Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association between plant-based diets and metabolic syndrome in obese adults from Iran: a cross-sectional study

BMC Endocrine Disorders volume 23, Article number: 109 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a common chronic disease with several complications. Given that, studies on the association of plant-based diet indices (PDIs) with risk of MetS among adults with obesity, are limited, we aimed to examine the association between PDIs (including overall PDI, healthy PDI (hPDI), unhealthy PDI (uPDI)) and MetS in Iranian adults with obesity.

Methods

In Tabriz, Iran, a total of 347 adults between the ages of 20 and 50 participated in this cross-sectional research study. We created an overall PDI, hPDI, and uPDI from validated semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) data. To investigate the association between hPDI, overall PDI, uPDI, and MetS and its components, a binary logistic regression analysis was performed.

Results

The average age was 40.78 ± 9.23 years, and the average body mass index was 32.62 ± 4.80 kg/m2. There was no significant association between overall PDI (OR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.54–1.47), hPDI (OR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.48–1.40), and uPDI (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.87–2.46) with MetS, even after adjustment for confounders. Moreover, our findings showed that participants with the highest adherence to uPDI had a higher chance of hyperglycemia (OR: 2.50; 95% CI: 1.13–5.52). Also, this association was significant in the first (OR: 2.51; 95% CI: 1.04–6.04) and second (OR: 2.58; 95% CI: 1.05–6.33) models, after controlling for covariates. However, in both adjusted and crude models, we did not find a significant association between hPDI and PDI scores and MetS components such as high triglyceride, high waist circumference, low High-density lipoprotein cholesterol, raised blood pressure, and hyperglycemia. Moreover, those in the top tertile of uPDI had higher fasting blood sugar and insulin levels when compared with those in the first tertile, and subjects in the last tertile of hPDI compared with participants in the first tertile had lower weight, waist-to-hip ratio, and fat-free mass.

Conclusion

We found a direct significant association between uPDI and odds of hyperglycemia in the whole population of study. Future large-scale, prospective studies on PDIs and the MetS are necessary to confirm these findings.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a growing concern for the health and well-being of adults worldwide. MetS is linked to a number of conditions, including abdominal obesity, endothelial dysfunction, glucose intolerance, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and hypertension (HTN), which are directly associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) [1,2,3]. Its prevalence in the world is estimated to be around 3.3% of the whole population and 29.2% of the population obesity [4]. Furthermore, the risk of diabetes and MetS has increased five-fold in people with obesity compared with normal-weight people [5]. Current studies indicate that 33.7% of Iranians over the age of 20 have MetS, with women being more affected than men (42% versus 24%) [6]. MetS is a multifactorial condition caused by the complex interaction of lifestyle, environmental and genetic variables (Fig. 1) [7].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Mechanisms highlighting MetS and hyperglycemia pathophysiology

Full size image

The establishment of healthy dietary patterns is one of several important factors that influence MetS status. Therefore, educating and encouraging adults to improve their diet quality by increasing the intake of healthy plant-based diets could be useful to prevent and treatment of MetS and its complications [8, 9]. According to certain research, patients who limit their intake of animal-based meals have positive metabolic profiles, including lower blood pressure, lower fasting blood sugar (FBS), and lower body mass index (BMI) [10, 11], but others showed no association [12, 13] or contrary relations [14,15,16]. The majority of these previous studies focus on the effects of a vegetarian diet, which is a subset of a plant-based diet (PBD). In addition, the consumption of plant foods, particularly less-healthy plant meals such as those high in processed carbohydrates or sugar processed carbs, has not been considered.

New plant-based indices (PDIs) have been offered as a strategy for dominating this field. A PDI that highlights intake of all plant foods while minimizing intake of animal foods; a healthy plant-based diet index (hPDI) that prioritizes consumption of plant foods associated with enhanced health outcomes, such as vegetables, fruits, and whole grains [17,18,19]. An unhealthful plant-based diet index (uPDI) focuses on the intake of unhealthy plant foods [19]. Numerous studies employing these indices have shown that stronger adherence to the hPDI, PDI, and the pro-vegetarian diet index is related to a lower risk of HTN, T2DM, and CVD, as well as reduced weight gain [19,20,21]. In an observational cohort study done by kim et al. [22] on MetS patients in South Korea. The results of this study illustrated that consumption of healthier plant foods (vegetables, fruits, nuts, whole grains, tea, coffee, and legumes) compared to relatively fewer healthy plant foods (potatoes, sugar-sweetened beverages, sweets, refined grains, salty foods) useful for prevention of MetS.

Besides, previous studies have also indicated that a plant-rich diet has been associated with MetS [23, 24], but the association of PDIs with MetS and its components in Iranian adults with obesity has been not yet studied and the link between PDIs and MetS remains unclear in obese adults. This cross-sectional study focuses mainly on the importance of PDIs as a modifiable risk factor for MetS. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to explore the association of PDIs (including overall PDI, hPDI, uPDI) to MetS and its components in Iranian adults with obesity.

Method

Patients participating in the study

This cross-sectional study included 347 obese adults (58.2% men and 41.8% women). When estimating sample size, the dependence between food quality indices and obesity was considered a crucial dependent variable. The sample size was projected to be 340 using the G-power program with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.25, α = 0.05, and power of 80% [25, 26]. Using the approach of convenience, samples were obtained via announcements. All research participants were questioned by a competent nutritionist. The participants in this study were obese adults with metabolic syndrome aged 20 to 50 years with a BMI of 30 to 40 kg/m2. Under the age of 18, people with a history of weight change of 5 kg or more in the last six months, pregnant women, lactating women, acute inflammatory disease, people with chronic diseases namely cancer, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, liver or kidney diseases or chronic infections, thyroid diseases, people with a history of alcohol or drug abuse and users of slimming drugs were excluded from the study. This research was approved by the ethics committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (IR.TBZMED. REC.1400.454 and grant number: 72003). Before participating in the trial, all patients provided written consent after being fully informed.

Anthropometric assessment and general features

Nutritionists collected information about participants’ gender, age, educational level, smoking, and matrimonial status via questionnaires. House ownership, family size, educational attainment, and employment status were each collected via face-to-face interviews as independent indicators of individuals’ socioeconomic status. The gathered total score was divided into three classes: high, medium, and low based on socioeconomic status tertiles [27]. Using a validated self-administered Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 Items questionnaire, the degree of depression was evaluated [28, 29]. Body weight was determined using a Seca (Germany) scale with a resolution of 0.1 kg, and height was determined using a stadiometer with a resolution of 0.1 cm. The waist circumference (WC) was measured using a constant tension tape in a standing position halfway between the iliac crests and lower rib borders. The BMI was calculated by dividing weight by the square of height (kg/m2). To get the waist-hip ratio (WHR), the WC was divided by the hip circumference. Using a BIA analyzer (Tanita, BC-428, Tokyo, Japan), fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) were defined. Patients’ diastolic and systolic blood pressure (DBP and SBP) were measured twice after 15 min of sitting using a conventional mercury sphygmomanometer, and their average was determined.

Description of MetS

In our study MetS was defined when three or more of the following components were met [30]: FBS ≥ 100 mg/dl or using anti-diabetic drugs; High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) < 50 mg/dl in women and < 40 mg/dl in men; TG ≥ 150 mg/dl or use of anti-lipid drugs; SBP ≥ 130 mmHg or DBP ≥ 85 mmHg or use of antihypertensive drugs and WC ≥ 95 cm for both genders, according to the new cut-off points for the Iranian adult population [31].

Physical activity (PA) assessment

The International PA Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF) was used to test PA levels in official Persian [32, 33]. This questionnaire has already been translated and validated for the Iranian adult population. Based on the information supplied by the people, the MET value was computed by taking into consideration the kind, quantity, and duration of weekly activities. At least 8.0 MET was regarded as intense physical activity, 4.0 MET as moderate, and walking at 3.3 MET [34].

Dietary evaluation and determination of the plant-based diet index

Using a validated semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) containing 147 food items, dietary intake information was collected [35]. Nutritionists with expertise in the field requested patients who participated in the research to pick the number of servings and the frequency with which they consumed each item over the previous year, monthly, weekly, yearly, or daily. A home scale was used to convert the portion sizes into grams. We utilized the Food Composition Table (FCT) from the USDA for our nutritional and energy study since the Iranian FCT does not give too much information [36]. These were converted to daily intakes and dietary information was utilized to develop three types of PDIs: an overall PDI, a high PDI, and a low PDI. We created 18 food groups based on nutrient and culinary similarities among healthy plant foods (whole grains, vegetables, fruits, tea, nuts, legumes, or coffee), fewer healthy plant foods (potatoes, sugar-sweetened beverages, refined grains, desserts, sweets, or fruit juices), and animal foods (fish or seafood, eggs, meat, dairy, other animal-based foods). The sorting of mixed-composition foods was based on the component that predominated. According to their food intake, participants were sorted into quintiles, which were then assigned negative or positive scores. Subjects scoring in the top quintile of a given food group were awarded a 5, while those scoring in the bottom quintile were awarded a 1. This scoring pattern was flipped by employing inverse scores. On the PDI, plant-based food categories received positive values, but animal-based food categories received negative values. On the hPDI, healthier plant-based food groups were assigned positive values, whereas less healthy plant-based food groups and animal-based food groups were assigned negative values. Positive values were assigned to less healthy plant food categories for the uPDI, whereas negative values were assigned to healthy plant food categories and animal food groups. The indices were computed by aggregating the scores for the 18 food categories.

Biochemical assessment

Following a fast of 12 h, venous blood was drawn from all participants, centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 rpm, 4 °C, and frozen at -75 °C until analysis. Total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), FBS, and HDL-C levels were all tested using a commercially available kit (Pars Azmoon, Tehran, Iran). Serum low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) was calculated using the Friedewald technique [37]. ELISA was used based on the manufacturer’s instructions to measure serum levels of insulin (BTL, Shanghai City, China).

Statistical analyses

We analyzed the data using version 21 SPSS (Inc., Chicago, IL). P-values below 0.05 were used to establish the statistical significance of the study. Tertiles of PBD indices were utilized to classify every topic. As the reference class, the first tertile of PBD indices was used. Mean and standard deviation (SD) were used to describe quantitative data, whereas percentages were employed to express qualitative factors. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Chi-squared tests were used to compare quantitative and categorical variables across tertiles of PBD indices, respectively. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for MetS and its components across tertiles of PBD indices were determined utilizing binary logistic regression with adjusted models. In the first model, adjustments were made for education, sex, marital status, age, smoking status, occupation, and physical activity [38, 39]. Energy consumption was modified further in the second model.

Results

Participant characteristics

General characteristics of the individuals across tertiles of hPDI, PDI, and uPDI are accessible in Table 1. The study included 347 participants (202 males and 145 females) with obesity, and the mean ± SD age of the subjects was 40.78 ± 9.23 years and the mean ± SD of BMI was 32.62 ± 4.80 kg/m2. The prevalence of MetS in our participants was 40.82%. Although most baseline variables were similar in the tertiles of PDI, participants in the last tertile of PDI compared with participants in the first tertile had higher WHR and higher intake of fat, carbohydrate, and protein (P < 0.05). Participants with the lowest hPDI score were significantly younger (P = 0.01) than those with the highest score. They had also lower weight (P = 0.04), WHR (P = 0.04), FFM (P = 0.03), and intake of fat, carbohydrate, and protein (P < 0.05). Participants in the last tertile of hPDI compared with participants in the first tertile were older and had lower weight, WHR, FFM, and a lower intake of fat, carbohydrate, and protein (P < 0.05). Moreover, there were significant differences in gender, socioeconomic status, and education level across tertiles of hPDI (P < 0.05). Participants in the last tertile of uPDI compared with participants in the first tertile had a higher intake of fat, carbohydrate, and protein (P < 0.05). No further differences were found in the general characteristics of participants among tertiles of uPDI (P > 0.05). As shown in Figs. 2, 3 and 4, we did not observe any statistically significant difference in biochemical parameters across tertiles of PDI, hPDI (P > 0.05). However, those in the top tertile of uPDI had higher FBS and insulin concentrations when compared with those in the bottom tertile (P < 0.05).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Metabolic variables (TG, TC, and insulin) of participants across tertiles of PDI, hPDI, and uPDI

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Metabolic variables (FBS, DBP, and SBP) of participants across tertiles of PDI, hPDI, and uPDI

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Metabolic variables (HDL-C, and LDL-C) of participants across tertiles of PDI, hPDI, and uPDI

Full size image
Table 1 The baseline characteristics of study population across tertiles of PDI, hPDI, and uPDI in a cross-sectional study of MetS in Iran (n = 347)
Full size table

Association between PDIs and MetS and its components

Multivariable-adjusted OR and 95% CIs for MetS and its components according to tertiles of uPDI, PDI, and hPDI are shown in Table 2. In the crude model, a higher score of uPDI was directly associated with the risk of hyperglycemia (OR: 2.50; 95% CI: 1.13–5.52). Also, this association was significant in the first (OR: 2.51; 95% CI: 1.04–6.04) and second (OR: 2.58; 95% CI: 1.05–6.33) models, after controlling for covariates. However, no significant association was found between uPDI and risk of MetS and high WC, high TC, high TG, low HDL-C, and elevated blood pressure in crude and adjusted models. No significant association was found between PDI and hPDI and risk of MetS (OR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.54–1.47, OR: 1.46; 95% CI: 0.87–2.46, respectively) and its components. After adjustment for covariates, including age, sex, occupation, marital status, education, smoking status, physical activity, and energy intake, the association remained unchanged.

Table 2 Odd’s ratio (OR) and confidence interval (CI) for MetS and its components according to tertiles of PDI, hPDI, and uPDI in a cross-sectional study of MetS in Iran (n = 347)
Full size table

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, the current cross-sectional study is the first to examine the association between PDIs and MetS and its components in Iranian adults with obesity. In this adult sample, there was no significant association between hPDI and PDI scores and MetS and its components, whereas a high uPDI score was associated with an increased risk of hyperglycemia. This association remained significant even after considering potential covariates. Moreover, those in the top tertile of uPDI had higher FBS and insulin levels when compared with those in the first tertile and participants in the last tertile of hPDI compared with participants in the first tertile had lower weight, WHR, and FFM.

Our results were compared with those from several studies assessing the relationship between MetS risk and: (1) overall diet, which includes animal-based and plant components, or (2) vegetarian diets. In line with our study, Huo et al. [40] in a cohort study in Chinese adults also revealed no significant relationship between uPDI and MetS, however, they found an inverse association between the hPDI and MetS. They reported that participants in the highest quintile of hPDI score had a 20% lower risk of developing high WC and had a 28% lower risk of developing MetS. Compared with the findings of a study on a PBD and MetS in South Korea (KoGES cohort), when adjusting for lifestyle and demographic variables, participants with the highest score of uPDI (diets high in sugars, salted vegetables, and refined carbohydrates, and low in healthy animal and plant foods) had a 44% greater risk of having incident MetS compared to those with the lowest score of uPDI, nevertheless they did not find a relationship between MetS and hPDI [22]. In the SUN cohort study, they showed a robust negative relationship between the healthy pro-vegetarian food pattern and overweight/obesity incidence, while these were not significant for the unhealthy pro-vegetarian food pattern [41]. The vegetarian food pattern was calculated likewise to the PDIs in our study. Contrary to the results of earlier studies, this study did not support the relationship between PDIs and with risk of having MetS [42,43,44]. The observed results are different from findings obtained from the Persian Kavar cohort study (PKCS) conducted among healthy Iranian individuals, showing a significant inverse relationship between hPDI and MetS, low serum HDL-C, and hyperglycemia [44]. However, in line with our results, several studies conducted in South Korea have currently shown no significant association between hPDI and MetS [22, 45].

The differences between our findings and the previous research could be due to Iran’s nutrition transition as a middle-income country. The conventional Iranian cuisine comprises a variety of food items, including fruits, vegetables, dairy products, poultry, meat, fresh leafy greens, and nuts [46]. Transitioning to a Western dietary pattern may have unfavorably affected Iranians’ dietary patterns. Western diets tend to contain larger portion sizes, which can lead to excessive energy consumption and an increased risk of obesity and its related diseases [47]. Furthermore, Western diets characterized by a high intake of processed and red meat are related to a higher incidence of MetS [48, 49]. We did not find an association between hPDI and MetS or its components. However, subjects in the last tertile of hPDI compared with participants in the first tertile had lower weight, WHR, and FFM. These results were as expected, as earlier research has reported favorable relations between weight and adherence to a hPDI [20, 50]. Probably, higher plant food consumption in subjects that is already consuming a PBD may not cause clinically significant metabolic responses. Moreover, the detected associations with hPDI may have been inconsequential owing to a distinct categorization of food items in the present investigation, as certain plant-based foods that are less healthy could not be distinguished from those that are healthy. Different study designs, participants’ characteristics, geographical regions, lack of adjusting for possible confounding factors, different sample sizes, and types of bias might explain the differences between our results and those of previous research. Generally, more research using the PDI, uPDI, and hPDI might help resolve these discrepancies.

MetS, characterized by hypertension, insulin resistance, abdominal obesity, low-grade inflammation, and dyslipidemia. The biological rationale for the possible relationship of PBD on MetS risk might be as follow: lower intake of meat, animal fats, and animal-based foods and higher consumption of healthy plant- foods such as fruits, vegetables, vegetable oils, whole grains, nuts, and legumes is accompanied with higher consumption of antioxidants, polyunsaturated fatty acids, fiber, isoflavones, phytochemicals, calcium, vitamins, all of which being inversely associated with obesity and its related diseases [51]. The synergic effects of these healthy foods can have beneficial effects on MetS and its components.

One of the biological treatments that are involved in decreasing MetS and its complications is a low level of inflammation status. Low consumption of fruits, vegetables, and whole grains is related to increased inflammatory markers [52]. Findings from a meta-analysis of PBDs and its association with inflammatory markers revealed that intake of a vegetarian-based diet was related to lower CRP, and fibrinogen levels compared with those following a mixed omnivorous diet [53]. Moreover, a cross-sectional study among Iranian women with obesity also shown that higher hPBD adherence was related to lower transforming growth factor and CRP levels [54]. Fiber consumption positively changes the microbiota and increases gut barrier function and anti-inflammatory molecules [55]. Dietary fiber has been revealed to decline plasma TC by binding to bile acids and dietary cholesterol in the intestinal tract, resulting in reduced cholesterol absorption [56]. Moreover, n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids contained in fish have been revealed to possess cardioprotective, anti-inflammatory, and hypotriglyceridemic propertie [57]. Monounsaturated fatty acids from nuts and olive oil can be anti-inflammatory in PBD, mainly by replacing saturated fat consumption [58]. Polyphenols may prevent the development of MetS by lowering plasma glucose, blood pressure, body weight, and improving dyslipidemia [59, 60]. Isoflavones, have anti-inflammatory effects and potentially protect against MetS by preventing the onset of dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, and hypertension [61]. Furthermore, phytochemicals modify inflammation by several mechanisms, such as modulating mitogen-activated protein kinase, inhibiting arachidonic acids pathways and nuclear factor kappa-B [62]. Thomas et al. [60] reviewed the effects of different types of PBDs on weight, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and low-grade inflammation. They concluded that vegan diets are effective in reducing weight and inflammatory markers, moreover, lacto-ovo- and lacto-vegetarian diets, that contain antioxidants and nutrients that improve inflammation and dyslipidemia, seem to provide positive effects for MetS.

Consumptions of dietary antioxidants might improve glucose metabolism by reducing glucose absorption and improving insulin sensitivity [63]. Furthermore, micronutrients such as vitamin C, magnesium, and potassium have been shown to improve insulin sensitivity, and blood pressure, and protect against inflammatory and oxidative stress [64,65,66]. Nevertheless, increased consumption of added sugars can lead to adverse effects on weight, blood pressure, lipid metabolism, and glycemic control, particularly high dietary fructose can increase hepatic de novo lipogenesis [67]. PBDs have a low energy density and low-energy food consumption is important for weight control and can decrease the incidence of abdominal obesity [68, 69]. Such a diet could have so several positive effects on health such as helping weight loss or maintenance, insulin regulation, improving lipid profile, and reducing blood pressure [17,18,19].

In recent years, the development of big retail supply of food has preferred energy-dense and processed foods over than fresh ones, with high salt, fat, and sugar content [70]. An increasing body of evidence shows that local food environments might affect health status [71,72,73]. It is consequently possible to speculate that length of a food supply chain might affect MetS and its components. Soummer et al. [70] in an observational study in Southern Italy demonstrated thate length of food supply chain plays a key role in determining the risk of MetS in a population adhering to the Mediterranean diet. Moreover, they reported that short supply chains is associated with a lower prevalence of MetS and insulin resistance is significantly more common among long supply chain subjects compared with short supply chains individuals.

Key elements of PBDs associated with reduced risk of MetS

There may be numerous dietary components of PBDs that are working together to have a positive and significant effect on MetS. These include both food groups and nutrients that are usually lower in PBDs (meat, saturated fat, and energy intake) or higher in PBDs (fiber, vegetables, and fruits) [74]. This may be one reason why PBDs may be protective against the development of MetS. One dietary benefit of following PBDs may be consuming a diet lower in energy content, as compared with omnivorous diets. In numerous studies comparing vegetarian diets with omnivorous dietary patterns, significant weight loss has occurred in the absence of significantly different alterations in reported energy consumption between groups [75, 76]. Moreover, in a cohort study BMI was found to be highest among omnivores and lowest among vegans; however energy consumption did not significantly differ among the groups [77]. Several studies have detected that diets high in saturated fat are related to increased risk of developing MetS. Both experimental [78, 79] and observational [77, 80] studies have consistently revealed lower saturated fat consumption among people following a vegan diet, as compared with omnivores. People following vegetarian diets tend to have higher vegetable and fruit consumption than those following omnivorous diets [81, 82]. High intake of vegetable and fruit can provide individuals with important antioxidants, which may help to prevent inflammation and oxidative stress. Moreover, vegetables and fruits are a good source of fiber, which can also help with preventing MetS and CVDs [83]. A study of Spanish adults revealed that dietary fiber consumption was related to a reduction in weight and WC [84], and dietary fiber can significantly reduce energy intake. Furthermore, energy consumption may be affected by dietary fiber in particular by changes in satiety and hunger signals. Absorption of water by soluble fibers could lead to a higher amount of viscous gel formation, higher satiety, and slower gut transit time [85]. Moreover, fiber can stimulate the fecal defecation of bile acids, thus lowering serum TC and improving the lipid profile [86]. However, higher glycemic index and a load of such an unhealthy diet might cause a decrease in satiety and an increase in hunger signals [87]. Processed and red meat consumption has been related to increased risk of MetS and T2DM [88, 89]. Exclusion of meat from the diet, which occurs when an individual follows a vegetarian or vegan diet, is one potential approach to mitigate the risk of developing MetS. Even people following PBDs consume less animal protein than do omnivores, while intakes are even lower among those following PBDs [77].

Strengths and limitations

Several strengths of this study include an adjustment for several confounding factors in the analysis, being the first study among adults with obesity, and using a validated FFQ and energy-adjusted values of all food groups for constructing PDIs. Certain plant-based foods, such as refined grains, potatoes, and sugar-sweetened beverages, have an adverse effect on health status [90, 91]. Thus, the study examined the impact of a comprehensive plant-based diet on MetS and analyzed the influence of healthy and unhealthy plant-based foods separately. However, some potential limitations also need to be kept in mind when interpreting results. The present study was carried out in a cross-sectional design, which is prone to misclassification, selection bias, recall bias, and response bias and would not allow us to infer causality. Although we used a validated FFQ, reporting of dietary consumption can still be subject to measurement error. Therefore, the results of this study may not represent all adults with obesity. Moreover, although we adjusted for several covariates, we could not control for some unknown and residual covariates, which could lead to confounding bias. Lastly, different cooking methods can have an influence on the nutritional value of plant food products, however the effects of cooking methods were not considered in the study.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our study of adults with obesity revealed a positive correlation between elevated uPDI scores and an increased risk of hyperglycemia. The study findings indicate that there was no significant association between PDI or hPDI and MetS or its components in the adult population with obesity. Additional prospective research on the relationship between PDI and MetS is required to validate the observed associations.

The findings of the present investigation indicate a positive correlation between increased adherence to uPDI score and a higher risk of hyperglycemia. Nonetheless, comprehending this correlation could be facilitated by considering the nutritional composition. The dietary makeup of an individual with upper percentile dietary intake (uPDI) may consist of elevated consumption of plant-based foods that are deemed less healthy, including but not limited to confectioneries, fruit juices, processed grains, sugary desserts, and starches that have been sweetened with sugar. Conversely, the consumption of antioxidants and micronutrients may be comparatively lower, which could potentially have a negative impact on the development of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its associated components. These foods have a high glycemic index and several studies have reported that high glycemic index foods increase fat storage and therefore increase visceral adiposity and weight [92]. A study in the US reported that women with higher dietary consumption of lipids and lower dietary consumption of micronutrients (vitamins A, E, C, and folate) had a raised risk of MetS [93].

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to some restrictions that applied by the ethical committee but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Sundström J, Risérus U, Byberg L, Zethelius B, Lithell H, Lind L. Clinical value of the metabolic syndrome for long term prediction of total and cardiovascular mortality: prospective, population based cohort study. BMJ. 2006;332(7546):878–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hui WS, Liu Z, Ho SC. Metabolic syndrome and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Springer; 2010. p. 375–84.

  3. Guerra ZC, Moore JR, Londoño T, Castro Y. Associations of acculturation and gender with obesity and physical activity among Latinos. Am J Health Behav. 2022;46(3):324–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Friend A, Craig L, Turner S. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome in children: a systematic review of the literature. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2013;11(2):71–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rubenstein AH. Obesity: a modern epidemic. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2005;116:103.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Farmanfarma KK, Kaykhaei MA, Adineh HA, Mohammadi M, Dabiri S, Ansari-Moghaddam A. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Iran: a meta-analysis of 69 studies. Diabetes Metab Syndr: Clin Res Rev. 2019;13(1):792–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cornier M-A, Dabelea D, Hernandez TL, Lindstrom RC, Steig AJ, Stob NR, et al. The metabolic syndrome. Endocr Rev. 2008;29(7):777–822.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Feldeisen SE, Tucker KL. Nutritional strategies in the prevention and treatment of metabolic syndrome. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2007;32(1):46–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Leman MA, Claramita M, Rahayu GR. Predicting factors on modeling health behavior: a systematic review. Am J Health Behav. 2021;45(2):268–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Picasso MC, Lo-Tayraco JA, Ramos-Villanueva JM, Pasupuleti V, Hernandez AV. Effect of vegetarian diets on the presentation of metabolic syndrome or its components: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(3):1117–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yokoyama Y, Nishimura K, Barnard ND, Takegami M, Watanabe M, Sekikawa A, et al. Vegetarian diets and blood pressure: a meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(4):577–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Choi SH, Oh DJ, Kwon KH, Lee JK, Koh M-S, Lee JH, et al. A vegetarian diet does not protect against nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): a cross-sectional study between buddhist priests and the general population. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2015;26(4):336–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vinagre J, Vinagre C, Pozzi F, Slywitch E, Maranhão R. Metabolism of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and transfer of lipids to high-density lipoproteins (HDL) in vegan and omnivore subjects. Nutr Metabolism Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;23(1):61–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bedford JL, Barr SI. Diets and selected lifestyle practices of self-defined adult vegetarians from a population-based sample suggest they are more’health conscious’. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activity. 2005;2(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chiang J-K, Lin Y-L, Chen C-L, Ouyang C-M, Wu Y-T, Chi Y-C, et al. Reduced risk for metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance associated with ovo-lacto-vegetarian behavior in female Buddhists: a case-control study. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(8):e71799.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Gupta A, Gupta S, Mani R, Durgapal P, Goyal B, Rajput D, et al. Expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, survivin, enhancer of zeste homolog-2, cyclooxygenase-2, p53 and p16 molecular markers in gall bladder carcinoma. J Carcinog. 2021;20:7.

  17. Satija A, Bhupathiraju SN, Rimm EB, Spiegelman D, Chiuve SE, Borgi L, et al. Plant-based dietary patterns and incidence of type 2 diabetes in US men and women: results from three prospective cohort studies. PLoS Med. 2016;13(6):e1002039.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee K, Kim H, Rebholz CM, Kim J. Association between different types of plant-based diets and risk of dyslipidemia: a prospective cohort study. Nutrients. 2021;13(1):220.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Satija A, Bhupathiraju SN, Spiegelman D, Chiuve SE, Manson JE, Willett W, et al. Healthful and unhealthful plant-based diets and the risk of coronary heart disease in US adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(4):411–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Satija A, Malik V, Rimm EB, Sacks F, Willett W, Hu FB. Changes in intake of plant-based diets and weight change: results from 3 prospective cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019;110(3):574–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim H, Rebholz CM, Garcia-Larsen V, Steffen LM, Coresh J, Caulfield LE. Operational differences in plant-based diet indices affect the ability to detect associations with incident hypertension in middle-aged US adults. J Nutr. 2020;150(4):842–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim H, Lee K, Rebholz CM, Kim J. Plant-based diets and incident metabolic syndrome: results from a south korean prospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2020;17(11):e1003371.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Patil S, Prabhakaran J, Nazar S, Abaya K. To study association between lipid profile in vegetarians and non-vegetarians in the local population. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2015;4(32):5533–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jung JG, Kang HW, Hahn SJ, Kim JH, Lee JK, Lim YJ, et al. Vegetarianism as a protective factor for reflux esophagitis: a retrospective, cross-sectional study between buddhist priests and general population. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58(8):2244–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Murray AE, McMorrow AM, O’Connor E, Kiely C, Mac Ananey O, O’Shea D, et al. Dietary quality in a sample of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Ireland; a cross-sectional case control study. Nutr J. 2013;12(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Khodarahmi M, Javidzade P, Farhangi MA, Hashemzehi A, Kahroba H. Interplay between fatty acid desaturase2 (FADS2) rs174583 genetic variant and dietary antioxidant capacity: cardio-metabolic risk factors in obese individuals. BMC Endocr disorders. 2022;22(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Khodarahmi M, Asghari-Jafarabadi M, Abbasalizad Farhangi M. A structural equation modeling approach for the association of a healthy eating index with metabolic syndrome and cardio-metabolic risk factors among obese individuals. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(7):e0219193.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Samani S, Joukar B. A study on the reliability and validity of the short form of the depression anxiety stress scale (DASS-21). 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gallegos-Gonzalez G, Pineda-García G, Serrano-Medina A, Martinez AL, Ochoa-Ruiz E. Association between stress and metabolic syndrome and its mediating factors in university students. Am J Health Behav. 2021;45(6):1091–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA, et al. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the international diabetes federation task force on epidemiology and prevention; national heart, lung, and blood institute; american heart association; world heart federation; international atherosclerosis society; and international association for the study of obesity. Circulation. 2009;120(16):1640–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Azizi F, Hadaegh F, Khalili D, Esteghamati A, Hossein PF, Delavari A, et al. Appropriate definition of metabolic syndrome among iranian adults: report of the Iranian National Committee of Obesity. 2010.

  32. Vasheghani-Farahani A, Tahmasbi M, Asheri H, Ashraf H, Nedjat S, Kordi R. The Persian, last 7-day, long form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire: translation and validation study. Asian J sports Med. 2011;2(2):106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Zelenović M, Kontro T, Dumitru RC, Aksovic N, Bjelica B, Alexe DI, et al. Leisure-time physical activity and all-cause mortality: a systematic review. Revista De Psicología Del Deporte (Journal of Sport Psychology). 31(1):1–16.

  34. Hyder KM, Mohan J, Varma V, Sivasankaran P, Raja D. Effects of muscle–specific exercises compared to existing interventions on insulin resistance among Prediabetes Population of South India. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2021;12(2):230.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Mirmiran P, Esfahani FH, Mehrabi Y, Hedayati M, Azizi F. Reliability and relative validity of an FFQ for nutrients in the Tehran lipid and glucose study. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13(5):654–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gaeini Z, Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Djazayery A. The association between dietary fat pattern and the risk of type 2 diabetes. Prev Nutr food Sci. 2019;24(1):1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18(6):499–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zamani B, Daneshzad E, Siassi F, Guilani B, Bellissimo N, Azadbakht L. Association of plant-based dietary patterns with psychological profile and obesity in iranian women. Clin Nutr. 2020;39(6):1799–808.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kamolthip R, Fung XC, Lin C-Y, Latner JD, O’Brien KS. Relationships among physical activity, health-related quality of life, and weight stigma in children in Hong Kong. Am J Health Behav. 2021;45(5):828–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Huo Y, Cao S, Liu J, Zhang B, Xu K, Wang Y, et al. The Association between Plant-Based Diet Indices and metabolic syndrome in chinese adults: longitudinal analyses from the China Health and Nutrition Survey. Nutrients. 2023;15(6):1341.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Martínez-González MA, Sánchez-Tainta A, Corella D, Salas-Salvado J, Ros E, Arós F, et al. A provegetarian food pattern and reduction in total mortality in the Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea (PREDIMED) study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100(suppl1):320S–8S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bianchi C, Penno G, Romero F, Del Prato S, Miccoli R. Treating the metabolic syndrome. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2007;5(3):491–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Pistollato F, Battino M. Role of plant-based diets in the prevention and regression of metabolic syndrome and neurodegenerative diseases. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2014;40(1):62–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Jafari F, Amini Kahrizsangi M, Najam W, Fattahi MR, Nouri M, Ghalandari H, et al. Association of plant-based dietary patterns with metabolic syndrome: baseline results from the Persian Kavar cohort study (PKCS). Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2023;74(2):291–301.

  45. Kim H, Lee K, Rebholz CM, Kim J. Association between unhealthy plant-based diets and the metabolic syndrome in adult men and women: a population-based study in South Korea. Br J Nutr. 2021;125(5):577–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ghassemi H, Harrison G, Mohammad K. An accelerated nutrition transition in Iran. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5(1a):149–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Livingstone MBE, Pourshahidi LK. Portion size and obesity. Adv Nutr. 2014;5(6):829–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Lutsey PL, Steffen LM, Stevens J. Dietary intake and the development of the metabolic syndrome: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Circulation. 2008;117(6):754–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Chen S, Zhou Z, Ren K. Influence of sports value on adolescent participation and preference of Sci-Tech experience activities. Revista De Psicología Del Deporte (Journal of Sport Psychology). 30(4):1–10.

  50. Gómez-Donoso C, Martínez-González M, Martínez JA, Gea A, Sanz-Serrano J, Perez-Cueto FJ, et al. A provegetarian food pattern emphasizing preference for healthy plant-derived foods reduces the risk of overweight/obesity in the SUN cohort. Nutrients. 2019;11(7):1553.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Azadbakht L, Mirmiran P, Azizi F. Dietary diversity score is favorably associated with the metabolic syndrome in tehranian adults. Int J Obes. 2005;29(11):1361–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Lopez-Garcia E, Schulze MB, Fung TT, Meigs JB, Rifai N, Manson JE, et al. Major dietary patterns are related to plasma concentrations of markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80(4):1029–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Craddock JC, Neale EP, Peoples GE, Probst YC. Vegetarian-based dietary patterns and their relation with inflammatory and immune biomarkers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Adv Nutr. 2019;10(3):433–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Bolori P, Setaysh L, Rasaei N, Jarrahi F, saeid Yekaninejad M. Adherence to a healthy plant diet may reduce inflammatory factors in obese and overweight women-a cross-sectional study. Diabetes Metab Syndr: Clin Res Rev. 2019;13(4):2795–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Thomas MS, Blesso CN, Calle MC, Chun OK, Puglisi M, Fernandez ML. Dietary influences on gut microbiota with a focus on metabolic syndrome. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2022;20(8):429–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Jesch ED, Carr TP. Food ingredients that inhibit cholesterol absorption. Prev Nutr food Sci. 2017;22(2):67.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Grosso G, Laudisio D, Frias-Toral E, Barrea L, Muscogiuri G, Savastano S, et al. Anti-inflammatory nutrients and obesity-associated metabolic-inflammation: state of the art and future direction. Nutrients. 2022;14(6):1137.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Ravaut G, Légiot A, Bergeron K-F, Mounier C. Monounsaturated fatty acids in obesity-related inflammation. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;22(1):330.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Kahleova H, Levin S, Barnard N. Cardio-metabolic benefits of plant-based diets. Nutrients. 2017;9(8):848.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Thomas MS, Calle M, Fernandez ML. Healthy plant-based diets improve dyslipidemias, insulin resistance, and inflammation in metabolic syndrome. A narrative review. Adv Nutr. 2023;14(1):44–54.

  61. Qin P, Wang T, Luo Y. A review on plant-based proteins from soybean: Health benefits and soy product development. J Agric Food Res. 2022;7:100265.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Yahfoufi N, Alsadi N, Jambi M, Matar C. The immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory role of polyphenols. Nutrients. 2018;10(11):1618.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Zhang C, Ning Y. Effect of dietary and lifestyle factors on the risk of gestational diabetes: review of epidemiologic evidence. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(suppl6):1975S–9S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Aaron KJ. In: Sanders PW, editor. Role of dietary salt and potassium intake in cardiovascular health and disease: a review of the evidence. Elsevier; 2013. Mayo Clinic Proceedings.

  65. Rosique-Esteban N, Guasch-Ferré M, Hernández-Alonso P, Salas-Salvadó J. Dietary magnesium and cardiovascular disease: a review with emphasis in epidemiological studies. Nutrients. 2018;10(2):168.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Xavier J, Farias CP, Soares MSP, Silveira GdO, Spanevello RM, Yonamine M, et al. Ayahuasca prevents oxidative stress in a rat model of depression elicited by unpredictable chronic mild stress. Arch Clin Psychiatry (São Paulo). 2021;48:90–8.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Fried SK, Rao SP. Sugars, hypertriglyceridemia, and cardiovascular disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;78(4):873S–80S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Farrell P, Negin J, Awoke M, Thow AM, Taua M, Faumuina T, et al. Associations between sociodemographic and behaviour factors, and dietary risk factors for overweight and obesity, in samoan women. Appetite. 2019;134:155–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Gani IH, Al-Obaidi Z. MgO NPs catalyzed the synthesis of novel pyridin-3-yl-pyrimidin-2-yl-aminophenyl-amide derivatives and evaluation of pharmacokinetic profiles and biological activity. Front Mater. 2023;10:1057677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Santulli G, Pascale V, Finelli R, Visco V, Giannotti R, Massari A, et al. We are what we eat: impact of food from short supply chain on metabolic syndrome. J Clin Med. 2019;8(12):2061.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Story M, Kaphingst KM, Robinson-O’Brien R, Glanz K. Creating healthy food and eating environments: policy and environmental approaches. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008;29:253–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Morland KB, Evenson KR. Obesity prevalence and the local food environment. Health Place. 2009;15(2):491–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Pitt E, Gallegos D, Comans T, Cameron C, Thornton L. Exploring the influence of local food environments on food behaviours: a systematic review of qualitative literature. Public Health Nutr. 2017;20(13):2393–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Turner-McGrievy G, Harris M. Key elements of plant-based diets associated with reduced risk of metabolic syndrome. Curr Diab Rep. 2014;14:1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Kahleova H, Matoulek M, Malinska H, Oliyarnik O, Kazdova L, Neskudla T, et al. Vegetarian diet improves insulin resistance and oxidative stress markers more than conventional diet in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2011;28(5):549–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Mishra S, Xu J, Agarwal U, Gonzales J, Levin S, Barnard ND. A multicenter randomized controlled trial of a plant-based nutrition program to reduce body weight and cardiovascular risk in the corporate setting: the GEICO study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67(7):718–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Rizzo NS, Jaceldo-Siegl K, Sabate J, Fraser GE. Nutrient profiles of vegetarian and nonvegetarian dietary patterns. J Acad Nutr Dietetics. 2013;113(12):1610–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Turner-McGrievy GM, Barnard ND, Scialli AR, Lanou AJ. Effects of a low-fat vegan diet and a step II diet on macro-and micronutrient intakes in overweight postmenopausal women. Nutrition. 2004;20(9):738–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Turner-McGrievy GM, Barnard ND, Cohen J, Jenkins DJ, Gloede L, Green AA. Changes in nutrient intake and dietary quality among participants with type 2 diabetes following a low-fat vegan diet or a conventional diabetes diet for 22 weeks. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008;108(10):1636–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Clarys P, Deliens T, Huybrechts I, Deriemaeker P, Vanaelst B, De Keyzer W, et al. Comparison of nutritional quality of the vegan, vegetarian, semi-vegetarian, pesco-vegetarian and omnivorous diet. Nutrients. 2014;6(3):1318–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Davey GK, Spencer EA, Appleby PN, Allen NE, Knox KH, Key TJ. EPIC–Oxford: lifestyle characteristics and nutrient intakes in a cohort of 33 883 meat-eaters and 31 546 non meat-eaters in the UK. Public Health Nutr. 2003;6(3):259–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Farmer B, Larson BT, Fulgoni VL III, Rainville AJ, Liepa GU. A vegetarian dietary pattern as a nutrient-dense approach to weight management: an analysis of the national health and nutrition examination survey 1999–2004. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(6):819–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Yoo S, Nicklas T, Baranowski T, Zakeri IF, Yang S-J, Srinivasan SR, et al. Comparison of dietary intakes associated with metabolic syndrome risk factors in young adults: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80(4):841–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. González-Rodríguez LG, Perea Sánchez JM, Aranceta-Bartrina J, Gil Á, González-Gross M, Serra-Majem L, et al. Intake and dietary food sources of fibre in Spain: differences with regard to the prevalence of excess body weight and abdominal obesity in adults of the ANIBES Study. Nutrients. 2017;9(4):326.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Howarth NC, Saltzman E, Roberts SB. Dietary fiber and weight regulation. Nutr Rev. 2001;59(5):129–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Sima P, Vannucci L, Vetvicka V. β-glucans and cholesterol. Int J Mol Med. 2018;41(4):1799–808.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Chang KT, Lampe JW, Schwarz Y, Breymeyer KL, Noar KA, Song X, et al. Low glycemic load experimental diet more satiating than high glycemic load diet. Nutr Cancer. 2012;64(5):666–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. de Oliveira Otto MC, Alonso A, Lee D-H, Delclos GL, Bertoni AG, Jiang R, et al. Dietary intakes of zinc and heme iron from red meat, but not from other sources, are associated with greater risk of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. J Nutr. 2012;142(3):526–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Sun L, Franco OH, Hu FB, Cai L, Yu Z, Li H, et al. Ferritin concentrations, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes in middle-aged and elderly chinese. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(12):4690–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Gangwisch JE, Hale L, Garcia L, Malaspina D, Opler MG, Payne ME, et al. High glycemic index diet as a risk factor for depression: analyses from the women’s Health Initiative. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;102(2):454–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Şenormancı G, Turan Ç, Çelik SK, Çelik A, Edgünlü TG, Bilgi C, et al. Gene variants and serum levels of synaptic vesicle and presynaptic plasma membrane proteins in alcohol dependence and their relationship with impulsivity and temperament. Arch Clin Psychiatry (São Paulo). 2021;48:99–104.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Brand-Miller JC, Holt SH, Pawlak DB, McMillan J. Glycemic index and obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76(1):281S–5S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Millen BE, Pencina MJ, Kimokoti RW, Zhu L, Meigs JB, Ordovas JM, et al. Nutritional risk and the metabolic syndrome in women: opportunities for preventive intervention from the Framingham Nutrition Study–. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84(2):434–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful from all of the study’s participants.

Funding

Present study has been financially supported by a grant from Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. (Garnt number: 72003 and registration codes: IR.TBZMED.REC.1398.460 and IR. TBZMED.REC.1396.768). The funders had no role in hypothesis generation, recruiting and designing the study. Their role was only financial supporting

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Student Research Committee, Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

    Mahdi Vajdi

  2. Department of Community Nutrition, Faculty of Nutrition, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

    Arash Karimi

  3. Razavi Cancer Research Center, Razavi Hospital, Imam Reza International University, Mashhad, Iran

    Ayda Zahiri Tousi

  4. Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Laparoscopy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

    Babak Hosseini

  5. Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

    Zeinab Nikniaz

  6. Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Attar Neyshabouri, Daneshgah Blv, Tabriz, Iran

    Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi

Authors
  1. Mahdi Vajdi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arash Karimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ayda Zahiri Tousi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Babak Hosseini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zeinab Nikniaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The final paper was read and approved by all writers. Research was supervised by MAF and ZN, and they also played a key role in designing the study. Together, MV and AK helped with the statistical analysis and drafted the article. AZT and BH were involved in patinets’ recruitment and data collection.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study protocol has been approved by the ethics committee of the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (registration code: IR.TBZMED.REC.1398.460 and IR. TBZMED.REC.1396.768). Written informed consent was obtained from all of the participants before participation in the study. All methods in the current research were performed in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki’s guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vajdi, M., Karimi, A., Tousi, A.Z. et al. Association between plant-based diets and metabolic syndrome in obese adults from Iran: a cross-sectional study. BMC Endocr Disord 23, 109 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-023-01358-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-023-01358-7

Keywords

BMC Endocrine Disorders

ISSN: 1472-6823

Contact us