The association between serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and hepatic insulin resistance (IR) has been evaluated with the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp. However, there is no information about the association of ALT with the Hepatic Insulin Resistance Index (HIRI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between serum ALT levels and HIRI in subjects with differing degrees of impaired glucose metabolism.
Methods
This cross-sectional study included subjects that had an indication for testing for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Clinical and biochemical evaluations were carried out including serum ALT level quantification. HIRI was calculated for each participant. Correlation analyses and lineal regression models were used to evaluate the association between ALT levels and HIRI.
Results
A total of 324 subjects (37.6% male) were included. The mean age was 40.4 ± 14.3 years and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 32.0 ± 7.3 kg/m2. Individuals were divided into 1 of 5 groups: without metabolic abnormalities (n = 113, 34.8%); with the metabolic syndrome (MetS, n = 179, 55.2%), impaired fasting glucose (IFG, n = 85, 26.2%); impaired glucose tolerance (IGT, n = 91, 28.0%), and T2DM (n = 23, 7.0%). The ALT (p < 0.001) and HOMA2-IR (p < 0.001) values progressively increased with HIRI quartiles, while ISI-Matsuda (p < 0.001) progressively decreased. After adjustment for sex, age, and BMI, we identified a significant correlation between HIRI and ALT in persons with the MetS (r = 0.22, p = 0.003), IFG (r = 0.33, p < 0.001), IGT (r = 0.37, p < 0.001), and T2DM (r = 0.72, p < 0.001). Lineal regression analysis adjusting for age, HDL-C, TG and waist circumference (WC) showed an independent association between ALT and HIRI in subjects with the MetS (beta = 0.07, p = 0.01), IFG (beta = 0.10, p = 0.02), IGT (beta = 0.09, p = 0.007), and T2DM (beta = 0.31, p = 0.003). This association was not identified in subjects without metabolic abnormalities.
Conclusions
ALT levels are independently associated with HIRI in subjects with the MetS, IFG, IGT, and T2DM. The ALT value in these subjects may be an indirect parameter to evaluate hepatic IR.
The liver is an important organ for glucose metabolism; this includes glucose uptake, storage, and synthesis[1]. Studies have shown that nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) increases the risk for the metabolic syndrome (MetS)[2], type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and cardiovascular diseases[3–8]. Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) has been closely correlated with liver fat accumulation[9–11]. Therefore, this enzyme is commonly used as a biomarker of NAFLD[12]. In addition, clinical studies have associated serum ALT levels with insulin resistance (IR), the MetS and the development of T2DM[13–15].
In the fasting state, the rate of hepatic glucose production (HGP) is the main determinant of the fasting glucose concentration. Insulin normally inhibits HGP, however this suppression is not well achieved in subjects with hepatic insulin resistance. Therefore, elevated fasting insulin can be considered a surrogate marker of hepatic insulin resistance[16, 17]. Accurate measurement of IR requires the use of techniques such as clamps that are costly, time-consuming, and invasive for use in large epidemiological or clinical studies. In this context, a number of simple indexes of IR have been proposed[18–23]. These indexes include HOMA-2, Matsuda-ISI, and QUICKI, among others.
A number of studies have reported a positive association between serum ALT levels and IR using indirect parameters such as the intravenous glucose tolerance test, (OR = 3.0 [95% CI 2.2-4.1]), and the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance [HOMA-IR, OR = 2.1 (1.5-2.9)][3, 14]. In the same way, a negative correlation has been reported between ALT and insulin sensitivity using the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp (Clamp ISI, r = −0.44, p < 0.001)[15]. The association of ALT with hepatic insulin sensitivity measured by the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp (r = 0.21, p = 0.001) has been determined[13]. However, there is no information about the association of ALT with the insulin sensitivity index (ISI) of Matsuda[24] and HIRI[25]. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether an independent association exists between serum ALT levels and HIRI in subjects with differing degrees of impaired glucose metabolism.
Subjects and methods
A total of 324 subjects fulfilled the selection criteria and were recruited for this cross-sectional study. The population consisted of subjects from the Internal Medicine and Endocrinology outpatient clinics of the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición “Salvador Zubirán” (INCMNSZ) that received attention between March 2007 and July 2010. We included individuals of both genders from 18 to 65 years-old, that had a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and at least two risk factors for T2DM as stated by the American Diabetes Association (ADA)[26]. These include: physical inactivity, a first-degree relative with T2DM, high risk race/ethnicity, women with a history of delivering a baby weighing >4 kg or with a diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus during their pregnancy, arterial hypertension (blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg or on therapy for hypertension), HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) level <35 mg/dL (0.90 mmol/L) and/or a triglyceride level >250 mg/dL (2.82 mmol/L), women with polycystic ovary syndrome, A1C ≥5.7%, IGT, or IFG on previous testing, other clinical conditions associated with insulin resistance (e.g., severe obesity, acanthosis nigricans), and a history of cardiovascular disease. HIRI and Matsuda indexes were calculated using the glucose and insulin values obtained every 30 minutes during the OGTT. We defined impaired fasting glucose (IFG, fasting glucose between 100 and 125 mg/dL), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT, 2 hr glucose value in the OGTT between 140 and 199 mg/dL), and type 2 diabetes (T2DM, fasting glucose level ≥ 126 mg/dL in two occasions, or glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL at the 2nd hr of the OGTT) using ADA criteria[26]. The MetS was defined according to the U.S. 2004 National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines[27] and modified as recommended in the latest American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement for fasting glucose and waist circumference[28]. The MetS was defined as the presence of three or more of the following risk factors: 1) central obesity (waist circumference ≥80 cm in women and ≥ 90 cm in men) 2) hypertriglyceridemia (fasting triglycerides ≥150 mg/dl (≥1.69 mmol/l); 3) low HDL cholesterol (HDL cholesterol <50 mg/dl (<1.29 mmol/l) in women and <40 mg/dl (1.04 mmol/l) in men); 4) hyperglycemia (fasting glucose ≥100 mg/dl (≥5.6 mmol/l); and 5) arterial hypertension (sitting blood pressure of 130/85 mmHg or more, taken as a mean of two readings obtained after a rest of at least 10 min in this position). We excluded subjects with medications that could influence glucose and insulin values during the OGTT such as steroids, oral glucose lowering drugs (such as metformin, sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, acarbose, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, and glinides), subcutaneous insulin, and thyroid hormones. We also excluded subjects with other chronic diseases (such as HIV infection, hepatitis C infection (all subjects that received a blood transfusion before 1992 were tested for hepatitis C, other viral markers were not measured), systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, seizures, major depression, use of hepatotoxic drugs (i.e., acetaminophen, antibiotics, analgesics, chemotherapy among others) hospitalization in the past 6 months, active cancer or under treatment for cancer), and pregnant women. The population was divided into 5 groups according to the degree of impaired glucose metabolism: 1) without metabolic abnormalities defined as a patient without the MetS, IFG, IGT or T2DM; 2) with the MetS; 3) IFG; 4) IGT; and 5) T2DM. IR was estimated using HOMA2-IR calculator provided on the web page[18]; insulin sensitivity was estimated with the ISI Matsuda with the formula: 10000/√(Glucose 0’ x Insulin 0’) x (mean glucose x mean insulin)[24]. HIRI was evaluated using the formula described by Abdul-Ghani as follows: √(glucose 0 to 30 [AUC in mg/dl/hr] x insulin 0–30 [AUC in μU/ml/hr])[25].
Biochemical and anthropometric measurements
The central laboratory of the INCMNSZ performed all biochemical laboratory measurements. The measurements were carried out with commercially available standardized methods. Glucose, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides were measured using the Synchron CX analyzer (Beckman Systems, Fullerton CA). Plasma insulin concentrations were estimated using a radioimmunoassay method (MEIA, Abbott Laboratories). ALT and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were measured using an enzymatic method AU2700 Beckman Coulter (Fullerton, CA). Anthropometric measurements were carried out after participants removed their shoes and upper garments. Body weight was measured with a mechanical beam scale (Health o meter Inc, Bridgeview IL) with daily calibration. Body fat was measured with Quantum Desktop - BIA Analyzer by RJL systems. All subjects were instructed to stand in the center of the scale during weight assessment. Height was obtained using the floor scale’s stadiometer. Height was measured to the nearest 0.5 cm. WC was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm at the level of the greatest frontal extension of the abdomen between the bottom of the rib cage and the top of the iliac crest. BMI was calculated using weight (kg) divided by height squared (m2). Sitting blood pressure was measured after a rest of at least 10 min in this position.
Ethics statement
The subanalyses presented in this study are from a protocol approved by our Human Biomedical Research Institutional Committee (REF 1650). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. All clinical investigation was conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.
Statistical analyses
Normally distributed data as assessed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test were expressed as mean and standard deviation (±SD) whereas variables with a skewed distribution were reported as median (interquartil range). The Pearson chi square test, Student’s unpaired t-test (normally distributed data), or Mann–Whitney U test (skewed distribution) was used as appropriate for comparisons between the sexes and for comparisons between subjects without metabolic abnormalities and subjects with differing degrees of impaired glucose metabolism. We divided the population in terms of HIRI quartiles: 0 to 28.2, 28.2 to 35.7, 35.7 to 43.2 and ≥ 43.2. Then, we compared these quartiles with the ALT and AST levels, peripheral and hepatic IR indexes, and the clinical and biochemical variables. One-way ANOVA (normally distributed data) or Kruskall–Wallis test (skewed distribution) was used for the comparisons between quartiles of the HIRI. Correlation coefficients between HIRI (adjusted for sex, age and BMI) and the clinical and biochemical parameters were evaluated with partial correlation analysis in each of the groups. We made six lineal regression models, one for each of the impaired glucose metabolism groups, to identify independent factors associated with HIRI. The variables selected to enter the regression analyses were those that correlated significantly with the HIRI. All reported p values are based on two-sided tests considering ≤0.05 as significant. All analyses were performed with SPSS 17.0 (Chicago, IL).
Results
The characteristics of the study population, stratified by gender and the degree of impaired glucose metabolism are shown in Table 1. A total of 324 subjects (37.6% male) were included. The mean age was 40.4 ± 14.3 years with a BMI of 32.0 ± 7.3 kg/m2. The median (interquartil range) ALT concentration was 26.0 IU/L (20.0-41.0) with a HOMA2-IR, ISI Matsuda, and HIRI of 1.4 (0.9-2.0), 3.5 (2.3-5.5), and 36.9 ± 12.1, respectively. A total of 113 subjects (34.8%) without metabolic abnormalities, 179 subjects (55.2%) with the MetS, 85 subjects (26.2%) with IFG, 91 subjects (28.0%) with IGT, and 23 subjects (7.0%) with T2DM were evaluated. As is summarized in Table 1, significant differences were identified in ALT, HDL-C, and body fat percentage between males and females in each group.
Table 1
Clinical and biochemical characteristics of the subjects (n = 324)
Variable
All subjects (n = 324)
Without metabolic abnormalities (n = 113)
Metabolic syndrome (n = 179)
IFG (n = 85)
IGT (n = 91)
Type 2 DM (n = 23)
Age (year)
40.4 ± 14.3
36.4 ± 13.5
42.1 ± 14.3a
47.3 ± 13.9b
46.4 ± 14.7c
48.8 ± 12.7d
Males (n, %)
122 (37.6)
38 (33.6)
70 (57.4)
34 (27.9)
39 (32.0)
10 (8.2)
Weight (kg)
84.8 ± 22.2
80.1 ± 18.8
89.1 ± 20.8a
86.2 ± 21.6b
86.0 ± 22.1c
86.3 ± 17.9
BMI (kg/m2)
32.0 ± 7.3
29.9 ± 6.6
33.9 ± 8.3a
33.2 ± 9.3b
33.4 ± 9.0c
32.8 ± 4.7
WC (cm)
103.9 ± 16.7
98.4 ± 16.5
108.1 ± 15.5a
105.9 ± 16.1b
107.3 ± 16.3c
107.0 ± 13.9d
M
105.2 ± 14.8
96.8 ± 15.3
110.1 ± 12.9a
108.6 ± 13.5b
110.2 ± 13.2c
110.9 ± 7.5d
F
103.1 ± 17.7
99.2 ± 17.2
106.8 ± 16.9a
104.1 ± 17.5
105.1 ± 18.1
104.0 ± 17.0
p
0.26
0.48
0.16
0.20
0.14
0.24
SBP (mmHg)
118.6 ± 15.5
111.7 ± 12.4
123.2 ± 16.3a
124.3 ± 16.0b
124.2 ± 16.0c
131.3 ± 17.0d
DBP (mmHg)
77.7 ± 10.0
74.1 ± 9.8
80.1 ± 9.7a
79.3 ± 8.7b
79.9 ± 8.8c
81.6 ± 8.7d
ALT (IU/L)
26.0 (20.0-41.0)
22 (17.0-31.0)
27.0 (22.0-51.0)a
29.0 (22.0-60.0)b
31.0 (23.0-49.0)c
30.0 (24.0-61.0)d
M
33.0 (23.7-62.7)
29.0 (22.0-38.5)
40.0 (26.0-80.0)a
39.5 (26.0-79.2)b
33.0 (24.0-79.0)
34.5 (28.0-65.5)
F
23.0 (19.0-32.0)
20.0 (16–28)
25.0 (20.0-34.0)a
25.0 (21.0-38.0)b
29.0 (23.0-44.0)c
27.0 (23.0-55.0)
p
<0.001
0.001
<0.001
0.003
0.13
0.20
AST (IU/L)
25.0 (21.0-35.0)
23.0 (19.0-29.0)
26.0 (22.0-38.-0)
27.0 (22.0-41.5)
29.0 (23.0-42.0)
27.0 (23.0-45.0)
M
28.5 (22.0-41.2)
26.5 (21.0-34.5)
30.5 (23.0-48.2)
31.5 (25.0-47.2)
31.0 (23.0-45.0)
29.5 (23.7-45.7)
F
23.0 (20.0-3.5)
21.0 (180–27.2)
25.0 (21.0-32.0)
26.0 (22.0-37.0)
29.0 (22.2-37.5)
26.0 (22.0-50.5)
p
<0.001
0.005
0.001
0.074
0.455
0.832
TC (mg/dL)
189.0 ± 36.3
178.4 ± 36.5
195.9 ± 34.5a
197.0 ± 33.1b
191.4 ± 38.9c
190.5 ± 39.2
Triglycerides (mg/dL)
147.0 (108.7-201.5)
107.0 (75.7-131.0)
174.5 (149.7-245.2)a
163.0 (123.0-210.0)b
167.0 (121.0-236.5)c
170.5 (127.2-211.2)d
HDL-C (mg/dL)
37.7 ± 10.9
41.6 ± 12.6
34.7 ± 8.2a
37.1 ± 10.7b
35.2 ± 9.3c
30.6 ± 9.5d
M
32.5 ± 8.9
36.5 ± 10.5
30.9 ± 7.0a
32.1 ± 8.0
31.1 ± 8.1c
25.6 ± 4.4d
F
39.5 ± 11.0
44.4 ± 12.9
37.3 ± 8.0a
40.7 ± 11.0
38.1 ± 9.0c
35.6 ± 10.8d
p
<0.001
0.003
<0.001
<0.001
0.001
0.01
Body fat (%)
38.1 ± 9.1
37.1 ± 9.5
39.2 ± 8.8a
38.2 ± 8.9
38.3 ± 8.8
38.8 ± 8.1
M
30.9 ± 7.2
28.6 ± 8.8
32.4 ± 5.9a
31.0 ± 6.3
31.8 ± 6.4
32.1 ± 4.6
F
42.4 ± 7.1
41.4 ± 6.5
43.6 ± 7.5a
43.0 ± 7.0
43.1 ± 7.2
44.0 ± 6.1
p
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
FG (mg/dL)
93.7 ± 13.6
85.7 ± 8.1
98.2 ± 14.8a
110.3 ± 13.0b
104.8 ± 16.4c
123.0 ± 19.2d
Fasting insulin (μlU/mL)
10.8 (6.9-15.4)
7.3 (5.2-11.6)
12.8 (8.1-17.9)a
13.7 (9.2-18.6)b
13.4 (8.5-19.9)c
14.8 (7.0-21.6)d
HOMA-2IR
1.4 (0.9-2.0)
1.0 (0.7-1.5)
1.7 (1.1-2.4)a
1.8 (1.2-2.4)b
1.8 (1.1-2.6)c
2.1 (0.9-3.0)d
ISI Matsuda
3.5 (2.3-5.5)
5.5 (3.9-8.5)
2.8 (1.9-4.4)a
2.5 (1.5-3.4)b
2.5 (1.5-3.6)c
2.1 (1.4-3.6)d
HIRI
36.9 ± 12.1
33.1 ± 12.0
39.4 ± 11.9a
38.6 ± 12.4b
37.6 ± 10.3c
36.3 ± 10.9
Data are expressed as mean ± SD (comparisons made with Student unpaired t-test), median [(interquartil range), comparisons made with Mann–Whitney U test], or frequency [(%) comparisons made with the Pearson chi square] BMI = body mass index, WC = waist circumference, SBP = systolic blood pressure, DBP = diastolic blood pressure, ALT = alanine aminotransferase, AST = aspartate aminotransferase, TC = total cholesterol, HDL-C = high density lipoprotein cholesterol, FG = fasting glucose, HOMA2-IR = Homeostasis Model Assessment Insulin Resistance 2, ISI = Insulin Sensitivity Index, and HIRI = Hepatic Insulin Resistance Index.
a = p < 0.05 between subjects without metabolic abnormalities and MetS.
b = p < 0.05 between subjects without metabolic abnormalities and IFG.
c = p < 0.05 between subjects without metabolic abnormalities and IGT.
d = p < 0.05 between subjects without metabolic abnormalities and T2DM.
The total number of subjects is different of 324, because, 40% (n = 73) of subjects with MetS have IFG, 36% (n = 66) of subjects with MetS have IGT, and 11% of subjects (n = 20) of subjects with MetS have DM2.
The baseline characteristics stratified by HIRI levels are shown in Table 2. In terms of demographic and laboratory data, a progressive and significant increment in weight (p < 0.001), BMI (p < 0.001), WC (p < 0.001), ALT (p < 0.001), body fat percentage (p < 0.001), insulin (p < 0.001), HOMA2-IR (p < 0.001) and HIRI (p < 0.001) were observed. In addition, HDL-C (p < 0.001) and ISI-Matsuda (p < 0.001) progressively decreased among HIRI quartiles. Interestingly, a higher level of HIRI and HOMA2-IR and a lower level of ISI-Matsuda index were identified among quartiles of ALT (Figure 1).
Table 2
Characteristics of the subjects studied stratified by quartiles of HIRI (n = 324)
Variables
HIRI value (quartiles)
<28.2 (n = 79)
28.2-35.7 (n = 82)
35.7-43.2 (n = 82)
≥43.2 (n = 81)
p value
Age (years)
41.3 ± 15.5
43.5 ± 14.7
40.0 ± 12.7
36.9 ± 13.9
0.03
Sex male (n, %)
28 (35.4)
29 (35.3)
35 (42.6)
30 (37.0)
0.74
Weight (kg)
75.4 ± 15.3
80.3 ± 18.4
90.8 ± 20.0
92.4 ± 21.8
<0.001
BMI (kg/m2)
28.5 ± 6.2
30.5 ± 6.4
34.5 ± 8.9
34.8 ± 7.4
<0.001
WC (cm)
95.1 ± 15.1
101.3 ± 15.0
108.8 ± 15.2
110.1 ± 17.0
<0.001
Male
96.0 ± 10.9
103.2 ± 12.6
108.4 ± 14.7
111.9 ± 16.0
<0.001
Female
94.6 ± 17.0
100.3 ± 16.2
109.0 ± 15.7
109.0 ± 17.7
<0.001
SBP (mmHg)
113.9 ± 14.1
121.0 ± 16.8
118.2 ± 14.4
117.4 ± 12.8
0.007
DBP (mmHg)
74.1 ± 10.9
77.6 ± 8.0
79.7 ± 9.7
77.4 ± 10.2
0.001
ALT (IU/L)
21.0 (15.0-29.0)
24.0 (19.7-34.0)
27.0 (21.0-46.0)
32.0 (24.0-68.0)
<0.001
Male
24.5 (15.5-40.2)
28.0 (23.0-36.0)
39.0 (26.0-61.0)
63.5 (31.0-93.0)
<0.001
Female
20.0 (15.0-26.0)
23.0 (19.0-30.0)
24.0 (20.0-37.0)
27.0 (22.0-40.0)
<0.001
AST (IU/L)
22.0 (19.0-29.0)
25.0 (21.0-31.0)
26.0 (21.0-37.0)
27.0 (22.5-45.5)
0.002
Male
24.5 (20.0-35.2)
28.0 (22.0-36.0)
29.0 (24.0-39.0)
38.5 (24.0-55.0)
0.026
Female
22.0 (19.0-27.0)
24.0 (20.5-29.0)
23.5 (19.0-34.2)
25.0 (21.0-36.0)
0.143
Cholesterol (mg/dL)
187.4 ± 39.5
190.2 ± 37.3
186.9 ± 36.5
191.0 ± 32.1
0.89
Triglycerides (mg/dL)
122.0 (81.5-166.0)
140.0 (95.0-204.2)
151.0 (114.2-204.0)
198.0 (148.5-348.5)
<0.001
HDL-C (mg/dL)
40.3 ± 12.5
40.5 ± 11.2
34.9 ± 8.1
35.1 ± 10.1
<0.001
Male
32.8 ± 8.8
36.8 ± 11.5
36.1 ± 8.1
29.6 ± 6.4
0.03
Female
44.6 ± 12.3
42.4 ± 10.7
39.8 ± 10.9
36.8 ± 8.9
0.001
Body fat (%)
35.0 ± 9.5
37.0 ± 8.7
39.8 ± 9.1
40.4 ± 8.0
<0.001
Male
27.0 ± 6.8
29.0 ± 5.6
33.0 ± 7.8
33.9 ± 6.4
<0.001
Female
39.4 ± 7.8
41.4 ± 6.8
45.0 ± 6.3
43.1 ± 7.4
<0.001
Glucose (mg/dL)
88.8 ± 12.9
94.2 ± 14.6
96.5 ± 12.7
95.1 ± 12.9
0.002
Insulin (μlU/mL)
6.5 (4.5-8.2)
8.2 (6.3-12.0)
13.1 (9.2-16.0)
17.6 (13.1-24.5)
<0.001
HOMA2-IR
0.8 (0.6-1.1)
1.1 (0.8-1.5)
1.7 (1.2-2.1)
2.3 (1.7-3.2)
<0.001
ISI Matsuda
6.9 (5.0-9.7)
4.6 (3.2-6.0)
2.9 (2.1-3.9)
2.0 (1.3-2.6)
<0.001
HIRI
23.4 ± 3.0
31.7 ± 2.1
39.0 ± 2.1
53.3 ± 9.5
<0.001
Data are expressed as mean ± SD, median (interquartil range), or frequency (%). Analyses were adjusted by gender. P values obtained of individual comparison using the Pearson chi square for frequency variables, one-way ANOVA (normally distributed variables) or Kruskall–Wallis (skewed distribution variables) test. BMI = body mass index, WC = waist circumference, SBP = systolic blood pressure, DBP = diastolic blood pressure, ALT = alanine aminotransferase, AST = aspartate aminotransferase, HDL-C = high density lipoprotein cholesterol, HOMA2-IR = Homeostasis Model Assessment Insulin Resistance 2, ISI = Insulin Sensitivity Index, and HIRI = Hepatic Insulin Resistance Index.
Figure 1
Comparison of HOMA2-IR, ISI Matsuda and HIRI with serum ALT levels.a. HOMA2-IR (n = 324, p < 0.001), and c. HIRI (n = 324, p < 0.001) significantly increased within ALT levels, whereas b. ISI Matsuda (n = 324, p < 0.001), significantly decreased within ALT levels, in both men and women. HOMA2-IR = Homeostasis Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance, ISI = Insulin Sensitivity Index, HIRI = Hepatic Insulin Resistance Index.
The partial correlations adjusted for gender, age and BMI between HIRI and the clinical and biochemical parameters are shown in Table 3. HIRI levels correlated significantly with ALT in all subjects with a metabolic diagnosis: MetS (r = 0.22, p = 0.003), IFG (r = 0.33, p < 0.001), IGT (r = 0.37, p < 0.001), and T2DM (r = 0.72, p < 0.001).
Table 3
Partial correlations of the HIRI with clinical and biochemical parameters
HIRI (adjusted for sex, age and BMI)
All subjects (n = 324)
Without metabolic abnormalities (n = 113)
Metabolic syndrome (n = 179)
IFG (n = 85)
IGT (n = 91)
T2DM (n = 23)
Variable
r
r
r
r
r
r
Weight
0.07
−0.17
0.13
0.09
0.24b
0.13
WC
0.15b
0.04
0.16b
0.12
0.20
−0.31
SBP
0.09
0.05
0.05
−0.15
0.02
−0.13
DBP
0.08
0.09
0.01
−0.21
0.03
−0.02
ALT
0.20a
0.03
0.22b
0.33a
0.37b
0.72a
AST
0.22a
0.12
0.19b
0.26b
0.38a
0.51b
Cholesterol
0.01
−0.17
0.001
0.02
0.10
0.19
Triglycerides
0.19a
0.05
0.13
0.19
0.16
0.31
HDL-C
-0.15
-0.08
-0.08
-0.16
-0.05
0.21
Body fat
0.07
-0.03
0.10
0.01
0.19
0.09
Glucose
0.12b
0.16
0.03
0.01
0.09
0.29
Insulin
0.54a
0.63a
0.51a
0.56a
0.69a
0.81a
HOMA2-IR
0.53a
0.63a
0.51a
0.56a
0.69a
0.81a
ISI Matsuda
-0.59a
-0.60
-0.57a
0.61a
0.69a
-0.84a
P Values obtained of individual comparison using Spearman (normally distributed variable) or Pearson (skewed distribution variables) bivariate correlation tests: a = p < 0.001, b = p < 0.05. BMI = body mass index, WC = waist circumference, SBP = systolic blood pressure, DBP = diastolic blood pressure, ALT = alanine aminotransferase, AST = aspartate aminotransferase, HDL-C = high density lipoprotein cholesterol, HOMA2-IR = Homeostasis Model Assessment Insulin Resistance 2, ISI = Insulin Sensitivity Index, and HIRI = Hepatic Insulin Resistance Index. The total number of subjects is different from 324, because, 40% (n = 73) of subjects with MetS have IFG, 36% (n = 66) of subjects with MetS have IGT, and 11% of subjects (n = 20) of subjects with MetS have DM2.
Using six lineal regression models, adjusted for age, HDL-C, TG and WC we identified certain parameters with an independent association with HIRI levels (Table 4). The first model, that included all subjects, showed an independent association between ALT levels and HIRI (β = 0.07, t = 2.50, p = 0.013). In subjects without metabolic abnormalities we did not find any independent association between ALT levels and HIRI (β = 0.005, t = 0.08, p = 0.933). However, in models 3 to 6 that correspond to subjects with the MetS (model 3), IFG (model 4), IGT (model 5), and T2DM (model 6) we found an independent association between ALT and HIRI levels (p < 0.05 in all models, Table 4). Because of high collinearity between AST and ALT (r = 0.83, p < 0.001), we made different regression models utilizing AST instead of ALT. AST showed an independent association with HIRI (p < 0.05) in models: 1 (all subjects; beta = 0.08; t = 2.47; p = 0.014), model 3 (MetS; beta = 0.09, t = 2.47, p = 0.014), model 5 (IGT; beta = 0.11; t = 2.62; p = 0.011) and model 6 (T2DM; beta = 0.48; t = 3.35; p = 0.005). In individuals without metabolic abnormalities (model 2; beta = −0.04; t = −0.41; p = 0.681) and with IFG (model 4; beta = 0.08; t = 1.61; p = 0.11) we did not find any independent association between AST levels and HIRI (Additional File 1: Table S1).
Table 4
Regression analysis of variables associated with the HIRI
Variable
β
Standardized β
T
p value
Model 1 (all subjects, n=324)
Age
−0.11
−0.13
−1.86
0.064
ALT
0.07
0.17
2.50
0.013
HDL-C
−0.07
−0.05
−0.67
0.501
TG
0.009
0.114
1.60
0.111
WC
0.17
0.22
2.98
0.003
Model 2 (Subjects without metabolic abnormalities, n=113)
Age
−0.05
−0.06
−0.57
0.569
ALT
0.005
0.009
0.08
0.933
HDL-C
−0.04
−0.05
−0.49
0.623
TG
0.013
0.065
0.61
0.541
WC
0.17
0.25
2.40
0.018
Model 3 (Subjects with metabolic syndrome, n=179)
Age
−0.11
−0.13
−1.86
0.064
ALT
0.07
0.17
2.50
0.013
HDL-C
−0.07
−0.05
−0.67
0.501
TG
0.009
0.11
1.60
0.111
WC
0.17
0.22
2.98
0.003
Model 4 (Subjects with impaired fasting glucose, n=85)
Age
−0.07
−0.08
−0.72
0.470
ALT
0.107
0.26
2.31
0.023
HDL-C
−0.05
−0.05
−0.39
0.697
TG
0.01
0.08
0.68
0.496
WC
0.08
0.11
0.97
0.334
Model 5 (Subjects with impaired glucose tolerance, n=91)
Age
−0.17
−0.24
−2.41
0.018
ALT
0.09
0.28
2.78
0.007
HDL-C
0.02
0.02
0.201
0.841
TG
0.008
0.06
0.66
0.507
WC
0.14
0.22
2.18
0.032
Model 6 (Subjects with type 2 diabetes, n=23)
Age
0.07
0.09
0.52
0.611
ALT
0.31
0.68
3.61
0.003
HDL-C
0.10
0.09
0.42
0.679
TG
0.01
0.15
0.75
0.463
WC
−0.09
−0.11
−0.48
0.636
Parameters of model 1: Constant: 23.6, F = 7.20; r2 = 0.17, p = <0.001.
Parameters of model 2: Constant: 17.72, F = 1.43; r2 = 0.07, p = 0.221.
Parameters of model 3: Constant: 23.6, F = 7.20; r2 = 0.17, p < 0.001.
Parameters of model 4: Constant: 27.7, F = 2.81; r2 = 0.16, p = 0.02.
Parameters of model 5: Constant: 23.0, F = 5.94; r2 = 0.28, p = 0.001.
Parameters of model 6: Constant: 21.0, F = 3.26; r2 = 0.53, p = 0.037.
ALT = alanine aminotransferase, HDL-C = high density lipoprotein cholesterol, TG = Triglycerides, WC = waist circumference, HIRI = Hepatic Insulin Resistance Index.
Discussion
ALT levels have been associated with insulin resistance, the metabolic syndrome and the development of T2DM[13–15]. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of serum ALT levels with surrogate markers of systemic and hepatic insulin resistance in subjects with and without impaired glucose metabolism. Since we excluded subjects on hepatotoxic drugs, or with liver disease or cirrhosis, this study suggests that ALT could be an indirect parameter reflecting the presence of hepatic insulin resistance in subjects with differing degrees of impaired glucose metabolism. We observed that in subjects without metabolic abnormalities, the association between ALT and HIRI was not statistically significant. However, in subjects with impaired glucose metabolism, or insulin resistance, ALT levels were an independent marker of hepatic insulin resistance as measured with HIRI. Measurement of ALT might be helpful as an early marker of metabolic abnormalities. We focused on ALT because this liver enzyme is more elevated in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) than AST[29]. Also the linear regression models demonstrated that ALT levels showed association in all groups with impaired glucose metabolism. In contrast, AST was not statistically associated in the IFG group.
Initially, we identified several factors associated with a lineal increment in HIRI levels. We found that weight, BMI, WC, ALT, body fat percentage, insulin, and HOMA2-IR, increased progressively with higher quartiles of HIRI. Moreover, HIRI correlated positively with WC, ALT, TG, fasting glucose and insulin, HOMA2-IR; and negatively with HDL-c and ISI Matsuda. Furthermore, ALT was higher in men than women, an association that has previously been reported[30–32]. Only two previous studies have evaluated the association between ALT and hepatic IR; both of which used the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp[13, 32]. Vozarova and cols[13] reported that higher ALT concentrations are associated with obesity, whole-body- and hepatic-IR. Furthermore, in a prospective observation, ALT levels were associated with a decline in hepatic insulin sensitivity and the development of type 2 diabetes. In our study, we used a novel hepatic IR index derived from the OGTT that can easily be applied in clinical practice. We found that HIRI correlated positively with serum ALT levels (Table 3). The significant association of HIRI with ALT confirms that an increment in this enzyme could be related to undiagnosed hepatic insulin resistance. Hepatic lipotoxicity caused by an oversupply of free fatty acids to the liver results in excess hepatic triglyceride synthesis and an intracellular accumulation of toxic lipid products that impair insulin signaling and activate inflammatory pathways[33]. The adaptation to this metabolic stress involves hepatic IR, dyslipidemia, steatohepatitis with mitochondrial dysfunction, endoplasmic reticulum stress, release of reactive oxygen species, and ultimately, hepatocellular damage[34].
The liver damage related to insulin resistance progresses to cirrhosis in approximately 20% of subjects with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis[35]. Therefore, early identification of metabolic abnormalities could be useful for initiating treatment and reducing the progression or even reverting the problem. Accordingly, we propose predicting the HIRI level using a single ALT measurement. According to model 3 (subjects with MetS), for each 10 IU/L of increment in ALT, the HIRI would increase approximately 0.7 units. However, a higher increment in HIRI could be expected if the patient has more severe impaired glucose metabolism. In subjects with IFG that corresponds to subjects with greater hepatic glucose production and hepatic IR[25], and in those with IGT that corresponds to subjects with impaired systemic IR[25] (models 4 and 5) for every 10 unit increment in ALT, HIRI increased by 0.9 and 1.0 unit respectively. In subjects with T2DM (model 6), an increment of 3 units of HIRI could be expected for the same 10 IU/L increment in ALT. This progressive increment in ALT with worsening glucose metabolism, possibly reflects how far along the patient is in the natural history of T2DM. The degree of hepatic insulin resistance could be predicted using the formula HIRI = constant + beta (ALT level). The value of the constant and beta could be obtained from Table 4, depending on the patient diagnosis. If the patient does not have a metabolic diagnosis yet, we suggest using the information presented in model 1. We cannot confirm the association between ALT and fatty liver disease with the current design, however our hypothesis is that individuals with higher plasma concentrations of ALT and/or higher levels of HIRI could have an underlying liver disease that warrants further investigation. In addition, the benefit of metformin treatment in improving HIRI was recently reported by our group[36]. Similarly, another report has shown that metformin reduces ALT levels[30]. Perhaps, subjects identified with high normal or elevated serum ALT levels, without any other known liver disease, could benefit from metformin treatment to reduce hepatic insulin resistance. However, this point warrants further investigation in prospective studies. It is important to mention that our results could be potentially biased since we included patients that had an indication for testing for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nevertheless, in the 113 patients that had no metabolic abnormalities we did not find any association between ALT and HIRI (Table 3, r = 0.03, p = 0.744; Table 4, model 2, beta = 0.005, p = 0.221). These results suggest that the increase in ALT in our patients is related to the metabolic derangement.
This study has certain limitations. Firstly, the cross-sectional design of our study does not allow us to conclude causality. Our results do not show that correction of insulin resistance with medication, diet, or exercising will improve ALT levels. Secondly, we used surrogate markers of insulin resistance. The results presented here should be confirmed in the clinical setting and studies with a prospective design. We did not take into account the amount of alcohol intake of the subjects in this study. In addition, our patients were not evaluated with liver ultrasound or gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) levels, the results of which would aid patient diagnosis. Finally, these results can only be applied to similar individuals. Since ALT levels may differ by ethnic groups[37], our results should be confirmed in different populations.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we found that ALT levels are independently associated with HIRI in subjects with the MetS, IFG, IGT, and T2DM. The ALT value in these subjects may be an indirect parameter to evaluate hepatic IR.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
MAGS would like to acknowledge Luz del Carmen Abascal Olascoaga for her support.
Authors’ Affiliations
(1)
Department of Internal Medicine, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición “Salvador Zubirán”
(2)
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición “Salvador Zubirán”
References
Lidofsky SD: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: diagnosis and relation to metabolic syndrome and approach to treatment. Curr Diab Rep. 2008, 8: 25-30. 10.1007/s11892-008-0006-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Hanley AJ, Wagenknecht LE, Festa A, D'Agostino RB, Haffner SM: Alanine aminotransferase and directly measured insulin sensitivity in a multiethnic cohort: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. Diabetes Care. 2007, 30: 1819-1827. 10.2337/dc07-0086.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Hanley AJ, Williams K, Festa A, Wagenknecht LE, D'Agostino RB, Haffner SM: Liver markers and development of the metabolic syndrome: the insulin resistance atherosclerosis study. Diabetes. 2005, 54: 3140-3147. 10.2337/diabetes.54.11.3140.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Hanley AJ, Williams K, Festa A, Wagenknecht LE, D'Agostino RB, Kempf J, Zinman B, Haffner SM: Elevations in markers of liver injury and risk of type 2 diabetes: the insulin resistance atherosclerosis study. Diabetes. 2004, 53: 2623-2632. 10.2337/diabetes.53.10.2623.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Stefan N, Kantartzis K, Haring HU: Causes and metabolic consequences of Fatty liver. Endocr Rev. 2008, 29: 939-960. 10.1210/er.2008-0009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Thamer C, Tschritter O, Haap M, Shirkavand F, Machann J, Fritsche A, Schick F, Häring H, Stumvoll M: Elevated serum GGT concentrations predict reduced insulin sensitivity and increased intrahepatic lipids. Horm Metab Res. 2005, 37: 246-251. 10.1055/s-2005-861411.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Liangpunsakul S, Chalasani N: Unexplained elevations in alanine aminotransferase in individuals with the metabolic syndrome: results from the third National Health and Nutrition Survey (NHANES III). Am J Med Sci. 2005, 329: 111-116. 10.1097/00000441-200503000-00001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Jacobs M, van Greevenbroek MM, van der Kallen CJ, Ferreira I, Feskens EJ, Jansen EH, Schalkwijk CG, Stehouwer C: The association between the metabolic syndrome and alanine amino transferase is mediated by insulin resistance via related metabolic intermediates (the Cohort on Diabetes and Atherosclerosis Maastricht [CODAM] study). Metabolism. 2011, 60: 969-975. 10.1016/j.metabol.2010.09.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Marchesini G, Forlani G: NASH: from liver diseases to metabolic disorders and back to clinical hepatology. Hepatology. 2002, 35: 497-499. 10.1053/jhep.2002.31551.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Westerbacka J, Cornér A, Tiikkainen M, Tamminen M, Vehkavaara S, Häkkinen AM, Fredriksson J, Yki-Järvinen H: Women and men have similar amounts of liver and intra-abdominal fat, despite more subcutaneous fat in women: implications for sex differences in markers of cardiovascular risk. Diabetologia. 2004, 47: 1360-1369.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Fraser A, Ebrahim S, Smith GD, Lawlor DA: A comparison of associations of alanine aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyltransferase with fasting glucose, fasting insulin, and glycated hemoglobin in women with and without diabetes. Hepatology. 2007, 46: 158-165. 10.1002/hep.21667.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Vozarova B, Stefan N, Lindsay RS, Saremi A, Pratley RE, Bogardus C, Tataranni PA: High alanine aminotransferase is associated with decreased hepatic insulin sensitivity and predicts the development of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2002, 51: 1889-1895. 10.2337/diabetes.51.6.1889.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Chen P-H, Chen J-D, Lin Y-C: A better parameter in predicting insulin resistance: Obesity plus elevated alanine aminotransferase. World J Gastroenterol. 2009, 15: 5598-5603. 10.3748/wjg.15.5598.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Zhang Y, Xi L, Hong J, Chao M, Weiqiong G, Wang W, Ning G: Positive correlations of liver enzymes with metabolic syndrome including insulin resistance in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. Endocr. 2010, 38: 181-187. 10.1007/s12020-010-9369-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Seppälä-Lindroos A, Vehkavaara S, Häkkinen AM, Goto T, Westerbacka J, Sovijärvi A, Halavaara J, Yki-Järvinen H: Fat accumulation in the liver is associated with defects in insulin suppression of glucose production and serum free fatty acids independent of obesity in normal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002, 87: 3023-3028. 10.1210/jc.87.7.3023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Tripathy D, Almgren P, Tuomi T, Groop L: Contribution of insulin stimulated glucose uptake and basal hepatic insulin sensitivity to surrogate measures of insulin sensitivity. Diabetes Care. 2004, 27: 2204-2210. 10.2337/diacare.27.9.2204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Laakso M: How good a marker is insulin level for insulin resistance?. Am J Epidemiol. 1993, 137: 959-965.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Phillips DI, Clark PM, Hales CN, Osmond C: Understanding oral glucose tolerance: comparison of glucose or insulin measurements during the oral glucose tolerance test with specific measurements of insulin resistance and insulin secretion. Diabet Med. 1994, 11: 286-292. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1994.tb00273.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Anderson RL, Hamman RF, Savage PJ, Saad MF, Laws A, Kades WW, Sands RE, Cefalu W: Exploration of simple insulin sensitivity measures derived from frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance (FSIGT) tests: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1995, 142: 724-732.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Hanson RL, Pratley RE, Bogardus C, Narayan KM, Roumain JM, Imperatore G, Fagot-Campagna A, Pettitt DJ, Bennett PH, Knowler WC: Evaluation of simple indices of insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion for use in epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol. 2000, 151: 190-198. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010187.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Hanley AJ, Williams K, Gonzalez C, D’Agostino RB, Wagenknecht LE, Stern MP, Haffner SM, San Antonio Heart Study Mexico City Diabetes Study Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study: Prediction of type 2 diabetes using simple measures of insulin resistance: combined results from the San Antonio Heart Study, the Mexico City Diabetes Study, and the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. Diabetes. 2003, 52: 463-469.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Matsuda M, DeFronzo RA: Insulin sensitivity indices obtained from oral glucose tolerance testing: comparison with the euglycemic insulin clamp. Diabetes Care. 1999, 22: 1462-1470. 10.2337/diacare.22.9.1462.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Abdul-Ghani M, Matsuda M, Balas B, DeFronzo RA: Muscle and Liver Insulin Resistance Indexes Derived From the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test. Diabetes Care. 2007, 30: 89-94. 10.2337/dc06-1519.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
American Diabetes Association: Standards of medical care in diabetes-2012. Diabetes Care. 2012, 35 (1): 11-63.Google Scholar
Expert Panel on Detection: Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults: Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001, 285: 2486-2497. 10.1001/jama.285.19.2486.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel RH, Franklin BA, Gordon DJ, Krauss RM, Savage PJ, Smith SC: Spertus JA, Costa F: Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: and American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation. 2005, 112: 2735-2752. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.169404.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Sorbi D, Boynton J, Lindor KD: The ratio of aspartate aminotransferase to alanine aminotransferase: potential value in differentiating nonalcoholic steatohepatitis from alcoholic liver disease. The American Journal of gastroenterology. 1999, 94: 1018-1022. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01006.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Preiss D, Sattar N, Harborne L, Norman J, Fleming R: The effects of 8 months of metformin on circulating GGT and ALT levels in obese women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Int J Clin Pract. 2008, 62: 1337-1343. 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01825.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Prati D, Taioli E, Zanella A, Della Torre E, Butelli S, Del Vecchio E, Vianello L, Zanuso F, Mozzi F, Milani S, Conte D, Colombo M, Sirchia G: Updated definitions of healthy ranges for serum alanine aminotransferase levels. Ann Intern Med. 2002, 137: 1-10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Bonnet F, Ducluzeau PH, Gastaldelli A, Laville M, Anderwald CH, Konrad T, Mari A, Balkau B, RISC Study Group: Liver enzymes are associated with hepatic insulin resistance, insulin secretion, and glucagon concentration in healthy men and women. Diabetes. 2011, 60 (6): 1660-1667. 10.2337/db10-1806.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Lomonaco R, Ortiz-Lopez C, Orsak B, Webb A, Hardies J, Darland C, Finch J, Gastaldelli A, Harrison S, Tio F, Cusi K: Effect of adipose tissue insulin resistance on metabolic parameters and liver histology in obese patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2011, 5: 1389-1397.Google Scholar
Cusi K: The role of adipose tissue and lipotoxicity in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2010, 10: 306-315. 10.1007/s11892-010-0122-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Levene AP, Goldin RD: The epidemiology, pathogenesis and histopathology of fatty liver disease. Histopathology. 2012, 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.04145.x.Google Scholar
Gómez-Sámano MA, Gulias-Herrero A, Cuevas-Ramos D, Brau-Figueroa H, Mehta R, Vargas-Gutiérrez D, Meza-Arana CE, Nieves-Niebla JM, Vázquez-Hernández MO: Metformin and improvement of the hepatic insulin resistance index independent of anthropometric changes. Endocr Pract. 2012, 1: 8-16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Stewart S, Connors G: Ethnicity, Alcohol Drinking and Changes in Transaminase Activity among Heavy Drinkers. J Natl Med Assoc. 2007, 99: 564-569.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
