Hypertriglyceridemia may be associated with important complications. The aim of this study is to estimate the magnitude of association and quality of supporting evidence linking hypertriglyceridemia to cardiovascular events and pancreatitis.
Methods
We conducted a systematic review of multiple electronic bibliographic databases and subsequent meta-analysis using a random effects model. Studies eligible for this review followed patients longitudinally and evaluated quantitatively the association of fasting hypertriglyceridemia with the outcomes of interest. Reviewers working independently and in duplicate reviewed studies and extracted data.
Results
35 studies provided data sufficient for meta-analysis. The quality of these observational studies was moderate to low with fair level of multivariable adjustments and adequate exposure and outcome ascertainment. Fasting hypertriglyceridemia was significantly associated with cardiovascular death (odds ratios (OR) 1.80; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31-2.49), cardiovascular events (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.23-1.53), myocardial infarction (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.15-1.49), and pancreatitis (OR, 3.96; 95% CI, 1.27-12.34, in one study only). The association with all-cause mortality was not statistically significant.
Conclusions
The current evidence suggests that fasting hypertriglyceridemia is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular death, MI, cardiovascular events, and possibly acute pancreatitis.
Précis: hypertriglyceridemia is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular death, MI, cardiovascular events, and possibly acute pancreatitis
Keywords
HypertriglyceridemiaCardiovascular diseasePancreatitisSystematic reviews and meta-analysis
Background
Hypertriglyceridemia is a manifestation of several common metabolic disorders in the western world. A recent cross-sectional study found that over 33% of adults in the United States had hypertriglyceridemia (serum triglyceride levels over 150 mg/dl (1.7 mmol/L)) of whom over 50% had serum triglyceride levels exceeding 200 mg/dl (2.2 mmol/L) [1].
The association of hypertriglyceridemia and clinically important complications such as cardiovascular events and acute pancreatitis has been suggested by several studies. Previous epidemiologic studies demonstrated increase in the risk of cardiovascular events although there has always been significant confounding due to varying levels of adjustments for traditional risk factors and other lipid subfractions [2–4]. As for pancreatitis, case series and uncontrolled studies reported that very severely elevated triglyceride levels are associated with lipemic serum, chylomicronemia syndrome, and increased risk of pancreatitis [5–7]. Serum triglycerides levels of 1000 mg/dl (11.3 mmol/L) and higher have been observed in 12% to 38% of patients presenting with acute pancreatitis [5]. However, the association with pancreatitis has not been evaluated in controlled studies or with less severe hypertriglyceridemia.
To update the evidence base to the present time (last meta-analysis [2] was performed 6 years ago), we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis. Our goal was to assess the magnitude of association and the quality of supporting evidence linking hypertriglyceridemia with cardiovascular events, mortality and pancreatitis. We specifically aimed at comparing association measures in studies with varying levels of adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors and to search for controlled studies evaluating the risk of pancreatitis.
Methods
This systematic review was conducted according to a priori established protocol that was commissioned and funded by the Endocrine Society and is reported according to the PRISMA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) [8].
Eligibility criteria
Eligible studies were randomized and observational studies that enrolled patients with untreated hypertriglyceridemia and reported a relative association measure between fasting serum triglycerides levels and the outcomes of interest: all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, cardiovascular events and pancreatitis. We excluded uncontrolled studies and studies of nonfasting hypertriglyceridemia.
Study identification and data extraction
An expert reference librarian (P.J.E) created and implemented the electronic search strategy with input from study investigators (V.M.M. & M.H.M). We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science and SCOPUS through August of 2010. The detailed search strategy is available in Additional file 1. We also sought recommendations from content expert for potentially relevant studies to be included in the screening process.
Reviewers working independently and in duplicate assessed each abstract for eligibility. Disagreements yielded an automatic inclusion into the following level of screening. Included studied were retrieved and full text screening commenced in duplicate as well. Disagreements in this level were resolved by discussion and consensus. Online reference management system was used to conduct this review and it reported a real-time chance-adjusted agreement (kappa) statistic to evaluate the agreement among reviewers. Kappa averaged 0.80. Two reviewers working independently and in duplicate extracted baseline and outcome data and assessed the quality of included study. A third reviewer compared the reviewer's data and resolved inconsistencies by referring to the full text article.
Quality
Using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, [9] reviewers assessed the quality of included observational studies (and control arms of RCT, considered as observational cohorts) by determining outcome ascertainment, adjustment for confounders, proportion of patients lost to follow-up as well as sample selection. We used the GRADE approach in evaluating the evidence yielded from included studies[10].
Statistical analysis
We pooled the relative association measures of relevant complications from included studies and analyzed the data using the random-effects model described by DerSimonian and Laird [11]. Heterogeneity in results across studies was measured using the I2 statistic, which estimates the proportion of variation in results across studies that is not due to chance. An I2 of 50% or more indicates large inconsistency between studies. Meta-analysis was completed using Comprehensive Meta-analysis (CMA) version 2.2 (Biostat Inc., Englewood, NJ).
Subgroup analyses and publication bias
A priori hypotheses were designed to explain between-study inconsistencies in results. These analyses sought an interaction with whether triglycerides levels were adjusted for other lipid fractions or not; whether the underlying metabolic disorder was diabetes vs. not; and whether the association differed between men and women. Publication bias was evaluated by assessing the symmetry of funnel plots and using Egger's regression test. In this regression, the size of the treatment effect is captured by the slope of the regression line and bias is captured by the intercept [12].
Results
Search results and included studies
Electronic search yielded 760 potentially eligible studies. Following screening, 60 studies met inclusion criteria, of which 35 reported data sufficient for meta-analysis [Figure 1].
Figure 1
Study selection process.
Methodological quality and risk of bias
Included studies had a fair methodological quality (Table 2) with follow-up period reported by 85% of studies averaging 114 months; 58% of studies reported loss to follow-up of participants that ranged 0% to 27%. Adjustment for potential confounders was reported in 90% of studies and the outcome ascertainment method was reported in all studies. Cohort selection was random in 18% of the studies.
To determine the standard clinical or angiographic variables or both present at initial angiography associated with the development of adverse coronary events in patients awaiting routine
PTCA
Patients
awaiting
routine
percutaneous transluminal
coronary
angioplasty
(PTCA)
57
215
Median 8 months
fatal or non-fatal MI, unstable angina or angiographic new total coronary occlusion
To investigate the association between elevated blood triglyceride levels and subsequent mortality risk in patients with established coronary heart disease
* It was unclear in most studies if enrolled patients did not have the outcomes pre-existent at baseline. In most studies, it was also unclear if patients were treated with drugs that can affect TG level (both of these elements lower the observed strength of association)
Triglycerides Conversion from mg/dL to mmol/L: multiply by (x) 0.01129; from mmol/L to mg/dL: multiply by (x) 88.6
Meta-analysis
The total number of included studies was 35 enrolling 927,218 patients who suffered 132,460 deaths and 72,654 cardiac events; respectively. Hypertriglyceridemia was significantly associated with cardiovascular death, cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, and pancreatitis; with odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of 1.80 (1.31-2.49), 1.37 (1.23-1.53), 1.31 (1.15-1.49) and 3.96 (1.27-12.34); respectively. There was nonsignificant association with all-cause mortality (OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.90-1.36). Forest plots depicting the results of random effects meta-analysis are presented in Figures 2, 3, 4 and 5.
Figure 2
Random effects meta-analysis (all-cause mortality).
Figure 3
Random effects meta-analysis (cardiovascular death).
Figure 4
Random effects meta-analysis (cardiac events).
Figure 5
Random effects meta-analysis (myocardial infarction).
It is worth noting that the association with acute pancreatitis was estimated by only one eligible study that included 129 patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia (119 with type IV phenotypes and 10 with type V phenotypes according to Fredrickson's classification) of whom 26 suffered acute pancreatitis [33]. In this study, subjects in the third tertile of TG had a 4.0-fold increased risk (95% confidence interval, 1.3-12.3) compared with the first tertile and those diagnosed with dyslipidemia at a younger age also had increased risk.
All analyses were associated with important heterogeneity (I2 > 50%) that our planned subgroup analyses could only partially explain (Table 3). The association of hypertriglyceridemia with mortality and cardiovascular mortality seemed to be stronger in women. These findings are consistent with a previous meta-analysis published in 1996. Hokanson and Austin estimated adjusted relative risks for incident cardiovascular events of 1.14 (95% Cl 1.05-1.28) in men and 1.37 (95% Cl 1.13-1.66) in women. The association with cardiovascular events was somewhat stronger in patients with diabetes although this effect was not statistically significant. Hence, there were no other significant subgroup interactions to explain heterogeneity (based on the level of adjustment for lipids subfractions, sex or the presence of diabetes).
Table 3
Subgroup analysis
Subgroup
No.
studies
OR
LL
UL
P-effect
Size
P-
interaction
Mortality
Men
3
1.03
0.95
1.12
0.49
0.04
Women
3
1.55
1.05
2.27
0.03
adequate adjustment
9
1.09
0.83
1.43
0.55
0.54
inadequate adjustment
3
1.22
0.94
1.59
0.14
General population
10
1.09
0.87
1.37
0.46
0.49
Diabetes
2
1.37
0.75
2.50
0.31
Cardiovascular death
Men
3
1.14
0.92
1.40
0.23
0.00
Women
2
4.73
2.15
10.37
0.00
adequate adjustment
5
1.88
1.12
3.15
0.02
0.84
inadequate adjustment
4
1.76
1.18
2.62
0.01
General population
8
1.75
1.26
2.43
0.00
0.36
Diabetes
1
2.97
1.00
8.80
0.05
Cardiovascular events
Men
6
1.29
1.13
1.47
0.00
0.67
Women
2
1.21
0.94
1.57
0.14
adequate adjustment
12
1.39
1.23
1.58
0.00
0.91
inadequate adjustment
4
1.37
1.01
1.84
0.04
General population
15
1.37
1.22
1.54
0.00
0.81
Diabetes
1
1.42
1.11
1.81
0.00
Myocardial infarction
Men
2
1.22
1.09
1.37
0.00
0.24
Women
1
1.40
1.15
1.70
0.00
adequate adjustment
3
1.72
0.98
3.01
0.06
0.29
inadequate adjustment
3
1.26
1.15
1.39
0.00
General population
5
1.27
1.13
1.44
0.00
0.13
Diabetes
1
2.04
1.12
3.70
0.02
*Only feasible analyses are shown
There was no evidence of publication bias (P value for Eggers test > 0.05 for all outcomes) although these analyses were underpowered to detect this problem and the presence of heterogeneity further limits the ability to detect publication bias.
Discussion
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis and documented an association between fasting hypertriglyceridemia and the risk of several cardiovascular adverse events and with pancreatitis.
Limitations, strengths and comparison with other reports
The main limitation of association studies is the observational nature of the existing evidence. Therefore, confounders (particularly, baseline risk of patients for developing cardiovascular disease and the effect of other lipid subfractions abnormalities) threaten the validity of results. In meta-analyses of observational studies, the ability to adjust for confounding is limited by the level of adjustment conducted in the original studies. We attempted to evaluate confounding by conducting subgroup analysis; however, this analysis was underpowered. Other limitations pertain to heterogeneity of the meta-analytic estimates, publication bias (which remains likely in the context of observational studies that do not require prospective registration) and reporting bias (which is also likely considering that several studies met the eligibility criteria for this review but did not report the outcomes of interest) [48]. It was unclear in most studies if enrolled patients did not have some of the outcomes pre-existent at baseline and it was also unclear if patients were treated with drugs that can affect TG level (both of these elements lower the confidence in the observed associations). We only found one controlled study that evaluated the association with acute pancreatitis.
The overall confidence in the estimated magnitude of associations is low [10]considering the described methodological limitations in evaluating the association with cardiovascular events; and imprecision (small number of events) in evaluating the association with pancreatitis.
The strengths of this study stems from the comprehensive literature search that spans across multiple databases and duplicate appraisal and study selection. Our results are consistent with previous evidence synthesis reports about the association of hypertriglyceridemia with cardiovascular events. We estimated increased odds by 37% (odds ratio of 1.37). Hokanson and Austin [3] estimated adjusted relative risks of 1.14 (95% Cl 1.05-1.28) in men and 1.37 (95% Cl 1.13-1.66) in women. Sarwar et al. [2] reported odds ratio of 1.73 in prospective cohort studies published prior to 2006. A systematic review by Labreuche et al. [49] demonstrated that baseline triglyceride levels in randomized trials is associated with increased stroke risk (adjusted RR, 1.05 per 10-mg/dL (0.1 mmol/L) increase; 95% CI, 1.03-1.07). To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review that sought to identify controlled studies evaluating the association with pancreatitis.
Implications
The associations demonstrated between hypertriglyceridemia and cardiovascular risk should not necessarily translate into a recommendation for treatment. It is plausible that the benefits of lowering triglycerides do not merely depend on how much the level is lowered, but rather on how it is lowered (i.e., lifestyle interventions vs. pharmacological therapy). Therefore, randomized trials of the different approaches with patient-important outcomes [50] used as primary endpoints are needed for making policy and clinical decisions.
Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses [49, 51–54] have summarized the evidence from randomized trials of fibrate therapy and demonstrated that fibrate therapy reduced the risk of vascular events (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.86) in patients with high triglyceride levels or atherogenic dyslipidemia (low HDL cholesterol combined with high triglyceride level) although all-cause mortality and non cardiovascular mortality were both significantly increased in clofibrate trials. Meta-analyses [55, 56] of niacin therapy demonstrate significant reduction in the risk of major coronary events (25% reduction in relative odds; 95% CI 13, 35), stroke (26%; 95% CI 8, 41) and any cardiovascular events (27%; 95% CI 15, 37). However, contemporary trials in the statin era have failed to substantiate these findings with fenofibrate among patients with diabetes [57] and with niacin in high risk patients [58]. Also, to our knowledge, there are no trials assessing the value of triglyceride lowering to reduce the risk of pancreatitis. Thus, lifestyle changes should remain the mainstay of therapy. Treatment of the underlying metabolic disorder (e.g., insulin resistance) should also be an essential and first step in the management plan of hypertriglyceridemia.
Conclusions
The current evidence suggests that hypertriglyceridemia is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular death, MI, cardiovascular events, and acute pancreatitis. The strength of inference is limited by the unexplained inconsistency of results and high risk of confounding and publication bias.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
This review was funded by a contract from the Endocrine Society. The funder had no role in study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Disclosure statement
MM, AH, FC, SD, SG, IB, ML, LB and VM have nothing to declare.
Financial support
This review was funded by a contract from the Endocrine Society.
Authors’ Affiliations
(1)
Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic
(2)
Division of Preventive Medicine, Mayo Clinic
(3)
Department of Internal Medicine, University of North Dakota
(4)
Davis and the VA Northern California Health Care System, University of California
(5)
Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, Nutrition, Mayo Clinic
References
Ford ES, Li C, Zhao G, Pearson WS, Mokdad AH: Hypertriglyceridemia and its pharmacologic treatment among US adults. Arch Intern Med. 2009, 169 (6): 572-578. 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.599.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Sarwar N, Danesh J, Eiriksdottir G, Sigurdsson G, Wareham N, Bingham S, Boekholdt SM, Khaw KT, Gudnason V: Triglycerides and the risk of coronary heart disease: 10,158 incident cases among 262,525 participants in 29 Western prospective studies. Circulation. 2007, 115 (4): 450-458. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.637793.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Hokanson JE, Austin MA: Plasma triglyceride level is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease independent of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level: a meta-analysis of population-based prospective studies. J Cardiovasc Risk. 1996, 3 (2): 213-219. 10.1097/00043798-199604000-00014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Patel A, Barzi F, Jamrozik K, Lam TH, Ueshima H, Whitlock G, Woodward M: Serum triglycerides as a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases in the Asia-Pacific region. Circulation. 2004, 110 (17): 2678-2686.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Brunzell JD, Schrott HG: The interaction of familial and secondary causes of hypertriglyceridemia: role in pancreatitis. Trans Assoc Am Physicians. 1973, 86: 245-254.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Familial lipoprotein lipase deficiency, ApoC-II deficiency, and hepatic lipase deficiency. The Metabolic Basis of Inherited Disease. Edited by: Scriver C, Beaudet A, Sly W, Valle D, Brunzell J, Deeb SI. 2001, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2789-2816. 8Google Scholar
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009, 6 (7): e1000097-10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Wells G, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P: The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute.Google Scholar
Swiglo BA, Murad MH, Schunemann HJ, Kunz R, Vigersky RA, Guyatt GH, Montori VM: A case for clarity, consistency, and helpfulness: state-of-the-art clinical practice guidelines in endocrinology using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation system. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008, 93 (3): 666-673.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
DerSimonian R, Laird N: Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986, 7 (3): 177-188. 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder Minder C: Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997, 315 (7109): 629-634. 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Acarturk E, Cayli M, Akpinar O, Attila G, Demir M: Relation between age and gender differences in plasma triglyceride concentrations and coronary artery disease in Southern Turkey. Clin Chim Acta. 2004, 339 (1-2): 123-128. 10.1016/j.cccn.2003.10.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Bansal S, Buring JE, Rifai N, Mora S, Sacks FM, Ridker PM: Fasting compared with nonfasting triglycerides and risk of cardiovascular events in women. JAMA. 2007, 298 (3): 309-316. 10.1001/jama.298.3.309.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Barrett-Connor E, Khaw KT: Borderline fasting hypertriglyceridemia: absence of excess risk of all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality in healthy men without hypercholesterolemia. Prev Med. 1987, 16 (1): 1-8. 10.1016/0091-7435(87)90001-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Bass KM, Newschaffer CJ, Klag MJ, Bush TL: Plasma lipoprotein levels as predictors of cardiovascular death in women. Arch Intern Med. 1993, 153 (19): 2209-2216. 10.1001/archinte.1993.00410190045006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Bonaventure A, Kurth T, Pico F, Barberger-Gateau P, Ritchie K, Stapf C, Tzourio C: Triglycerides and risk of hemorrhagic stroke vs. ischemic vascular events: the three-city study. Atherosclerosis. 2010, 210 (1): 243-248. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.10.043.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Carlson LA, Rosenhamer G: Reduction of mortality in the Stockholm ischaemic heart disease secondary prevention study by combined treatment with clofibrate and nicotinic acid. Acta Med Scand. 1988, 223 (5): 405-418.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Chan WB, Tong PC, Chow CC, So WY, Ng MC, Ma RC, Osaki R, Cockram CS, Chan JC: Triglyceride predicts cardiovascular mortality and its relationship with glycaemia and obesity in Chinese type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2005, 21 (2): 183-188. 10.1002/dmrr.497.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Chester M, Chen L, Kaski JC: Identification of patients at high risk for adverse coronary events while awaiting routine coronary angioplasty. Br Heart J. 1995, 73 (3): 216-222. 10.1136/hrt.73.3.216.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Czernichow S, Bruckert E, Bertrais S, Galan P, Hercberg S, Oppert JM: Hypertriglyceridemic waist and 7.5-year prospective risk of cardiovascular disease in asymptomatic middle-aged men. Int J Obes (Lond). 2007, 31 (5): 791-796.Google Scholar
Drexel H, Aczel S, Marte T, Benzer W, Langer P, Moll W, Saely CH: Is atherosclerosis in diabetes and impaired fasting glucose driven by elevated LDL cholesterol or by decreased HDL cholesterol?. Diabetes Care. 2005, 28 (1): 101-107. 10.2337/diacare.28.1.101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Eberly LE, Stamler J, Neaton JD: Relation of triglyceride levels, fasting and nonfasting, to fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease. Arch Intern Med. 2003, 163 (9): 1077-1083. 10.1001/archinte.163.9.1077.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Egger M, Smith GD, Pfluger D, Altpeter E, Elwood PC: Triglyceride as a risk factor for ischaemic heart disease in British men: effect of adjusting for measurement error. Atherosclerosis. 1999, 143 (2): 275-284. 10.1016/S0021-9150(98)00300-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Ellingsen I, Hjermann I, Abdelnoor M, Hjerkinn EM, Tonstad S: Dietary and antismoking advice and ischemic heart disease mortality in men with normal or high fasting triacylglycerol concentrations: a 23-y follow-up study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003, 78 (5): 935-940.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Goldberg RJ, Urowitz MB, Ibanez D, Nikpour M, Gladman DD: Risk factors for development of coronary artery disease in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 2009, 36 (11): 2454-2461. 10.3899/jrheum.090011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Habib AN, Baird BC, Leypoldt JK, Cheung AK, Goldfarb-Rumyantzev AS: The association of lipid levels with mortality in patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006, 21 (10): 2881-2892. 10.1093/ndt/gfl272.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Haim M, Benderly M, Brunner D, Behar S, Graff E, Reicher-Reiss H, Goldbourt U: Elevated serum triglyceride levels and long-term mortality in patients with coronary heart disease: the Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention (BIP) registry. Circulation. 1999, 100 (5): 475-482.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Hoogeveen RC, Gambhir JK, Gambhir DS, Kimball KT, Ghazzaly K, Gaubatz JW, Vaduganathan M, Rao RS, Koschinsky M, Morrisett JD: Evaluation of Lp[a] and other independent risk factors for CHD in Asian Indians and their USA counterparts. J Lipid Res. 2001, 42 (4): 631-638.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Jonsdottir LS, Sigfusson N, Guonason V, Sigvaldason H, Thorgeirsson G: Do lipids, blood pressure, diabetes, and smoking confer equal risk of myocardial infarction in women as in men? The Reykjavik study. J Cardiovasc Risk. 2002, 9 (2): 67-76. 10.1097/00043798-200204000-00001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Lamarche B, Despres JP, Moorjani S, Cantin B, Dagenais GR, Lupien PJ: Prevalence of dyslipidemic phenotypes in ischemic heart disease (prospective results from the Quebec Cardiovascular study). Am J Cardiol. 1995, 75 (17): 1189-1195. 10.1016/S0002-9149(99)80760-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Lloret Linares C, Pelletier AL, Czernichow S, Vergnaud AC, Bonnefont-Rousselot D, Levy P, Ruszniewski P, Bruckert E: Acute pancreatitis in a cohort of 129 patients referred for severe hypertriglyceridemia. Pancreas. 2008, 37 (1): 12-13.Google Scholar
Lu W, Resnick HE, Jablonski KA, Jones KL, Jain AK, Howard WMJ, Robbins DC, Howard BV: Non-HDL cholesterol as a predictor of cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes: The strong heart study. Diabetes Care. 2003, 26 (1): 16-23. 10.2337/diacare.26.1.16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Malone DC, Boudreau DM, Nichols GA, Raebel MA, Fishman PA, Feldstein AC, Ben-Joseph RH, Okamoto LJ, Boscoe AN, Magid DJ: Association of cardiometabolic risk factors and prevalent cardiovascular events. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2009, 7 (6): 585-593. 10.1089/met.2009.0033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Mazza A, Tikhonoff V, Schiavon L, Casiglia E: Triglycerides + high-density-lipoprotein-cholesterol dyslipidaemia, a coronary risk factor in elderly women: the CArdiovascular STudy in the ELderly. Intern Med J. 2005, 35 (10): 604-610. 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2005.00940.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Mora S, Rifai N, Buring JE, Ridker PM: Fasting compared with nonfasting lipids and apolipoproteins for predicting incident cardiovascular events. Circulation. 2008, 118 (10): 993-1001. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.777334.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Noda H, Maruyama K, Iso H, Dohi S, Terai T, Fujioka S, Goto K, Horie S, Nakano S, Hirobe K: Prediction of myocardial infarction using coronary risk scores among Japanese male workers: 3M study. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2010, 17 (5): 452-459. 10.5551/jat.3277.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Rubins HB, Robins SJ, Collins D, Fye CL, Anderson JW, Elam MB, Faas FH, Linares E, Schaefer EJ, Schectman G: Gemfibrozil for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in men with low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Intervention Trial Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999, 341 (6): 410-418. 10.1056/NEJM199908053410604.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Samuelsson O, Hedner T, Persson B, Andersson O, Berglund G, Wilhelmesen L: The role of diabetes mellitus and hypertriglyceridaemia as coronary risk factors in treated hypertension: 15 years of follow-up of antihypertensive treatment in middle-aged men in the Primary Prevention Trial in Goteborg, Sweden. J Intern Med. 1994, 235 (3): 217-227. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1994.tb01063.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Schupf N, Costa R, Luchsinger J, Tang MX, Lee JH, Mayeux R: Relationship between plasma lipids and all-cause mortality in nondemented elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005, 53 (2): 219-226. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53106.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Sprecher DL, Pearce GL, Park EM, Pashkow FJ, Hoogwerf BJ: Preoperative triglycerides predict post-coronary artery bypass graft survival in diabetic patients: a sex analysis. Diabetes Care. 2000, 23 (11): 1648-1653. 10.2337/diacare.23.11.1648.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Tanko LB, Bagger YZ, Qin G, Alexandersen P, Larsen PJ, Christiansen C: Enlarged waist combined with elevated triglycerides is a strong predictor of accelerated atherogenesis and related cardiovascular mortality in postmenopausal women. Circulation. 2005, 111 (15): 1883-1890. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000161801.65408.8D.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Tsai SP, Wen CP, Chan HT, Chiang PH, Tsai MK, Cheng TY: The effects of pre-disease risk factors within metabolic syndrome on all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008, 82 (1): 148-156. 10.1016/j.diabres.2008.07.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Upmeier E, Lavonius S, Lehtonen A, Viitanen M, Isoaho H, Arve S: Serum lipids and their association with mortality in the elderly: A prospective cohort study. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2009, 21 (6): 424-430.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Valdivielso P, Sanchez-Chaparro MA, Calvo-Bonacho E, Cabrera-Sierra M, Sainz-Gutierrez JC, Fernandez-Labandera C, Fernandez-Meseguer A, Quevedo-Aguado L, Moraga MR, Galvez-Moraleda A: Association of moderate and severe hypertriglyceridemia with obesity, diabetes mellitus and vascular disease in the Spanish working population: results of the ICARIA study. Atherosclerosis. 2009, 207 (2): 573-578. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.05.024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Weir CJ, Sattar N, Walters MR, Lees KR: Low triglyceride, not low cholesterol concentration, independently predicts poor outcome following acute stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003, 16 (1): 76-82. 10.1159/000070119.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Furukawa TA, Watanabe N, Omori IM, Montori VM, Guyatt GH: Association between unreported outcomes and effect size estimates in Cochrane meta-analyses. JAMA. 2007, 297 (5): 468-470.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Labreuche J, Deplanque D, Touboul PJ, Bruckert E, Amarenco P: Association between change in plasma triglyceride levels and risk of stroke and carotid atherosclerosis: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Atherosclerosis. 2010, 212 (1): 9-15. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.02.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Bruckert E, Labreuche J, Deplanque D, Touboul PJ, Amarenco P: Fibrates effect on cardiovascular risk is greater in patients with high triglyceride levels or atherogenic dyslipidemia profile: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2011, 57 (2): 267-272. 10.1097/FJC.0b013e318202709f.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Loomba RS, Arora R: Prevention of cardiovascular disease utilizing fibrates-a pooled meta-analysis. Am J Ther. 2010, 17 (6): e182-e188. 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3181dcf72b.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Jun M, Foote C, Lv J, Neal B, Patel A, Nicholls SJ, Grobbee DE, Cass A, Chalmers J, Perkovic V: Effects of fibrates on cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2010, 375 (9729): 1875-1884. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60656-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Lee M, Saver JL, Towfighi A, Chow J, Ovbiagele B: Efficacy of fibrates for cardiovascular risk reduction in persons with atherogenic dyslipidemia: A meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis. 2011Google Scholar
Bruckert E, Labreuche J, Amarenco P: Meta-analysis of the effect of nicotinic acid alone or in combination on cardiovascular events and atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 2010, 210 (2): 353-361. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.12.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Duggal JK, Singh M, Attri N, Singh PP, Ahmed N, Pahwa S, Molnar J, Singh S, Khosla S, Arora R: Effect of niacin therapy on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2010, 15 (2): 158-166. 10.1177/1074248410361337.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Chew EY, Ambrosius WT, Davis MD, Danis RP, Gangaputra S, Greven CM, Hubbard L, Esser BA, Lovato JF, Perdue LH: Effects of medical therapies on retinopathy progression in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2010, 363 (3): 233-244.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
AIM-HIGH Investigators: The role of niacin in raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to reduce cardiovascular events in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and optimally treated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol Rationale and study design. The Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic syndrome with low HDL/high triglycerides: Impact on Global Health outcomes (AIM-HIGH). Am Heart J. 2011, 161 (3): 471-477. e472View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
