Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Endocrine Disorders

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

C-reactive protein genetic variant is associated with diabetic retinopathy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes

  • Danfeng Peng1,
  • Jie Wang1,
  • Rong Zhang1,
  • Shanshan Tang1,
  • Feng Jiang1,
  • Miao Chen1,
  • Jing Yan1,
  • Xue Sun1,
  • Tao Wang1,
  • Shiyun Wang1,
  • Yuqian Bao1,
  • Cheng Hu1Email author and
  • Weiping Jia1Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Endocrine Disorders201515:8

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-015-0006-5

Received: 4 March 2014

Accepted: 18 February 2015

Published: 2 March 2015

Abstract

Background

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is an important microvascular complication of diabetes with a high concordance rate in patients with diabetes. Inflammation is supposed to participate in the development of DR. This study aimed to investigate whether genetic variants of CRP are associated with DR.

Methods

A total of 1,018 patients with type 2 diabetes were recruited in this study. Of these patients, 618 were diagnosed with DR, 400 were patients with diabetes for over 10 years but without DR, considered as cases and controls for DR, respectively. Four tagging SNPs (rs2808629, rs3093077, rs1130864 and rs2808634) within CRP region were genotyped for all the participants. Fundus photography was performed for diagnosis and classification for DR.

Results

rs2808629 was significantly associated with increased susceptibility to DR (odds ratio 1.296, 95% CI 1.076-1.561, P = 0.006, empirical P = 0.029, for G allele). This association remained significant after adjustment for confounding factors (odds ratio 1.261, 95% CI 1.022-1.555, P = 0.030).

Conclusions

In this study, we found CRP rs2808629 was associated with DR in the Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes.

Keywords

C-reactive proteinDiabetic retinopathySingle nucleotide polymorphismInflammationType 2 diabetes

Background

Diabetes mellitus, especially type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), has become a global epidemic. With the rapid rising incidence of T2DM, diabetic complications will certainly pose a major public health concern in the coming decades. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major microvascular complication of diabetes and ranks as the leading cause of blindness among working-aged adults around the world [1]. Epidemiological studies have shown that the incidence of DR parallels with diabetes duration and intensive glycaemic control can delay its development [2]. However it is noteworthy that some patients with good glycaemic control may still develop DR whereas some are spared from DR despite poor glycaemic control. Although the mechanisms underlie this observation remains largely unknown, inherited susceptibility may modulate the risk of DR because retinopathy aggregates in families. Siblings of patients with T2DM who have DR showed a significant higher risk of DR compared to siblings of patients with T2DM who have no DR [3,4]. Significant familial influence on the severity of DR was also observed [5,6] and the risk of DR varies among different ethnic groups [7-9]. To data, although no locus for DR from genome-wide association study (GWAS) has reached conventional significance criteria, but a significant number of genes and genetic variants have been proposed for DR or proliferative DR through candidate gene approach [10,11]. Several pathways and processes, including the renin-angiotensin system, vascular endothelial dysfunction, tissue matrix remodeling, and angiogenesis, have been strongly implicated in the pathogenesis of DR, and multiple genes involved in these pathways have been identified for DR (e.g., AKR1B1, VEGFA, ACE, and AGER).

C-reactive protein (CRP), a very sensitive marker of inflammation produced by the liver cells in response to various stimuli, is involved in endothelial dysfunction and angiogenesis [12,13] which have been proposed to play an important role in the pathogenesis of DR [14,15]. It is now well accepted that CRP is a strong predictor of future cardiovascular events [16,17]. However, less is known about its relationship with microvascular complications of diabetes. In this regard, some, though not all, studies (especially prospective studies) have reported that circulating CRP is associated with diabetic nephropathy (DN) [18,19] and DR [15,20] in the last decade, raising the possibility that the increase of CRP may be an early event or even one of driving forces in the development of microvascular complications of diabetes. Therefore, it is plausible to hypothesize that genetic variants of CRP may have impact on the risk of these complications. In the current study, we investigated the association between CRP variants and DR in a Chinese population.

Methods

Participants

This study involved 1,018 patients with T2DM recruited from the Shanghai Diabetes Institute Inpatient Database of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital. All participants were unrelated patients with T2DM meeting the 1999 WHO criteria (fasting plasma glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/l and/or 2 h plasma glucose ≥ 11.1 mmol/l). Type 1 diabetes and mitochondrial diabetes were excluded by clinical, immunological (individuals with GAD and/or protein tyrosine phosphatase IA-2 antibodies were excluded) and genetic methods (mitochondrial tRNALeu(UUR) A3243G mutation carriers were excluded). Of these patients, 618 were diagnosed with DR, 400 were patients without DR, considered as cases and controls for DR, respectively. For controls selection, patients with diabetes for over 10 years were chosen deliberately. This study was approved by the institutional review board of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital, with written informed consent obtained from each participant.

Clinical measurement

Each participant completed a standard questionnaire for detailed information as described previously [21]. Fundus photography was performed according to a standardized protocol at the Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital. Both eyes of each patient were photographed with a 45-degree 6.3-megapixel digital nonmydriatic camera (Canon CR6-45NM, Lake Success, NY). A five-stage disease severity classification for DR was applied according to the International Classification of Diabetic Retinopathy [22]: no apparent retinopathy (no abnormalities), mild nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) (microaneurysms only), moderate NPDR (more than just microaneurysms but less than severe NPDR), severe NPDR (more than 20 intraretinal hemorrhages in each of 4 quadrants and/or definite venous beading in 2 quadrants and/or prominent intraretinal microvascular abnormalities in 1quadrant and no signs of proliferative retinopathy), or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) (neovascularization and/or vitreous hemorrhage and/or preretinal hemorrhage). DR grade was evaluated for both eyes, and higher grade was recorded for each person. Of the 618 patients with DR in this study, there were 395 with mild NPDR, 103 with moderate NPDR, 84 with severe NPDR, and 36 with PDR. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared. Glycaemic control was evaluated by measuring glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. Data of blood pressures and lipid profiles were also collected for each participant. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg.

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) selection, genotyping and quality control

In this study, we selected four tagging SNPs (rs2808629, rs3093077, rs1130864 and rs2808634) that spanned 11 kb in the upstream and 6 kb in the downstream region of CRP, according to HapMap phase III (release 28) Han Chinese database with a threshold of r2 ≥ 0.8. We could tag 95% SNPs (21 out of 22 SNPs) with a minor allele frequency (MAF) > 0.01 within CRP region. All genotyping was done using the primer extension of multiplex products with detecting by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectroscopy using a MassARRAY Compact Analyzer (Sequenom, San Diego, CA, USA). The genotyping data underwent a series of quality control checks and cleaned data were used in further statistical analysis. The call rates for rs2808629, rs3093077, rs1130864 and rs2808634 were 97.0%, 95.9%, 98.3% and 96.9%, respectively. The concordance rates based on 100 duplicates were over 99% for all these SNPs. Thirty-seven individuals were excluded from the sample call rate checks. The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test was performed before the association analysis, and all the four SNPs were in accordance with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P = 0.68 for rs2808629, P = 0.74 for rs3093077, P = 0.34 for rs1130864 and P = 0.47 for rs2808634, respectively).

Statistical analysis

The allelic frequencies between the patients with or without DR were compared by χ2 test, and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were presented. Genotype distributions between patients with or without DR were compared using multiple logistic regressions under an additive model with adjustment for confounding factors. The effects of SNPs on the levels of retinopathy severity were analyzed by trend analysis. All these analyses were performed using SAS 9.3 (SAS institute, Cary, NC, USA) unless specified otherwise. A two-tailed P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

On the basis of the previously reported effect size of genetic loci for DR (~1.40) [10], our samples had > 90% power to detect an effect SNP with MAF of 0.3 and > 80% power to detect an effect SNP with MAF of 0.2 at a level of significance of 0.05.

Results

The clinical characteristics of the subjects passed genotype quality control were shown in Table 1. Compared with patients without DR, patients with DR were diagnosed with diabetes at earlier age and had higher HbA1c levels and higher prevalence of hypertension and diabetic nephropathy. Besides, as patients without DR with diabetes for over 10 years were selected in our study, they were older and had longer duration of diabetes compared with patients with DR.
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of the study patients

Characteristic

Diabetic retinopathy

Patients without retinopathy

Pvalue

 

(n = 593)

(n = 388)

 

Male/female (n)

285/308

154/234

0.010

Age (years)

62.48 ± 10.79

67.37 ± 9.62

<0.0001

BMI (kg/m2)

24.12 ± 3.65

24.02 ± 3.36

0.861

Age at diagnosis of diabetes (years)

51.70 ± 10.60

53.39 ± 9.87

0.014

Duration of diabetes (years)

10.00(5.00,15.00)

12.00(10.00,16.00)

<0.0001

HbA1c (%)

9.16 ± 2. 17

8.70 ± 2.11

0.0003

Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)

138.66 ± 18.90

135.98 ± 17.83

0.014

Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)

81.39 ± 9.55

79.34 ± 9.45

0.001

Subjects with hypertension [n (%)]

335(56.5%)

186(47.9%)

0.009

Subjects with nephropathy [n (%)]

232(39.1%)

113(29.1%)

0.001

Data are n, mean ± SD or median (interquartile range). BMI, body mass index.

25 patients with DR and 12 patients without DR were excluded due to sample call rate check.

We firstly analyzed the association between these SNPs and the risk of DR. As shown in Table 2, rs2808629 was nominally associated with increased susceptibility to DR (odds ratio 1.296, 95% CI 1.076-1.561, P = 0.006, for G allele). This association remained significant after adjusting for confounding factors, including HbA1c levels, duration of diabetes, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, BMI and sex (odds ratio 1.261, 95% CI 1.022-1.555, P = 0.030), as well as adjusting for multiple comparisons (empirical P = 0.029). The other SNPs did not show any association with DR. Further, we tried to examine the effect of rs2808629 on the disease severity of DR. Of the 593 DR patients, there were 379 patients with mild NPDR, 98 with moderate NPDR, 80 with severe NPDR and 36 with PDR. However, no significant association of rs2808629 with DR severity was observed (P = 0.387 for trend analysis). The distributions of these four SNPs among patients with different levels of DR were shown in Table 3. In addition, rs2808629 was genotyped among 438 subjects with normal glucose regulation. The distribution of this SNP was similar to those reported in other studies of Asian populations in the HapMap database (G allele frequency 0.453 vs 0.419/0.297/0.537), indicating that there was no technical error in this study.
Table 2

Associations of CRP SNPs with diabetic retinopathy

SNP

Chr: position (Build 38)

Reference position*

Major/minor allele

Risk allele

Cases

Controls

OR (95% CI)

Pvalue (empiricalPvalue)

OR (95% CI)§

Pvalue§

(n = 593)

(n = 388)

     

Minor allele frequencies

Genotype count 11/12/22#

Minor allele frequencies

Genotype count 11/12/22#

    

rs2808629

1:159707006

+5283

A/G

G

0.452

171/297/115

0.389

141/180/57

1.296(1.076,1.561)

0.006(0.029)

1.261(1.022,1.555)

0.030

rs3093077

1:159709846

+2443

T/G

G

0.183

390/179/18

0.163

271/106/10

1.153(0.906,1.468)

0.248(0.612)

1.194(0.906,1.574)

0.209

rs1130864

1:159713301

3’ UTR

C/T

T

0.058

520/62/3

0.045

352/33/1

1.299(0.855,1.974)

0.219(0.667)

1.250(0.794,1.968)

0.335

rs2808634

1:159722783

−8194

C/T

T

0.160

420/155/17

0.151

281/97/10

1.070(0.833,1.375)

0.597(0.968)

1.056(0.804,1.386)

0.697

P values < 0.05 are shown in bold.

The additive model was used in the association analysis between genotype and DR.

*position of SNP with reference to CRP.

#11, major allele homozygotes; 12, heterozygotes; 2 2, minor allele homozygotes.

§adjusted for duration of diabetes, HbA1c, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, body mass index and sex.

Empirical P values are based on 10,000 permutations.

The OR with 95% CI shown is for the minor allele.

Table 3

CRP SNPs distributions among patients with different severities of DR

SNP

Mild NPDR

Moderate NPDR

Severe NPDR

PDR

 

(n = 379)

(n = 98)

(n = 80)

(n = 36)

 

Minor allele frequencies

Genotype count 11/12/22#

Minor allele frequencies

Genotype count 11/12/22#

Minor allele frequencies

Genotype count 11/12/22#

Minor allele frequencies

Genotype count 11/12/22#

rs2808629

0.465

110/180/84

0.463

25/52/18

0.405

25/44/10

0.386

11/21/3

rs3093077

0.196

242/122/13

0.168

67/24/4

0.163

55/24/1

0.129

26/9/0

rs1130864

0.053

339/34/3

0.072

83/14/0

0.058

69/9/0

0.074

29/5/0

rs2808634

0.166

263/106/10

0.168

69/25/4

0.127

61/16/2

0.139

27/8/1

#11, major allele homozygotes; 12, heterozygotes; 22, minor allele homozygotes.

Discussion

In the present study, we investigated the association of CRP variants with DR in Chinese patients with T2DM. It’s the first time to our knowledge to investigate the association between CRP variants with DR. Our results revealed that rs2808629 was significantly associated with the risk of DR in Chinese patients with T2DM. This association remained significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. Moreover, the correlation of rs2808629 with DR stayed significant after adjusting for confounding factors, including duration of diabetes, HbA1c, blood pressure, BMI and sex, implying that this SNP is an independent genetic factor for susceptibility to DR. It has been reported in several studies that CRP genetic variants were associated with serum CRP levels [23-28]. rs2808629 was identified to be associated with serum CRP levels in a previous genome-wide association study [23]. Therefore, it is plausible that the effect of rs2808629 on susceptibility to DR is because of its influence on serum CRP levels. However, further studies are needed for confirmation.

As an acute phase reactant, CRP production increases in response to a variety of systemic events such as infection, trauma, or autoimmune inflammatory diseases. Among other systemic inflammatory mediators, CRP has been widely accepted as a potent risk indicator, independently predicting future cardiovascular events in the last decades [29-31]. On the other hand, given the increasingly recognized link between chronic inflammation and microvascular complications [15,32], the relationship between CRP and DR has been investigated in some studies. However, results from limited studies on possible association of CRP with DR are inconsistent. In the Hoorn study [15], a large population-based cohort study of 625 adults, higher CRP was associated with the prevalence of any DR. Another prospective study of inflammatory biomarkers and risk of DR in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial also indicated that after adjusting for known risk factors, increasing quintiles of baseline high-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) level may be associated with higher risks of incident clinically significant macular edema and the development of macular hard exudates [33]. However, report from the Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy (WESDR) [34], a longitudinal population based study of persons with type 1 diabetes, did not find any association between CRP and DR. Similar results were reported by the Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) [35]. Besides, Lim et al. [36] reported that patients with higher levels of CRP were less likely to have DR in the Singapore Malay Eye Study (SiMES), a cross-sectional study on 718 persons with diabetes. Nevertheless, emerging evidence supports CRP as an active participant instead of a mere bystander in the pathogenesis of DR. CRP could inhibit endothelium-dependent nitric oxide-mediated dilation in retinal arterioles, thus potentially facilitating the development of retinal vascular diseases [37]. Besides, CRP could stimulate leucocyte-endothelium interactions [38], decrease endothelial nitric oxide [39], and impair the number and function of endothelial progenitor cells [40], thereby promoting endothelial dysfunction, which is another important mediator in the development of diabetic microvascular complications [15]. Taken together, these findings imply that genetic variants of CRP may exert significant effects on DR. And our study found a common variant of CRP, rs2808629, was significantly associated with DR in the Chinese patients with T2DM.

Some limitations should be noted in our study. Firstly, although the association of rs2808629 with DR remained significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons (empirical P = 0.029), we still cannot fully exclude the possibility that the association detected was a false positive. But considering the power of our study samples and the effect of this SNP, the possibility of a false positive is limited. Secondly, rs2808629 locates in the downstream of CRP, and we suppose that it may participate in the susceptibility to DR through its effects on regulating CRP expression or it may be just a genetic marker in linkage disequilibrium with the causal variant(s). However, further studies are needed to reveal the underlying mechanism. Thirdly, although we found association of CRP variant with DR in Chinese patients with T2DM, whether this effect is restricted to T2DM is still unknown and needs to be investigated in studies among patients with type 1 diabetes and other ethnic groups.

Conclusions

In summary, we found that CRP rs2808629 was associated with DR in Chinese patients with T2DM. This study discover the association of CRP variant with DR for the first time, although the mechanism underlying the genotype–phenotype association is unknown, it provides a hypothesis for future researches. Further studies are needed to replicate this finding in other populations and translate the common variant association signal into biological mechanisms of disease causation.

Notes

Abbreviations

T2DM: 

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

DR: 

Diabetic retinopathy

DN: 

Diabetic nephropathy

GWAS: 

Genome-wide association study

CRP: 

C-reactive protein

NPDR: 

Nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy

PDR: 

Proliferative diabetic retinopathy

HbA1c: 

Glycated haemoglobin

SNP: 

Single nucleotide polymorphism

BMI: 

Body mass index

hsCRP: 

High-sensitivity CRP

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grant from the National 973 Program (2011CB504001), the National 863 program (2012AA02A509), NSFC (81200582 and 81322010), Excellent Young Medical Expert of Shanghai (XYQ2011041), Shanghai Talent Development Grant (2012041), National Young Top Talent Supporting Program, the Drug Innovation Program of the National Science and Technology Project (2011ZX09307-001-02) and grant from Shanghai Health and Family Planning Commission (2013ZYJB1001). The authors appreciate all the participants of this research and gratefully acknowledge the skillful technical support of all nursing and medical staff at Shanghai Clinical Center for Diabetes.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Shanghai Diabetes Institute, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Diabetes Mellitus, Shanghai Clinical Center for Diabetes, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital

References

  1. Klein BE. Overview of epidemiologic studies of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2007;14(4):179–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000;321(7258):405–12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Rema M, Saravanan G, Deepa R, Mohan V. Familial clustering of diabetic retinopathy in South Indian Type 2 diabetic patients. Diabet Med. 2002;19(11):910–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Murea M, Ma L, Freedman BI. Genetic and environmental factors associated with type 2 diabetes and diabetic vascular complications. Rev Diabet Stud. 2012;9(1):6–22.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Research Group. Retinopathy and nephropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes four years after a trial of intensive therapy. The New England journal of medicine. 2000;342(6):381–9.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Arar NH, Freedman BI, Adler SG, Iyengar SK, Chew EY, Davis MD, et al. Heritability of the severity of diabetic retinopathy: the FIND-Eye study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(9):3839–45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Tudor SM, Hamman RF, Baron A, Johnson DW, Shetterly SM. Incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy in Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites with type 2 diabetes. San Luis Valley Diabetes Study, Colorado. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(1):53–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hallman DM, Huber Jr JC, Gonzalez VH, Klein BE, Klein R, Hanis CL. Familial aggregation of severity of diabetic retinopathy in Mexican Americans from Starr County, Texas. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(5):1163–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Velho G, Vaxillaire M, Boccio V, Charpentier G, Froguel P. Diabetes complications in NIDDM kindreds linked to the MODY3 locus on chromosome 12q. Diabetes Care. 1996;19(9):915–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ng DP. Human genetics of diabetic retinopathy: current perspectives. J Ophthalmol. 2010;2010:172593.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Petrovic D. Candidate genes for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:540416.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Verma S, Wang CH, Li SH, Dumont AS, Fedak PW, Badiwala MV, et al. A self-fulfilling prophecy: C-reactive protein attenuates nitric oxide production and inhibits angiogenesis. Circulation. 2002;106(8):913–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Verma S, Li SH, Badiwala MV, Weisel RD, Fedak PW, Li RK, et al. Endothelin antagonism and interleukin-6 inhibition attenuate the proatherogenic effects of C-reactive protein. Circulation. 2002;105(16):1890–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Crawford TN, Alfaro 3rd DV, Kerrison JB, Jablon EP. Diabetic retinopathy and angiogenesis. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2009;5(1):8–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. van Hecke MV, Dekker JM, Nijpels G, Moll AC, Heine RJ, Bouter LM, et al. Inflammation and endothelial dysfunction are associated with retinopathy: the Hoorn Study. Diabetologia. 2005;48(7):1300–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Koenig W, Sund M, Frohlich M, Fischer HG, Lowel H, Doring A, et al. C-Reactive protein, a sensitive marker of inflammation, predicts future risk of coronary heart disease in initially healthy middle-aged men: results from the MONICA (Monitoring Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease) Augsburg Cohort Study, 1984 to 1992. Circulation. 1999;99(2):237–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Pradhan AD, Manson JE, Rifai N, Buring JE, Ridker PM. C-reactive protein, interleukin 6, and risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 2001;286(3):327–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Overgaard AJ, McGuire JN, Hovind P, Parving HH, Rossing P, Pociot F. Serum amyloid A and C-reactive protein levels may predict microalbuminuria and macroalbuminuria in newly diagnosed type 1 diabetic patients. J Diabetes Complications. 2013;27(1):59–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hansen TK, Forsblom C, Saraheimo M, Thorn L, Waden J, Hoyem P, et al. Association between mannose-binding lectin, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and the progression of diabetic nephropathy in type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2010;53(7):1517–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nowak M, Wielkoszynski T, Marek B, Kos-Kudla B, Swietochowska E, Sieminska L, et al. Antioxidant potential, paraoxonase 1, ceruloplasmin activity and C-reactive protein concentration in diabetic retinopathy. Clin Exp Med. 2010;10(3):185–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Jia WP, Pang C, Chen L, Bao YQ, Lu JX, Lu HJ, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose regulation in a Chinese adult population: the Shanghai Diabetes Studies, a cross-sectional 3-year follow-up study in Shanghai urban communities. Diabetologia. 2007;50(2):286–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wilkinson CP, Ferris 3rd FL, Klein RE, Lee PP, Agardh CD, Davis M, et al. Proposed international clinical diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema disease severity scales. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(9):1677–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Benjamin EJ, Dupuis J, Larson MG, Lunetta KL, Booth SL, Govindaraju DR, et al. Genome-wide association with select biomarker traits in the Framingham Heart Study. BMC Med Genet. 2007;8 Suppl 1:S11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Schumacher W, Cockcroft J, Timpson NJ, McEniery CM, Gallacher J, Rumley A, et al. Association between C-reactive protein genotype, circulating levels, and aortic pulse wave velocity. Hypertension. 2009;53(2):150–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee CC, You NC, Song Y, Hsu YH, Manson J, Nathan L, et al. Relation of genetic variation in the gene coding for C-reactive protein with its plasma protein concentrations: findings from the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Cohort. Clin Chem. 2009;55(2):351–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Teng MS, Hsu LA, Wu S, Chang HH, Chou HH, Ko YL. Association between C-reactive protein gene haplotypes and C-reactive protein levels in Taiwanese: interaction with obesity. Atherosclerosis. 2009;204(2):e64–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Komurcu-Bayrak E, Erginel-Unaltuna N, Onat A, Ozsait B, Eklund C, Hurme M, et al. Association of C-reactive protein (CRP) gene allelic variants with serum CRP levels and hypertension in Turkish adults. Atherosclerosis. 2009;206(2):474–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kong H, Qian YS, Tang XF, Zhang J, Gao PJ, Zhang Y, et al. C-reactive protein (CRP) gene polymorphisms, CRP levels and risk of incident essential hypertension: findings from an observational cohort of Han Chinese. Hypertens Res. 2012;35(10):1019–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Haverkate F, Thompson SG, Pyke SD, Gallimore JR, Pepys MB. Production of C-reactive protein and risk of coronary events in stable and unstable angina. European Concerted Action on Thrombosis and Disabilities Angina Pectoris Study Group. Lancet. 1997;349(9050):462–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Liuzzo G, Biasucci LM, Gallimore JR, Grillo RL, Rebuzzi AG, Pepys MB, et al. The prognostic value of C-reactive protein and serum amyloid a protein in severe unstable angina. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(7):417–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ridker PM, Buring JE, Shih J, Matias M, Hennekens CH. Prospective study of C-reactive protein and the risk of future cardiovascular events among apparently healthy women. Circulation. 1998;98(8):731–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Goldberg RB. Cytokine and cytokine-like inflammation markers, endothelial dysfunction, and imbalanced coagulation in development of diabetes and its complications. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(9):3171–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Muni RH, Kohly RP, Lee EQ, Manson JE, Semba RD, Schaumberg DA. Prospective study of inflammatory biomarkers and risk of diabetic retinopathy in the diabetes control and complications trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(4):514–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Klein BE, Knudtson MD, Tsai MY, Klein R. The relation of markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction to the prevalence and progression of diabetic retinopathy: Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(9):1175–82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Nguyen TT, Alibrahim E, Islam FM, Klein R, Klein BE, Cotch MF, et al. Inflammatory, hemostatic, and other novel biomarkers for diabetic retinopathy: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(9):1704–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Lim LS, Tai ES, Mitchell P, Wang JJ, Tay WT, Lamoureux E, et al. C-reactive protein, body mass index, and diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(9):4458–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Nagaoka T, Kuo L, Ren Y, Yoshida A, Hein TW. C-reactive protein inhibits endothelium-dependent nitric oxide-mediated dilation of retinal arterioles via enhanced superoxide production. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(5):2053–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Devaraj S, Davis B, Simon SI, Jialal I. CRP promotes monocyte-endothelial cell adhesion via Fcgamma receptors in human aortic endothelial cells under static and shear flow conditions. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;291(3):H1170–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Venugopal SK, Devaraj S, Yuhanna I, Shaul P, Jialal I. Demonstration that C-reactive protein decreases eNOS expression and bioactivity in human aortic endothelial cells. Circulation. 2002;106(12):1439–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kalka C, Masuda H, Takahashi T, Kalka-Moll WM, Silver M, Kearney M, et al. Transplantation of ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor cells for therapeutic neovascularization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(7):3422–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Peng et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement