Skip to content


  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Differences in insulin sensitivity, lipid metabolism and inflammation between young adult Pakistani and Norwegian patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross sectional study

  • 1, 2, 3Email author,
  • 1,
  • 3, 4,
  • 3, 4,
  • 1,
  • 5,
  • 1,
  • 3, 4, 6 and
  • 2, 3
BMC Endocrine Disorders201313:49

  • Received: 26 February 2013
  • Accepted: 15 October 2013
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports



Immigrants from South Asia to Western countries have a high prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We explored pathogenic factors that might contribute to the high risk of T2DM in Pakistani immigrants to Norway.


A cross-sectional study was performed in 18 Pakistani and 21 Norwegian men and women with T2DM (age 29 – 45 years), recruited from two hospital out-patient clinics. Anthropometrics and a two-step euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic clamp with measurements of non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) during clamp, was performed in all patients. Insulin sensitivity, given as the Glucose Infusion Rate (GIR) and Insulin Sensitivity Index (ISI), was calculated from the two euglycemic clamp steps. Fasting adipokines and inflammatory mediators were measured. Continuous variables between groups were compared using Student’s t test or Mann–Whitney U test as appropriate. Spearman’s correlation coefficient and multiple linear regression analyses were used.


Despite having a lower BMI, Pakistani patients were more insulin resistant than Norwegian patients, during both low and high insulin infusion rates, after adjustment for sex and % body fat: median (interquartile range) GIR(low insulin): 339.8(468.0) vs 468.4(587.3) μmol/m2/min (p = 0.060), ISI(low insulin): 57.1(74.1) vs 79.7(137.9) μmol/m2/min (p = 0.012), GIR(high insulin): 1661.1(672.3) vs 2055.6(907.0) μmol/m2/min (p = 0.042), ISI(high insulin): 14.2(7.3) vs 20.7(17.2) μmol/m2/min (p = 0.014). Pakistani patients had lower percentage NEFA suppression 30 minutes into clamp hyperinsulinemia than Norwegians: 41.9(90.6)% vs 71.2(42.1)%, (p = 0.042). The relationship of ISI to BMI, leptin and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist also differed between Norwegians and Pakistanis.


Compared with Norwegian patients, Pakistani patients with T2DM had lower insulin sensitivity, affecting both glucose and lipid metabolism. The relation of insulin sensitivity to BMI and some adipokines also differed between the groups.


  • Ethnicity
  • South Asian
  • Insulin sensitivity
  • Anthropometry
  • NEFA
  • Adipokines
  • Inflammation


Immigrants from South Asia to Western countries have a high prevalence of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [14]. The prevalence is also high in urban areas in their countries of origin [57]. Studies comparing non-diabetic subjects from India and the US indicate that Indians have lower insulin sensitivity [8, 9]. Norway, like many other Western countries, has a growing population of immigrants, with one of the largest groups being of Pakistani origin. This group has an alarming prevalence of T2DM, manifesting at a younger age than in ethnic Norwegians [10], and reaching more than 25% in 30–60 year old South Asian women living in an Eastern suburb of Oslo [11]. Better knowledge through studies of the pathophysiology of T2DM in this population is necessary to develop more efficient prevention and treatment strategies. Such studies could also give new insight into the pathogenesis of T2DM in general.

There is a well known association between obesity and T2DM, but South Asians develop T2DM at lower levels of body mass index (BMI) than Westerners, and are more insulin resistant for any given BMI [12, 13]. Several studies have indicated that, in individuals from South Asia, BMI may be inferior to other measures of adiposity as a predictor of metabolic risk [1315].

Adipokines and inflammatory mediators derived from adipose tissue may be important in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance and T2DM [16]. Possible differences in the profile of these substances between South Asians and Westerners with T2DM, could potentially help explain differences in the development of T2DM in these groups.

In the present study, we investigated a group of young adult immigrants from Pakistan with T2DM, and compared them to a group of Norwegian patients of similar age. We chose to study young adult subjects, where disease duration was relatively short, to avoid comorbidities that might confound the interpretation of our data. Our aim was to explore differences between the groups with regards to pathogenic factors such as insulin resistance, obesity and inflammation, which might contribute to the high prevalence of T2DM in Pakistani immigrants to Norway.



This was a cross-sectional study comparing young T2DM patients from two different ethnic groups.


Norwegian and Pakistani patients with T2DM, aged 45 years or younger, attending the out-patient clinics at Lovisenberg Deaconess Hospital between 1999 and 2005, and Aker University Hospital between 2003 and 2009,were eligible for inclusion. After searches in the two hospitals’ patient registries, 195 patients were randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria were: ethnicities other than Norwegian or Pakistani, positive GAD or IA2 auto-antibodies, age > 45 years, person unwilling or unable to give informed consent. Patients were contacted by letter with information about the study in Norwegian and Urdu, and patients whose telephone number could be obtained were also informed by phone. Nineteen Pakistani and 21 Norwegian sex-matched patients (age 29–45 years, 49% men) with confirmed T2DM, agreed to participate, and were included in the study. Participant characteristics were similar to a subgroup of approximately 80 of the 155 patients not included, where data on HbA1c and anthropometrics were available. All Pakistani participants were first generation immigrants. One Pakistani woman was excluded on the first day of testing, because of difficulties in obtaining intravenous access. The remaining 39 patients were examined.

Anthropometrical measurements

Height and weight were measured with participants wearing light clothing and without any shoes on. Waist and hip circumferences were assessed with a tape measure at mid point between the lowest rib margin and the iliac crest, and at the level of the major trochanter, respectively. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) was performed on a Tanita Body Composition Analyzer BC-418 (Tokyo, Japan). All subjects were fasting and voided urine before measurement.

Euglycemic clamp

To enhance comparability of examinations, all patients stopped taking oral antidiabetic drugs for two days, and insulin for at least 12 hours prior to examination. Patients were asked to refrain from strenuous physical exercise and alcohol intake during these two days, and to fast from midnight during the night before the examination. We performed a euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic clamp, using a modification of the method originally described by De Fronzo et al. [17]. The clamp was performed with two steps, first administering a primed, continuous insulin dose of 40 mU/m2/min for a minimum of 100 minutes, until at least 30 minutes of stable euglycemia was obtained. This was directly followed by a 400 mU/m2/min insulin infusion, also for a minimum of 100 minutes, with at least 30 minutes of stable euglycemia at the end. The body surface area was calculated using Mostellers equation [18].

Human insulin (Actrapid®, Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) 300 mU/mL and Glucose 200 mg/mL were infused through a teflon catheter in a vein at the left elbow of the patient. Insulin was diluted in NaCl 0.9%, after having first added 2 ml of the patients own blood, to avoid insulin sticking to the walls of the bag. All blood samples were drawn from a teflon catheter in a vein at the right elbow, kept open by a slow infusion of NaCl 0.9%. The right arm was kept at 37°C by a heating sleeve connected to a thermal control unit (Swetron AB, Veddestad, Sweden), to arterialize blood samples. Plasma glucose was measured every five minutes using a OneTouch Ultra glucose measuring device (LifeScan, Milpitas, CA), with control measurements every 30 minutes by the glucose oxidase method, on a Glucose Analyzer II (Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA). At the end of each step of the clamp, three measurements of serum insulin were taken at ten-minute intervals. The glucose infusion rate in μmol/m2/min was established, and denoted GIR40 and GIR400 respectively. Because of varying metabolic clearance rates of insulin, the insulin levels measured at the end of each step of the clamp differed between patients. The insulin sensitivity index (ISI) was therefore also calculated, and expressed as the ratio of the GIR to the prevailing mean serum insulin levels ((GIR/I) × 100), denoted ISI40 and ISI400. Every 30 minutes during the 2 step euglycemic clamp, EDTA plasma for non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) measurements was extracted and immediately frozen at -70°C.

Two Norwegian and two Pakistani patients did not attain euglycemia during the first step of the clamp, and were excluded from this part of the clamp analyses. Two Norwegian and four Pakistani patients were not examined with the high-step clamp, due to contraindication of hyperosmolar glucose at high infusion rates (for the most insulin sensitive patients) and long duration of the low-step part of the clamp to reach euglycemia (for the most insulin resistant patients). After excluding these patients from clamp analyses, there were 46% men in the first step and 48% men in the second step of the clamp.

Blood samples

Fasting plasma glucose was measured by the glucose oxidase method on a Glucose Analyzer II (Beckman Instruments). Serum insulin was analyzed using the radioimmunoassay (RIA) kit, formerly from Linco Research Inc. (St. Charles, MO), presently available from Millipore Corp. (Billerica, MA). Plasma HbA1c was measured by high performance liquid chromatography on a Variant analyzer (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA). Fasting serum total cholesterol, serum HDL cholesterol, and serum triglycerides were measured using a routine enzymatic method (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Serum LDL cholesterol was calculated using the Friedewald equation [19]. NEFA were analyzed using a NEFA C enzymatic color test kit, (Wako Chaemicals GmbH, Neuss, Germany), modified to run on a Technicon RA1000 (Technicon Instruments Corp., Tarrytown, NY). Plasma levels of adiponectin and leptin were analyzed using RIA kits from Millipore Corp. (Billerica, MA),(also formerly from Linco Research Inc. (St. Charles, MO)). Plasma measurements of soluble tumor necrosis factor-receptor type 1 (sTNF-R1) and high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were performed using DuoSet ELISA kits from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Plasma measurements of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) were performed using CytoSet from Invitrogen Corporation (Carlsbad, CA), with streptavidin-horseradish peroxydase from R&D Systems. Plasma measurements of interleukin-6 (IL-6) were performed using a High Sensitivity ELISA kit from Abcam plc. (Cambridge, UK).

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± SD, or median (interquartile range) as appropriate. We analysed non-normally distributed data log-transformed, or with the use of non-parametric methods. Student’s t test or Mann Whitney U tests were used for comparison of continuous variables between groups. For correlations, Spearman’s correlation coefficient (rs) was used. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed with log-transformation of parameters when needed, to obtain normally distributed residuals. A two-sided p-value <0.05 was considered significant, but owing to the large number of comparisons, particular attention should be directed towards analyses where p-values are <0.01. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 18.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).


The study was carried out in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, and approved by the Eastern Norway Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics. Informed, written consent was obtained from each participant before enrolment.


Ethnic differences in diabetes duration and anthropometrics

The two ethnic groups did not differ significantly in age, sex and fasting plasma glucose. In contrast, BMI and weight, including both total body fat mass and lean body mass were significantly higher in the Norwegian, compared with the Pakistani group (Table 1). Despite lower BMI, Pakistani patients had higher median HbA1c, longer median duration of diabetes, and a tendency towards earlier onset of diabetes (reported mean age at onset 30 years vs 34 years, p = 0.06). Further clinical characteristics of the participating patients are presented in Additional file 1.
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of patients according to ethnic group





n = 21

n = 18


Males (%)

10 (48%)

9 (50%)


Age (years)

42 (6)

41 (8)


Years with diabetes

5 (9)

9 (7)


Weight (kg)

106.8 ± 13.6

90.1 ±23.4


BMI (kg/m2)

37.2 (6.0)

30.9 (9.4)


Waist circumference (cm)

114.3 ± 10.9

106.5 ±17.4


Waist-hip ratio

1.00 ± 0.09

1.01 ± 0.09


Total body fat (%)

36.9 ± 9.6

34.2 ± 7.7


Total body fat mass (kg)

39.5 ± 12.0

28.0 ± 8.2


Lean body mass (kg)

67.1 ± 12.6

54.2 ± 12.2


Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/l)

10.7 ± 3.2

10.6 ± 3.3


HbA1c (%/mmol/mol)

7.3/56 (1.4/13)

8.7/72 (2.9/31)


Fasting insulin (pmol/l)

166 (160)

209 (193)


Fasting C-peptide (pmol/l)

1162 ± 458

977 ± 373


Total cholesterol (mmol/l)

4.5 ± 1.0

4.7 ± 1.3


HDL cholesterol (mmol/l)

1.03 ± 0.21

1.08 ± 0.24


LDL cholesterol (mmol/l)

2.7 ± 0.8

2.6 ± 0.6


Triglycerides (mmol/l)

1.6 (1.1)

1.4 (1.1)


Table 1: For normally distributed parameters, mean ± SD is given, and comparisons were made using Student’s t test. For non-normally distributed parameters, median (interquartile range) is given, and comparisons were made using the Mann–Whitney U test. Median HbA1c-values are reported as NGSP-%/IFCC-mmol/mol with interquartile range in parentheses. In bold: p < 0.05.

Ethnic differences in insulin sensitivity

When examining insulin sensitivity with a two-step euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic clamp, median values for GIR and ISI showed consistently higher point estimates in the Norwegian compared to the Pakistani group, although we found no statistically significant crude differences between the groups in GIR or ISI during the first step (Table 2). However, when adjusting for sex and % TBF in a multiple regression analysis, LogGIR40 showed a clear tendency towards lower values in the Pakistani group, and LogISI40 was significantly lower in the Pakistani compared to the Norwegian group (Table 3). Further adjustment for BMI, HbA1c or diabetes duration did not change the relation of ISI40 or GIR40 to ethnicity. Ethnicity, sex and % TBF together explained 55% of the variation in insulin sensitivity, expressed as ISI40. During the second step of the clamp, Pakistani patients had non-significantly lower median GIR400, and significantly lower ISI400 (Table 2). In standard multiple regression analyses, ethnicity and % TBF explained 29% of ISI400 and 24% of GIR400 variation (Table 3). Sex was no longer a significant predictor of LogISI400 or Log GIR400, and neither was BMI, diabetes duration or HbA1c.
Table 2

Insulin sensitivity and NEFA suppression






468.4 (587.3)

339.8 (468.0)



79.7 (137.9)

57.1 (74.1)


S-insulin end low step(pmol/l)

546 (336)

715 (243)



2055.6 (907.0)

1661.1 (672.3)



20.7 (17.2)

14.2 (7.3)


S-insulin end high step (pmol/l)

9505 (2738)

11082 (2922)


Fasting p-NEFA (mmol/l)

0.59 (0.43)

0.50 (0.29)


NEFA suppression 0–30 minutes (%)

71.2 (42.1)

41.9 (90.6)


Table 2: Data are presented as median (interquartile range), and comparisons are made using the Mann–Whitney U test. In bold: p < 0.05. GIR40 = glucose infusion ratelow step, ISI40 = glucose infusion rate/s-insulinlow step, GIR400 = glucose infusion ratehigh step, ISI400 = glucose infusion rate/s-insulinhigh step. GIR is expressed as μmol/m2/min, and ISI as 100 × μmol/m2/min/s-Ins. NEFA = non-esterified fatty acids. Number of Norwegians and Pakistanis were: during the low step, n = 19 and 16, respectively. During the high step, n = 19 and 14, respectively, and for NEFA measurements, n = 13 and 15, respectively.

Table 3

Multiple regression analyses of insulin sensitivity


Adjusted effect β

95% CI


Adjusted effect β

95% CI


Model A:







(-0.588, -0.081)



(-0.429, 0.010)




(-1.129, -0.322)



(-0.804, -0.106)


% body fat


(-0.084, -0.037)



(-0.065, -0.024)


Model A + BMI


(-0.015, 0.031)



(-0.017, 0.022)


Model A + HbA1c


(-0.095, 0.078)



(-0.111, 0.036)


Model A + Diabetes duration


(-0.028, 0.026)



(-0.019, 0.028)


Model B:

LogISI 400


Log GIR 400




(-0.333, -0.040)



(-0.229, -0.005)


% body fat


(-0.017, 0.000)



(-0.013, 0.000)


Model B + Sex


(-0.394, 0.068)



(-0.262, 0.101)


Model B + BMI


(-0.007, 0.018)



(-0.004, 0.014)


Model B + HbA1c


(-0.045, 0.055)



(-0.051, 0.025)


Model B + Diabetes duration


(-0.023, 0.007)



(-0.019, 0.005)


Table 3: Dependent variables in model A: LogISI40 or LogGIR40. Constant for Log ISI40 = 4.428. R2: 0.55. Constant for LogGIR40 = 4.464. R2: 0.48. Reference group for ethnicity = Norwegians, for sex = women. Variables excluded from final models: BMI, HbA1c(NGSP) and diabetes duration.

Dependent variables in model B: LogISI400 or LogGIR400. Constant for Log ISI400 = 1.650. R2: 0.29. Constant for LogGIR400 = 3.558. R2: 0.24. Variables excluded from final models: sex, BMI, HbA1c and diabetes duration. In bold: p < 0.05.

Ethnic differences in the relation of BMI and waist circumference to insulin sensitivity

When exploring the relationships between anthropometric characteristics and insulin sensitivity, we found a strong, significant correlation between ISI40 and BMI in the Norwegian group, and a weaker, non significant correlation in the Pakistani group. Waist circumference, however was significantly correlated with ISI40 in the Pakistani, but not in the Norwegian group (Figure 1a-b and Additional file 2). There was also a significant interaction between ethnicity and LogBMI (p = 0.032) in a multiple regression analysis, suggesting a difference between the ethnic groups. (Dependent variable: LogISI40, independent variables: ethnicity (p = 0,026), LogBMI (p = 0,004), as well as ethnicity x LogBMI). We were, however, not able to confirm an ethnic difference in the relationship between insulin sensitivity and waist circumference by regression analysis (data not shown).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Relation between ISI 40 , BMI and waist circumference. Relation of insulin sensitivity, expressed as ISI40, to a) body mass index (BMI) and b) waist circumference in Norwegian (black diamonds) and Pakistani (white circles) patients with type 2 diabetes. Solid regression lines represent Norwegian patients and dashed lines represent Pakistani patients. Spearman’s Correlation coefficients (rs) and p-values for each correlation are presented for both ethnicities. In a) the correlations have been performed both including and omitting the outlier (BMI 59). They give approximately the same result, and the outlier is excluded in the rs presented, but shown in the scatterplot.

Ethnic differences in suppression of non-esterified fatty acids

There were no significant differences in fasting NEFA values between Norwegian and Pakistani patients, but initial NEFA suppression by hyperinsulinemia, expressed as percentage suppression of NEFA after 30 minutes of the clamp, was significantly more pronounced in the Norwegian group compared to the Pakistani group (Figure 2, Table 2).
Figure 2
Figure 2

Suppression of NEFA during euglycemic clamp. Non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) values have been standardized, with fasting values set to 1.0. The figure shows standardized mean (SD) values of NEFA during the first 120 minutes of the low step euglycaemic clamp, for both patient groups. Norwegian patients are shown in black diamonds with solid lines. Pakistani patients are shown in white circles with dashed lines. *p < 0.05.

Adipokines and markers of inflammation

Table 4 shows levels of adipokines and markers of inflammation in the two ethnic groups. The Norwegian, but not the Pakistani group, showed negative correlations between ISI40 and leptin, as well as IL-1RA (Additional file 2). Fasting IL-1RA was significantly positively correlated to BMI in both patient groups. In the Norwegian group it was also positively correlated to leptin (rs = 0.59, p = 0.006). In the Pakistani group, IL-1RA neither correlated to ISI, nor to leptin (rs = 0.14, p = 0.593), but correlated positively to waist circumference.
Table 4

Adipokines and markers of inflammation





Adiponectin (μg/ml)

4.6 (4.4)

3.3 (3.4)


Leptin (pmol/l)

950 (1043)

907 (1014)


IL-6 (pg/ml)

1.18 (1.19)

1.07 (2.18)


hsCRP (pg/ml)

2.31 (3.48)

2.45 (2.46)


IL-1RA (pg/ml)

62.75 (98.10)

45.90 (103.95)


sTNF-R1 (ng/ml)

1.04 (0.20)

0.92 (0.31)


Table 4: Data are presented as median (interquartile range), and comparisons are made using the Mann–Whitney U test. Nor = Norwegian patients. Pak = Pakistani patients.The number of Nor/Pak were: for adiponectin and leptin, n = 21/18. For IL-6, hsCRP and IL-1RA, n = 20/17, and for sTNF-R1, n = 20/16. IL-6 = interleukin-6, hsCRP = high sensitive C-reactive protein, IL-1RA = interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, sTNF-R1 = soluble tumor necrosis factor-receptor 1.


In the present study we found significant differences in insulin sensitivity, measured by the euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic clamp, between young adult Norwegian and Pakistani patients with T2DM. There were also ethnic differences in diabetes duration and HbA1c, even in this young patient population, demonstrating longer duration of diabetes and poorer glycemic control in the Pakistani group. These differences, however, did not explain the lower insulin sensitivity in the Pakistani group per se, since neither HbA1c nor diabetes duration were significantly associated with the ethnic differences found in insulin sensitivity in adjusted multiple regression analyses.

Furthermore, we demonstrated a different relationship between insulin sensitivity and BMI in the two groups. Although obesity is clearly an important factor in insulin resistance, BMI was a poor marker of metabolic disturbances in the Pakistani patients. Whereas Pakistani patients were all quite insulin resistant regardless of BMI, among the Norwegian patients there was a strong negative correlation between BMI and insulin sensitivity. To our knowledge, this is the first study, using the euglycemic clamp to measure insulin sensitivity, to show such ethnic differences in subjects with T2DM. Our results support and expand previously published results obtained in healthy South Asian immigrants [20, 21].

NEFA are normally suppressed by hyperinsulinemia. There is evidence that this suppression is impaired in T2DM [22], although this has not been found by all authors [23]. Our study shows similar fasting NEFA values between the two ethnic groups, but significantly slower NEFA suppression in the Pakistani group, despite higher fasting and end-clamp serum insulin levels. Some evidence of ethnic differences, both in fasting NEFA levels and degree of suppression by hyperinsulinemia, has previously been shown in non-diabetic subjects [24]. Other authors, however, found no difference in NEFA suppression according to ethnicity [25]. Our findings further support that impaired insulin sensitivity affects lipid metabolism more severely in Pakistani patients as compared to Norwegian patients with T2DM.

It is noteworthy that leptin and IL-1RA were differently related to insulin sensitivity in the two ethnic groups. T2DM is now regarded as a disorder characterized by non-resolving inflammation. IL-1, released though activation of Nod-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasomes, seems to play an important role in the inflammatory processes [26]. Il-1RA is considered an anti-inflammatory cytokine, that antagonizes IL-1β and IL-1α, and is elevated, at least in part, in response to elevation of these inflammatory cytokines. An early study showed decreased IL-1RA levels in type 2 diabetes [27], and it has been demonstrated that Leptin decreases β-cell production of IL-1RA, down-regulating IL-1RA expression in pancreatic β-cells in type 2 diabetes [28]. However, more recent studies have shown high levels of IL-1RA in obesity, correlating with BMI, insulin resistance and serum leptin levels, and increased production of IL-1RA in adipose tissue in obese humans [2931]. Subjects with impaired glucose tolerance have higher levels of IL-1RA [32], and in two prospective cohort studies, IL-1RA was found to be elevated several years before diabetes diagnosis, and significantly predicted incident diabetes [33, 34]. Whether this represents a counteracting mechanism in response to IL-1, which circulates at much lower levels in plasma and is more difficult to detect in clinical samples, is at present unclear. In our study, leptin as well as IL-1RA was negatively associated with insulin sensitivity in the Norwegian, but not the Pakistani patients. Leptin and IL-1RA correlated with BMI in both groups, and with waist circumference in the Pakistani group only. These findings, together with the different relationship between insulin sensitivity and BMI demonstrated in our two groups, suggest that there may be important differences in the relationship between obesity, insulin sensitivity, and the effect and/or regulation of these signal molecules between the two ethnic groups. As leptin is known to correlate mainly to superficial abdominal adipose tissue [35, 36], our findings could indicate that ethnic differences exist in the metabolic activity of the different compartments of abdominal adipose tissue.

The main strengths of our study include thorough patient examinations with gold standard methods for measurement of insulin sensitivity, and using two steps of hyperinsulinemia. The difference in HbA1c and diabetes duration between the two patient groups may be regarded as a weakness. However, these differences were also present in patients who were not included in the study, and have been demonstrated in several other studies [1012]. Thus, an attempt to match for these parameters could in our opinion have created a selection bias. It can nevertheless be regarded as a limitation to our study that patients were recruited from a population referred to hospital outpatient diabetes clinics, and that sample size was limited, increasing the risk of type II statistical errors. Recruitment of patients, especially the Pakistani patients, proved challenging, which explains why only 20% of the invited patients participated. While a larger and more representative cohort would have strengthened our study, we note that the ethnic differences in insulin sensitivity showed consistent patterns for all four estimates of insulin sensitivity. This also corresponds well with the clinical picture of higher diabetes prevalence and poorer glycemic control apparent in South Asian populations. We did not measure endogenous glucose production during the euglycemic clamp, and our glucose infusion rates may therefore underestimate the true peripheral glucose uptake, at least during the low insulin infusion level. Lastly, body composition was measured by BIA, which may be less accurate than dual x-ray absorptiometry, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. BIA is, however, an inexpensive and accessible way of estimating body composition, which is gaining use in clinical practice.


In this study of Norwegian and Pakistani patients with T2DM we found significant differences in insulin sensitivity and the relationship between insulin sensitivity and obesity markers, which may impact on our understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms that place Pakistani subjects at higher risk of developing T2DM. Further studies are needed to elucidate a possible relationship between insulin sensitivity, various adipose tissue compartments and adipokines and related molecules in various ethnic groups.



Anti-glutamic acid decarboxylate


Anti-protein tyrosine phosphatase


Bioelectrical impedance analysis


Body-mass index


Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay


Glucose infusion rate at the low insulin infusion clamp step


Glucose infusion rate at the high insulin infusion clamp step


High sensitivity C-reactive protein


Interleukine-1 alpha


Interleukine-1 beta


Interleukine-1 receptor antagonist




Insulin sensitivity index at the low insulin infusion clamp step


Insulin sensitivity index at the high insulin infusion clamp step


Non-esterified fatty acids


Nod-like receptor protein 3


Radio immuno assay


Soluble tumor necrosis factor-receptor 1


Standard deviation


Type 2 diabetes mellitus


Percent total body fat.



We are grateful to Prof. Christian A. Drevon and Staff Engineer Anne-Randi Enget for performing the NEFA analyses for our study. We also thank the study nurses Åse Halsne and Gøril Vinje at the Diabetes Research Laboratory, Hormone Laboratory, Oslo University Hospital, and medical students Ruben Jensen and Thorbjørn Sandem, for their invaluable help in performing the study procedures. We thank BLS Lise-Marit Amlie, Hormone Laboratory, for her kind assistance during planning and running of the study. We thank Dr Anh T. Tran for sharing her data, used for background evaluation of our patient sample. We acknowledge LifeScan Inc. for supplying us with test strips for the OneTouch Ultra glucose monitoring device. The study was funded by the University of Oslo and the Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, with contributions from Aker University Hospital, the Norwegian Diabetes Association and Freia Chokolade Fabrik’s Medical Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

Hormone Laboratory, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Research Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Department of Medicine, Lovisenberg Deaconess Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Section of Clinical Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway


  1. Mather HM, Keen H: The Southall Diabetes Survey: prevalence of known diabetes in Asians and Europeans. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985, 291: 1081-1084.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. McKeigue PM, Shah B, Marmot MG: Relation of central obesity and insulin resistance with high diabetes prevalence and cardiovascular risk in South Asians. Lancet. 1991, 337: 382-386.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kanaya AM, Wassel CL, Mathur D, Stewart A, Herrington D, Budoff MJ, Ranpura V, Liu K: Prevalence and correlates of diabetes in South asian indians in the United States: findings from the metabolic syndrome and atherosclerosis in South Asians living in America study and the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2010, 8: 157-164.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Garduno-Diaz SD, Khokhar S: Prevalence, risk factors and complications associated with type 2 diabetes in migrant South Asians. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012, 28: 6-24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Latha E, Vijay V, Viswanathan M: Rising prevalence of NIDDM in an urban population in India. Diabetologia. 1997, 40: 232-237.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Latha E, Manoharan M, Vijay V: Impacts of urbanisation on the lifestyle and on the prevalence of diabetes in native Asian Indian population. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1999, 44: 207-213.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Shera AS, Jawad F, Maqsood A: Prevalence of diabetes in Pakistan. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007, 76: 219-222.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Raji A, Gerhard-Herman MD, Warren M, Silverman SG, Raptopoulos V, Mantzoros CS, Simonson DC: Insulin resistance and vascular dysfunction in nondiabetic Asian Indians. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004, 89: 3965-3972.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chandalia M, Lin P, Seenivasan T, Livingston EH, Snell PG, Grundy SM, Abate N: Insulin resistance and body fat distribution in South Asian men compared to Caucasian men. Public Libr Sci One. 2007, 2: e812-Google Scholar
  10. Tran AT, Diep LM, Cooper JG, Claudi T, Straand J, Birkeland K, Ingskog W, Jenum AK: Quality of care for patients with type 2 diabetes in general practice according to patients’ ethnic background: a cross-sectional study from Oslo, Norway. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010, 10: 145-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Jenum AK, Holme I, Graff-Iversen S, Birkeland KI: Ethnicity and sex are strong determinants of diabetes in an urban Western society: implications for prevention. Diabetologia. 2005, 48: 435-439.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mukhopadhyay B, Forouhi NG, Fisher BM, Kesson CM, Sattar N: A comparison of glycaemic and metabolic control over time among South Asian and European patients with Type 2 diabetes: results from follow-up in a routine diabetes clinic. Diabet Med. 2006, 23: 94-98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. WHO expert consultation: Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004, 363: 157-163.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Dudeja V, Misra A, Pandey RM, Devina G, Kumar G, Vikram NK: BMI does not accurately predict overweight in Asian Indians in northern India. Br J Nutr. 2001, 86: 105-112.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. McKeigue PM, Pierpoint T, Ferrie JE, Marmot MG: Relationship of glucose intolerance and hyperinsulinaemia to body fat pattern in south Asians and Europeans. Diabetologia. 1992, 35: 785-791.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gregor MF, Hotamisligil GS: Inflammatory mechanisms in obesity. Annu Rev Immunol. 2011, 29: 415-445.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. DeFronzo RA, Tobin JD, Andres R: Glucose clamp technique: a method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance. Am J Physiol. 1979, 237: E214-E223.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mosteller RD: Simplified calculation of body-surface area. N Engl J Med. 1987, 317: 1098-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS: Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972, 18: 499-502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Forouhi NG, Jenkinson G, Thomas EL, Mullick S, Mierisova S, Bhonsle U, McKeigue PM, Bell JD: Relation of triglyceride stores in skeletal muscle cells to central obesity and insulin sensitivity in European and South Asian men. Diabetologia. 1999, 42: 932-935.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Raji A, Seely EW, Arky RA, Simonson DC: Body Fat distribution and insulin resistance in healthy Asian Indians and Caucasians. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001, 86: 5366-5371.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Groop LC, Bonadonna RC, DelPrato S, Ratheiser K, Zyck K, Ferrannini E, DeFronzo RA: Glucose and free fatty acid metabolism in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: evidence for multiple sites of insulin resistance. J Clin Invest. 1989, 84: 205-213.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Howard BV, Klimes I, Vasquez B, Brady D, Nagulesparan M, Unger RH: The antilipolytic action of insulin in obese subjects with resistance to its glucoregulatory action. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1984, 58: 544-548.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Abate N, Chandalia M, Snell PG, Grundy SM: Adipose tissue metabolites and insulin resistance in nondiabetic Asian Indian men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004, 89: 2750-2755.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Zoratti R, Godsland IF, Chaturvedi N, Crook D, Crook D, Stevenson JC, McKeigue PM: Relation of plasma lipids to insulin resistance, nonesterified fatty acid levels, and body fat in men from three ethnic groups: relevance to variation in risk of diabetes and coronary disease. Metabolism. 2000, 49: 245-252.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. McGettrick AF, O’Neill LA: NLRP3 and IL-1beta in macrophages as critical regulators of metabolic diseases. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013, 15 (Suppl 3): 19-25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Marculescu R, Endler G, Schillinger M, Iordanova N, Exner M, Hayden E, Huber K, Wagner O, Mannhalter C: Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist genotype is associated with coronary atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2002, 51: 3582-3585.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Maedler K, Sergeev P, Ehses JA, Mathe Z, Bosco D, Berney T, Dayer JM, Reinecke M, Halban PA, Donath MY: Leptin modulates beta cell expression of IL-1 receptor antagonist and release of IL-1beta in human islets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 8138-8143.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Juge-Aubry CE, Somm E, Giusti V, Pernin A, Chicheportiche R, Verdumo C, Rohner-Jeanrenaud F, Burger D, Dayer JM, Meier CA: Adipose tissue is a major source of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist: upregulation in obesity and inflammation. Diabetes. 2003, 52: 1104-1110.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Somm E, Cettour-Rose P, Asensio C, Charollais A, Klein M, Theander-Carrillo C, Juge-Aubry CE, Dayer JM, Nicklin MJ, Meda P, Rohner-Jeanrenaud F, Meier CA: Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist is upregulated during diet-induced obesity and regulates insulin sensitivity in rodents. Diabetologia. 2006, 49: 387-393.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Meier CA, Bobbioni E, Gabay C, Assimacopoulos-Jeannet F, Golay A, Dayer JM: IL-1 receptor antagonist serum levels are increased in human obesity: a possible link to the resistance to leptin?. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002, 87: 1184-1188.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ruotsalainen E, Salmenniemi U, Vauhkonen I, Pihlajamaki J, Punnonen K, Kainulainen S, Laakso M: Changes in inflammatory cytokines are related to impaired glucose tolerance in offspring of type 2 diabetic subjects. Diabetes Care. 2006, 29: 2714-2720.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Carstensen M, Herder C, Kivimaki M, Jokela M, Roden M, Shipley MJ, Witte DR, Brunner EJ, Tabak AG: Accelerated increase in serum interleukin-1 receptor antagonist starts 6 years before diagnosis of type 2 diabetes: whitehall II prospective cohort study. Diabetes. 2010, 59: 1222-1227.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Luotola K, Pietila A, Zeller T, Moilanen L, Kahonen M, Nieminen MS, Kesaniemi YA, Blankenberg S, Jula A, Perola M, Salomaa V: Associations between interleukin-1 (IL-1) gene variations or IL-1 receptor antagonist levels and the development of type 2 diabetes. J Intern Med. 2011, 269: 322-332.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Van HV, Reynisdottir S, Eriksson P, Thorne A, Hoffstedt J, Lonnqvist F, Arner P: Leptin secretion from subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue in women. Diabetes. 1998, 47: 913-917.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Banerji MA, Faridi N, Atluri R, Chaiken RL, Lebovitz HE: Body composition, visceral Fat, leptin, and insulin resistance in Asian Indian men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999, 84: 137-144.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:


© Wium et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.