Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Diabetes, even newly defined by HbA1c testing, is associated with an increased risk of in-hospital death in adults with COVID-19

BMC Endocrine Disorders volume 21, Article number: 56 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Diabetes is associated with poor coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes. However, little is known on the impact of undiagnosed diabetes in the COVID-19 population. We investigated whether diabetes, particularly undiagnosed diabetes, was associated with an increased risk of death from COVID-19.

Methods

This retrospective study identified adult patients with COVID-19 admitted to Tongji Hospital (Wuhan) from January 28 to April 4, 2020. Diabetes was determined using patients’ past history (diagnosed) or was newly defined if the hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level at admission was ≥6.5% (48 mmol/mol) (undiagnosed). The in-hospital mortality rate and survival probability were compared between the non-diabetes and diabetes (overall, diagnosed, and undiagnosed diabetes) groups. Risk factors of mortality were explored using Cox regression analysis.

Results

Of 373 patients, 233 were included in the final analysis, among whom 80 (34.3%) had diabetes: 44 (55.0%) reported a diabetes history, and 36 (45.0%) were newly defined as having undiagnosed diabetes by HbA1c testing at admission. Compared with the non-diabetes group, the overall diabetes group had a significantly increased mortality rate (22.5% vs. 5.9%, p <  0.001). Moreover, the overall, diagnosed, and undiagnosed diabetes groups displayed lower survival probability in the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (all p <  0.01). Using multivariate Cox regression, diabetes, age, quick sequential organ failure assessment score, and D-dimer ≥1.0 μg/mL were identified as independent risk factors for in-hospital death in patients with COVID-19.

Conclusions

The prevalence of undiagnosed pre-existing diabetes among patients with COVID-19 is high in China. Diabetes, even newly defined by HbA1c testing at admission, is associated with increased mortality in patients with COVID-19. Screening for undiagnosed diabetes by HbA1c measurement should be considered in adult Chinese inpatients with COVID-19.

Peer Review reports

Background

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [1], has spread worldwide, resulting in more than 100 million confirmed infections and over two million deaths as of 1 March, 2021 (see https://covid19.who.int) [2].

The reported mortality rate for hospitalised patients with COVID-19 ranges from 1.4 to 22.5%, which may be due to different characteristics of patient populations, such as age, comorbidities, and the availability of medical resources [3,4,5,6]. Studies have shown that elderly patients with underlying comorbidities are at a greater risk of poor outcomes [7,8,9]. In particular, several studies have highlighted the association between diabetes and poor COVID-19 prognosis. Diabetes is a common comorbidity, and more patients with severe cases of COVID-19 have diabetes than patients with mild symptoms [8, 10,11,12]. Patients with diabetes also have a higher mortality rate than those without diabetes [13,14,15]. However, the diagnostic rate of diabetes is currently low, particularly in China [16], leaving many patients undiagnosed and untreated. There is little information on the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes in the COVID-19 population and whether undiagnosed diabetes is associated with an increased risk of death from COVID-19.

In this retrospective observational study, we described the prevalence of diabetes, including previously diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes, in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 at a tertiary medical centre in Wuhan, China. Moreover, we investigated whether diabetes, particularly undiagnosed diabetes, was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital death in patients with COVID-19.

Methods

Study design and population

This retrospective study aimed to investigate the impact of diabetes on the prognosis of COVID-19. We screened all adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 who were admitted to the COVID-19 wards at Zhongfaxincheng campus of Tongji Hospital in Wuhan, China, from January 28, 2020 to April 4, 2020. In Wuhan, critical, severe, and most moderate patients with COVID-19 were directly admitted to tertiary medical centres such as our institution. Mild patients and a few moderate patients were treated in Fangcang temporary shelter hospitals [17]. If the disease progressed, patients were transferred to tertiary medical centres for further treatment. We excluded transferred patients from Fangcang hospitals to eliminate bias associated with pre-admission treatments. We also excluded patients who lacked records of medical history, vital signs and routine blood test data, and those who had other serious comorbidities (end-stage renal disease or diseases requiring corticosteroid or immunosuppressant therapy) (Fig. 1). All the paitents were followed up to their discharge or in-hospital death.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram

Full size image

This study was approved by the Ethics Commission of Peking University Third Hospital (IRB 00006761-M2020060).

Definition of COVID-19, disease severity and diabetes

The diagnosis of COVID-19 was confirmed if a suspect case with at least two clinical manifestations of COVID-19 was tested positively for SARS-CoV-2 using quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays of nasopharyngeal samples, according to the guideline for COVID-19 issued by the Chinese National Health Committee (version seven). Disease severity classification and treatment protocol were also based on this guideline [18]. Diabetes was determined based on self-reported diabetes history. If patients denied having a history of diabetes and their hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels at admission were ≥ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) without hemoglobinopathy, they were established to have diabetes.

Data abstraction

Using a standardised data collection form, the epidemiological records, demographic data, clinical manifestations, laboratory findings, treatment, and outcome data of patients with COVID-19 were extracted from electronic medical records. All data were collected as of April 4, 2020 and were independently checked by two physicians, and a third researcher adjudicated any difference in interpretation between the two physicians.

Quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) scores were calculated based on systolic blood pressure, respiratory rate in room air, and mental status at admission [19]. Laboratory findings included first in-hospital routine blood test, liver and kidney function test, fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c levels, coagulation profile, and inflammatory markers. HbA1c testing was performed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HA-8180, Arkray; Kyoto, Japan).

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics (version 23.0, IBM; Armonk, NY). Graphs were conducted with R software (version 4.0.2, R Foundation). The normality of distributions of continuous variables was checked by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Data that were not normally distributed are expressed as medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs). Categorical variables are presented as numbers and percentages. Comparisons between groups were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test, χ2 test, or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Clinical features and 28-day all-cause mortality during hospitalisation were analysed and compared between patients with and without diabetes. Cumulative survival rates were plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test. Risk factors associated with in-hospital death and their corresponding hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were analysed using univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses (likelihood ratio method). Sensitivity analysis was performed in a subgroup of patients with HbA1c results at admission, and risk factors for in-hospital death were also evaluated with logistic regression analysis. A two-sided P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Clinical characteristics of patients at admission

Of the 373 patients with COVID-19, 101 patients transferred from Fangcang hospitals were excluded. An additional 39 patients were excluded because of missing key variables (30 cases), end-stage renal disease (six cases), renal transplantation (two cases), and systemic lupus erythematosus under continuous corticosteroid therapy (one case). In total, 233 patients were included in the final analysis. Eighty (34.3%) patients had diabetes, among whom 44 (55.0%) were previously diagnosed and 36 (45.0%) were newly defined as having undiagnosed diabetes with an HbA1c level ≥ 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) at admission (Fig. 1). All of them were classified as having type 2 diabetes (T2D) based on the physicians’ clinical evaluation. One middle-aged woman with undiagnosed diabetes developed diabetic ketoacidosis on admission. She achieved well controlled glucose level with oral antidiabetic drugs after receiving intensive insulin therapy and supportive treatment for COVID-19.

The demographic and clinical characteristics and laboratory findings of patients with COVID-19 at admission are presented in Table 1. The median age was 64 years, and there were 115 (49.4%) males. The most common comorbidities other than diabetes were hypertension (90 cases, 38.6%), coronary artery disease (26 cases, 11.2%), and cerebrovascular disease (12 cases, 5.2%). At admission, 115 (49.4%), 95 (40.8%), and 23 (9.8%) patients were classified as moderate, severe, and critical cases, respectively.

Table 1 Demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics at admission, and in-hospital death in patients with COVID-19
Full size table

The median age was higher in patients with T2D than in those without diabetes, and patients with T2D also had a higher rate of pre-existing hypertension and coronary artery disease. More patients in the diabetes group were classified as having severe and critical cases than those in the non-diabetes group. No significant difference was found between groups in sex, other comorbidities, or qSOFA score at admission. Patients with T2D had higher fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c levels, higher white blood cell counts, lower lymphocyte counts, and higher serum creatinine and D-dimer levels at admission than patiens without diabetes (Table 1).

In the subgroup analysis, patients with undiagnosed diabetes had more comorbid chronic pulmonary diseases, higher qSOFA scores, more severe and critical cases, higher fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c levels, higher white blood cell counts, and higher serum creatinine and D-dimer levels at admission than those without diabetes (Additional Table 1).

In-hospital mortality rate

Twenty-seven patient deaths occurred during hospitalisation, all within 28 days after admission. The in-hospital mortality rate was higher in the overall (22.5% vs. 5.9%, p <  0.001), diagnosed (22.7% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.001), and undiagnosed diabetes (22.2% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.002) groups than in the non-diabetes group (Table 1, Additional Table 1). The mortality rate did not significantly differ between patients with undiagnosed and diagnosed diabetes (22.2% vs. 22.7%, p = 0.957). The survival curves of patients with or without diabetes are shown in Fig. 2a, indicating that the survival probability was lower in patients with diabetes than in those without. Moreover, the probability of survival was significantly decreased in patients with both diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes compared to those without diabetes (Fig. 2b and c). In a subgroup of 140 patients who had their HbA1c level tested, the survival probability was still lower in patients in the overall, diagnosed, and undiagnosed diabetes groups than in the non-diabetes group (Additional Fig. 1).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Survival probability of inpatients with COVID-19. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of patients with COVID-19 belonging to the overall diabetes (a), diagnosed diabetes (b), and undiagnosed diabetes (c) groups versus that of patients in the non-diabetes group. The blue and pink areas represent 95% CIs

Full size image

Risk factors associated with in-hospital death in patients with COVID-19

To further investigate whether diabetes was independently associated with an increased risk of mortality in patients with COVID-19, Cox regression analysis was performed. Using univariable analysis, it was found that the risk of in-hospital death was significantly increased in all patients with diabetes (HR 3.80, 95% CI 1.71–8.47), those with diagnosed diabetes (HR 4.03, 95% CI 1.64–9.91), and those with undiagnosed diabetes who were newly defined by HbA1c testing at admission (HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.18–3.05) compared to those without diabetes. Age, qSOFA score, white blood cell count, lymphocyte count, fasting plasma glucose level, and D-dimer level ≥ 1 μg/mL at admission were also significantly associated with the risk of in-hospital death (Table 2). Additionally, patients with high HbA1c (≥ 6.5%) or fasting glucose level (≥ 7.0 mmol/L) at admission had increased mortality risk (Table 3).

Table 2 Risk factors associated with in-hospital death in patients with COVID-19 by Cox regression analysis
Full size table
Table 3 Glycaemic level at admission and the risk of in-hospital death in patients with COVID-19
Full size table

Subsequently, we used age, diabetes, qSOFA score, lymphocyte count, and high D-dimer level as variables for multivariable Cox regression analysis. In addition, male sex and chronic pulmonary disease, which both reached 10% significance in the univariable analysis, were also included. A total of 223 patients with complete data for all analysed variables were included in the multivariable Cox regression model. Age (HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02–1.10), diabetes (HR 2.64, 95% CI 1.14–6.11), qSOFA score (HR 2.80, 95% CI 1.58–4.97), and D-dimer level ≥ 1 μg/mL (HR 3.28, 95% CI 1.12–9.64) at admission were independently associated with an increased risk of in-hospital death in patients with COVID-19 (Table 2). Results of the multivariable logistic regression analysis were consistent with those of the Cox regression analysis (Additional Table 2).

Discussion

In this retrospective observational study, the prevalence of diabetes in patients with non-mild COVID-19 cases was 34.3%. Among the patients with T2D, 45.0% were unaware of their underlying diabetes condition before admission. Diabetes was independently associated with an increased risk of in-hospital death in patients with COVID-19. Notably, patients with undiagnosed diabetes who were newly defined by HbA1c testing at admission had an increased risk of mortality during hospitalisation similar to that of patients with diagnosed diabetes, compared with their non-diabetes counterparts.

Diabetes has been garnering attention in terms of its prevalence and impact in the COVID-19 population. A report on the largest case series of COVID-19 in China, conducted by the Chinese National Emergency Response Epidemiology Team, showed that the prevalence of diabetes among 44,672 confirmed Chinese mainland patients with COVID-19 was 5.3% [20]. Observational studies and meta-analyses reported that the prevalence of pre-existing diabetes in Chinese patients with COVID-19 ranged from 8.2 to 19.0% [8, 21,22,23]. Here, we showed a much higher prevalence of diabetes (34.3%) in patients with COVID-19. This could be due to two reasons. First, our patients were from one of the national intensive care centres for COVID-19 that only admitted moderate to critical patients. The patients in our study were older and had more severe conditions than those in the nationwide analysis [20, 21]. Therefore, a higher prevalence of diabetes was expected in this study, similar to that reported by medical centres in Western countries [6, 11, 24, 25]. This might also suggest an association between pre-existing diabetes and an increased severity of COVID-19. Second, we included patients with newly diagnosed diabetes defined by HbA1c testing at admission. By contrast, most previous studies reported the prevalence of diabetes as a comorbidity according to patient histories of those with COVID-19, and patients who were included in non-diabetes groups had no available HbA1c data [23] or some of them had HbA1c levels over 6.5% [10]. In the most recent national epidemiological survey involving 75,880 adult participants, the prevalence of overall, self-reported, and newly diagnosed diabetes based on the American Diabetes Association criteria were 12.8, 6.0, and 6.8%, respectively, in China [26]. In agreement with that study, we found that approximately 50% of patients with T2D (elevated HbA1c levels) were undiagnosed before admission. HbA1c was first introduced into the American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria of diabetes in 2010 [27]. HbA1c testing can well represent average blood glucose levels within 2–3 months before testing and is not influenced by factors such as acute infection, stress, or recent medications that could alter glucose metabolism, like corticosteroids. Moreover, HbA1c testing does not require fasting. Therefore, HbA1c is a reasonable diagnostic parameter for the quick identification of the background glucose metabolic state in severe and critical patients with COVID-19. Because diabetes is one of the most common comorbidities in patients with COVID-19 and is associated with poor outcomes, HbA1c testing at admission can provide important information for patient assessment and help identify those who have not been diagnosed but are at great risk.

It has been shown that patients with diabetes have poorer COVID-19 outcomes. The prevalence of diabetes is much higher in patients with COVID-19 treated in intensive care units than in those treated in general wards [5]. Patients with diabetes had a higher risk of developing severe or critical COVID-19 [23] and having multiple-organ damage, and a higher mortality rate than patients without diabetes [10, 11, 14, 15, 20]. The risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation was elevated in community people with poorly controlled diagnosed diabetes, and even in those with undiagnosed diabetes (HbA1c ≥ 6.5% at baseline) [28]. It is not surprising that both higher HbA1c and fasting glucose levels at admission were associated with higher mortality rate which were found by our and previous studies [29, 30]. Similar to previous studies [8, 21], our data indicated that diabetes, together with advanced age, a high qSOFA score, and coagulation disorders, was a risk factor for in-hospital death in moderate to critical patients with COVID-19. Similarly, diabetes was also previously reported as a major risk factor for mortality in severe acute respiratory syndrome in 2003 and Middle East respiratory syndrome [31, 32]. Thus far, there is no established effective therapy for reducing the mortality rate of COVID-19. However, a recent study reported that a well-controlled blood glucose level in patients with diabetes during hospitalisation was associated with a markedly reduced mortality from COVID-19, in comparison with poorly controlled glycaemia [10]. Therefore, identifying undiagnosed diabetes provides awareness of the background glycaemic disorder, thereby facilitating appropriate intervention for at-risk patients with coronavirus infections, including glucose monitoring and glycaemic control, and possibly better outcomes.

The underlying mechanism of the impact of diabetes on the prognosis of COVID-19 is still under investigation. It is well known that patients with diabetes are usually older and have more complications or comorbidities than those without diabetes. Increased number of underlying cardiometabolic conditions (e.g., diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidaemia) is associated with higher mortality rate in patients with COVID-19 [33]. Notably, in line with our findings, several studies also showed that diabetes was an independent risk factor for poor prognosis in patients with COVID-19 after adjusted for the confounders [10, 28, 33], suggesting that diabetes itself, under its multiple mechanisms, may have adverse effects on the prognosis of COVID-19.

The dysregulated immune response caused by diabetes may contribute to increased disease severity. COVID-19 patients with diabetes have more neutrophils and a higher rate of lymphopenia [10], which is in agreement with our findings of higher white blood cell counts and lower lymphocyte counts in patients with T2D than in those without diabetes. In addition, diabetes may cause a chronic inflammatory state, elevating the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-1 (IL-1) and IL-6, and further aggravate cytokine storms in some patients with COVID-19 [34,35,36]. Accordingly, both higher HbA1c and fasting glucose levels at admission, two indicators for poor glycaemic control, are associated with excessive inflammation and hypercoagulability in patients with COVID-19 [29, 30]. Furthermore, in hyperglycaemic patients, higher plasma IL-6 levels were associated with reduced effects of tocilizumab [37], indicating that hyperglycaemia may cause exaggerative and harmful inflammation in patients with COVID-19. However, our study did not show a significant difference in serum IL-6 levels between groups.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) may be another underlying mechanism for the detrimental effects of diabetes on the prognosis of COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 gains entry into host pneumocytes by binding to ACE2 [38]. Patients with diabetes were reported to have a higher expression of ACE2, thereby facilitating viral uptake and increasing the risk of severe infection [39]. Moreover, glucose can also directly increase the viral load and upregulate the expression of ACE2 and IL-1β in SARS-CoV-2-infected monocytes in a dose-dependent manner, suggesting that individuals with elevated circulating glucose levels may be more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection and more likely to develop severe illness [40]. We noticed that patients with T2D had a higher rate of pre-existing hypertension in our study, which may bring concerns of possible effects by ACE2 inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) on the prognosis of COVID-19. However, there is no evidence that ACEIs or ARBs could increase the expression of ACE2 in human beings [41]. Importantly, there is no clinically significantly increased risk of COVID-19 diagnosis or hospital admission-related outcomes associated with ACEIs/ARBs use in prospective and retrospective cohort studies [42,43,44]. Therefore, we are not worried that ACEIs/ARBs exposure may change our findings substantially.

Our study has several advantages. Our study focused on the clinical outcomes of both undiagnosed and diagnosed diabetes in patients with COVID-19. The HbA1c determination method used in our centre is comparable to the National Glycohemoglobin Standardisation Programme standard. By testing the HbA1c level at admission, we reduced the omission diagnostic rate of diabetes and prevented the overdiagnosis of diabetes because of stress-induced hyperglycaemia. The high percentage of undiagnosed diabetes, together with the similarly worse clinical outcome of undiagnosed and diagnosed diabetes compared with non-diabetes, highlighted the importance of screening for undiagnosed diabetes by HbA1c detection in patients with COVID-19. Moreover, the patients included in this study were admitted at a single medical centre and underwent treatments following uniform clinical guidelines, thereby reducing bias resulting from different treatment methods. Finally, we presented survival curves of COVID-19 patients with and without diabetes, while most previous studies only showed final outcomes without time-kinetic changes. Shi et al. [23] reported survival curves of patients with COVID-19, in which the survival probability of patients with diabetes was lower than that of sex- and age-matched patients without diabetes. However, in their study, patients in the non-diabetes control group had no available HbA1c data, and the fasting glucose levels in some cases were over 11.1 mmol/L, indicating a high possibility of patients with undiagnosed diabetes in the control group.

Our study has some limitations. First, it was a single-centre study with a limited number of patients. We enrolled as many patients as we could and excluded patients who were transferred from Fangcang hospitals to reduce bias from pre-admission treatment. Second, not all patients had their HbA1c level tested during the hospitalisation, particularly those in the non-diabetes group, as not all medical teams in our COVID-19 wards had members specialising in endocrinology. At the very beginning of the pandemic in Wuhan, some medical staff had not realised the potential benefit of evaluating and managing glucose metabolism in patients with COVID-19. Therefore, some patients did not undergo HbA1c testing; thus, the prevalence of diabetes in our COVID-19 population may even be higher than what we reported in this study. Nevertheless, in the subgroup analysis of 140 patients with available HbA1c data, the association between lower survival probability and diabetes (overall, diagnosed, or undiagnosed diabetes) was consistent with the results of the primary analysis of all 233 patients. Third, we only included IL-6 in the risk factor analysis and did not analyse other inflammatory biomarkers, such as serum C-reactive protein (CRP) or ferritin, in the present study. Most patients were tested for high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP), rather than CRP, because hsCRP was incorporated into the biochemical analysis at our medical centre. hsCRP levels are more associated with systemic low-grade inflammation than with acute inflammatory conditions, such as COVID-19. In addition, IL-6, which is upstream of CRP as a sensitive marker for acute infection, was tested in most of our patients at admission. Therefore, we used IL-6 as the inflammatory biomarker in our Cox regression analysis. Although ferritin data were available in 223 patients, many were tested several days after admission, indicating that the levels could be confounded by other in-hospital factors. Thus, ferritin was excluded in the final analysis.

Conclusion

The prevalence of diabetes is high (34.3%) in adult patients with non-mild COVID-19 cases in China, with 45.0% of the patients being unaware of their underlying diabetes condition. Importantly, similar to patients with diagnosed diabetes, patients with undiagnosed diabetes are also at a higher risk of in-hospital death from COVID-19. Therefore, HbA1c testing should be considered for all adult inpatients with COVID-19 to help clinicians identify patients with undiagnosed diabetes and provide appropriate management for this potentially high-risk population, including glucose monitoring and glycaemic control, in order to achieve better outcomes.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ACE:

Angiotensin-converting enzyme

CI:

Confident interval

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease 2019

CRP:

C-Reactive protein

hcCRP:

High-sensitivity CRP

HbA1c:

Hemoglobin A1c

HR:

Hazard ratio

IL:

Interleukin

IQR:

Interquartile range

qSOFA:

quick sequential organ failure assessment

SARS-CoV-2:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

T2D:

Type 2 diabetes

References

  1. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(8):727–33. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization (2020) Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): situation report. Available from https://covid19.who.int/. Accessed 1 March, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(18):1708–20. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2002032.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020;323(11):1061–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.1585.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Fox T, Ruddiman K, Lo KB, Peterson E, DeJoy R 3rd, Salacup G, et al. The relationship between diabetes and clinical outcomes in COVID-19: a single-center retrospective analysis. Acta Diabetol. 2020;17:1–6 [Online ahead of print].

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hu Y, Sun J, Dai Z, Deng H, Li X, Huang Q, et al. Prevalence and severity of corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Virol. 2020;127:104371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104371.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Cao B. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1054–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Targher G, Mantovani A, Wang XB, Yan HD, Sun QF, Pan KH, Byrne CD, Zheng KI, Chen YP, Eslam M, George J, Zheng MH. Patients with diabetes are at higher risk for severe illness from COVID-19. Diabetes Metab. 2020;46(4):335–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2020.05.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu L, She ZG, Cheng X, Qin JJ, Zhang XJ, Cai J, et al. Association of Blood Glucose Control and Outcomes in Patients with COVID-19 and Pre-existing Type 2 Diabetes. Cell Metab. 2020;31(6):1068–1077.e3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, Crawford JM, McGinn T, Davidson KW, et al. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the new York City area. JAMA. 2020;323(20):2052–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.6775.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Myers LC, Parodi SM, Escobar GJ, Liu VX. Characteristics of hospitalized adults with COVID-19 in an integrated health care system in California. JAMA. 2020;323(21):2195–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.7202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Li B, Yang J, Zhao F, Zhi L, Wang X, Liu L, Bi Z, Zhao Y. Prevalence and impact of cardiovascular metabolic diseases on COVID-19 in China. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020;109(5):531–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01626-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang I, Lim MA, Pranata R. Diabetes mellitus is associated with increased mortality and severity of disease in COVID-19 pneumonia - a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(4):395–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.018.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar A, Arora A, Sharma P, Anikhindi SA, Bansal N, Singla V, Khare S, Srivastava A. Is diabetes mellitus associated with mortality and severity of COVID-19? A meta-analysis Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(4):535–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang L, Gao P, Zhang M, Huang Z, Zhang D, Deng Q, Li Y, Zhao Z, Qin X, Jin D, Zhou M, Tang X, Hu Y, Wang L. Prevalence and ethnic pattern of diabetes and Prediabetes in China in 2013. JAMA. 2017;317(24):2515–23. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.7596.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen S, Zhang Z, Yang J, Wang J, Zhai X, Bärnighausen T, Wang C. Fangcang shelter hospitals: a novel concept for responding to public health emergencies. Lancet. 2020;395(10232):1305–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30744-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. National Health Commission & State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Diagnosis and treatment protocol for novel coronavirus pneumonia (trial version 7). Chin Med J. 2020;133(9):1087–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, Brunkhorst FM, Rea TD, Scherag A, et al. Assessment of clinical criteria for Sepsis: for the third international consensus definitions for Sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):762–74. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0288.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. The Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia Emergency Response Epidemiology Team. The epidemiological characteristics of an outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) in China. Chin J Epidemiol. 2020;41(2):145–51.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Guan WJ, Liang WH, Zhao Y, Liang HR, Chen ZS, Li YM, et al. Comorbidity and its impact on 1590 patients with COVID-19 in China: a nationwide analysis. Eur Respir J. 2020;55(5):2000547. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00547-2020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang J, Zheng Y, Gou X, Pu K, Chen Z, Guo Q, et al. Prevalence of comorbidities and its effects in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;94:91–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Shi Q, Zhang X, Jiang F, Zhang X, Hu N, Bimu C, et al. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for mortality of COVID-19 patients with diabetes in Wuhan, China: a two-center, Retrospective Study. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(7):1382–91. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-0598.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Suleyman G, Fadel RA, Malette KM, Hammond C, Abdulla H, Entz A, et al. Clinical characteristics and morbidity associated with coronavirus disease 2019 in a series of patients in metropolitan Detroit. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(6):e2012270. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12270.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Cummings MJ, Baldwin MR, Abrams D, Jacobson SD, Meyer BJ, Balough EM, et al. Epidemiology, clinical course, and outcomes of critically ill adults with COVID-19 in New York city: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10239):1763–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31189-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Li Y, Teng D, Shi X, Qin G, Qin Y, Quan H, et al. Prevalence of diabetes recorded in mainland China using 2018 diagnostic criteria from the American Diabetes Association: national cross sectional study. BMJ. 2020;369:m997.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2010. Diabetes Care. 2010;33 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hamer M, Gale CR, Batty GD. Diabetes, glycaemic control, and risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation: population-based, prospective cohort study. Metabolism. 2020;22(112):154344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang Z, Du Z, Zhu F. Glycosylated hemoglobin is associated with systemic inflammation, hypercoagulability, and prognosis of COVID-19 patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020;164:108214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108214.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Sardu C, D'Onofrio N, Balestrieri ML, Barbieri M, Rizzo MR, Messina V, et al. Outcomes in patients with hyperglycemia affected by COVID-19: can we do more on glycemic control? Diabetes Care. 2020;43(7):1408–15. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-0723.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang JK, Feng Y, Yuan MY, Yuan SY, Fu HJ, Wu BY, et al. Plasma glucose levels and diabetes are independent predictors for mortality and morbidity in patients with SARS. Diabet Med. 2006;23(6):623–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01861.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. ALqahtani FY, Aleanizy FS, Mohamed R, Alanazi MS, Mohamed N, Alrasheed MM, et al. Prevalence of comorbidities in cases of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: a retrospective study. Epidemiol Infect. 2018;147(e35):1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Maddaloni E, D'Onofrio L, Alessandri F, Mignogna C, Leto G, Pascarella G, et al. Cardiometabolic multimorbidity is associated with a worse Covid-19 prognosis than individual cardiometabolic risk. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020;19(1):164. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-020-01140-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. McGonagle D, Sharif K, O'Regan A, Bridgewood C. The role of cytokines including Interleukin-6 in COVID-19 induced pneumonia and macrophage activation syndrome-like disease. Autoimmun Rev. 2020;19(6):102537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102537.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, Sanchez E, Tattersall RS, Manson JJ, et al. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1033–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30628-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Apicella M, Campopiano MC, Mantuano M, Mazoni L, Coppelli A, Del Prato S. COVID-19 in people with diabetes: understanding the reasons for worse outcomes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;8(9):782–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30238-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Marfella R, Paolisso P, Sardu C, Bergamaschi L, D'Angelo EC, Barbieri M, et al. Negative impact of hyperglycaemia on tocilizumab therapy in Covid-19 patients. Diabetes Metab. 2020;46(5):403–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2020.05.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, Krüger N, Herrler T, Erichsen S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell. 2020;181(2):271–280.e8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Li Y, Xu Q, Ma L, Wu D, Gao J, Chen G, Li H. Systematic profiling of ACE2 expression in diverse physiological and pathological conditions for COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24(16):9478–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.15607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Codo AC, Davanzo GG, Monteiro LB, de Souza GF, Muraro SP, Virgilio-da-Silva JV, et al. Elevated Glucose Levels Favor SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Monocyte Response through a HIF-1alpha/Glycolysis-Dependent Axis. Cell Metab. 2020;32(3):437–446.e5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Alexandre J, Cracowski JL, Richard V, Bouhanick B. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and COVID-19 infection. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2020;81(2–3):63–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ando.2020.04.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sardu C, Maggi P, Messina V, Iuliano P, Sardu A, Iovinella V, et al. Could anti-hypertensive drug therapy affect the clinical prognosis of hypertensive patients with COVID-19 infection? Data from centers of southern Italy. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(17):e016948. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.016948.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Morales DR, Conover MM, You SC, Pratt N, Kostka K, Duarte-Salles T, et al. Renin-angiotensin system blockers and susceptibility to COVID-19: an international, open science, cohort analysis. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;S2589–7500(20):30289–2.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Tian C, Li N, Bai Y, Xiao H, Li S, Ge QG, et al. Angiotensin converting enzymes inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers should be continued in COVID-19 patients with hypertension. World J Clin Cases. 2021;9(1):47–60. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i1.47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Liu Y, Cheng Q, Wang J, Li S, Tian C, Li Y, et al. Family companion between patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a retrospective observational study. Chin Med J. 2020;133(20):2507–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001114.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge all patients and all health-care workers in our isolation ward of COVID-19. We thank Ms. Wenhui Zhang and Ms. Xue Qu from Peking University Third Hospital for their kind help in data collection.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1313900), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81830022). The sponsors had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Ye Liu, Ran Lu and Junhong Wang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, P.R. China

    Ye Liu, Ran Lu, Yunyi Le, Haining Wang, Wenhua Xiao, Hongwei Gao & Tianpei Hong

  2. Department of Emergency, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, P.R. China

    Junhong Wang

  3. Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, P.R. China

    Qin Cheng

  4. Department of Cardiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, P.R. China

    Ruitao Zhang

  5. Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, P.R. China

    Shuisheng Zhang

  6. Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, P.R. China

    Lin Zeng

Authors
  1. Ye Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ran Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Junhong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qin Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ruitao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shuisheng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yunyi Le
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Haining Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Wenhua Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Hongwei Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Lin Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Tianpei Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YL, RL and TH contributed to the study conception and design. Data collection, analysis and interpretation were performed by YL, JW, QC, RZ, SZ, YLe, WX and LZ. The first draft of the manuscript was written by YL, RL and HW. Critical manuscript revision was performed by HG and TH. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tianpei Hong.

Ethics declarations

Data included in other reports

53 patients among the 373 patients in this study has been included in our previous research on the family companion between patients with COVID-19 [45]. No data about their glucose level has been reported previously.

Consent to participate and publish

Because COVID-19 is an emerging infectious disease, the requirement for written informed consent was waived by the Ethics Commission. Moreover, this study analysed deidentified participant data for which formal consent is not required.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study design was granted by the Ethics Commission of Peking University Third Hospital (IRB 00006761-M2020060). The access to the raw data was permitted both by Peking University Third Hospital and Zhongfaxincheng campus of Tongji Hospital in Wuhan.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Survival probability of inpatients with COVID-19 who underwent HbA1c testing. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of patients with COVID-19 belonging to the overall diabetes (a), diagnosed diabetes (b), and undiagnosed diabetes (c) groups versus that of patients without diabetes in a subgroup of participants who had their HbA1c tested at admission. The blue and pink areas represent 95% CIs. HbA1c hemoglobin A1c.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Lu, R., Wang, J. et al. Diabetes, even newly defined by HbA1c testing, is associated with an increased risk of in-hospital death in adults with COVID-19. BMC Endocr Disord 21, 56 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-021-00717-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-021-00717-6

Keywords

BMC Endocrine Disorders

ISSN: 1472-6823

Contact us