression in human adipose tissue in vivo. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000, 85: 2312-2317. 10.1210/jc.85.6.2312.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Schonfeld-Warden NA, Warden CH: Physiological effects of variants in human uncoupling proteins: UCP2 influences body-mass index. Biochem Soc Trans. 2001, 29: 777-784. 10.1042/BST0290777.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Zheng Y, Xiang K, Zhang R, Jia W, Lu J, Tang J, Li J: [The association between A55V variant in UCP2 gene and body fat distribution, serum lipid profile in Chinese]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2000, 17: 97-100.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Krempler F, Esterbauer H, Weitgasser R, Ebenbichler C, Patsch JR, Miller K, Xie M, Linnemayr V, Oberkofler H, Patsch W: A functional polymorphism in the promoter of UCP2 enhances obesity risk but reduces type 2 diabetes risk in obese middle-aged humans. Diabetes. 2002, 51: 3331-3335. 10.2337/diabetes.51.11.3331.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Ramis JM, Gonzalez-Sanchez JL, Proenza AM, Martinez-Larrad MT, Fernandez-Perez C, Palou A, Serrano-Rios M: The Arg64 allele of the beta 3-adrenoceptor gene but not the -3826G allele of the uncoupling protein 1 gene is associated with increased leptin levels in the Spanish population. Metabolism. 2004, 53 (11): 1411-1416. 10.1016/j.metabol.2004.06.006.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Matsushita H, Kurabayashi T, Tomita M, Kato N, Tanaka K: Effects of uncoupling protein 1 and beta3-adrenergic receptor gene polymorphisms on body size and serum lipid concentrations in Japanese women. Maturitas. 2003, 45: 39-45. 10.1016/S0378-5122(03)00088-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kiec-Wilk B, Wybranska I, Malczewska-Malec M, Leszczynska-Golabek L, Partyka L, Niedbal S, Jabrocka A, Dembinska-Kiec A: Correlation of the -3826A >G polymorphism in the promoter of the uncoupling protein 1 gene with obesity and metabolic disorders in obese families from southern Poland. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2002, 53: 477-490.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6823/7/1/prepub

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank participants in the IRAS Family Study for their participation. Thanks also to Pam Hicks, Elyse Jung, and Federico Paroni for technical assistance, Dr Carl Langefeld, Dr Stephen Rich, Stephanie Beck and Joel Campbell for statistical assistance, Dr Donald Bowden for initiating genotyping and comments on the manuscript, and Drs J. Mark Cline and Nancy Kock for advice on immunohistochemistry experiments. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grants HL060944, HL060894, HL061210, HL060931, HL061019, HL061210 and DK66358. MMS is supported by a Career Development Award from the American Diabetes Association.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Center for Human Genomics, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA

    Michèle M Sale, Nicholette D Palmer, Candace J Gordon & Keith L Keene

  2. Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA

    Michèle M Sale

  3. Center for Public Health Genomics and Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA

    Michèle M Sale

  4. Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA

    Fang-Chi Hsu

  5. Department of Biochemistry, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA

    Nicholette D Palmer

  6. Department of Comparative Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA

    Hermina M Borgerink

  7. Joslin Diabetes Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA

    Arun J Sharma

  8. Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA

    Richard N Bergman

  9. Medical Genetics Institute, and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA

    Kent D Taylor

  10. Department of Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook School of Medicine, Stony Brook, USA

    Mohammed F Saad

  11. Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, USA

    Jill M Norris

Authors
  1. Michèle M Sale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fang-Chi Hsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nicholette D Palmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Candace J Gordon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Keith L Keene
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hermina M Borgerink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Arun J Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Richard N Bergman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Kent D Taylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Mohammed F Saad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Jill M Norris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michèle M Sale.

Additional information

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

MMS reviewed association results, planned expression and immunohistochemistry experiments, and drafted the manuscript. FCH conducted statistical analyses. NDP selected SNPs and performed genotyping assays. CJG and KLK conducted RT-PCR and sequencing assays of human pancreas, while RT-PCR of MIN-6 and αTC1.6 cells were provided by AJS. HMB conducted the immunohistochemistry experiments. RNB, MFS, and JMN were involved in the conception, design and phenotypic characterization of the IRAS Family Study. MFS and JMN also played a key role in recruitment, and KDT contributed to genotypic characterization of the population. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sale, M.M., Hsu, F., Palmer, N.D. et al. The uncoupling protein 1 gene, UCP1, is expressed in mammalian islet cells and associated with acute insulin response to glucose in African American families from the IRAS Family Study. BMC Endocr Disord 7, 1 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6823-7-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Visceral Adipose Tissue
  • African American
  • African American Family
  • Regular Human Insulin
  • UCP1 Expression

BMC Endocrine Disorders

ISSN: 1472-6823

Contact us