Skip to main content
Download PDF

Coincidence of primary adrenocortical carcinoma and melanoma: three CASE reports

BMC Endocrine Disorders volume 23, Article number: 4 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare endocrine malignancy with a heterogeneous prognosis, while adrenal metastasis from other primary cancers, including melanoma, may occur more frequently. ACC may rarely occur as part of familial cancer syndromes, but even in sporadic cases, a significant proportion of patients had other malignancies before or after diagnosis of ACC. Herein we present three cases where sporadic ACC was identified in patients with coexistent or previous history of melanoma.

Case description

Patient 1 - A 37-yr-old man with a superficial spreading BRAF-positive melanoma was found to harbour a progressively growing left adrenal mass. Initially, he was suspected of having adrenal metastasis, but the histology after adrenalectomy confirmed ACC. Patient 2 - A 68-year-old man with a history of recurrent BRAF-positive melanoma was diagnosed with disseminated metastatic melanoma recurrence, including a rapidly enlarging left adrenal mass. Consequently, he underwent left adrenalectomy, and histology again confirmed ACC. Patient 3 – A 50-yr-old man was referred with histological diagnosis of metastatic ACC. He had a background history of pT1 melanoma.

We undertook targeted sequencing of ACC tissue samples in all cases. Somatic variants were observed in the known driver genes CTNNB1 (Patient 1), APC and KMT2D (Patient 2), and APC and TP53 (Patient 3). Germline TP53 variants (Li-Fraumeni syndrome) were excluded in all cases.

Retrospective review of our patient cohort in the last 21 years revealed a frequency of 0.5% of histologically diagnosed melanoma metastasis among patients referred for adrenal masses. On the other hand, 1.6% of patients with histologically confirmed ACC had a previous history of melanoma.

Conclusion

Sporadic ACC can occur in the background of melanoma, even if adrenal metastasis might appear to be the most likely diagnosis. Coexistent primary adrenal malignancy should be considered and investigated for in all patients with a history of melanoma with suspicious adrenal lesions.

Peer Review reports

Background

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare and aggressive endocrine malignancy with an incidence of 0.7–2.0 cases/million/year. It commonly arises sporadically, but in rare cases, may also be a part of familial syndromes [1, 2]. ACC has been traditionally linked to Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), an autosomal dominant disorder, caused by germline variants in the suppressor gene TP53, where co-tumours, such as leukemia, sarcomas, brain tumours, and breast cancers, are often seen [3, 4]. Overall, ACC develops in 6–13% of individuals with LFS [5]. ACC can occur in the context of other hereditary genetic syndromes such as Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, Von Hippel-Lindau disease, multiple endocrine neoplasias (types 1 and 2), Carney complex, Lynch syndrome, or hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer and familial adenomatous polyposis [6,7,8,9]. Even outside recognised familial cancer syndromes, sporadic ACC can arise synchronously with or in the background of other malignant tumours, such as testicular and ovarian tumours, rectal cancer, stomach gastrointestinal stromal tumour, osteosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, myoepithelioma, and neuroblastoma [10,11,12,13]. However, to our knowledge, coexistence or direct association between ACC and melanoma has never been reported.

Melanoma is the most aggressive type of skin cancer, arising from the pigment-producing cells melanocytes. The adrenal gland is one of the most common sites of metastasis after the lung, liver, and bone [14]. Most cases of melanoma are sporadic while the most frequent somatic mutation occurs in the 600th codon of the gene BRAF (50% of cases) [15]. Oncogenic RAS genes (NRAS, HRAS, and KRAS) are also recurrently mutated (30% of The Cancer Genome Atlas cases) [16]. Loss-of-function mutations can also affect tumor suppressor genes, such as NF1, TP53, and CDKN2A, mutually exclusive to BRAF.

The genetic background of ACC is mainly heterogeneous. The most common alterations involve the activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway (i.e., variants in ZNRF3, CTNNB1, and APC) or the p53 apoptosis/Rb1 cell cycle (i.e., variants in TP53 and CDKN2A) [17,18,19,20]. Additionally, loss of heterozygosity at the 11p15 locus, leading to loss of maternal imprinting and increased expression of IGF2, is observed in up to 85% of adult ACC [19, 21, 22]. More rarely, alterations in chromatin remodelling/maintenance and PKA/cAMP signalling have also been reported [23, 24].

Herein, we present three cases where ACC was identified in patients with a history of melanoma, from two European Centres. For all cases, targeted sequencing of ACC tissue was undertaken. We also retrospectively studied the case records of patients assessed at a large tertiary adrenal tumour service in the UK in a 21 year period (2000–2021) to further evaluate the coexistence of ACC and melanoma. This presented an opportunity to reflect on the differential diagnosis of malignant adrenal lesions, particularly in the context of cancer that can metastasise to the adrenal gland.

Case presentation

Demographic, clinical, histopathological, and hormonal data of the presented cases are reported in Table 1. Representative haematoxylin-eosin staining samples of the ACC are shown in Fig. 2.

Table 1 Demographic, clinical data and hormonal tests at the time of diagnosis of adrenocortical carcinoma
Full size table

Case 1: A 37-year-old man seen by Dermatology for a superficial spreading, BRAF-positive malignant melanoma on his right flank diagnosed in May 2019. His mother developed breast cancer at the age of 30 years and his brother developed lung cancer aged 48. He underwent an excisional biopsy of the skin lesion, and the histology was consistent with tumour stage pT3b, sentinel lymph node-negative, and positive somatic BRAF pathogenic variant (c.1799 T > A, p.Val600Glu). He underwent a Thorax-Abdomen-Pelvis (TAP) CT scan in November 2019, which detected a 6 cm left adrenal mass and multiple small lung nodules. A subsequent Positron Emission Tomography CT (PET-CT) showed avid FDG uptake in the adrenal lesion, but not in the lung nodules. Surveillance TAP CT scans showed a significant increase in the size of the adrenal lesion to 7.2 cm over 6 months, which was therefore considered suspicious for adrenal metastasis (Fig. 1 – Case 1). The tiny lung nodules remained stable. He was referred to our Adrenal Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) meeting for further investigations. To differentiate between adrenal metastasis and primary ACC, we performed a complete adrenal workup, including overnight dexamethasone suppression test, adrenal androgens, and plasma metanephrines and normetanephrines, which did not show any adrenal hormonal excess (Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Radiological imaging of large adrenocortical lesions before surgery or at the time of disease recurrence. Case 1 (at time of diagnosis). Panel a) FDG-PET CT scan December 2019: The left adrenal mass is concordant with the CT scan from November. The lesion shows abnormal FDG uptake with maximum S U V is 16.2. The lesion remains highly suspicious of soft tissue metastasis from melanoma. Panel b Abdomen Pelvis CT scan April 2020: The left adrenal mass measures up to 73 mm maximum axial dimension. It is closely related to the medial aspect of the spleen where direct invasion cannot be excluded, to the left crus of the left kidney but there are thought to be thin planes of separation from these structures. No evidence of other metastatic disease.of the diaphragm and to the upper pole. Case 2 (at time of diagnosis). Panel a and Panel b) Thorax Abdomen Pelvis CT scan October 2020 – Panel b (compared to July 2020 – Panel a): Further enlargement of the isolated multicystic left adrenal metastasis, now 62.0 mm × 32.5 mm (compared to 33 × 26 mm in 3 months’ interval). The metastasis now abuts the stomach and spleen as well as the pancreas. Multi-planar reconstruction suggests the stomach rugae are lying against the metastasis rather than being invaded by it. No evidence of other metastatic disease. C) Case 3 (at time of disease recurrence). Panel a) FDG-PET CT scan and b) Abdomen Pelvis CT scan March 2015 at time of tumor progression. Evidence of lung metastases and new lymph nodes metastasis in the mediastinum

Full size image

The patient underwent left adrenalectomy, for a presumed oligometastasis from melanoma, in May 2020. Histology revealed a microscopic appearance and molecular and immunohistochemical profiles completely different from a malignant melanoma. Instead, light microscopy appearances and electron microscopy findings were compatible with a primary adrenocortical origin tumour. The tumour showed patchy synaptophysin and diffuse NSE expression but was negative for all applied melanoma markers (melan-A, Fig. 2 – Case 1, S-100, HMB-45, SOX10) and other adrenocortical markers (inhibin, calretinin). Slides were imaged with the Leica Aperio Versa brightfield scanning microscope (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and pictures were obtained using the Aperio ImageScope software (Leica Biosystems) (Fig. 2a). The tumour did not express SMA, desmin, CD31, CD34, CD17, or chromogranin. There was no loss of SNF5. It was concluded that this was a de-differentiated ACC (pT2) with Weiss score 4, modified Weiss score 5, Ki-67 index 10–11%, completely resected (R0).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Representative histological pictures – Immunohistochemistry patterns of the three adrenocortical carcinomas. Case 1. Adrenocortical carcinoma composed of trabeculae and cords of medium cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm dispersed within myxoid stroma (panel A, H&E, 5x). The tumour was negative to Melan A (panel B, Melan A, 10x). Slides were imaged with the Leica Aperio Versa brightfield scanning microscope (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and pictures were obtained using the Aperio ImageScope software (Leica Biosystems). Scale bar = 200 μm and 10 μm, respectively. Case 2. Adrenocortical carcinoma with blastematous histological features. The neoplasm revealed extra-adrenal extension, venous vascular invasion (panel A, H&E 12.5x), high nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio with confluent necrosis (panel B, H&E, 100x), frequent mitotic figures (panel C, H&E 200x), and numerous atypical mitoses (panel D, H&E 400x). The images were acquired using the ZEN core software (version 3.1). The minimal resolution was 1.375 μm for 4x magnification, 0.61 for 10x, 0.37 for 20x, and 0.29 for 40x. Scale bar = 2 mm, 200 μm, 100 μm and 50 μm, respectively. Case 3. Adrenocortical carcinoma with infiltration of the liver. The microscopic report described a diffuse tumour architecture with necrosis, tumour cells with a high nuclear grade, mitotic count of > 20 mitoses/50 HPF, atypical mitotic figure, sinusoidal, vascular, and capsular invasion. H&E slides were imaged with the Leica Aperio Versa brightfield scanning microscope (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and picture were obtained using the Aperio ImageScope software (Leica Biosystems) with 10x (panel A) and 20x (panel B) enlargement. Scale bar = 200 μm. All the images have been acquired without filters, additional processing, or adjustment for size or color

Full size image

Case 2: A 68-year-old man with a history of recurrent melanoma and three previous resections in 2001 (right lower back) and April 2013 (right upper back and right upper abdomen), presented in March 2019 with suspected disease recurrence in the right axilla and subcutaneous nodules in the thoracic region. Genetic investigations were not previously performed to investigate the presence of somatic BRAF variants. There was no family history of cancer. Biopsy confirmed metastatic melanoma positive for a pathogenic variant in codon 600 of the BRAF gene (c.1799 T > A, p.Val600Glu). A staging TAP CT scan revealed disseminated metastatic disease with multiple subcutaneous, mediastinal and peritoneal nodules, indeterminate liver deposits and bilateral adrenal lesions.

The patient was commenced on a combination of Nivolumab and Ipsilumumab in August 2019. His metastatic melanoma showed an excellent response to immunotherapy with disappearance of the nodal and right adrenal disease manifestation, apart from the left adrenal mass which increased in size from 19 mm to 62 mm on serial surveillance imaging (Fig. 1 – Case 2). Following this rapid increase in size of the presumed left adrenal metastasis, which was inconsistent with the response to immunotherapy in the rest of the body, a decision was made to proceed with left adrenalectomy (December 2020).

The histology of the resected adrenal mass did not show any features consistent with melanoma but rather showed an ACC (pT3 L1 V1 N0) with high histological grade and blastematous characteristics (Fig. 2- Case 2). The tumour cells revealed focal cytoplasmic expression of calretinin and synaptophysin, and they were negative for S100, HMB45, melan A, and chromogranin. The Ki-67 index was 80% with incomplete resection status (R1). The shown microscopy images were acquired using the ZEN core software (version 3.1). The minimal resolution was 1.375 μm for 4x magnification, 0.61 for 10x, 0.37 for 20x, and 0.29 for 40x (Fig. 2b).

Case 3: A 50-year-old man came to our attention 1 month after the radical surgical resection of a right ACC associated with single liver metastasis (ENSAT stage IV). He presented a few months earlier with an incidental retroperitoneal lesion, infiltrating the liver, and dyspnoea. Urinary normetanephrine and metanephrine were within the normal range but no other hormonal diagnostic workup was performed before adrenalectomy. Histology reported described a 225 mm necrotic adrenal lesion with infiltration of the liver segment VIII and 25 mm single liver metastasis within segment VIII/IV (Fig. 2 - Case 3). Immunohistochemistry for SF1, inhibin, and melan A was positive and was therefore consistent with ACC (pT3, M1), Weiss score of 9 and Ki-67 index of 50%. The shown H&E slides were imaged with the Leica Aperio Versa brightfield scanning microscope (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and picture were obtained using the Aperio ImageScope software (Leica Biosystems) (Fig. 2c).

The patient reported that he underwent a resection of a 0.72 mm melanoma of the left shoulder (pT1a, N0, M0) 11 years earlier. His brother also suffered from melanoma and another brother had a history of testicular cancer.

Treatment and follow-up

Case 1: The patient was commenced on adjuvant mitotane therapy in June 2020 in line with the local and international guidelines [25]. His surveillance imaging up to December 2021 did not show any local recurrence or distant metastasis. The known small indeterminate lung nodules have remained stable over time. The local Dermatology team is simultaneously following him to monitor the melanoma.

Case 2: The patient was commenced on adjuvant mitotane therapy in January 2021 in line with the local and international guidelines [25]. However, mitotane had to be permanently discontinued due to significant hepatotoxicity. Oncologists continue to closely monitor his melanoma. Surveillance TAP CT scans until December 2021 showed no recurrence of his ACC and stable appearances of the right lower lobe subpleural nodule.

Case 3: Because of the high risk of recurrence, the patient was treated with 4 cycles of adjuvant carboplatin and etoposide [26]. After tumour progression with two lung metastases, etoposide-doxorubicin-platinum associated with mitotane were started [27], but unfortunately without any objective response. He was subsequently treated with 8 cycles of gemcitabine plus capecitabine [28] and radiotherapy to one metastasis in the mediastinum. In March 2015, FDG-PET/TC scan showed progression of the lung metastases and the development of a new lymph node metastasis in the mediastinum (Fig. 1 – Case 3). Mitotane therapy was discontinued, and he was commenced on streptozotocin chemotherapy. His disease remained stable and streptozotocin was continued for 21 cycles but then he developed new liver metastasis in segment II. In April 2016, the patient underwent resection of the liver metastasis and resection of thoracic metastases 1 month later. He remained tumour-free until December 2021.

Genetic analysis

Genetic counselling

Due to two different types of malignancies, genetic counselling was recommended for patient 1 (additional family history for other cancer types) and 2. Genetic testing for TP53 gene alterations (screening for Li-Fraumeni Syndrome) was performed and came back negative in both cases. Genetic counselling was not undertaken for Case 3.

Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS)

Targeted DNA sequencing was undertaken on the three tumour samples as part of a previous study (Case 3, [20] or an ongoing collaborative project (Case 1 and 2, data unpublished). FFPE ACC tumour material and EDTA blood samples were collected to investigate somatic variants by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS). Tumour-DNA and leukocyte were isolated using commercially available kits (GeneRead DNA FFPE Kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany, and NucleoSpin Blood L Kit (Macherey-Nagel, Bethlehem, PA), respectively. Samples were either enriched with a Cell3 Target Custom Panel (Nonacus, Birmingham, United Kingdom) – including 33 genes known to be associated with ACC (gene list provided in Suppl Table 1) – (Case 1 and 2) or with the Human Comprehensive Cancer Panel (Qiagen) – including a total of 160 cancer-related genes (Case 3) [20]. Sequencing was performed on a NextSeq500 with Mid Output Reagent Kit V2 and 150 cycles paired-end read sequencing or on a MiSeq with 300 cycles paired-end sequencing (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), respectively. Raw data were aligned and analysed with GensearchNGS (Phenosystems S.A., Belgium). For detection of single nucleotide variants (SNV) and small insertions and deletions (small Indels) the called variants were filtered as followed: exon distance < 21; variant allele frequency (VAF) > 0.1; Minor Allele Frequency (MAF) < 0.02; variant balance > 0; Type = worse than synonymous [20]. By comparing data from tumour and blood samples, variants were classified as somatic (detectable only in tumour sample) or germline (detectable in tumour and blood sample).

Results

A detailed summary of all the observed variants is shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Results of targeted sequencing analysis in the three patients with adrenocortical carcinoma and a previous history of melanoma
Full size table

Case 1: a somatic variant was found in a known disease-causing hot-spot region of gene CTNNB1 (NM_001904.3, c.133C > T, p. Ser45Pro), leading to constitutively activated ß-Catenin. No germline variants in any of the 33 genes analysed by targeted NGS were detected.

Case 2: we observed two likely oncogenic somatic variants, one in APC (NM_000038.5, c. 14C > T, p.Ser5Leu) and one in KMT2D (NM_003482.3, c.12935C > T, p.Ser4312Phe). In addition, the targeted sequencing of DNA isolated from whole blood revealed germline variants in genes MLH1 (NM_000249.3, c.977 T > C, p.Val326Ala) and ATM (NM_000051.3, c.2119 T > C, p.Ser707Pro), which were classified as a variant of uncertain significance and likely benign, respectively.

Case 3: two somatic variants were detected in APC (NM_001127511, c.4558G > T, p.E1520X) and TP53 (NM_000546.5, c.365_366del, p.Val122Aspfs*26) both classified as likely oncogenic. Moreover, interestingly, in this case eight germline variants were observed in 6 different genes (out of 160 investigated), including PMS2 (benign) and ATM (likely benign). Among these, only variants in gene CBLB was classified as of uncertain significance.

Frequency of melanoma as second cancer in patients with ACC

We then retrospectively evaluated the cohort of patients with suspicious adrenal lesions presented at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham between 2000 and 2021 to investigate the relevance of past medical history of melanoma. First, we looked at the frequency of history of melanoma, but without recognised familial cancer syndromes, in our cohort of patients with diagnosed ACC. We observed 2 out of 126 patients with a documented history of melanoma (1.6% of total). Second, we checked the frequency of diagnosed adrenal metastasis from primary melanoma among patients referred for indeterminate/suspicious adrenal masses. Altogether, only one out of 201 patients (0.5%) had a histological diagnosis of melanoma metastasis. This percentage was higher when considering only patients with a previous history of non-adrenal cancers (1 out of 48; 2%).

Discussion and conclusion

We present three cases of ACC diagnosed in patients with a history of melanoma. In two cases, adrenalectomy was undertaken for a presumed oligometastasis from underlying malignant BRAF-mutated melanoma. However, histology of the adrenal lesions was consistent with primary adrenal cancer, and adjuvant treatment with mitotane was promptly started. In the third case, ACC occurred in a background history of low-aggressive melanoma.

The association of two primary malignancies could be approached from two perspectives. First, patients with malignant melanoma are known to increase the overall risk of second primary cancer [29, 30]. The type of malignancies reported differs depending on the subtype of melanoma. In general, patients with malignant melanomas had increased occurrence of thyroid cancer (cutaneous melanoma), renal cancer (non-acral, mucosal, and uveal melanomas), and lymphoma (non-acral and acral melanomas). The proposed biological rationale was the common oncogenic mutations of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in cutaneous melanomas and thyroid cancers, the shared immunogenicity and BAP1 aberrations in kidney cancers, cutaneous and uveal melanomas, and the decreased immune surveillance for lymphomas and melanomas [31]. Second, the incidence of adrenal gland neoplasms as a second primary malignancy revealed a high incidence ratio in specific primary sites, including hypopharynx, other endocrine tissue (including the thymus), small intestine, liver, stomach, nodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma, kidney, and renal pelvis, and breast [32]. The available literature about adrenal gland neoplasms as a second primary cancer is limited; its incidence is higher than expected and does not mention the connection with malignant melanoma.

Choroid plexus tumours, sarcomas, early-onset breast cancers, brain cancers, and leukaemias, can typically co-exist with ACC within LFS, caused by known germline TP53 mutations. Nevertheless, other cancers, such as lung adenocarcinoma, melanoma, gastrointestinal tumours (i.e., colon, pancreas), kidney, thyroid, and gonadal germ cells (i.e., ovarian, testicular, and prostate), may develop along with ACC in patients with less explored germline TP53 mutations [4, 5, 33,34,35]. In addition, second malignancies have also been reported in ACC patients without hereditary cancer syndromes [36, 37]. In particular, Ayala-Ramirez et al. reported a frequency of 11.5% of patients with other cancers before or after their diagnosis of ACC. Breast and prostate cancers were the most common (both 18.4%), followed by skin cancer (10.5%), non-small cell lung cancer (10.5%), endometrial carcinoma (7.9%), papillary thyroid cancer (5.2%), renal cell carcinoma (5.2%), and melanoma (5.2%). However, no association or specific tumour pattern has been catalogued in previous studies, and there is no recognised link between ACC and melanoma.

On the other hand, in patients with a history of cancer, suspicious adrenal masses pose the crucial issue of differential diagnosis between adrenal metastasis and ACC [25]. In general, adrenal metastases are the most common malignant lesions affecting the adrenal gland and the second most common adrenocortical tumour after benign adenomas [38]. Almost any cancer can spread to the adrenal glands, but some tumours are more likely than others to metastasize to this region. The cancers that most frequently spread to the adrenal gland(s) are lung cancer, kidney cancer (renal cell carcinoma), and malignant melanoma, followed by breast, colon, and rectal cancer. Furthermore, post-mortem examination of patients with advanced-stage melanoma has found adrenal gland metastases in approximately 50% of cases, making the adrenal gland the fourth most common site of metastasis after lung, liver, and bone [14]. Therefore, adrenal metastasis would be the most likely diagnosis in a patient with a suspicious adrenal mass and previous history of melanoma. However, according to our case series and our casuistic review, where melanoma co-existed in 2.3% of ACC cases, and adrenal metastasis from melanoma was observed in 0.6% of patients with suspicious adrenal masses, the possibility of primary adrenal cancer should always be considered.

From a molecular perspective, two of our patients had somatic BRAF mutations detected at the malignant melanoma level. BRAF, serine/threonine kinase, plays a vital role in the RAS-MEK-ERK pathway that relays extracellular signals for cell proliferation and survival. Somatic variants of the BRAF gene are associated with 60% of malignant melanomas and moderate to high frequency in colorectal, ovarian, and papillary thyroid carcinomas [39, 40]. BRAF mutations have also been described in few cases of ACC. For instance, Kotoula et al. observed BRAF variants in two out of 35 ACC samples [41]. Our group also previously detected recurrent somatic alterations in genes not previously associated with ACC, including BRCA1, BRCA2, and BRAF, in 9 out of 117 specimens analysed [20]. However, no BRAF variants were detected in ACC samples from the present small case series using targeted sequencing.

Of note, we identified a few somatic alterations in our three ACC samples. In all cases, we detected a somatic mutation in one Wnt/β-catenin related gene, with additional variants in KMT2D in Case 2 and TP53 in Case 3. This finding agrees with previous pan-genomic studies that collectively revealed modification of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in 41% of ACC cases [17, 19]. Specifically, in Case 1, a well-known, activating missense CTNNB1 variant has been observed. This likely oncogenic mutation is described in different types of cancer [42,43,44,45] and about 30% of ACC [17, 19, 20]. In both other cases, somatic missense mutations in gene APC, coding for a tumor suppressor protein that acts as an antagonist of the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway, were detected. Furthermore, in Case 2, we observed an additional likely pathogenic, somatic missense mutation in gene KMT2D. KMT2D is a histone H3 lysine-4 methyltransferase required for FOXA1, PBX, and oestrogen receptor (ER) recruitment and activation. AKT binds and phosphorylates KMT2D, attenuating methyltransferase activity and ER function, whereas PI3K-alpha inhibition enhances KMT2D activity. This activity regulates remodelling and organization of chromatin and can potentially contribute to the blastematous appearance of the neoplasm. Somatic mutations in this genes have been previously reported in a small percentage of ACC [20]. Finally, in Case 3, we detected a deletion in the well-known tumour-suppressor gene TP53. Again, this is following previous studies, where somatic alterations in the p53 apoptosis/Rb1 cell-cycle pathway (i.e., TP53, CDKN2A, RB1, CDK4, and CCNE1) were altered in 45% of ACCs. Interestingly, this area overlaps with the neoplastic development and progression in metastatic melanoma.

In conclusion, a complete diagnostic workup should be carried out to exclude ACC in patients with rapidly enlarging adrenal masses, even in patients with current or previous history of melanoma. An experienced Adrenal MDT has a crucial role to ensure timely management and adequate monitoring.

According to our interesting findings on a small case series, we believe that a future large and systematic study on the occurrence of adrenal gland neoplasms as second primary cancers after melanoma (or vice versa) is needed.

Availability of data and materials

The DNA sequencing dataset generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the BioProject repository at the link http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/910169 (BioProject ID PRJNA910169). The other datasets are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

17OHP:

17 Hydroxyprogesterone

ACC:

Adrenal Carcinoma

ACTH:

Adrenocorticotrophic Hormone

CEDAM:

Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

CT:

Computed Tomography

DHEAS:

Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic Acid

eGFR:

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate

ENSAT:

European Network For The Study of Adrenal Tumours

FDG:

Flurodeoxyglucose

FFPE:

Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded

HBRC:

Human Biomaterial Resource Centre

HNPCC:

Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer

HPF:

High Power Filed

LFS:

Li-Fraumeni Syndrome

MAF:

Minor Allele Frequency

MDT:

Multi-disciplinary Meeting

NGS:

Next Generation Sequencing

NSE:

Neurone Specific Enolase

PET:

Positron Emission Tomography

SMA:

Smooth Muscle Actin

TAP:

Thorax Abdomen and Pelvis

TCGA:

The Cancer Genome Atlas

VAF:

Variant Allele Frequency

References

  1. Else T, Kim AC, Sabolch A, Raymond VM, Kandathil A, Caoili EM, et al. Adrenocortical carcinoma. Endocr Rev. 2014;35(2):282–326.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Libe R. Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC): diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2015;3:45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mai PL, Malkin D, Garber JE, Schiffman JD, Weitzel JN, Strong LC, et al. Li-Fraumeni syndrome: report of a clinical research workshop and creation of a research consortium. Cancer Gene Ther. 2012;205(10):479–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bougeard G, Renaux-Petel M, Flaman JM, Charbonnier C, Fermey P, Belotti M, et al. Revisiting Li-Fraumeni syndrome from TP53 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(21):2345–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mai PL, Best AF, Peters JA, DeCastro RM, Khincha PP, Loud JT, et al. Risks of first and subsequent cancers among TP53 mutation carriers in the National Cancer Institute Li-Fraumeni syndrome cohort. Cancer. 2016;122(23):3673–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lodish M. Genetics of adrenocortical development and Tumors. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. 2017;46(2):419–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Raymond VM, Everett JN, Furtado LV, Gustafson SL, Jungbluth CR, Gruber SB, et al. Adrenocortical carcinoma is a lynch syndrome-associated cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(24):3012–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bertherat J. Adrenocortical cancer in carney complex: a paradigm of endocrine tumor progression or an association of genetic predisposing factors? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(2):387–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Menon RK, Ferrau F, Kurzawinski TR, Rumsby G, Freeman A, Amin Z, et al. Adrenal cancer in neurofibromatosis type 1: case report and DNA analysis. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep. 2014;2014:140074.

    Google Scholar 

  10. He Y, Xu L, Li Q, Feng M, Wang W. Synchronous adrenocortical carcinoma and ovarian malignant mixed germ cell tumor: a case report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(20):e10730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Inoue T, Terai A, Terachi T, Souma T, Yoshida O. Synchronous testicular seminoma and adrenocortical carcinoma: a case report. Int J Urol. 1998;5(6):615–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Khayat CM, Johnston DL. Rhabdomyosarcoma, osteosarcoma, and adrenocortical carcinoma in a child with a germline p53 mutation. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2004;43(6):683–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kovecsi A, Jung I, Bara T, Bara TJ, Azamfirei L, Kovacs Z, et al. First case report of a sporadic adrenocortical carcinoma with gastric metastasis and a synchronous gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the stomach. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(37):e1549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Borges FC, Ramos C, Ramos A, Mendes GP, Murteira R, Soares P, et al. Monitoring real-life utilization of pembrolizumab in advanced melanoma using the Portuguese National Cancer Registry. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021;30(3):342–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ascierto PA, Kirkwood JM, Grob JJ, Simeone E, Grimaldi AM, Maio M, et al. The role of BRAF V600 mutation in melanoma. J Transl Med. 2012;10:85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Akbani R, Ng PK, Werner HM, Shahmoradgoli M, Zhang F, Ju Z, et al. Corrigendum: a pan-cancer proteomic perspective on the Cancer genome atlas. Nat Commun. 2015;6:4852.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Assie G, Letouze E, Fassnacht M, Jouinot A, Luscap W, Barreau O, et al. Integrated genomic characterization of adrenocortical carcinoma. Nat Genet. 2014;46(6):607–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Juhlin CC, Goh G, Healy JM, Fonseca AL, Scholl UI, Stenman A, et al. Whole-exome sequencing characterizes the landscape of somatic mutations and copy number alterations in adrenocortical carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(3):E493–502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zheng S, Cherniack AD, Dewal N, Moffitt RA, Danilova L, Murray BA, et al. Comprehensive Pan-genomic characterization of adrenocortical carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2016;29(5):723–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lippert J, Appenzeller S, Liang R, Sbiera S, Kircher S, Altieri B, et al. Targeted molecular analysis in adrenocortical carcinomas: a strategy towards improved personalized prognostication. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018.

  21. Heaton JH, Wood MA, Kim AC, Lima LO, Barlaskar FM, Almeida MQ, et al. Progression to adrenocortical tumorigenesis in mice and humans through insulin-like growth factor 2 and beta-catenin. Am J Pathol. 2012;181(3):1017–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Altieri B, Colao A, Faggiano A. The role of insulin-like growth factor system in the adrenocortical tumors. Minerva Endocrinol. 2019;44(1):43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Crona J, Beuschlein F. Adrenocortical carcinoma - towards genomics guided clinical care. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019;15(9):548–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pittaway JFH, Guasti L. Pathobiology and genetics of adrenocortical carcinoma. J Mol Endocrinol. 2019;62(2):R105–R19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fassnacht MDO, Else T, Baudin E, Berruti A, de Krijger RR, Haak HR, et al. European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Adrenocortical Carcinoma in adults, in collaboration with the European network for the study of adrenal Tumors. Eur J Endocrinol. 2018;179(4):G1–G46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kimpel O, Bedrose S, Megerle F, Berruti A, Terzolo M, Kroiss M, et al. Adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in radically resected adrenocortical carcinoma: a cohort study. Br J Cancer. 2021;125(9):1233–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fassnacht M, Terzolo M, Allolio B, Baudin E, Haak H, Berruti A, et al. Combination chemotherapy in advanced adrenocortical carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(23):2189–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Henning JEK, Deutschbein T, Altieri B, Steinhauer S, Kircher S, Sbiera S, et al. Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in adrenocortical carcinoma: a Multicenter study of efficacy and predictive factors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(11):4323–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bradford PT, Freedman DM, Goldstein AM, Tucker MA. Increased risk of second primary cancers after a diagnosis of melanoma. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146(3):265–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Deng W, Wang Y, Liu X, Liu J, Wang L, Yang Z, et al. Assessment of trends in second primary cancers in patients with metastatic melanoma from 2005 to 2016. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(12):e2028627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Loya A, Gombos DS, Patel SP. Second primary malignancies in patients with melanoma subtypes: analysis of 120,299 patients from the SEER database (2000-2016). Front Oncol. 2022;12:853076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rashed WM, Saad AM, Al-Husseini MJ, Galal AM, Ismael AM, Al-Tayep AM, et al. Incidence of adrenal gland tumor as a second primary malignancy: SEER-based study. Endocr Connect. 2018;7(10):1040–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Qian M, Cao X, Devidas M, Yang W, Cheng C, Dai Y, et al. TP53 germline variations influence the predisposition and prognosis of B-cell acute lymphoblastic Leukemia in children. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(6):591–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Guha T, Malkin D. Inherited TP53 mutations and the Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2017;7:4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Valdez JM, Nichols KE, Kesserwan C. Li-Fraumeni syndrome: a paradigm for the understanding of hereditary cancer predisposition. Br J Haematol. 2017;176(4):539–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ayala-Ramirez M, Jasim S, Feng L, Ejaz S, Deniz F, Busaidy N, et al. Adrenocortical carcinoma: clinical outcomes and prognosis of 330 patients at a tertiary care center. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;169(6):891–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Venkatesh S, Hickey RC, Sellin RV, Fernandez JF, Samaan NA. Adrenal cortical carcinoma. Cancer. 1989;64(3):765–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Cingam SR, Mukkamalla SKR, Karanchi H. Adrenal Metastasis. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls; 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rajagopalan H, Bardelli A, Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Velculescu VE. Tumorigenesis: RAF/RAS oncogenes and mismatch-repair status. Nature. 2002;418(6901):934.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Brose MS, Volpe P, Feldman M, Kumar M, Rishi I, Gerrero R, et al. BRAF and RAS mutations in human lung cancer and melanoma. Cancer Res. 2002;62(23):6997–7000.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kotoula V, Sozopoulos E, Litsiou H, Fanourakis G, Koletsa T, Voutsinas G, et al. Mutational analysis of the BRAF, RAS and EGFR genes in human adrenocortical carcinomas. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2009;16(2):565–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Gao C, Wang Y, Broaddus R, Sun L, Xue F, Zhang W. Exon 3 mutations of CTNNB1 drive tumorigenesis: a review. Oncotarget. 2018;9(4):5492–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. White BD, Chien AJ, Dawson DW. Dysregulation of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in gastrointestinal cancers. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(2):219–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Robinson DR, Zylstra CR, Williams BO. Wnt signaling and prostate cancer. Curr Drug Targets. 2008;9(7):571–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Mukherjee N, Bhattacharya N, Alam N, Roy A, Roychoudhury S, Panda CK. Subtype-specific alterations of the Wnt signaling pathway in breast cancer: clinical and prognostic significance. Cancer Sci. 2012;103(2):210–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This manuscript is in memory of Vaishnavi Kumar.

Funding

This work was partially supported by the Deutsche Krebshilfe Stifftung (project number 70112969 to CLR). The funding body played no role in any part of the design of the study, data collection and interpretation or manuscript writing.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Vaishnavi Kumar is deceased.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Endocrinology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK

    Ye Lynn Ko, Vaishnavi Kumar & Miriam Asia

  2. Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany

    Juliane Lippert, Otilia Kimpel, Barbara Altieri & Cristina L. Ronchi

  3. Department of Histopathology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK

    Salvador Diaz-Cano & Kassiani Skordilis

  4. Institute for Pathology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany

    Stefan Kircher

  5. Institute of Metabolism and System Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT, UK

    Yasir S. Elhassan & Cristina L. Ronchi

  6. Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism (CEDAM), Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK

    Yasir S. Elhassan & Cristina L. Ronchi

Authors
  1. Ye Lynn Ko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vaishnavi Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Juliane Lippert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Salvador Diaz-Cano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kassiani Skordilis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Otilia Kimpel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Stefan Kircher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Miriam Asia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yasir S. Elhassan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Barbara Altieri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Cristina L. Ronchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YLK, VK, YSE and CLR: physicians of the patients Case 1 and Case 2, MA: specialist nurse caring for patients Case 1 and Case 2, OK and BA: physicians of the patient Case 3, JL performed sequencing and bioinformatics analysis for the genetic findings, KS and SDC provided histological evaluation and documentation for Case 1 and Case 2, SK provided histological evaluation and documentation for Case 3, YLK and VK wrote the draft of the manuscript and prepared tables, JL, BA and SDC contributed to manuscript draft and tables, CLR conceptualised the case report, supervised the study and contributed to write the manuscript. All co-authors reviewed the manuscript and provided feedback. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristina L. Ronchi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All patients provided written informed consent for data collection and use of biomaterial including genetic analysis. Both participating Institutions obtained local ethical approval (Birmingham Human Resource Centre HBRC 11–660, Wuerzburg 88/11). Research was carried out in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration (https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/).

Consent for publication

all patients provided written consent for publication. A copy of the consent form is available for the Editor to review upon request.

Competing interests

The Authors declare that no financial or non-financial conflict of interest could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

List of genes included in the customised panel for Next Generation Sequencing.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ko, Y.L., Kumar, V., Lippert, J. et al. Coincidence of primary adrenocortical carcinoma and melanoma: three CASE reports. BMC Endocr Disord 23, 4 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-022-01253-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-022-01253-7

Keywords

BMC Endocrine Disorders

ISSN: 1472-6823

Contact us