Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Endocrine Disorders

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Short-term effectiveness of low dose liraglutide in combination with metformin versus high dose liraglutide alone in treatment of obese PCOS: randomized trial

  • Mojca Jensterle1,
  • Nika Aleksandra Kravos1,
  • Katja Goričar2 and
  • Andrej Janez1Email author
BMC Endocrine DisordersBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:5

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-017-0155-9

Received: 29 October 2016

Accepted: 21 January 2017

Published: 31 January 2017

Abstract

Background

Liraglutide 3 mg was recently approved as an anti-obesity drug. Metformin is weight neutral, yet it could enhance the therapeutic index of GLP-1 agonist. We compared weight-lowering potential of liraglutide 1.2 mg in combination with metformin to liraglutide 3 mg monotherapy in obese PCOS.

Methods

Thirty obese women with PCOS (aged 33.1 ± 6.1 years, BMI 38.3 ± 5.4 kg/m2) were randomized to combination (COMBO) of metformin (MET) 1000 mg BID and liraglutide 1.2 mg QD (N = 15) or liraglutide 3 mg (LIRA3) QD alone (N = 15) for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was change in anthropometric measures of obesity.

Results

Both treatments led to significant weight loss (−3.6 ± 2.5 kg, p = 0.002 in COMBO vs −6.3 ± 3.7 kg, p = 0.001 in LIRA3). BMI and waist circumference reduction in LIRA3 was greater than in COMBO (−2.2 ± 1.3 vs −1.3 ± 0.9 kg/m2 , p = 0.05 and −4.2 ± 3.4 vs −2.2 ± 6.2 cm, p = 0.014, respectively). Both interventions resulted in a significant decrease of post-OGTT glucose levels. COMBO significantly reduced total testosterone and was associated with less nausea.

Conclusions

Short-term interventions with COMBO and LIRA3 both led to significant improvement of measures of obesity in obese PCOS, LIRA3 being superior to COMBO. However, COMBO further improved androgen profile beyond weight reduction and was associated with better tolerability.

Trial registration

The study was retrospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02909933) on 16th of September 2016.

Keywords

LiraglutideMetforminObesityPCOS

Background

Obesity is present in 50–80% of women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) [1]. Even a modest weight loss of 5–10% is primarily important for reduction of cardiovascular risk factors and improvement of fertility potential [24]. First line recommended lifestyle therapy for weight management often remains unsatisfactory and non-sustainable in clinical practice [57].

Liraglutide, a long acting glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue, has a dose dependent dual beneficial effect. It improves glucose homoeostasis and reduces body weight. As anti-diabetic therapy is approved at doses up to 1.8 mg [8], whereas higher doses are required for maximum weight reduction [9, 10]. Liraglutide 3 mg led to decreases in body weight of more than 5 to as much as 15% [11] and was recently approved for weight management in many countries. Exposure to higher doses was not linked with deterioration in safety when compared with lower doses but to potential higher frequency of gastrointestinal side effects [12].

Metformin is an established treatment in PCOS. Despite being weight neutral as monotherapy, it has multiple favourable effects mediated through reduction of insulin resistance and via direct action on steroidogenesis. It improves clinical, metabolic and reproductive outcomes of the syndrome [1317]. In addition, metformin has a less defined and less studied potential to enhance the therapeutic index of GLP-1 [1822]. We hypothesized that metformin may enhance weight-lowering capacity of low dose liraglutide and provide certain advantages in management of PCOS related obesity compared to high dose liraglutide alone.

The purpose of this pilot randomized study was to compare the combination of metformin and low dose liraglutide 1.2 mg to high dose liraglutide 3 mg alone on measures of obesity in obese PCOS.

Methods

Study design

The present study used a 12-week pilot prospective randomized open-label design recruiting 30 obese women with PCOS. It was conducted at the outpatients Department for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases University Medical Center Ljubljana. The study was registered according to the Slovenian drug Law and retrospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02909933) on 16th of September 2016.

The patient inclusion criteria were as follows: type A phenotype of PCOS diagnosed by ASRM-ESHRE Rotterdam criteria including concomitant presence of a) hyperandrogenemia on either the biochemical or the clinical level, b) menses abnormalities and c) PCO morphology; age 18 years to menopause and obesity (body mass index: BMI ≥ 30). Patients with history of carcinoma, significant cardiovascular, kidney or hepatic disease and the use of medications known to affect reproductive or metabolic functions within prior to study entry were excluded.

They were randomized to COMBO or LIRA3 arm. In COMBO arm, metformin was initiated at a dose of 500 mg once per day and increased up to 1000 mg BID. Liraglutide was initiated at a dose of 0.6 mg injected s.c. once per day and increased to 1.2 mg. In LIRA3 arm, liraglutide was initiated at a dose of 0.6 mg injected s.c. once per day with increments to 3 mg. The primary outcome of the study was mean change in measures of obesity. Secondary outcomes included metabolic and hormonal changes.

At baseline and end of the study all patients underwent standard anthropometric measurements: height, weight and waist circumference. BMI was calculated as the weight in kilograms divided by square of height in meters. Patients were provided with glucose-monitoring devices and supplies and educated on their use. They were instructed to measure blood glucose levels at any signs and symptoms suggesting low blood glucose. Hypoglycemia was defined according to American Diabetes Association criteria as symptoms suggestive of low blood glucose confirmed by self-monitored blood glucose measurement below 3.9 mmol/l [23]. All women were instructed to report any side effects during the treatment. They were given an advice on recommended lifestyle intervention that was actively promoted at the beginning of the study.

A fasting blood was drawn for determination of glucose, insulin, androstenedione, total and free testosterone (T) followed by a standard 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) to assess glucose homeostasis. Glucose levels were determined using a standard glucose oxidase method (Beckman Coulter Glucose Analyzer, Beckman Coulter Inc CA, USA). Insulin was determined by solid-phase enzyme-labeled chemiluminiscent immunometric assay (Immulite 2000 XPi System, Siemens Healthcare, United Kingdom). Androstenedione was measured by specific double antibody RIA using 125 I-labeled hormones (Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Webster, Tx). Total and free testosterone levels were measured by coated tube RIA (DiaSorin, S. p. A, Salluggia, Italy and Diagnostic Products Corporation, LA, respectively). Sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) was determined with a chemiluminescent immunoassay (Immulite 2000 Analyzer, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Lipids were determined using Adiva 1800, Siemens analyzer. Intra-assay variations ranged from 1.6 to 6.3%, and inter-assay variations ranged from 5.8 to 9.6% for the applied methods. Pre- and post-treatment samples from each patient were assayed in the same assay run. Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR) calculation was applied as a measure for insulin resistance (IR). Safety clinical assessment was performed at the beginning and week 4, 8 and 12 of the treatment period. Pregnancy was excluded before randomization by measuring β-human chorionic gonadotropin. Women were advised to strictly use barrier contraception. They were informed that there is a very limited knowledge based on some case reports regarding human exposure to liraglutide during pregnancy in women with diabetes [24].

Statistical analysis

Sample size was determined based on mean change in weight and data from previous studies with comparative treatment intervention using Power and Sample Size Calculation version 3.0.43 [25]. To detect a statistically significant difference between groups of approximately 2.5 kg in weight loss with 80% power, each group had to consist of 14 patients. Mean values and standard deviation were used to describe continuous variables. Nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test for related samples was used to compare pretreatment and post-treatment values of continuous variables in each of the treatment groups. To compare the pretreatment values and the change of clinical parameters among different treatment groups, nonparametric Mann–Whitney test was used. Logistic regression was used to compare the proportion of patients losing at least 5% of weight. P values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 19.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Baseline results

The study enrolled 30 participants (aged 33.1 ± 6.1 years, BMI 38.3 ± 5.4 kg/m2, mean ± SD). Two patients discontinued the study because of protocol violation. Twenty-eight patients completed the study: 14 on COMBO and 14 on LIRA3. Baseline characteristics of the patients are provided in Table 1. There were no statistically significant differences between both groups (Table 1).
Table 1

Pretreatment and posttreatment values of clinical parameters of the patients for each treatment group

 

LIRA3

N = 14

 

LIRA1.2 + MET2000

N = 14

 

Comparison of pretreatment values between groups

Characteristic

Pretreatment

Post treatment

P a

Pretreatment

Post treatment

P a

P b

Age (years)

34.6 ± 6.1

  

31.6 ± 5.9

  

0.164

Weight (kg)

111.1 ± 14.8

104.7 ± 14.8

0.001

102.5 ± 9

98.9 ± 10.3

0.002

0.137

BMI (kg/m2)

39.2 ± 5.5

37.0 ± 5.5

0.001

37.5 ± 5.3

36.2 ± 5.5

0.002

0.482

Waist circumference (cm)

110.1 ± 12

105.9 ± 12.8

0.003

105.2 ± 10.7

103.0 ± 8.2

0.113

0.265

Androstenedione (nmol/l)

7.0 ± 3.7

7.7 ± 3.4

0.451

10.6 ± 6.4

8.6 ± 3.5

0.530

0.094

Total testosterone (nmol/l)

1.3 ± 0.7

1.2 ± 0.5

0.065

1.8 ± 0.9

1.5 ± 0.8

0.023

0.125

Free testosterone (pmol/l)

9.1 ± 5.1

9.7 ± 3.8

0.594

11.7 ± 5.7

11.0 ± 4.2

0.660

0.164

SHBG (nmol/l)

39.6 ± 41.4

46.9 ± 54.5

0.018

27.7 ± 21.1

47.2 ± 90.4

0.430

0.137

Glu 0 min OGTT (mmol/l)

5.2 ± 0.4

5.1 ± 0.4

0.341

5.4 ± 0.6

5.0 ± 0.3

0.015

0.635

Glu 120 min OGTT (mmol/l)

5.9 ± 1.0

4.7 ± 0.7

0.002

7.1 ± 2.0

5.9 ± 1.6

0.016

0.178

Insulin 0 min OGTT (mU/l)

22 ± 11.7

19.4 ± 10.4

0.272

24.5 ± 18.4

16.8 ± 13.2

0.035

0.839

Insulin 120 min OGTT (mU/l)

86.4 ± 40.3 [2]

68.9 ± 58.4

0.008

118.8 ± 87.5

109.1 ± 127.0

0.551

0.631

HOMA IR

5.1 ± 2.9

4.4 ± 2.4

0.272

5.9 ± 4.3

3.7 ± 3.0

0.013

0.910

Cholesterol (mmol/l)

4.8 ± 0.8

4.8 ± 0.8

0.875

4.9 ± 1.1 [1]

4.5 ± 1.0 [1]

0.107

0.720

HDL cholesterol (mmol/l)

1.3 ± 0.3

1.2 ± 0.3

0.194

1.3 ± 0.1 [1]

1.3 ± 0.2 [1]

0.627

0.239

LDL cholesterol (mmol/l)

2.9 ± 0.8

3.0 ± 0.7

0.928

3.0 ± 0.9 [1]

2.7 ± 0.9 [1]

0.049

0.905

TG (mmol/l)

1.5 ± 0.7

1.6 ± 0.6

0.727

1.4 ± 0.7 [1]

1.2 ± 0.5 [1]

0.075

0.550

data are expressed as mean ± SD

acompared with Wilcoxon signed-rank test for related samples, bold values indicate statistically significant differences

bcompared with nonparametric Mann–Whitney test

Measures of obesity

The mean post-treatment measures of obesity are presented in Table 1. At the end of the study, weight and BMI were significantly decreased in both groups (all p-values <0.01). Subjects treated with COMBO lost on average 3.6 ± 2.5 kg compared with a 6.3 ± 3.7 kg weight loss in LIRA3 group (p = 0.062, Table 2). BMI decreased for 1.3 ± 0.9 kg/m2 in COMBO arm compared to 2.2 ± 1.3 kg/m2 in LIRA arm with the statistically significant between treatment differences in BMI (p = 0.05). LIRA3 intervention also resulted in a significant reduction of waist circumference. The between treatment difference in the decrease of waist circumference was statistically significant (Table 2). Clinically meaningful ≥5% weight reduction was achieved in 35.7% of patients in COMBO and 57.1% of patients in LIRA3 arm (OR = 0.42, 95% CI =0.09–1.91), however the between treatment difference was not statistically significant.
Table 2

Comparison of absolute change in clinical parameters of PCOS patients among different treatment groups

 

LIRA3

LIRA1.2 + MET2000

P a

Characteristic

Absolute change mean ± SD

Absolute change mean ± SD

 

Weight (kg)

−6.3 ± 3.7

−3.6 ± 2.5

0.062

BMI (kg/m2)

−2.2 ± 1.3

−1.3 ± 0.9

0.050

Waist circumference (cm)

−4.2 ± 3.4

−2.2 ± 6.2

0.014

Androstenedione (nmol/l)

0.6 ± 2.7

−2.0 ± 6.0

0.376

Total testosterone (nmol/l)

−0.2 ± 0.3

−0.3 ± 0.6

0.285

Free testosterone (pmol/l)

0.6 ± 3.3

−0.7 ± 5.3

0.482

SHBG (nmol/l)

7.3 ± 14.2

19.5 ± 71.4

0.376

Glu 0 min OGTT (mmol/l)

−0.1 ± 0.4

−0.4 ± 0.6

0.734

Glu 120 min OGTT (mmol/l)

−1.2 ± 0.8

−1.1 ± 1.4

0.804

Insulin 0 min OGTT (mU/l)

−2.5 ± 9.3

−7.7 ± 16.3

0.571

Insulin 120 min OGTT (mU/l)

−30.9 ± 29.5 [2]

−9.7 ± 73.4

0.560

HOMA IR

−0.7 ± 2.3

−2.1 ± 3.9

0.427

Cholesterol (mmol/l)

0.0 ± 0.4

−0.3 ± 0.6 [1]

0.094

HDL cholesterol (mmol/l)

0.0 ± 0.1

0.0 ± 0.1 [1]

0.793

LDL cholesterol (mmol/l)

0.0. ± 0.3

−0.3 ± 0.4 [1]

0.038

TG (mmol/l)

0.1 ± 0.4

−0.2 ± 0.4 [1]

0.128

acompared with nonparametric Mann–Whitney test, bold values indicate statistically significant differences

Metabolic parameters

Significant decreases of glucose at 0 and 120 min, insulin at 0 min of OGTT, HOMA-IR and LDL cholesterol were observed in the COMBO arm (p = 0.015, p = 0.016, p = 0,035, p = 0.013 and p = 0.049 respectively, Table 1). LIRA3 resulted in significant improvement of glucose and insulin levels at 120 min of OGTT (p = 0.002 and p = 0,008 respectively, Table 1). The between treatment difference in the parameters of glucose homoeostasis were not statistically significant, whereas COMBO was superior in the decrease of LDL cholesterol (Table 2).

Endocrine parameters

Significant decrease of total testosterone was observed in COMBO arm (p = 0.023), whereas the decrease in LIRA3 was not statistically significant yet. Androstendione and free testosterone decreases tended to be greater in COMBO compared to LIRA3. In LIRA3 significant increase of SHBG (p = 0.018) was observed (Table 1). There were no significant between treatment differences in endocrine parameters (Table 2).

The most common side effects in LIRA3 were nausea (8/14) and diarrhea (5/14). Vomiting occurred in 1/14 patients and 2/14 mild headache were documented. Most of the side effects were present in the first 4 weeks of the treatment, from the 4th to 8th week 2 women had persistent mild nausea. Adverse effects reported in COMBO were nausea (6/14), mild diarrhea (6/14), and insomnia (1/14). All adverse events resolved within the first 1 to 4 weeks. Hypoglycemic event was reported once in 1 woman in LIRA3. No side effect was documented by 6/14 in LIRA3 arm and 8/14 in COMBO arm. No subject withdrew because of the adverse events in either group. One woman from LIRA3 had gallbladder related symptoms one week after the end of the study.

Discussion and conclusions

Short-term treatment with high dose liraglutide 3 mg monotherapy or liraglutide 1.2 mg in adjunct to metformin both resulted in significant within treatment weight and BMI decrease in obese PCOS. Liraglutide 3 mg was linked to greater weight reduction and higher proportion of good responders that lost at least 5% of baseline weight within 12 weeks. In addition, liraglutide 3 mg led to significant reduction in waist circumference. However, a dual-targeting combination treatment with low dose liraglutide 1.2 mg and metformin resulted in improved androgen profile that was not observed with LIRA3. Both regimens improved parameters of glucose homeostasis. In addition, COMBO led to significant within treatment LDL decrease. Liraglutide 1.2 mg in adjunct to metformin and liraglutide 3 mg as a monotherapy were both generally well tolerated with nausea being more frequent yet transient with liraglutide 3 mg.

Clearly, obesity and obesity related abnormalities are multifactorial diseases. Treatment algorithms for weight management should therefore be tailored to specific obesity related population. In obese PCOS the treatment should focus on modifiable weight related and weight nonrelated derangements. The combination treatment could potentially improve treatment outcomes in obese PCOS via co-targeting multifactorial origin of obesity and concomitant abnormalities intrinsically related to PCOS. Furthermore, the right composition of combination treatment could enhance the therapeutic index of the drugs in combination.

Metformin as an add-on to low dose liraglutide seems to be mechanistically well-suited combination when obesity is related to PCOS. Metformin alone has well known beneficial metabolic and gynecological effects in this population that are mediated through improvement of IR and via direct action at the ovarian level beyond weight reduction [13]. Similarly, adding metformin to liraglutide could potentially enhance GLP-1 effect of liraglutide enabling the use of lower dose of liraglutide in combination treatment. It was demonstrating in animal studies that metformin increased GLP-1 [22]. In humans a single dose of metformin also increases GLP-1 after oral glucose load in non-diabetic subjects [21]. In addition, chronic exposure to metformin increased GLP-1 in diabetic and non-diabetic participants [21]. The impact of metformin on weight reducing potential of liraglutide could be further explained also through the stimulation of the expression of GLP-1 receptor and insulin induced signalling pathways [19].

We have previously demonstrated that low dose liraglutide 1.2 mg in combination with metformin in obese patients with PCOS who had lost less than 5% of body weight with metformin and lifestyle intervention had beneficial effects compared to low dose liraglutide and metformin monotherapies. After randomization the participants either continued with metformin or were switched to liraglutide 1.2 mg alone or assigned liraglutide 1.2 mg in combination with metformin for 12 weeks. Combination led to 6.5 kg loss compared with 3.8 loss in low dose liraglutide arm and 1.2 kg in metformin arm [26]. Furthermore, we observed that metformin added to low dose liraglutide 1.2 mg was more effective than liraglutide 1.2 mg alone in reducing weight after 12 weeks in treatment naïve obese PCOS. Addition of metformin resulting in higher proportion of subjects achieving clinically meaningful ≥ 5% weight reduction in almost 60% compared to about 40% of good responders in low dose liraglutide monotherapy arm [27]. Both study designs were conducted with low dose liraglutide 1.2 mg before high dose liraglutide 3 mg was established as an anti-obesity treatment.

The present study further supports liraglutide 3 mg for weight reduction in obese PCOS. In 12 weeks almost 60% of women exposed to liraglutide 3 mg achieved clinically meaningful ≥ 5% weight loss, that might already improved cardiovascular risk profile in obese patients [28]. In addition, high dose liraglutide led to a significant within treatment reduction of waist circumference, another well-known independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. In line with our observation, dual-energy x-ray absorbtiometry of obese patients who were exposed to liraglutide 3 mg for 20 weeks demonstrated that weight reduction was primarily from decreased fat, including visceral fat, rather than lean tissue [29]. However, a significant weight reduction in LIRA 3 group was not yet associated with improvement of androgen profile.

The combination treatment of liraglutide 1.2 mg and metformin also resulted in significant within treatment reduction of weight in obese PCOS, although the amount of weight and waist circumference reductions and the proportion of good responders that lost ≥ 5% baseline weight were less than in LIRA3 arm. However, a dual-targeting treatment approach was superior in improving the androgen profile. The observed superior endocrine effect with COMBO despite the inferior trend in weight reduction could imply well-known weight independent action of metformin mediated through direct regulation of ovarian steroidogenesis [13].

The beneficial effects on glucose metabolism were comparable in both treatment arms, whereas the LDL decrease in our study was greater on COMBO compared to LIRA3. Previous studies with liraglutide have shown no consistent changes in lipids in subjects with type 2 diabetes [9]. Due to small sample size, general methodological difficulties in androgen measurements we cannot provide any firm conclusion about observations regarding endocrine and metabolic parameters that were pre-specified as secondary outcomes.

High dose liraglutide was not related to deterioration in general tolerability except higher frequency of dose dependent nausea. It was present in almost 60% of women treated with liraglutide 3 mg compared to less than half of women receiving COMBO. However, all side effects were transient and mild to moderate, declining within 4–6 weeks. The adverse events were in line with the documentation of dose depending adverse events in phase 2 trial with liraglutide from 1.2 mg up to 3.0 mg, where 3.0 mg dose induced nausea in almost 50% of participants without type 2 diabetes [30]. In phase 3 trials nausea was induced with lower doses 1.2 and 1.8 mg in up to 40% of diabetic individuals [31].

The results of our study are subject to several limitations. The duration was too short to assess the sustainability of the benefits from the combination regimen. Our sample size was small. Future larger designs of longer duration including the proposed combination treatment in PCOS related obesity could possibly be powered using our preliminary results. The main strength of this study was pathophysiological supported strategy combining two medications that act through synergistic modulation of incretin axis and via direct and indirect manipulation of intrinsic weight independent abnormalities in this specific obesity related population.

Overall, the selection of the right combination for the combination treatment is a complex task that requires understanding of pathophysiological backgrounds of the obesity and obesity related comorbidities. The results of this study indicated the potential benefits of combination of low dose liraglutide and metformin in the management of obese PCOS. Our results are preliminary, but support future investigations of this dual treatment approach when obesity is linked to PCOS.

Abbreviations

BMI: 

Body mass index

COMBO: 

Combination of metformin and liraglutide

GLP-1: 

Glucagon-like peptide-1

HOMA-IR: 

Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance

IR: 

Insulin resistance

LIRA: 

Liraglutide

MET: 

Metformin

OGTT: 

Oral glucose tolerance test

PCOS: 

Polycystic ovary syndrome

SD: 

Standard deviation

SHBG: 

Sex hormone binding globulin

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the study participants. We appreciate the assistance of Mirela Ozura and Elizabeta Stepanovic, RNs.

Funding

The study was supported by the Ministry of Health, Republic of Slovenia, Tertiary Care Scientific grant Number 20120047 of the University Medical Centre Ljubljana.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

MJ and AJ conceived and designed the study, MJ, NAK, AJ were involved in collecting the data, and KG performed the data analysis. All authors helped drafting the manuscript and have read and approved the final version.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All the patients provided written informed consent before participation in the study and the Slovene National Medical Ethics Committee approved the protocol. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, University Medical Centre Ljubljana
(2)
Institute of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana

References

  1. Lim SS, Davies MJ, Norman RJ, Moran LJ. Overweight, obesity and central obesity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18:618–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lass N, Kleber M, Winkel K, Wunsch R, Reinehr T. Effect of lifestyle intervention on features of polycystic ovarian syndrome, metabolic syndrome, and intima-media thickness in obese adolescent girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:3533–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Crosignani PG, Colombo M, Vegetti W, Somigliana E, Gessati A, Ragni G. Overweight and obese anovulatory patients with polycystic ovaries: parallel improvements in anthropometric indices, ovarian physiology and fertility rate induced by diet. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1928–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Thomson RL, Buckley JD, Noakes M, Clifton PM, Norman RJ, Brinkworth GD. The effect of a hypocaloric diet with and without exercise training on body composition, cardiometabolic risk profile, and reproductive function in overweight and obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:3373–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Avenell A, Broom J, Brown TJ, Poobalan A, Aucott L, Stearns SC, et al. Systematic review of the long-term effects and economic consequences of treatments for obesity and implications for health improvement. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8:1–182.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Guidance for Industry: developing products for weight management. 2007.Google Scholar
  7. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Obesity - guidance on the prevention, identification, assessment and management of overweight and obesity in adults and children. NICE clinical guideline 43. 2006.Google Scholar
  8. Blonde L, Russell-Jones D. The safety and efficacy of liraglutide with or without oral antidiabetic drug therapy in type 2 diabetes: an overview of the LEAD 1–5 studies. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009;11:26–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Astrup A, Rossner S, Van Gaal L, Rissanen A, Niskanen L, Al Hakim M, et al. Effects of liraglutide in the treatment of obesity: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet. 2009;374:1606–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Davies MJ, Bergenstal R, Bode B, Kushner RF, Lewin A, Skjoth TV, et al. Efficacy of liraglutide for weight loss among patients with type 2 diabetes the SCALE diabetes randomized clinical trial. Jama-J Am Med Assoc. 2015;314:687–99.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Vilsboll T, Christensen M, Junker AE, Knop FK, Gluud LL. Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on weight loss: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2012;344:d7771.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Wilding JP, Overgaard RV, Jacobsen LV, Jensen CB, le Roux CW. Exposure-response analyses of liraglutide 3.0 mg for weight management. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18:491–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Palomba S, Falbo A, Zullo F, Orio Jr F. Evidence-based and potential benefits of metformin in the polycystic ovary syndrome: a comprehensive review. Endocr Rev. 2009;30:1–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Christakou CD, Kandaraki E, Economou FN. Metformin: an old medication of new fashion: evolving new molecular mechanisms and clinical implications in polycystic ovary syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol. 2010;162:193–212.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunaif A. Drug insight: insulin-sensitizing drugs in the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome - a reappraisal. Nat Clin Pract Endoc. 2008;4:272–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Pasquali R, Gambineri A. Targeting insulin sensitivity in the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2009;13:1205–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Panidis D, Tziomalos K, Papadakis E, Kandaraki EA, Katsikis I. The guidelines issued by the European society for human reproduction and embryology and the American society for reproductive medicine regarding the induction of ovulation with metformin in patients with the polycystic ovary syndrome potentially require reconsideration. Horm-Int J Endocrino. 2013;12:192–200.Google Scholar
  18. Jensterle M, Goricar K, Janez A. Metformin as an initial adjunct to low-dose liraglutide enhances the weight-decreasing potential of liraglutide in obese polycystic ovary syndrome: Randomized control study. Exp Ther Med. 2016;11:1194–200.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Maida A, Lamont BJ, Cao X, Drucker DJ. Metformin regulates the incretin receptor axis via a pathway dependent on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha in mice. Diabetologia. 2011;54:339–49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mannucci E, Ognibene A, Cremasco F, Bardini G, Mencucci A, Pierazzuoli E, et al. Effect of metformin on glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and leptin levels in obese nondiabetic subjects. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:489–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Mannucci E, Tesi F, Bardini G, Ognibene A, Petracca MG, Ciani S, et al. Effects of metformin on glucagon-like peptide-1 levels in obese patients with and without Type 2 diabetes. Diabetes, Nutrition Metab. 2004;17:336–42.Google Scholar
  22. Yasuda N, Inoue T, Nagakura T, Yamazaki K, Kira K, Saeki T, et al. Enhanced secretion of glucagon-like peptide 1 by biguanide compounds. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;298:779–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2013. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:S11–66.Google Scholar
  24. Greco D. Normal pregnancy outcome after first-trimester exposure to liraglutide in a woman with Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2015;32:e29–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Dupont WD, Plummer Jr WD. Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program. Control Clin Trials. 1990;11:116–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jensterle Sever M, Kocjan T, Pfeifer M, Kravos NA, Janez A. Short-term combined treatment with liraglutide and metformin leads to significant weight loss in obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome and previous poor response to metformin. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014;170:451–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Jensterle M, Kravos NA, Pfeifer M, Kocjan T, Janez A. A 12-week treatment with the long-acting glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist liraglutide leads to significant weight loss in a subset of obese women with newly diagnosed polycystic ovary syndrome. Hormones (Athens). 2015;14:81–90.Google Scholar
  28. Goldstein DJ. Beneficial health effects of modest weight loss. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1992;16:397–415.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Astrup A, Carraro R, Finer N, Harper A, Kunesova M, Lean ME, et al. Safety, tolerability and sustained weight loss over 2 years with the once-daily human GLP-1 analog, liraglutide. Int J Obes (Lond). 2012;36:843–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Lean ME, Carraro R, Finer N, Hartvig H, Lindegaard ML, Rossner S, et al. Tolerability of nausea and vomiting and associations with weight loss in a randomized trial of liraglutide in obese, non-diabetic adults. Int J Obes (Lond). 2014;38:689–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Davies MJ, Kela R, Khunti K. Liraglutide - overview of the preclinical and clinical data and its role in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011;13:207–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement