Skip to main content

The interaction between MC4R gene variant (rs17782313) and dominant dietary patterns on depression in obese and overweight women: a cross sectional study

Abstract

Background

Previous studies have shown that the minor allele (C allele) for melanocortin 4 receptor (MC4R) rs17782313 may be associated with depressed mood. Moreover, dietary patterns have potentially adverse effects on depression. This study investigates the interactions between the MC4R gene variant (rs17782313) and dietary patterns on depression among Iranian obese and overweight women.

Methods

A total of 289 Iranian overweight and obese women, aged 18–50 years, were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Biochemical, anthropometric, and body composition indices were assessed in all participants. Moreover, MC4R rs17782313, by the restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method, and depression, using the 21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) questionnaire, were assessed. Food intakes were assessed by completing a 147-item semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ).

Results

By the use of factor analysis, 2 major dietary patterns were extracted: healthy dietary pattern (HDP) and unhealthy dietary pattern (UDP). Binary logistic analysis showed that individuals with minor allele risk (CC) with high adherence to the unhealthy pattern increased odds for depression (OR: 8.77, 95%CI: -0.86-18.40, P: 0.07), after controlling for confounders. Also, a logical inverse relationship was observed between CT genotype and HDP on depression in the crude and adjusted models (OR: -0.56, 95% CI: -3.69-2.57, P: 0.72) (OR: -4.17, 95% CI: -9.28-0.94, P: 0.11), although this interaction was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

According to the above findings, adherence to unhealthy food intake pattern increases odds of depression in MC4R risk allele (C allele) carriers. To confirm these findings, more studies are needed in the form of clinical trials and prospective studies with higher sample sizes.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Obesity and overweight are influential factors in today’s world, such that the prevalence of overweight and obesity in low-income countries, as well as in low-income groups in high-income countries, has steadily increased over the past century. In 2016, worldwide, 13% of adults over the age of 18 were reported to be obese and 39% to be overweight [1, 2]. Obesity, as a metabolic disease, is a major risk factor for other metabolic diseases such as coronary heart disease, ischemic stroke, and type 2 diabetes, and the physiological and psychological consequences of obesity, causes greater burden on health systems by disrupting people’s quality of life [3,4,5]. In the etiology of obesity, factors such as genetics [6], lifestyle [7], gender [8], diet [9], etc. are influential.

Mental disorders are a major public health problem in the world. In general, a mental disorder is a behavioral or mental pattern that causes discomfort or dysfunction in a person, and is significantly associated with decreased quality and life expectancy [10]. In 2020, about 150 million people worldwide were reportedly suffering from depression [11, 12]. Thus, it is predicted that after cardiovascular diseases, depression and anxiety will become the second leading risk of death in the world [13, 14]. Regarding the etiology of depression, factors such as genetics [15], lifestyle [16], gender [17], obesity [18], diet [16], etc. are influential. There are several studies on the relationship between diet, obesity, and depression [19,20,21,22], indicating that dietary patterns may have influence on the onset of depression [23,24,25]. Lifestyle changes in recent decades have led to changes in the consumption of food groups and the consumption of unhealthy foods, in addition to the direct impact on obesity [26, 27], has also been linked to depression [28]. Possible mechanisms of this association are increased inflammatory responses to overconsumption of unhealthy foods, due to the presence of chemical additives or due to dietary composition [29,30,31], as well as metabolic, physiological, and hormonal changes caused by excessive consumption of this style of dietary pattern [32,33,34]. Meanwhile, the consumption of healthy pattern diets, such as the Mediterranean diet, has been shown to have a protective effect on depression [35,36,37].

Variation in the MC4R gene variants, which are responsible for encoding the melanocortin 4 receptor, is the most common genetic cause of human obesity [38], and obesity itself is independently associated with depression [39]. The common Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs17782313 gene, close to MC4R, may also be significantly associated with higher total energy intake and dietary fat, thereby exerting an effect on dietary change [40]. Contemporary data suggests that synergistic interactions between environmental factors to dietary patterns may play an important role in pathogenesis of obesity and depression [6, 41]. In general, studies on the effect of the MC4R gene and depression are very limited. In a previous study, in addition to the association of this gene with obesity and the association of rs17782313 C allele variant with BMI, the association of this gene with depressed mood and overeating behaviors was reported [42]. In another study, the interactions of MC4R polymorphism (rs12970134) and dietary factors on metabolic syndrome were investigated, with the incumbent findings suggesting that there is an interaction between rs12970134 and Western diet, fat, and vegetable consumption on the risk of MetS or its components. In addition, there was also a significant correlation between rs12970134 and total fat and iron intake on the risk of abdominal obesity [43]. In a study that examined the interaction of MC4R variants and dietary patterns on the risk of obesity in Korean middle-aged adults, it was reported that the MC4R rs18882313 minor allele was more common in the obese group and that processed foods and fats (as a percentage of energy) was significantly higher, whilst fruit consumption was significantly lower, in people with MC4R minor alleles [44]. Moreover, it was shown that the interaction of mental stress interactions and energy intake with the MC4R minor allele genotype may increase the risk of obesity in Korean adults [44].

Most recent studies have shown that dietary patterns are associated with depression, and the association between obesity and overweight has been independently studied in the development of depression. However, since studies on the association between the MC4R gene and depression are very limited, and there is no study on the interaction of the MC4R gene with dominant dietary patterns and depression, this study, for the first time, sought to investigate the interaction of the MC4R gene and dietary patterns on depression.

Materials and methods

Study population

Two hundred and eighty-nine adult overweight (n = 136) and obese (n = 153) women from Tehran, Iran were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Moreover, the study only included participants with good general health as self-certified by them. A mean age of 36.52 years (± 8.32 years) was determined from the range of 18 to 50 years. Subjects’ BMI ranged from 25 to 40.70 kg/m2. Blood samples and anthropometric measurements were taken at Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS). An informed consent form was filled out by each participant before the study began. Hypertension, cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes mellitus, impaired liver renal function, use of medicine regularly, such as an oral contraceptive pill, smoking, excessive alcohol consumption, pregnancy, lactation, and menopause were excluded from the study. Furthermore, we excluded participants if they had a chronic illness that affected their diet, ate a special diet arbitrarily, or if they fluctuated in weight during the past year, or if their daily calories were less than 800 kcal and more than 4,200 kcal. The Ethics Commission of the TUMS granted ethical approval and assigned the number IR.TUMS.VCR.REC.1398.619.

Assessment of dietary intake

In this study, a semi-quantitative FFQ of 147 questions was used to assess the dietary intake of individuals, which was administered by a trained nutritionist. FFQ was based on standard-sized foods commonly consumed by Iranians. Then, according to the participants’ reports, we collected the frequency of consumption of each meal of each food item that was consumed daily (e.g., bread), weekly (e.g., rice, meat), or monthly (e.g., fish) in the previous year. Also, the frequency reported for each food item was then converted into daily intake and the share of food consumed was converted to grams using household criteria [45]. Total energy intake was calculated by summing up energy intakes from all foods. The Iranian Food Composition Table [46] was used to determine the nutrient composition of Iranian food using United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food Composition data [47]. To identify the main patterns of diet, 147 nutrients were classified into 31 food groups. By using factor analysis based on eigenvalues larger than 1.5, two significant dietary patterns—later referred to as the HDP and the UDP—were identified. The principle component analysis (PCA) was carried out in order to separate these two eating patterns based on the 31 food groups. In the healthy dietary pattern, the consumption of food items included; vegetables, tomatoes, fruits, garlic, starchy vegetables, fruits, nuts, fish, bananas, and legumes. In the unhealthy dietary pattern, people were more likely to consume red meat, high-energy drinks, chicken, nuts, processed foods, high-fat dairy, low-cereals, low-spices, and less fruit.

Assessment of depression

The 21-item DASS questionnaire was used to determine the status of depression. This questionnaire has two forms, short and long, each of which has 21 and 42 questions, respectively. The short form, introduced by Lovibond and Lovibond [48], has 21 terms that evaluates each of the psychological structures of depression, anxiety, and stress with 7 different term in which the validity of this tool in Iran has been confirmed [49]. Participants reported their responses to the items on this questionnaire on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 (does not apply to me at all) to 3 (applies to me most or most of the time). For each scale, scores were added for the specified items, and because DASS 21 is a short version of DASS (the long form has 42 items), finally, the total score of 21 questions is multiplied by 2, and for the depression subgroup, the score range between 10 and 13, 14–20, 21–27 and above 28 indicates mild, moderate, severe and very severe depression.

DNA extraction and sequencing of the gene

The MC4R gene primer was selected based on a previous study [50]. According to the manufacturer’s protocol, we extracted genomic DNA from blood samples with the use of the Mini Columns, Type G kit (GeneALL, Exgene). In addition, with the use of a Nano Drop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific Company, USA), we measured the concentration and purity of extracted DNA. We stored the extracted DNA at 4ºC, before sequencing was performed. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using the following primers: forward primer 5-AAGTTCTACCTACCATGTTCTTGG-3 and reverse primer 5- TTCCCCCTGAAGCTTTTCTTGTCATTTTGAT-3. PCR reactions were performed in a final volume of 20 µl, containing 1 µl extracted DNA, 0.5 µl primers F, 0.5 µl primers R, 10 µl Permix (Amplicon, Germany), and 8 µl Distilled water, with the following conditions in a DNA thermocycler: 1- primary denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min; 2- Thirty- five cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 58 °C for 30 s, extension at 72 °C for 30 s; 3- final extension at 72 °C for 5 min; 4- final step at 4 °C. Amplified DNA (7 µl) was digested with 0.5 µl of BCII restriction enzyme (Fermentase, Germany) at 56 °C overnight. All products were visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis. Then, fragments containing three genotypes were distinguished: CC, CT, and TT [51].

Biochemical assessments

Fasting serum glucose (FSB), insulin, total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), low density lipoprotein (LDL), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) was measured from blood samples drawn after 8–12 h of overnight fasting. All samples were assessed by standard methods at the Nutrition and Biochemistry Laboratory of the school of Nutritional and Dietetics at Tehran University of medical sciences.

Anthropometric assessments

Weight was measured with digital scales, to the nearest 100 g, with minimal clothing and no shoes. Participants’ height was measured with a stadiometer, in a standing position and without shoes. BMI was calculated by dividing weight (kg) by height squared (cm), and neck circumference (NC) was measured below the laryngeal ridge and perpendicular to the long axis of the neck [52], and the minimum circumference was recorded with the nearest 0.1 cm.

Body composition analysis

Body composition was measured using a multi-frequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer (BIA), InBody 770 scanner (Inbody Co., Seoul, Korea), which records weight, body mass index (BMI), Body Fat Mass (BFM), Fat-free Mass (FFM), Waist Circumference (WC), and Hip Circumference (HC). According to the manufacturer’s instructions, first, participants removed their shoes, coats, and sweaters, then they stood on the balance scale, barefooted, and held the handles of the machine.

Assessment of other variables

Levels of physical activity, using a valid questionnaire (International Physical Activity Questionnaire - short form (IPAC)), which includes all areas of physical activity (occupation, transportation, yard / garden, home and leisure) and sitting and as a metabolic equivalent Hours per week (MET-h / wk), were evaluated [53]. The questionnaire included questions in 5 areas of activity: job-related physical activity; Physical transport activity; Activities for housework and house maintenance; Recreation, exercise and physical activity in leisure time; And the time spent sitting the participant’s pants were asked to think about all the intense and moderate activity they had done in the past 7 days, taking into account the time spent on these activities. It was classified as: low < 600 (MET-h / wk), moderate = 600–3500 (MET-h / wk) and severe > 3500 (MET-h / wk)[54]. A demographic questionnaire was used to collect information on age, marital status, and family history of obesity and overweight, which was defined as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 and 25 ≤ BMI ≤ 29.9 kg/m2, respectively [55].

Statistical analysis

The distribution of data was investigated using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Quantitative data were reported as mean and standard deviation and qualitative data were expressed as number and percentage, respectively. We used principal component analysis (PCA) to identify the main dietary patterns based on 31 food groups, based on scree plot inspection and eigenvalues over 1.5. Varimax rotation was used to achieve a simple matrix with better ability to interpret and extract dominant dietary patterns. According to previous studies, and because of the nature of the data and correlations, values with a load factor greater than 0.58 were considered to determine the items of each food pattern. Factor loads illustrate correlation coefficients between food groups and dietary patterns, and a positive charge in a factor indicates a direct relationship with the agent, while a negative charge indicates that the food is inversely related to the agent. Dietary patterns were labeled based on the researchers’ interpretation of the data, and participants were classified based on the mean scores of healthy, unhealthy, which resulted in low and high intakes. Independent t-tests were performed to assess differences in participants’ general characteristics (such as age, anthropometry, and physical activity) in the dietary patterns and depression. The distribution of qualitative variables in the groups was assessed using Chi-square test. To determine the relationship between main dietary patterns and MC4R gene and depression, logistic binary regression was performed in crude and adjusted models. Adjustments were made for age, economic status, night sleep status, a history of weight loss, and physical activity. In all multivariate models, the low adherence of dietary patterns score was considered as reference. Comparison of quantitative variables between quartiles of dietary pattern or genotype was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The interaction between dietary pattern and genotype on quantitative variables was assessed using linear regression model analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 23; SPSS Inc, Chicago IL), with statistical significance accepted, a priori, at P < 0.05.

Result

Study population characteristics

In this cross-sectional study, the demographic characteristics of individuals are reported in Table 1. The means and standard deviation (SD) of age, weight, and BMI of individuals were 36.52 (8.32) years, 78.75 (11.51) kg, and 30.33 (3.65) kg/m 2, respectively. The frequencies of T and C alleles of rs17782313 were 41.8% and 58.2%. The overall prevalence of rs17782313 genotype was 29.4%, 24.8%, and 45.7% for TT, TC, and CC, respectively. Among the participants in terms of marital status, 27.3% were single and 72.6% were married. The majority of study population (99.3%) were employed, and 22.1% were economically weak, 44.2% were moderate, and 33.5% had good economic condition. Among the participants in terms of depression, 53.2% were normal, 13.3% were mild, 17.9% were moderate, 9.3% were severe, and 6.1% were very severe.

Table 1 Characteristics of study participants (n = 289)

Association between biochemical parameters, body composition among rs17782313 genotype

The general characteristics of the participants among the MC4R genotype are presented in Table 2. A total of 289 Iranian women were categorized based on rs17782313 genotype, and divided into three groups: TT genotype (n = 96), TC genotype (n = 96), and CC genotype (n = 97). Although there was a significant marginal difference in educational status (P = 0.08), among other variables, no significant relationship was observed with MC4R gene variants, even after adjustment for BMI, age, total energy intake, and physical activity (P > 0.05).

Table 2 Characteristics of participants among MC4R gene genotypes (n = 289)

Association between dietary intakes among rs17782313 genotype

The food group and nutrient intakes according to MC4R rs17782313 genotype are shown in Table 3. The results of this study, after controlling for confounding factor (energy intake), shows that those with CC risk alleles consumed significantly less B carotene than those with TT and TC alleles. Among all micronutrients, only a significant correlation was shown with B carotene (P = 0.05), and this correlation remained significant after adjusting for energy intake (P = 0.03). Among other variables, no significant relationship was observed with MC4R gene varieties and dietary intake, even after adjusting the total energy intake (P > 0.05).

Table 3 Dietary intake in individuals with MC4R gene variant (rs17782313) (n = 289)

Factor loadings of food groups in identified dietary patterns

Table 4 shows the factor loadings of food groups in identified dietary patterns. Nutrient patterns were derived using PCA with varimax rotation and based on the correlation matrix. Factor load values less than 0.2 have been omitted and the Kaiser—Meyer—Olkin measure of sampling adequacy (KMO) was 0.558. 31 Food group were selected for factor analysis, including vegetables, tomato, low fat dairy, nuts ,garlic ,starchy, fruit, walnut ,fish, banana, red Meat, high energy drink, chicken, nuts ,processed food, high-fat dairy, beans, grain and spices. Factor scores for all participants for each of the extracted factors were calculated by summing the frequency of consumption, multiplied by factor loadings across food groups. By using the factor analysis method and according to the Scree Plot chart review, two dominant dietary patterns were identified in the subjects (Fig. 1). Patterns were named based on food groups as the healthy pattern and unhealthy pattern. The healthy eating pattern included vegetables, tomatoes, low-fat dairy, nuts, garlic, starchy vegetables, fruits, walnuts, fish, bananas, dried red meat, cereals, spices, and legumes (percentage variance = 9.73). The UDP included red meat, high energy drinks, chicken, processed foods, and high fat dairy (percentage of variance = 6.28).

Table 4 Factor loadings of the food groups in the main dietary patterns extracted (n = 289)
Fig. 1
figure 1

Scree plot of the nutrients and the extracted principal components in overweight and obese women

Association between biochemical parameters, body composition among adherence of dietary patterns

The general characteristics of the participants among the food groups extracted are presented in Table 5. All participants were divided into two groups based on the healthy and unhealthy food patterns extracted. For the healthy dietary pattern, there was a significant difference in height (P = 0.01), FBS (P = 0.05) and FFM (P = 0.01) in the crude model. After adjusting BMI, age, total energy intake and physical activity, Body weight (P = 0.04), Job (P = 0.03) and educational status (P < 0.001) showed a significant difference. In this regard, the economic status (P = 0.004) maintained its significance after adjusting for confounding factors. There was no significant difference for the other variables in Table 5 compared to the HDP (P > 0.05). But, in terms of following an unhealthy dietary pattern, in the crude model, there was a significant difference with height (P = 0.009), Economic (P = 0.01) and marital status (P = 0.03). After adjusting for BMI, age, total energy intake, and physical activity, a significant difference was observed between groups for HC (P = 0.03). In this regard, Age (P < 0.001) and physical activity (P = 0.01) remained significant after controlling for potential cofounders.

Table 5 Characteristics of participants among dietary patterns (n = 289)

Interaction between dietary patterns and MC4R gene variants on depression

Interaction between dietary patterns and MC4R gene variants and the effect on depression is shown in Table 6. Using the Generalized linear Model (GLM), the interaction between MC4R polymorphism (rs17782313) and dietary patterns on depression was examined. No Significant interactions were observed between UDP score and rs17782313 SNP in the crude model for people with CC (OR: 0.60, 95%CI: -1.22-2.43, P: 0.51) and CT (OR: 0.95, 95%CI: -1.14-3.06, P: 0.37) genotypes on depression. In adjusted model, participants with the CC genotype, who had the highest adherence to the UPD score, were more likely to develop depression, after controlling for confounders (age, economic status, Night sleep status, a history of weight loss and physical activity) (OR: 8.77, 95%CI: -0.86-18.40, P: 0.07) (Fig. 2). Although the interaction of CT genotype with UDP in the crude model was not significant on depression (OR: 0.95, 95%CI: -1.14-3.06, P: 0.37), a positive logical relationship with depression in was observed adjusted model (OR: 3.78, 95% CI: -5.88-13.45, P: 0.44), after controlling for confounding factors. Regarding the interaction of MC4R gene and HDP on depression (Fig. 3), logical inverse relationships were observed between CT genotype and HDP on depression in both crude and adjusted models (OR: -0.56, 95% CI: -3.69-2.57, P: 0.72) (OR: -4.17, 95% CI: -9.28-0.94, P: 0.11), although this interaction was not statistically significant in both models. In individuals with CC genotype, there was no significant relationship between depression and increased adherence to a HDP in both models.

Table 6 Interaction of MC4R gene (rs17782313) and healthy and unhealthy dietary patterns on depression in obese and overweight women (n = 289)
Fig. 2
figure 2

Interaction between MC4R genotypes (TT as the reference group) and UDP on depression (The P value for CC genotype: 0.91; P value for UDP: 0.15; P value for interaction between CC genotype and UDP: 0.07)

Fig. 3
figure 3

Interaction between MC4R genotypes (TT as the reference group) and HDP on depression (The P value for CC genotype: 0.91; P value for HDP: 0.277; P value for interaction between CC genotype and HDP: 0.94)

Discussion

The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between dominant dietary patterns and MC4R with depression in overweight and obese Iranian adults. After analyzing the variables of dominant dietary patterns by method, unhealthy and healthy dietary patterns were obtained. In the unhealthy dietary pattern, consumption of food items, such as eat red meat, high-energy drinks, chicken, nuts, processed foods, and high-fat dairy was higher. In contrast, in the healthy dietary pattern, people were more likely to consume vegetables, tomatoes, fruits, garlic, starchy vegetables, fruits, nuts, fish, bananas and legumes. The hypothesis of this study regarding the effect of dietary patterns on mental health was that greater adherence to a HDP would be associated with lower odds of developing depression. In this study, the relationship between dominant dietary patterns and MC4R with the likelihood of depression, after adjusting for the effects of confounders such as age, economic status, night sleep status, a history of weight loss, and physical activity, was seen with increasing adherence to unhealthy dietary pattern. In this investigation, in adjusted model, participants with the CC genotype who had the highest adherence to the UPD score were more likely to develop depression, but no significant relationship was observed in the crude model. On the other hand, in the present study, data analysis showed that HDP in this study was not significantly associated with the score of depression in crude and adjusted models. Also, the HDP was not significantly associated with the odds ratio of depression in the crude and adjusted models. However, the relationship between following a HDP and lower odds ratio of depression in the adjusted model in people with CT alleles was close to significant and in both models, where an inverse relationship with CT gene and consumption of HDP with depression was observed.

So far, various studies have been conducted pertaining to the relationship between diet and the incidence of depression. Kim et al. found that the “Western” dietary pattern, which consisted of refined grains, white potatoes, cheese, meat, oils and fats, and high sugar, was significantly associated with depression in both sexes. Moreover, a healthy dietary pattern, consisting whole grains, fruits, vegetables, fish, nuts, and seeds was inversely associated with depression (OR) in women [56]. A study by Maryam Khosravi et al., performed on 330 depressed patients (case) and healthy individuals (control) (1: 2), found two main dietary patterns using factor analysis. These patterns were an unhealthy dietary pattern, including high-refined grains and breads, high-fat dairy, solid oils, liquid oils and mayonnaise, pickles, snacks, soft drinks, fruits and industrial juices, red meat, poultry, processed meats, and sweets, in addition to a healthy dietary pattern, which included fruits, cruciferous vegetables, yellow, green leaves and other vegetables, low fat dairy products, whole grains, nuts, and olives. Accordingly, findings from this study suggest that healthy and unhealthy dietary patterns may be associated with a higher risk of depression [24]. A prospective study in 2011 revealed a significant dose-dependent and inverse relationship between PUFA and MUFA intake and depression, and participants with the highest trans-FA intake showed significantly higher risk of depression [57]. Furthermore, sugar consumption has also been linked to depression [58]. Possible mechanisms of unhealthy dietary patterns include the presence of more processed foods which are linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, as well as increased inflammation[59, 60], both of which are involved in the pathogenesis of depression [61, 62]. In people with major depressive disorder, the level of proinflammatory cytokines increases, and cytokines can affect the incidence of depression by altering neurotransmitter metabolism, endocrine nerve function, and regional brain activity [63]. Dietary folate deficiency, on the other hand, can reduce access to S-adenosylmethionine, which is responsible for methyl transport in the body, thereby disrupting the formation of myelin, neurotransmitters, and membrane phospholipids by increasing the risk of depression [34].

There are several studies pertaining to the relationship between healthy dietary patterns and depression. For instance, a cohort study of 3,523 people in France found that greater adherence to the Mediterranean dietary pattern in mid-life was associated with a reduced risk of developing depressive symptoms, especially in men [64]. A study by Skarupski et al. also found that following a diet high in vegetables, fruits, whole grains, fish, and legumes could have a protective effect against the development of depressive symptoms at older ages [65]. In a study of 64 girls, aged 17 − 15 years with normal body mass index (BMI), the relationship between walking exercise and banana consumption was examined for depressive symptoms, where banana consumption, alone and with exercise, was significantly associated with lower depression score than the control group [66].

Previous studies in this field have been limited to investigating the relationship between the dominant food intake pattern and mental disorders [25, 67,68,69,70]. They have also evaluated the interaction of MC4R and different diets on different outcomes (metabolic syndrome, diabetes and obesity) [71, 72]. According to a contemporary approach to nutrition epidemiology, where the role of mediators between diet and genes is considered, we, for the first time in Iran and the world, discerned the interaction between the dominant food intake pattern and MC4R 17782313rs on mood disorders (depression). A study examining the interaction of MC4R rs17782313 with mental stress and energy intake and the risk of obesity found that interactions of mental stress and energy intake with the MC4R minor allele genotype may be associated with an increased risk of obesity in Korean adults [44]. Another study showed that the relationship between MC4R 17782313rs polymorphism and type 2 diabetes depends on diet. In fact, people with a C-risk allele had a lower risk of type 2 diabetes with less adherence to the Mediterranean dietary pattern, whilst people with a high adherence to the Mediterranean dietary pattern had a lower risk of type 2 diabetes [73]. Yilmaz et al. (2015) examined the association between MC4R rs17782313 polymorphism of overeating and depression, and found that BMI was associated with the rs17782313 C allele. Moreover, the authors also noted that rs17782313 was significantly associated with depression and overeating behaviors, and that MC4R leads to weight gain and BMI via depression and overeating behaviors [42]. In the present study, a significant relationship was observed between individuals with CC genotype and consumption of an UDP with depression, while this association was not observed among individuals with CT genotype, despite an increase in OR. This may be because when a dangerous allele is placed next to a harmless allele, they behave differently than when two dangerous alleles are placed next to each other. Also, no significant relationship was observed between MC4R gene interaction and HDP and depression, but a logical inverse relationship was observed between CT genotype and HDP on depression. This may be because most people in the study chose an UDP as their dominant diet, and therefore, the interaction between the MC4R gene and an UDP is more closely linked to depression.

Several limitations must be considered when interpreting the results of the present study. Indeed, the cross-sectional design precludes causal inferences into the interaction between dietary intake and depression in individuals at risk for the MC4R gene allele. Another limitation is that the FFQ for evaluating the diet for accurate reporting is dependent on people’s memory and can be reported incorrectly. Further, based on the study population, this study is only generalizable to overweight and obese women, so it cannot be used for men and women with normal weight. Future research should take into account another limitation—depression-induced changes in eating behavior.

Conclusion

Overall, these findings underline the importance of the UDP in the alarming prevalence of the depression in developing countries. Although the theoretical models of genetic-dietary patterns-depression interactions clearly need a more empiric foundation, the evidence from this study putatively shows a direct link between the incidence of depressive for people with CC alleles of MC4R gene and greater adherence to an unhealthy dietary pattern. The findings of this study show that the interaction of MC4R variants between individuals and high consumption of UDP can play an important role in the development of depression.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from Khadijeh Mirzaei but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are, however, available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of Khadijeh Mirzaei.

Abbreviations

ANCOVA:

analysis of covariance

BMI:

body mass index

BP:

Blood pressure

CVD:

cardiovascular disease

DBP:

diastolic blood pressure

DASS:

Depression Anxiety Stress Scales

FBS:

Fasting blood sugar

FFM:

fat free mass

FFQ:

food frequency questionnaire

GLM:

generalized linear model

HC:

Hip Circumference

HDL-C:

low density, lipoprotein cholesterol

IPAQ:

international Physical Activity Questionnaire

LDL:

low density lipoprotein

MC4R:

melanocortin 4 receptor

PCA:

principal component analysis

PCR-RFLP:

polymerase chain restriction fragment length polymorphism

SBP:

systolic blood pressure

SNP:

single nucleotide polymorphism

TC:

total cholesterol

TG:

triacylglycerol

WC:

waist circumferences.

References

  1. Tran BX, Dang KA, Le HT, Ha GH, Nguyen LH, Nguyen TH, et al. Global evolution of obesity research in children and youths: setting priorities for interventions and policies. Obes Facts. 2019;12(2):137–49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Organization WH. Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. 2004.

  3. Latino-Martel P, Cottet V, Druesne-Pecollo N, Pierre FH, Touillaud M, Touvier M, et al. Alcoholic beverages, obesity, physical activity and other nutritional factors, and cancer risk: a review of the evidence. Crit Rev Oncol/Hematol. 2016;99:308–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thompson R, Mitrou G, Brown S, Almond E, Bandurek I, Brockton N, et al. Major new review of global evidence on diet, nutrition and physical activity: a blueprint to reduce cancer risk. Wiley Online Library. 2018.

  5. Wyatt SB, Winters KP, Dubbert PM. Overweight and obesity: prevalence, consequences, and causes of a growing public health problem. Am J Med Sci. 2006;331(4):166–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Xi B, Chandak GR, Shen Y, Wang Q, Zhou D. Association between common polymorphism near the MC4R gene and obesity risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2012.

  7. Cameron AJ, Zimmet PZ, Dunstan DW, Dalton M, Shaw JE, Welborn TA, et al. Overweight and obesity in Australia: the 1999–2000 australian diabetes, obesity and lifestyle study (AusDiab). Med J Aust. 2003;178(9):427–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Seidell JC, editor, editor. Epidemiology of obesity. Seminars in vascular medicine; 2005: Copyright© 2005 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New &#8230

  9. Rezazadeh A, Rashidkhani B. The association of general and central obesity with major dietary patterns of adult women living in Tehran. Iran J nutritional Sci vitaminology. 2010;56(2):132–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bolton D. What is mental disorder?: an essay in philosophy, science, and values. Oxford University Press; 2008.

  11. Kessler RC, Sampson NA, Berglund P, Gruber M, Al-Hamzawi A, Andrade L, et al. Anxious and non-anxious major depressive disorder in the World Health Organization World Mental Health surveys. Epidemiol psychiatric Sci. 2015;24(3):210–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yeshaw Y, Mossie A. Depression, anxiety, stress, and their associated factors among Jimma University staff, Jimma, Southwest Ethiopia, 2016: a cross-sectional study. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017;13:2803.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hahn C, Oh JH, Joo S-H, Jeong J-E, Chae J-H, Lee C-U, et al. Association between mental health status and bone mineral density: analysis of the 2008–2010 Korea national health and nutrition examination survey. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(11):e0187425.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Dores RM, Londraville RL, Prokop J, Davis P, Dewey N, Lesinski N. Molecular evolution of GPCRs: melanocortin/melanocortin receptors. J Mol Endocrinol. 2014;52(3):T29–T42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mulugeta A, Zhou A, Vimaleswaran KS, Dickson C, Hyppönen E. Depression increases the genetic susceptibility to high body mass index: evidence from UK Biobank. Depress Anxiety. 2019;36(12):1154–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Opie R, Itsiopoulos C, Parletta N, Sanchez-Villegas A, Akbaraly TN, Ruusunen A, et al. Dietary recommendations for the prevention of depression. Nutr Neurosci. 2017;20(3):161–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sadeghirad B, Haghdoost A-A, Amin-Esmaeili M, Ananloo ES, Ghaeli P, Rahimi-Movaghar A, et al. Epidemiology of major depressive disorder in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Prev Med. 2010;1(2):81.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. De Wit L, Luppino F, van Straten A, Penninx B, Zitman F, Cuijpers P. Depression and obesity: a meta-analysis of community-based studies. Psychiatry Res. 2010;178(2):230–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Patsalos O, Keeler J, Schmidt U, Penninx BW, Young AH, Himmerich H. Diet, obesity, and Depression: a systematic review. J personalized Med. 2021;11(3):176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Khalid S, Williams CM, Reynolds SA. Is there an association between diet and depression in children and adolescents? A systematic review. Br J Nutr. 2016;116(12):2097–108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sanchez-Villegas A, Henriquez P, Bes-Rastrollo M, Doreste J. Mediterranean diet and depression. Public Health Nutr. 2006;9(8A):1104–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sanchez-Villegas A, Martínez-González MA. Diet, a new target to prevent depression? BMC Med. 2013;11(1):1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rahe C, Unrath M, Berger K. Dietary patterns and the risk of depression in adults: a systematic review of observational studies. Eur J Nutr. 2014;53(4):997–1013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Khosravi M, Sotoudeh G, Majdzadeh R, Nejati S, Darabi S, Raisi F, et al. Healthy and unhealthy dietary patterns are related to depression: a case-control study. Psychiatry Invest. 2015;12(4):434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gregório MJ, Rodrigues AM, Eusébio M, Sousa RD, Dias S, Andre B, et al. Dietary patterns characterized by high meat consumption are associated with other unhealthy life styles and depression symptoms. Front Nutr. 2017;4:25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Bakhtiyari M, Ehrampoush E, Enayati N, Joodi G, Sadr S, Delpisheh A, et al. Anxiety as a consequence of modern dietary pattern in adults in Tehran—Iran. Eat Behav. 2013;14(2):107–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cuevas-Sierra A, Milagro FI, Aranaz P, Martínez JA, Riezu-Boj JI. Gut microbiota differences according to ultra-processed food consumption in a spanish population. Nutrients. 2021;13(8):2710.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Akbaraly TN, Brunner EJ, Ferrie JE, Marmot MG, Kivimaki M, Singh-Manoux A. Dietary pattern and depressive symptoms in middle age. Br J Psychiatry. 2009;195(5):408–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Gómez-Donoso C, Sánchez-Villegas A, Martínez-González MA, Gea A, Mendonça RdD, Lahortiga-Ramos F, et al. Ultra-processed food consumption and the incidence of depression in a Mediterranean cohort: the SUN Project. Eur J Nutr. 2020;59(3):1093–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Toh KL, Jones CR, He Y, Eide EJ, Hinz WA, Virshup DM, et al. An h Per2 phosphorylation site mutation in familial advanced sleep phase syndrome. Science. 2001;291(5506):1040–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Haytowitz D, Bhagwat S, Prior R, Wu X, Gebhardt S, Holden J. Oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) of selected foods-2007. Nutr Data Lab ARS USDA; 2007.

  32. Alpert JE, Fava M. Nutrition and depression: the role of folate. Nutr Rev. 1997;55(5):145–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bender A, Hagan KE, Kingston N. The association of folate and depression: a meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Res. 2017;95:9–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Selhub J, Bagley LC, Miller J, Rosenberg IH. B vitamins, homocysteine, and neurocognitive function in the elderly. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71(2):614S–20S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Pano O, Martínez-Lapiscina EH, Sayón-Orea C, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Martinez JA, Sanchez-Villegas A. Healthy diet, depression and quality of life: a narrative review of biological mechanisms and primary prevention opportunities. World J psychiatry. 2021;11(11):997.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Francis HM, Stevenson RJ, Chambers JR, Gupta D, Newey B, Lim CK. A brief diet intervention can reduce symptoms of depression in young adults–A randomised controlled trial. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(10):e0222768.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Molendijk M, Molero P, Sánchez-Pedreño FO, Van der Does W, Martínez-González MA. Diet quality and depression risk: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Affect Disord. 2018;226:346–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Grant SF, Bradfield JP, Zhang H, Wang K, Kim CE, Annaiah K, et al. Investigation of the locus near MC4R with childhood obesity in Americans of European and African ancestry. Obesity. 2009;17(7):1461–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Whitaker BN, Fisher PL, Jambhekar S, Com G, Razzaq S, Thompson JE, et al. Impact of degree of obesity on sleep, quality of life, and depression in youth. J Pediatr Health Care. 2018;32(2):e37–e44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Qi L, Kraft P, Hunter DJ, Hu FB. The common obesity variant near MC4R gene is associated with higher intakes of total energy and dietary fat, weight change and diabetes risk in women. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17(22):3502–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Doglikuu B-ID, Djazayery A, Mirzababaei A, Sajjadi SF, Badruj N, Mirzaei K. Does Interaction between Sleep Quality and major dietary patterns predicts Depression among overweight and obese women in Iran? Iran J Public Health. 2021;50(7):1445.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Yilmaz Z, Davis C, Loxton NJ, Kaplan AS, Levitan RD, Carter JC, et al. Association between MC4R rs17782313 polymorphism and overeating behaviors. Int J Obes. 2015;39(1):114–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Koochakpoor G, Daneshpour MS, Mirmiran P, Hosseini SA, Hosseini-Esfahani F, Sedaghatikhayat B, et al. The effect of interaction between Melanocortin-4 receptor polymorphism and dietary factors on the risk of metabolic syndrome. Nutr metabolism. 2016;13(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Park S, Daily JW, Zhang X, Jin HS, Lee HJ, Lee YH. Interactions with the MC4R rs17782313 variant, mental stress and energy intake and the risk of obesity in Genome Epidemiology Study. Nutr metabolism. 2016;13(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ghaffarpour M, Houshiar-Rad A, Kianfar H. The manual for household measures, cooking yields factors and edible portion of foods. Tehran: Nashre Olume Keshavarzy. 1999;7(213):42–58.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Esmaillzadeh A, Kimiagar M, Mehrabi Y, Azadbakht L, Hu FB, Willett WC. Dietary patterns and markers of systemic inflammation among iranian women. J Nutr. 2007;137(4):992–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ahuja JK, Moshfegh AJ, Holden JM, Harris E. USDA food and nutrient databases provide the infrastructure for food and nutrition research, policy, and practice. J Nutr. 2013;143(2):241S–9S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and anxiety inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33(3):335–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sahebi A, Asghari MJ, Salari RS. Validation of depression anxiety and stress scale (DASS-21) for an Iranian population. 2005.

  50. Zlatohlavek L, Vrablik M, Motykova E, Ceska R, Vasickova L, Dlouha D, et al. FTO and MC4R gene variants determine BMI changes in children after intensive lifestyle intervention. Clin Biochem. 2013;46(4–5):313–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Alizadeh S, Pooyan S, Mirzababaei A, Arghavani H, Hasani H, Mirzaei K. Interaction of MC4R rs17782313 variants and dietary carbohydrate quantity and quality on basal metabolic rate and general and central obesity in overweight/obese women: a cross-sectional study. 2020.

  52. Preis SR, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, D’Agostino Sr RB, Levy D, Robins SJ, et al. Neck circumference as a novel measure of cardiometabolic risk: the Framingham Heart study. J Clin Endocrinol metabolism. 2010;95(8):3701–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Aung K, Lorenzo C, Hinojosa MA, Haffner SM. Risk of developing diabetes and cardiovascular disease in metabolically unhealthy normal-weight and metabolically healthy obese individuals. J Clin Endocrinol Metabolism. 2014;99(2):462–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Naderyan S, Sahaf R, Akbari Kamrani AA, Abolfathi Momtaz Y, Ghasemzadeh H, Papi S. Physical activity among iranian former sportsmen and athletes as possible evidence for continuity theory of aging. Iran Rehabilitation J. 2019;17(2):141–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Yarizadeh H, Mirzababaei A, Ghodoosi N, Pooyan S, Djafarian K, Clark CC, et al. The interaction between the dietary inflammatory index and MC4R gene variants on cardiovascular risk factors. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(2):488–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kim WK, Shin D, Song WO. Are dietary patterns associated with depression in US adults? J Med Food. 2016;19(11):1074–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Sánchez-Villegas A, Verberne L, De Irala J, Ruiz-Canela M, Toledo E, Serra-Majem L, et al. Dietary fat intake and the risk of depression: the SUN Project. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(1):e16268.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Westover AN, Marangell LB. A cross-national relationship between sugar consumption and major depression? Depress Anxiety. 2002;16(3):118–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Hu FB. Dietary pattern analysis: a new direction in nutritional epidemiology. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2002;13(1):3–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Lopez-Garcia E, Schulze MB, Fung TT, Meigs JB, Rifai N, Manson JE, et al. Major dietary patterns are related to plasma concentrations of markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80(4):1029–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Kamphuis MH. Depression and cardiovascular disease: the role of diet, lifestyle and health. Utrecht University; 2006.

  62. Tiemeier H, Hofman A, van Tuijl HR, Kiliaan AJ, Meijer J, Breteler MM. Inflammatory proteins and depression in the elderly. Epidemiology. 2003:103–7.

  63. Zunszain PA, Hepgul N, Pariante CM. Inflammation and depression. Behavioral neurobiology of depression and its treatment. 2012:135–51.

  64. Adjibade M, Assmann KE, Andreeva VA, Lemogne C, Hercberg S, Galan P, et al. Prospective association between adherence to the Mediterranean diet and risk of depressive symptoms in the french SU. VI. MAX cohort. Eur J Nutr. 2018;57(3):1225–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Skarupski KA, Tangney C, Li H, Evans D, Morris M. Mediterranean diet and depressive symptoms among older adults over time. J Nutr Health Aging. 2013;17(5):441–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Putra ES, Wasita B, Anantanyu S. A randomised trial on walking exercise and banana consumption on self-reported depression symptoms among female adolescents in Surakarta, Indonesia. Mal J Nutr. 2018;24(3):467–73.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Li Y, Lv M-R, Wei Y-J, Sun L, Zhang J-X, Zhang H-G, et al. Dietary patterns and depression risk: a meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2017;253:373–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Liu Y, Ozodiegwu ID, Yu Y, Hess R, Bie R. An association of health behaviors with depression and metabolic risks: data from 2007 to 2014 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Affect Disord. 2017;217:190–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Rius-Ottenheim N, Kromhout D, Sijtsma FP, Geleijnse JM, Giltay EJ. Dietary patterns and mental health after myocardial infarction. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(10):e0186368.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Nguyen B, Ding D, Mihrshahi S. Fruit and vegetable consumption and psychological distress: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses based on a large australian sample. BMJ open. 2017;7(3):e014201.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Ortega-Azorín C, Sorlí JV, Asensio EM, Coltell O, Martínez-González M, Salas-Salvadó J, et al. Associations of the FTO rs9939609 and the MC4R rs17782313 polymorphisms with type 2 diabetes are modulated by diet, being higher when adherence to the Mediterranean diet pattern is low. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2012;11(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Rukh G, Sonestedt E, Melander O, Hedblad B, Wirfält E, Ericson U, et al. Genetic susceptibility to obesity and diet intakes: association and interaction analyses in the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study. Genes & nutrition. 2013;8(6):535–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Chen Y, Liu H, Wang L, Zhou T, Liang Z, Li W, et al. Lifestyle intervention modifies the effect of the MC4R genotype on changes in insulin resistance among women with prior gestational diabetes: Tianjin Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Prevention Program. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;110(3):750–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the school of Nutritional and Dietetics at Tehran University of medical sciences and participants in this investigation.

Funding

This work was supported financially by the Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) (Grant ID: 95-04-161-33833).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MM, and AM designed the research and collected the samples; MM, CC, AM, and RGE wrote the paper; MM analyzed data; MM conducted research and had primary responsibility for final content. KhM supervised the whole project. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khadijeh Mirzaei.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Study protocol was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki in the declaration. Ethical approval, and associated number: IR.TUMS.VCR.REC.1399.558 was obtained from the Ethics Commission of the TUMS. Informed consent statement for all participants was included (Including illiterate). Each participant was completely informed about the study protocol and provided a written and informed consent form before taking part in the study. Informed consent for illiterate subjects were obtained from legal representative.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hajmir, M.M., Mirzababaei, A., Clark, C.C.T. et al. The interaction between MC4R gene variant (rs17782313) and dominant dietary patterns on depression in obese and overweight women: a cross sectional study. BMC Endocr Disord 23, 83 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-023-01335-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-023-01335-0

Keywords