Skip to main content
Download PDF

Predictors of response to ovulation induction using letrozole in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

BMC Endocrine Disorders volume 23, Article number: 90 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the initial screening characteristics of women with anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who did or did not respond to 2.5 mg letrozole (LET).

Methods

The clinical and laboratory characteristics of women with PCOS who underwent LET treatment were evaluated. Women with PCOS were stratified according to their responses to LET (2.5 mg). The potential predictors of their responses to LET were estimated using logistic regression analysis.

Results

Our retrospective study included 214 eligible patients with a response to 2.5 mg LET (n = 131) or no response to 2.5 mg LET (n = 83). PCOS patients who responded to 2.5 mg LET showed better outcomes than those who did not (2.5 mg LET) for pregnancy rate, live birth rate, pregnancy rate per patient, and live birth rate per patient. Logistic regression analyses showed that late menarche (odds ratio [OR], 1.79 [95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.22–2.64], P = 0.003), and increased anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) (OR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.02–1.23], P = 0.02), baseline luteinizing hormone (LH)/ follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) (OR, 3.73 [95% CI, 2.12–6.64], P < 0.001), and free androgen index (FAI) (OR, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.16–1.64], P < 0.001) were associated with a higher possibility of no response to 2.5 mg LET.

Conclusions

PCOS patients with an increased LH/FSH ratio, AMH, FAI, and late menarche may need an increased dosage of LET for a treatment response, which could be helpful in designing a personalized treatment strategy.

Peer Review reports

Background

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a heterogeneous condition affecting approximately 20% of women worldwide and accounting for approximately 80% of cases of anovulatory infertility in women [1]. The mechanisms causing ovarian follicular arrest are complex, and the exact pathogenesis remains unknown [2, 3]. Ovulation induction is the first-line treatment among infertile women with PCOS, but the responses vary according to different ovarian stimulation protocols or different dosages of the same drug [2]. As personalized medicine, an advancing and accurate treatment, is expected, it is vital to identify the specific characteristics of PCOS patients and make accurate treatment plans.

Letrozole (LET), an aromatase inhibitor, has been recommended as a first-line therapy for anovulatory PCOS, which prevents the aromatase-induced conversion of androgens to estrogens, increases the secretion of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and stimulates ovarian follicle development and maturation [4,5,6]. A meta-analysis showed that LET was better than clomiphene, the previous first-line agent, for ovulation rate per patient, pregnancy rate per patient, and live birth rate per patient [4, 5]. Also, LET resistance rates and multiple pregnancy rates appear lower with LET versus clomiphene [4, 5].

Usually, the starting dose of LET is 2.5 mg/day for 5 days (usually starting on day 3 of the cycle). The dose of LET should be increased to 5 mg and then 7.5 mg/day in subsequent cycles in cases of absent ovarian response. Using this approach, 49.4%~83.8% of patients ovulated in response to 2.5 mg LET [7, 8]. Higher dosage of LET may be needed for those un-responsive to 2.5 mg. Patients who ovulated with a higher dosage of LET would take longer to conceive and their compliance would be affected, especially for women of advanced age. Thus, predicting the possible doses of LET in different PCOS patients using their screening characteristics before ovulation induction may increase the effectiveness of treatment.

The objective of this study was to identify whether the pre-treatment characteristics reflecting the reproductive ability of PCOS patients had the predictive value for their ovarian response to the minimal ovulation doses of LET.

Methods

Study design and participants

This retrospective, single-center cohort study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Before the initiation of treatment, all patients had proven patency of at least one fallopian tube and normal semen analysis of their male partners. All patients who underwent ovulation induction with LET at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between April 2019 and July 2021 were evaluated for inclusion in the study. Eligible participants were women aged 20–38 years with a body mass index (BMI) ≤ 35 kg/m2, oligo-/anovulation, and a diagnosis of PCOS based on the Rotterdam consensus (two of three criteria: oligo-/anovulation, hyperandrogenemia, and sonographic appearance of polycystic ovaries). Diagnosis of oligo-/anovulation was defined as a menstrual cycle length > 35 days with < 8 menstrual cycles per year or no menstrual bleeding for 6 months or longer. Hyperandrogenemia was diagnosed either clinically (acne/hirsutism) or biochemically (testosterone ≥ 7.5ng/ml or free androgen index [FAI] ≥ 5). The ultrasound criteria included ≥ 12 follicles (2–9 mm) and/or ovarian volume > 10 ml. Patients with uncontrolled thyroid disease, hyperprolactinemia, adrenal hyperplasia, or Cushing’s syndrome were excluded.

Assessment

Blood samples were drawn on days 2–4 of spontaneous or progesterone-induced menstruation. The following basal hormone assays were measured: follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol, total testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S), prolactin, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), and anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) measured by specific immunoassays (Beckman kit, America).

Interventions

Oral LET was prescribed orally daily for 5 days, starting on day 3 of the menstrual period or a progestogen-induced bleed. The starting dose of LET was 2.5 mg/day, and if pregnancy was not achieved, the dose was 5 mg/day in the second cycle. The maximum daily dose was 7.5 mg. LET resistance was defined as resistance to 7.5 mg LET for at least 1 cycle. A maximum of three or four cycles of ovulation induction was provided to the patients.

Outcome parameters

Ovulation criteria were a follicle diameter ≥ 17 mm and ovulation monitored by ultrasound. Patients were stratified into two groups based on their response to LET (response to 2.5 mg LET or no response to 2.5 mg LET). All participants were advised about timed intercourse during the treatment cycles; couples were asked to refrain from intercourse until one follicle measuring at least 17 mm was found, and to keep sexual intercourse to every other day until ovulation. Live birth was defined as a live birth after ≥ 28 gestational weeks. Clinal pregnancy was defined as the presence of at least one gestational sac in the uterine cavity on ultrasonography at 5 weeks.

Statistical methods

Continuous data were compared with the use of the Student’s t-test, and categorical variables were compared using the χ2 test. Variables were introduced into a multivariable logistic regression analysis in a stepwise fashion, with a univariate analysis (P < 0.30) to enter, and were retained in the multivariable model when the P value was < 0.05. Tables are presented with odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for predictors in the adjusted logistic regression analysis. Cumulative probabilities for the outcomes of interest were determined using the Kaplan-Meier failure function (log-rank test) over four cycles according to stratified variables selected through multivariable logistic regression analysis. These variables were converted into dichotomous variables using receiver operating characteristic curves.

All data were analyzed using R (http://www.r-project.org), and a P-value < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.

Results

Baseline data

A total of 214 eligible PCOS patients (605 cycles) were included in the analysis. A total of 131 (61.2%) patients ovulated with 2.5 mg LET, whereas 83 (38.8%) did not ovulate with LET (2.5 mg). Nine (4.2%) patients were LET resistant.

Baseline characteristics

The baseline demographic, clinical, and endocrine characteristics are shown in Table 1. Patients who did not respond to LET (2.5 mg) had a late menarche compared to the 2.5 mg LET response group (mean [SD], 13.28 [1.29] vs. 13.69 [1.45] kg/m2, P = 0.042). Moreover, significantly higher serum AMH and baseline LH/FSH ratios were found in patients who did not respond to 2.5 mg LET (mean [SD]: 8.99 [4.94] vs. 10.52 [5.18] ng/ml, P = 0.042; 1.69 [0.87] vs. 2.09 [1.10], P = 0.005, respectively). The hyperandrogenemia indicators, including the modified Ferriman-Gallwey (mF-G) score, total testosterone, DHEA-S, and FAI, was not significantly different between the two groups.

Table 1 Characteristic of women who responded to 2.5 mg letrozole and who did not respond to 2.5 mg letrozole
Full size table

Outcomes

Table 2 illustrates the outcomes, including the rates of pregnancy, live birth, and live birth per ovulating patient. In addition, the success rates per cycle, including pregnancy and live births, are shown. Pregnancy and live birth rates were significantly higher in the 2.5 mg LET response group (64.8% vs. 31.3%, P < 0.001; 52.7% vs. 21.7%, P < 0.001). The pregnancy and live birth rates per patient were also significantly higher in the 2.5 mg LET response group than in the other group (64.9% vs. 35.1%, P < 0.001; 52.7% vs. 24.3%, P < 0.001). Per cycle analysis revealed significantly higher pregnancy and live birth rates in the 2.5 mg LET response group (26.6% vs. 7.0%, P < 0.001; 21.6% vs. 6.3%, P < 0.001). Patients in the 2.5 mg LET no response group needed longer average cycles (mean [SD], 1.82 [0.90] vs. 2.77 [0.82], P < 0.001).

Table 2 Outcomes of women who responded to 2.5 mg letrozole and who did not respond to 2.5 mg letrozole
Full size table

Univariate and multivariate analysis

After adjusting for age (Table 3), logistic regression analyses showed that late menarche (odds ratio [OR], 1.79 [95% CI, 1.22–2.64], P = 0.003), AMH (OR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.02–1.23], P = 0.02), baseline LH/FSH (OR, 3.73 [95% CI, 2.12–6.64], P < 0.001), and FAI (OR, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.16–1.64], P < 0.001) were correlated with a higher risk of no response to 2.5 mg LET.

Table 3 Univariate and multivariate regression analyses that compare variable clinical markers with respective outcomes
Full size table

To further evaluate the influence of these indexes on fertility, we categorized the patients into two groups according to their menarche (menarche < 13.5y, menarche ≥ 13.5y), AMH (AMH < 9.78ng/ml, AMH ≥ 9.78 ng/ml), baseline LH/FSH (LH/FSH < 1.83, LH/FSH ≥ 1.83), and FAI (FAI < 5.99, FAI ≥ 5.99), and utilized Kaplan-Meier curves to describe ovulation and pregnancy in different groups. The cumulative ovulation rates of patients with menarche < 13.5y, LH/FSH ratio < 1.83, AMH < 9.78ng/ml, and FAI < 5.99 were significantly higher than that of patients with menarche ≥ 13.5, LH/FSH ratio ≥ 1.87, AMH ≥ 9.78 ng/ml, and FAI ≥ 5.99 (P = 0.027, 0.01, 0.019, and 0.012, respectively) (Fig. 1A-D). The cumulative pregnancy rate of patients with FAI < 5.99 was significantly higher than that of patients with FAI ≥ 5.99 (P = 0.0063) (Fig. 1H). The cumulative probabilities of pregnancy showed no significant differences between the menarche, LH/FSH, and AMH groups (Fig. 1E-G).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Unadjusted cumulative probabilities of achieving ovulation or pregnancy determined by the Kaplan-Meier failure function (log-rank test). (A) Probabilities of achieving ovulation, stratification on menarche < 13.5 years old and menarche ≥ 13.5 years old; (B) Probabilities of achieving ovulation, stratification on LH/FSH < 1.83 and LH/FSH ≥ 1.83; (C) Probabilities of achieving ovulation, and stratification on AMH < 9.78 ng/ml and AMH ≥ 9.78 ng/ml; (D) Probabilities of achieving ovulation, stratification on FAI < 5.99 and FAI ≥ 5.99; (E) Probabilities of achieving pregnancy, stratification on menarche < 13.5 years old and menarche ≥ 13.5 years old; (F) Probabilities of achieving pregnancy, stratification on LH/FSH < 1.83 and LH/FSH ≥ 1.83. (G) Probabilities of achieving pregnancy, stratification on AMH < 9.78 ng/ml and AMH ≥ 9.78 ng/ml; (H) Probabilities of achieving pregnancy, stratification on FAI < 5.99 and FAI ≥ 5.99; AMH anti-müllerian hormone, FSH follicle stimulating hormone, LH luteinizing hormone, FAI free androgen index

Full size image

Discussion

In the present study, we evaluated multiple characteristics associated with follicular responses to 2.5 mg LET doses in 214 patients with PCOS. Our results showed that late menarche, LH/FSH ratio, AMH and FAI were significantly higher in women with PCOS who did not respond to 2.5 mg LET. Cumulative ovulation rates were significantly lower in patients with menarche ≥ 13.5y, LH/FSH ratio ≥ 1.83, AMH ≥ 9.78 ng/ml, and FAI ≥ 5.99.

Fertility treatment in women with PCOS aims to restore monofollicular ovulation and achieve singleton pregnancy. “Low-tech” therapies, such as lifestyle modification and/or escalation of oral medication to achieve ovulation, are usually recommended [2]. Currently, LET represents the first line of treatment for patients with anovulatory infertility, whose conception and live birth rates can reach 41.2% and 27.5%, respectively; clomiphene, the previous first-line agent, provided conception and live birth rates of 27.4% and 19.1%, respectively [7]. Although the likelihood of live birth is increased by 40–60% with LET compared to clomiphene, the live birth rate is substantially lower than is generally assumed, which means it may take a relatively long time to search for help from assisted reproductive services if patients have lower chances of live birth with the LET protocol. Thus, it is necessary to describe the therapeutic effects of LET to help PCOS patients make better choices and improve their patience and compliance. In this study, we found that the dosage of LET-inducing ovulation could be a good index to discriminate women with PCOS who are expected to be pregnant with simple medical therapies. Our results showed that women who responded to LET (2.5 mg) had a significantly higher pregnancy rate (64.8%) and live birth rate (52.7%) than those who did not. Additionally, the chance of pregnancy was 26.6% per ovulatory cycle in women who responded to 2.5 mg LET, which was significantly higher than that in women who did not respond to 2.5 mg LET (7.0%), and similar to that in women without PCOS (10–15%) [9]. This means PCOS patients who respond to 2.5 mg LET are expected to have a similar chance of pregnancy with oral medication as those without PCOS. PCOS patients with no response to LET (2.5 mg) had a higher probability of seeking other complex therapies to get pregnant. The live birth rate was the most accurate index to present the effect of ovulation induction; however, the ovulatory responses of the minimal dosage of LET was also meaningful, acting as an easy and quick tool to partially reflect reproductive outcomes.

A higher baseline LH/FSH ratio has been shown to impair human reproduction. LH hypersecretion might cause premature luteinization of granulosa cells and increased production of androgens [10]. Relatively low FSH concentrations lead to inefficient aromatization of estrogen [11], which is detrimental to normal follicular growth. Previous studies have evaluated the importance of subgroups with high LH/FSH ratios for ovulation induction or assisted reproduction. An elevated baseline LH/FSH ratio is associated with poor ovulatory response but better clinical pregnancy and live birth after ovulation induction by clomiphene and/or acupuncture [12]. A basal LH/FSH ratio > 3 has an adverse effect on the number of follicles and oocytes, as well as on oocyte maturity in PCOS patients stimulated with human menopausal gonadotropins [13]. In addition, an LH/FSH ratio > 1.5 in PCOS patients who underwent in vitro maturation treatment led to a significant reduction in treatment [14]. An elevated LH/FSH ratio may influence the preferred protocol for PCOS treatment in in-vitro fertilization (IVF). PCOS patients with high LH/FSH ratios tended to have a higher probability of being pregnant using GnRH-agonist rather than GnRH-antagonist protocols [14], and this also affected the live-birth rate of fresh-embryo transfer cycle [15]. However, there are conflicting reports [16, 17]. Our results showed that the LH/FSH ratio was significantly higher in patients who did not respond to 2.5 mg LET and that LH/FSH ≥ 1.83 significantly impacted the success of ovulation induction by LET. This was different from previous results, probably due to the different populations, as the previous study only included a clomiphene-resistant population [18].

The elevated AMH level was another factor that profoundly affected the response to LET and proved to be related to fertility in PCOS. Hypersecretion of AMH in granulosa cells can impair follicular growth by inhibiting FSH and aromatase activity [19]. Previous results showed that serum AMH levels were significantly lower in cycles with a response to clomiphene than in cycles with no response [20,21,22]. Another study showed that PCOS patients with higher serum AMH levels have a lower possibility of response to clomiphene or LET [23]. Besides, high serum AMH levels are associated with a significantly lower probability of response to human menopausal gonadotrophin stimulation [24, 25]. High AMH is associated with lower live birth rates in women with PCOS undergoing assisted reproductive technology [26]. Our study also found a relationship between AMH levels and the effect of LET. The ovulation rate in patients with AMH < 9.78ng/ml was significantly higher than that in patients with AMH ≥ 9.78ng/ml. Therefore, we recommend that PCOS women with substantially elevated serum AMH levels induce ovulation with an increased dosage of LET.

An increased FAI also impacted the ovulatory responses to LET. Elevated androgen could inhibit ovarian follicular development, reduce oocyte meiotic capacity, and impact ovulation [27,28,29]. A previous study found that PCOS patients with a low hirsutism score had a higher possibility of conception, pregnancy, and live birth when ovulation was induced with clomiphene, metformin, or the combination of both [30]. PCOS patients with a lower total testosterone and higher SHBG concentrations also achieved pregnancy in a shorter time [31]. Similarly, hyperandrogenic PCOS phenotypes confer significantly lower cumulative live birth rates compared with their normo-androgenic counterparts who undergo IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment [32]. Our study found that patients with FAI < 5.99 were associated with both higher cumulative ovulation rate and cumulative pregnancy when using LET. Thus, hyperandrogenism may be another indicator for using a higher dosage of LET to induce ovulation.

BMI was reported to impact ovulation but was not retained after stepwise selection in this study. BMI has been proven to reduce the reproductive outcomes including responsiveness to clomiphene, intrauterine insemination, and IVF [33,34,35,36]. Our research showed different results partially because few patients in our study were obese.

The major strength of our study is that we presented the ovulatory ability of LET by patient responses to a 2.5 mg dosage, which provides a different perspective to evaluate ovulation. Also, multiple characteristics associated with the follicular responses were evaluated which inspired us to develop personalized dosages of LET. Our study also had certain limitations. The sample size of this study was relatively small. This was a retrospective study; therefore, we could not provide an accurate model to predict the specific effects of LET in PCOS patients. In addition, we set the success of ovulation as the endpoint, which is a simple and direct index to evaluate the effect of LET, but could not represent the live birth rate.

Conclusions

In conclusion, elevated LH/FSH, AMH, FAI, and late menarche are risk factors for poor ovulation induction in PCOS, which may requires a large than minimal dosage of LET.

Data Availability

The datasets used in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AMH:

anti-müllerian hormone

BMI:

body mass index

CI:

confidence intervals

DHEA-S:

dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate

FAI:

free androgen index

FSH:

follicle stimulating hormone

IVF:

in vitro fertilization

LET:

letrozole

LH:

luteinizing hormone

mF-G:

modified Ferriman-Gallwey

PCOS:

polycystic ovary syndrome

OR:

odds ratio

SHBG:

sex hormone-binding globulin

References

  1. ESHRE/ASRM. Consensus on infertility treatment related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod (Oxford England). 2008;23(3):462–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Azziz R, Carmina E, Chen Z, et al. Polycystic ovary syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16057.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dumesic DA, Oberfield SE, Stener-Victorin E, Marshall JC, Laven JS, Legro RS. Scientific Statement on the Diagnostic Criteria, Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Molecular Genetics of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Endocr Rev. 2015;36(5):487–525.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Teede H, Misso M, Costello M, et al. Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(3):364–79.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Teede H, Misso M, Costello M, et al. Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod (Oxford England). 2018;33(9):1602–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Holzer H, Casper R, Tulandi T. A new era in ovulation induction. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(2):277–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Legro RS, Brzyski RG, Diamond MP, et al. Letrozole versus clomiphene for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(2):119–29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Amer SA, Smith J, Mahran A, Fox P, Fakis A. Double-blind randomized controlled trial of letrozole versus clomiphene citrate in subfertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(8):1631–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Legro RS, Barnhart HX, Schlaff WD, et al. Clomiphene, metformin, or both for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(6):551–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Franks S, Stark J, Hardy K. Follicle dynamics and anovulation in polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14(4):367–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rebar R, Judd HL, Yen SS, Rakoff J, Vandenberg G, Naftolin F. Characterization of the inappropriate gonadotropin secretion in polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Invest. 1976;57(5):1320–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Xia Q, Xie L, Wu Q, et al. Elevated baseline LH/FSH ratio is associated with poor ovulatory response but better clinical pregnancy and live birth in chinese women with PCOS after ovulation induction. Heliyon. 2023;9(1):e13024.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Tarlatzis BC, Grimbizis G, Pournaropoulos F, et al. The prognostic value of basal luteinizing hormone:follicle-stimulating hormone ratio in the treatment of patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome by assisted reproduction techniques. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(10):2545–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wiser A, Shehata F, Holzer H, et al. Effect of high LH/FSH ratio on women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing in vitro maturation treatment. J Reprod Med. 2013;58(5–6):219–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Su N, Huang C, Liu J, et al. Association between baseline LH/FSH and live-birth rate after fresh-embryo transfer in polycystic ovary syndrome women. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):20490.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ganor-Paz Y, Friedler-Mashiach Y, Ghetler Y, et al. What is the best treatment for women with polycystic ovarian syndrome and high LH/FSH ratio? A comparison among in vitro fertilization with GnRH agonist, GnRH antagonist and in vitro maturation. J Endocrinol Invest. 2016;39(7):799–803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Neeta S, Neha M, Yogita D. Do basal luteinizing hormone and luteinizing Hormone/ follicle-stimulating hormone ratio have significance in prognosticating the outcome of in vitro fertilization cycles in polycystic ovary syndrome? J Hum Reprod Sci. 2021;14(3):326.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Imani B, Eijkemans MJ, te Velde ER, Habbema JD, Fauser BC. A nomogram to predict the probability of live birth after clomiphene citrate induction of ovulation in normogonadotropic oligoamenorrheic infertility. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(1):91–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Broekmans FJ, Visser JA, Laven JS, Broer SL, Themmen AP, Fauser BC. Anti-Müllerian hormone and ovarian dysfunction. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2008;19(9):340–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mumford SL, Legro RS, Diamond MP, et al. Baseline AMH Level Associated with Ovulation following Ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(9):3288–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Mahran A, Abdelmeged A, El-Adawy AR, Eissa MK, Shaw RW, Amer SA. The predictive value of circulating anti-Müllerian hormone in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome receiving clomiphene citrate: a prospective observational study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(10):4170–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gülşen MS, Ulu İ, Yıldırım Köpük Ş, Kıran G. The role of anti-Müllerian hormone in predicting clomiphene citrate resistance in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019;35(1):86–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vagios S, Sacha CR, Hammer KC, et al. Response to ovulation induction treatments in women with polycystic ovary syndrome as a function of serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38(7):1827–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Amer SA, Mahran A, Abdelmaged A, El-Adawy AR, Eissa MK, Shaw RW. The influence of circulating anti-Müllerian hormone on ovarian responsiveness to ovulation induction with gonadotrophins in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: a pilot study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013;11:115.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kamel A, Ramadan W, Hussein AM, et al. Can AMH levels predict the need for increased medication during IVF/ICSI in PCOS women? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(1):32–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tal R, Seifer C, Khanimov M, Seifer D, Tal O. High serum antimullerian hormone levels are associated with lower live birth rates in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome undergoing assisted reproductive technology. Volume 18. Reproductive biology and endocrinology: RB&E.; 2020. p. 20. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Farookhi R. Effects of aromatizable and nonaromatizable androgen treatments on luteinizing hormone receptors and ovulation induction in immature rats. Biol Reprod. 1985;33(2):363–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Anderiesz C, Trounson AO. The effect of testosterone on the maturation and developmental capacity of murine oocytes in vitro. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(9):2377–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Romero S, Smitz J. Exposing cultured mouse ovarian follicles under increased gonadotropin tonus to aromatizable androgens influences the steroid balance and reduces oocyte meiotic capacity. Endocrine. 2010;38(2):243–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rausch ME, Legro RS, Barnhart HX, et al. Predictors of pregnancy in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(9):3458–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Gunning MN, Christ JP, van Rijn BB, et al. Predicting pregnancy chances leading to term live birth in oligo/anovulatory women diagnosed with PCOS. Reprod Biomed Online. 2023;46(1):156–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. De Vos M, Pareyn S, Drakopoulos P, et al. Cumulative live birth rates after IVF in patients with polycystic ovaries: phenotype matters. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;37(2):163–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Luke B, Brown M, Stern J, Missmer S, Fujimoto V, Leach R. Female obesity adversely affects assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy and live birth rates. Hum Reprod (Oxford England). 2011;26(1):245–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kawwass J, Kulkarni A, Hipp H, Crawford S, Kissin D, Jamieson D. Extremities of body mass index and their association with pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing in vitro fertilization in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(7):1742–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Guan H, Pan L, Song H, Tang H, Tang L. Predictors of pregnancy after intrauterine insemination in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Int Med Res. 2021;49(5):3000605211018600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sachdeva G, Gainder S, Suri V, Sachdeva N, Chopra S. Obese and non-obese polycystic ovarian syndrome: comparison of clinical, metabolic, hormonal parameters, and their Differential response to Clomiphene. Indian J Endocrinol Metabol. 2019;23(2):257–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by grant from the National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (2022-PUMCH-B-081).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China

    Zaixin Guo, Shuwen Chen, Pan Hu, Yanfang Hao & Qi Yu

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Beijing, China

    Zhiyan Chen

Authors
  1. Zaixin Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shuwen Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhiyan Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pan Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yanfang Hao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Qi Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZG and QY designed the study. PH and YH collected the data. ZG, SC and ZC performed the data analyses and interpretation. ZG and QY prepared the manuscript. All authors contributed to the revision of the manuscript and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qi Yu.

Ethics declarations

Ethnics & guidelines approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, Z., Chen, S., Chen, Z. et al. Predictors of response to ovulation induction using letrozole in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. BMC Endocr Disord 23, 90 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-023-01336-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-023-01336-z

Keywords

BMC Endocrine Disorders

ISSN: 1472-6823

Contact us