Skip to main content
Download PDF

The effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on blood interleukin-6 concentration: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BMC Endocrine Disorders volume 23, Article number: 257 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The low-grade chronic inflammation in diabetes plays an important role in development of cardiovascular and renal complications. Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are recognized as protective agents for cardio-renal complications. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is positively associated with the pathophysiology of metabolic-related pathologies. The aim of this meta-analysis is to investigate the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on blood IL-6 concentration in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods

Embase, PubMed, and Scopus were systematically searched up to 1st of November 2023. The eligible studies were RCTs with adult population that had provided blood IL-6 for both control and intervention groups. Cochrane risk-of-bias tool were for study quality assessment. Data were analyzed using random effect model via Stata statistical software.

Results

Eighteen studies with a total of 5311 patients were included. Of which 3222 and 2052 patients were in intervention and control arm, respectively. Of the total population, 49.7% were men. The study durations ranged from 8 to 52 weeks. The pooled analysis showed a significant association between the use of SGLT2 inhibitors and lower IL-6 levels (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -1.04, Confidence Interval (CI): -1.48; -0.60, I2 = 96.93%). Dapagliflozin was observed to have a higher IL-6-lowering effect (SMD = -1.30, CI: -1.89; -0.71, I2 = 92.52) than empagliflozin or canagliflozin. Sub-group analysis of control groups (SMD = -0.58 (-1.01, -0.15) and -1.35 (-2.00, -0.70 for the placebo and active control sub-groups, respectively) and duration of interventions (SMD = -0.78 (-1.28, -0.28) and -1.20 (-1.86, -0.55) for study duration of ≤ 12 and > 12 weeks, respectively) did not change the results. Meta-regression analysis showed a significant correlation between the level of HbA1c and IL-6-lowering efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors.

Conclusion

IL-6 levels are significantly reduced with the use of SGLT2 inhibitors with HbA1c as the only marker influencing such reductions, and dapagliflozin had the highest potency. The anti-inflammatory effect of SGLT2 inhibitors supports their broader use to address diabetic complications related to inflammatory responses.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The prevalence of diabetes, especially type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), is increasing universally [1]. Hyperglycemia is believed to induce oxidative stress within tissues which triggers the formation of reactive oxygen species and cell death leading to enhanced cytokine infiltrations [2]. Circulatory interleukin-6 (IL-6) is commonly elevated in T2DM [3]. A growing body of evidence supports the critical role of IL-6 in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular and renal dysfunctions [4]. Genotyping for the IL-6 gene has revealed that IL-6 polymorphism is independently associated with coronary artery disease [5]. It has been established that IL-6 regulates glucose hemostasis, increased IL-6 levels might serve as an adaptive response to improve glycemic control [6]. However, IL-6 manifests a dual action against insulin resistance [7], while the cytokine enhances glucose uptake [8], serum IL-6 can predict the development of T2DM [9]. IL-6 as a downstream mediator of angiotensin II signaling can contribute to hypertensive disorders as well [10]. It is also one of the promoters of the Janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK/STAT) signaling pathway [11]. Excessive amounts of IL-6 disturb the physiological balance of the cytokine’s signaling and leads to activation of JAK and STAT that can result in metabolic- and inflammatory -relate pathologies [12].

IL-6/ Soluble IL-6 receptor α (sIL-6Rα) pathway activate the pro-inflammatory trans-signaling in cells. More recently, blockade of this pathway in addition to neutralizing antibodies against IL-6 aiming at addressing the low-grade inflammation in patients with T2DM have shown beneficial effect [13, 14]. Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are glucose-lowering medications that have demonstrated protective effects against cardiorenal comorbidities [15]. Many studies have suggested that SGLT2 inhibitors exert promising anti-inflammatory characteristics [16]. Moreover, elevated IL-6 levels are strongly associated with poorly controlled diabetes. The effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on IL-6 levels has been assessed in several observational studies and in randomized controlled trials (RCTs); however, their overall impact on serum IL-6 has several discrepancies in the current literature. Therefore, in the present study we aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of published RCTs to investigate the change in IL-6 levels with SGLT2 inhibitors.

Materials and methods

The study was performed in accordance with PRISMA statement 2020 for the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses [17]. The protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, ID: CRD42023393268.

Literature search strategy

The authors systematically searched online databases including Embase, PubMed, and Scopus for relevant studies that were investigated until 1st November 2023. The searches were conducted using the following Medline keywords: (Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors and its drug names (gliflozins)) AND (Inflammation OR Interleukin-6 OR Tumor Necrosis Factors OR Cytokines OR Chemokines) AND (Randomized Controlled Trial and all the relevant keywords) with all their sub-trees in different combinations. The detailed search strategy is presented in supplementary file (Section A, Table S1). There was no restriction on language. Additionally, a manual search of references of related papers was performed to include any possible missed studies.

Inclusion criteria

Two authors (SEP.G and M.M) had the responsibility of screening all searches to find eligible studies after removal of all duplicate reports. Afterwards, the eligible studies were classified based on their findings and data. Further, authors (SEP.G and SA.G) independently inspected all the screened papers. The PICO model that we used to s defined in supplementary file (Section B, Table S1). Only studies that met the following criteria were included in our meta-analysis: 1) Randomized controlled trial studies, 2) Human populations aged 18-year-old and above, 3) Studies that provided blood IL-6 for each group, and 4) Studies that compared SGLT2 inhibitors as the intervention group with a control group that used other glycemia-lowering agents, other medications, or placebo.

The exclusion criteria comprised of 1) participants with specific diseases that potentially carries alterations in serum IL-6 (e.g., malignancy, severe renal and liver failure), and if 2) the intervention period was less than 4 weeks.

Data extraction

Data extraction was conducted according to a prepared checklist that consists of the following data: name of the first author, country of origin, year of publication, study design, study duration, type of intervention, study population, demographics, blood IL-6 and the related data for further analyses were extracted by two authors (SEP.G, M.M). In case the required data for the analyses was not reported in the main text, they were extracted from the figures by means of he online web application (https://apps.automeris.io/wpd/). Moreover, if the needed data hasn’t been mentioned, a request email was sent to the corresponding author obtain the data.

Quality assessment and risk of bias

Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB-2) [18] was used to methodologically assess the quality of evidence in each article by two independent authors (SA.G and M.M) with disagreements being determined by a third author (A.J, Sh.G). The domains of this scale are listed as randomization process, deviation from intended intervention, missing outcome data, measurement of the outcome, and the selection of the reported result. RoB-2 categorizes studies into low, high, and some concerns regarding the risk of bias. Finally, a traffic light plot was generated using Rob-2 excel assessment tool.

Statistical analysis

Data was expressed as standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the generic inverse-variance method and random effects restricted maximum likelihood model. Whenever standard deviation (SD) change was not reported, we used [(SD baseline2 + SD final2)—(2 × R × SD baseline × SD final)]. We performed four meta-regression analyses to evaluate age, level of HbA1c and sex effects on outcomes. Funnel plot and Egger's regression tests were used to assess publication bias. Statistical heterogeneity between studies was investigated using Higgins I2 statistics (> 50%), τ2, and the Cochrane Q test (P < 0.1) [19]. A statistical significance was considered Two-tailed ρ value < 0.05. All analyses were fulfilled by using Stata (Stata Statistical Software: Release V.15. College Station, Texas, USA: StataCorp LLC) [20].

Results

Study selection and characteristics

The systematic search yielded 2264 potentially relevant records of which 801 were duplicates. Through screening the abstracts, 162 articles were assessed for full-text analysis. Among which, articles that reported irrelevant outcomes, urinary IL-6, had study periods less than 4 weeks, and had insufficient data were excluded. Following the exclusions, 18 articles were identified that met the inclusion criteria (Fig. 1). The eligible studies were published from 2018 to end of 2023 and, 3 were post-hoc analyses. The web application was used to extract the IL-6 data for 5 studies [21,22,23,24,25]. One study was in Chinese and was translated into English [26]. The complementary data for 1 study was obtained by email from the corresponding author [27].

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA flow-diagram of the included studies

Full size image

The total number of patients included in the analysis was 5311. The median age was 49.5 years and 49.7% were male. Treatment durations varied from 8 to 52 weeks. Three studies had used canagliflozin [22, 24, 25], 9 had used dapagliflozin [21, 26, 28,29,30,31,32,33,34] and 6 had used empagliflozin [23, 27, 35,36,37,38]. With respect to active controls, 8 studies had compared with placebo and 10 had compared with other anti-glycemic agents (e.g., liraglutide, glibenclamide, metformin, sitagliptin, glimepiride) or another medication (valsartan and standard anti-heart failure drugs). Detailed information about the studies and their patients’ characteristics are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Study and patients’ characteristics
Full size table

Meta-analysis results

The pooled analysis of the 18 studies that were included showed a significant effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on blood IL-6 concentration, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of (-1.04, CI: -1.48; -0.60). The intra-studies heterogeneity was significantly high (I2 = 96.93%) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Forest plot of the effects of SGLT2 inhibitor drugs on blood interleukin-6. SGLT2 inhibitors: Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors

Full size image

In sub-group analysis of the type of SGLT2 inhibitor employed, dapagliflozin was observed to have a relatively higher IL-6-lowering effect (SMD = -1.30, CI: -1.89; -0.71, I2 = 92.52%) compared to either canagliflozin or empagliflozin (Fig. 3). Sub-group analysis of control groups suggested no difference between use of placebo or other glycemia-lowering or other medications (SMD = -0.58 (-1.01, -0.15) and -1.35 (-2.00, -0.70) for the placebo and active control sub-groups, respectively) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Forest plot summarizing the SMD of change scores among interleukin-6 between intervention and control arms for RCTs divided by the different types of gliflozins. SMD: Standardized mean difference. RCT: Randomized controlled trial

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Forest plot summarizing the SMD of change scores among interleukin-6 between intervention and control arms for RCTs divided by either placebo or other medications (anti-diabetics or valsartan)

Full size image

The duration of intervention, either less or more than 12 weeks, also did not change the results (SMD = -0.78 (-1.28, -0.28) and -1.20 (-1.86, -0.55) for study duration of ≤ 12 and > 12 weeks, respectively) (Supplementary file, Section C, Figure S1). Additionally, the subgroup analysis of stratified HbA1c levels indicated no significant difference (Supplementary file, Section C, Figure S2). The meta-regression analysis of age, gender and HbA1C showed a significance correlation between IL-6-lowering efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors with the level of HbA1c at baseline (β = -0.403, 95% CI: -0.639, -0.166, P = 0.004) (Supplementary file, Section C, Table S1 and Figure S3). No correlations were found with the variables of age and male sex (Supplementary file, Section C, Figure S4 and Figure S5).

Publication bias and sensitivity analyses

The randomization process was adequately generated in 5 (27.7%) trials; in the others the allocation was not concealed or not mentioned. In 6 (33.3%) studies, both patients and caregivers were blinded to the treatment and the judgment of the other trials declared “some concerns”. The assessor’s awareness of the intervention had disturbed the measurement of outcome as there were no information in 8 trials. In one study a pre-specific analysis plan for IL-6 was not finalized before reporting the results. The detailed risk of bias assessment is presented in supplementary file (Section D, Figure S1). The funnel plot showed no significant evidence of asymmetry (Supplementary file, Section D, Figure S2). Galbraith plot for heterogeneity analysis showed that there was no inconsistency across studies (Supplementary file, Section D, Figure S3). Leave-one-out and cumulative sensitivity analysis showed that the effect sizes were robust (Supplementary file, Section D, Figure S4). A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the different correlation coefficients (r) for the main analysis. Neither different r nor using mean difference (MD) instead of SMD changed the result of the main analysis (Supplementary file, Section D, Table S1).

Discussion

This meta-analysis showed that use of SGLT2 inhibitors is associated with a reduction in blood IL-6 levels. A prior meta-analysis was conducted on the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on the biomarkers of inflammation; however, considering their inclusion of limited evidence in their assessment on IL-6, the study had failed to gain enough power to reach the significance level [39].

IL-6 exacerbates insulin resistance by activating STAT-3 in hepatocytes [40]. Current evidence has to some degree elucidated the mechanisms by which SGLT2 inhibitors regulate IL-6 levels [41, 42]. This class of medications suppress the mitochondrial complex I and inhibit intracellular glucose metabolism that leads to increased expression of AMPK signaling pathway and promote autophagy in immune cells; hence they exhibit anti-inflammatory effects [41,42,43]. Moreover, SGLT2 inhibitors hamper polarization of M2 macrophages, and as a result with decreased production of M1 macrophages, the release of IL-6 is moderated [44, 45]. Finally, it is worth emphasis that the effect of use of SGLT2 inhibitors on lowering IL-6 levels is not merely through control of glycemia because no reduction in IL-6 levels (compared to placebo) was found with use of other glycemia-lowering agents (Fig. 4).

IL-6 is considered to be an important contributor to kidney diseases [46]. Podocytes are great source of IL-6 secretion, and inevitably kidney is the first organ to be insulted by IL-6 [47]. This cytokine is involved in wide variety of glomerular and tubular pathological abnormalities [48]. In situ expression of IL-6 in diabetic nephropathy was significantly increased compared to a control group; hence higher IL-6 production may be associated with kidney injury in T2DM [49]. Furthermore, IL-6 in patients with T2DM is a robust trigger for the progression of chronic kidney disease [50], and high serum and urine IL-6 values have been proposed to be a prognostic marker for development of diabetic nephropathy [51].

Vascular cell aging via IL-6 signaling is hypothesized to accelerate atherosclerosis [52]. As IL-6 inhibition had markedly reduced biomarkers of thrombosis, IL-6 is thought to be a major contributing factor in myocardial ischemia and atherothrombotic complications [53, 54]. Furthermore, persistence elevated IL-6 concentrations can lead to cardiac hypertrophy mainly through IL-6 trans-signaling [55].

Reductions in circulating IL-6 have been shown to be associated with improved glycemic control in T2DM. Tocilizumab an anti-IL-6 receptor antibody decreased HbA1c after 6 months of treatment [54]. Sarilumab, another IL-6 inhibitor, was associated with reduced HbA1c level, seemingly independent of its anti-inflammatory effect [56]. Although IL-6 is known to be a key player in pancreatic beta-cell survival in diabetogenic conditions [57], IL-6 can couple autophagy to antioxidant response in beta-cells [58]. IL-6 was found to enhance insulin secretion in pancreatic islets and the associated hyperinsulinemia, suggesting that IL-6 plays a role in the pathogenesis insulin resistance [59, 60].

The disease-development properties of IL-6 have long been a topic of great interest. More recently, novel strategies are being implicated to target IL-6 for treatment of immune-mediated diseases through inhibition of the IL-6 signal transduction [61]. However, due to the duality of IL-6 function, blockade of IL-6 signaling has encountered some untoward complexities [62], and as such, interfering with the physiological homeostatic functions of IL-6 arguably should be avoided. In general, the therapeutic benefits must be weighed against the undesired effects of IL-6 blocking in T2DM.

In this meta-analysis, use of dapagliflozin was associated with a greater decrease in IL-6 levels compared to other medications in its own class, although the number of studies using canagliflozin was limited. The subgroup analysis of the control groups, use of SGLT2 inhibitors was more potent in lowering IL-6 than other glycemia-lowering agents. In addition, the duration of treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors, whether less or more than 12 weeks, did not change the results, however a relatively greater reduction in IL-6 was observed with longer duration of treatment. Meta-regression analysis showed that age and sex had no contributary effects in IL-6-lowering characteristic with SGLT2 inhibitors. Higher HbA1c levels at baseline were found to be associated with more pronounced reductions in serum IL-6 according to our meta-regression analysis. It is noteworthy to mention that such lowering effect may not be merely related to the reduction of HbA1c because similar reduction in IL-6 concentrations was not found in the control arms of three included studies that compared empagliflozin with other glycemic-lowering agents in which decreased HbA1c were observed in both study groups [21, 27, 34]. However, the above-mentioned finding has been less assessed in the current literature and thus further studies are needed.

Koshino et al. observed that the increments of IL-6 with canagliflozin after one year had significantly lower slope than the controls and the differences was even wider by 6 years [22]. The limited upward slope of IL-6 levels with SGLT2 inhibitors advocates their anti-inflammatory role. Such effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on both IL-6 and glycemic level can uphold the use of this class of medications in T2DM. The potential mechanisms and clinical role of SGLT2 inhibitor on the complications of DM through regulating IL-6 is yet to be elucidated. Use of SGLT2 inhibitors to target inflammatory responses is not only focused on T2DM, but also in a wider range of diseases may warrant future large-scale studies.

This study has several strengths. First, this is the first meta-analysis that has gathered enough evidence regarding the changes in circulatory IL-6 with use of SGLT2 inhibitors. Second, our results appear to show that dapagliflozin is a more effective agent in this class of medications in attenuating IL-6 levels. Third, we have performed sensitivity analysis through reevaluating the data with three different correlation coefficients and all three represented the same results. Moreover, there were very narrow differences in between the SMDs and MDs with each coefficient. Altogether, such statistics have favored the results to achieve high reliability. Furthermore, it should be noted that although 40% of the included studies were from China, the rest of the studies were from different regions worldwide. Such diversity of the origin of the study population can highlight the generalizability of our results. We also acknowledge important limitations of our study. The main limitation was the marked heterogeneity across studies. Although, we have explored the source of heterogeneity through meta-regression and subgroup analysis, HbA1c at baseline was the only factor identified to explain the heterogeneity.

Conclusion

In this meta-analysis and systematic review, we have presented robust evidence that the pro-inflammatory biomarker, IL-6, is significantly reduced by SGLT2 inhibitors with HbA1c as the only marker influencing such reduction. Use of dapagliflozin was associated with greater decrease in IL-6 levels compared to use of either empagliflozin or canagliflozin. The importance of these findings could be attributed to the cardiorenal protective properties of SGLT2 inhibitors. These findings arguably suggest that use of SGLT2 inhibitors could be considered in other inflammatory-related pathologies in patients with and without T2DM.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

T2DM:

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

IL-6:

Interleukin 6

JAK/STAT pathway:

Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway

SGLT2 inhibitors:

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

SMD:

Standardized mean difference

MD:

Mean difference

AMPK pathway:

AMP-activated protein kinase pathway

moAbs:

Monoclonal antibodies

References

  1. Sun H, Saeedi P, Karuranga S, Pinkepank M, Ogurtsova K, Duncan BB, et al. IDF diabetes atlas: Global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022;183: 109119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Oguntibeju OO. Type 2 diabetes mellitus, oxidative stress and inflammation: examining the links. Int J Phys, Pathophysiol Pharmacol. 2019;11(3):45.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mirza S, Hossain M, Mathews C, Martinez P, Pino P, Gay JL, et al. Type 2-diabetes is associated with elevated levels of TNF-alpha, IL-6 and adiponectin and low levels of leptin in a population of Mexican Americans: a cross-sectional study. Cytokine. 2012;57(1):136–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kreiner FF, Kraaijenhof JM, von Herrath M, Hovingh GKK, von Scholten BJ. Interleukin 6 in diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease: mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2022;18(4):377–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rai H, Colleran R, Cassese S, Joner M, Kastrati A, Byrne RA. Association of interleukin 6–174 G/C polymorphism with coronary artery disease and circulating IL-6 levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Inflamm Res. 2021;70(10):1075–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Lehrskov LL, Christensen RH. The role of interleukin-6 in glucose homeostasis and lipid metabolism. In Seminars in Immunopathology. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 2019;41:491–99.

  7. Carey A, Febbraio M. Interleukin-6 and insulin sensitivity: friend or foe? Diabetologia. 2004;47(7):1135–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stouthard J, Elferink RO, Sauerwein H. Interleukin-6 enhances glucose transport in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996;220(2):241–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim JH, Bachmann RA, Chen J. Interleukin-6 and insulin resistance. Vitam Horm. 2009;80:613–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang W, Wang W, Yu H, Zhang Y, Dai Y, Ning C, et al. Interleukin 6 underlies angiotensin II–induced hypertension and chronic renal damage. Hypertension. 2012;59(1):136–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Aliyu M, Zohora FT, Anka AU, Ali K, Maleknia S, Saffarioun M, et al. Interleukin-6 cytokine: An overview of the immune regulation, immune dysregulation, and therapeutic approach. Int Immunopharmacol. 2022;111: 109130.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gurzov EN, Stanley WJ, Pappas EG, Thomas HE, Gough DJ. The JAK/STAT pathway in obesity and diabetes. FEBS J. 2016;283(16):3002–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuryłowicz A, Koźniewski K. Anti-inflammatory strategies targeting metaflammation in type 2 diabetes. Molecules. 2020;25(9):2224.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Moshapa FT, Riches-Suman K, Palmer TM. Therapeutic targeting of the proinflammatory IL-6-JAK/STAT signalling pathways responsible for vascular restenosis in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cardiol Res Pract. 2019;2019:9846312.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Bonnet F, Scheen A. Effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on systemic and tissue low-grade inflammation: the potential contribution to diabetes complications and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes Metab. 2018;44(6):457–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. La Grotta R, de Candia P, Olivieri F, Matacchione G, Giuliani A, Rippo MR, et al. Anti-inflammatory effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors via uric acid and insulin. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2022;79(5):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg. 2021;88: 105906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sterne JA, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. bmj. 2019;366:4898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.4 (updated August 2023). Cochrane. 2023. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.

  20. StataCorp L. Stata statistical software: Release 15 (2017). College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ou T, Wang W, Yong H, Hao H, Wang R, Dai X, et al. Liraglutide plus Dapagliflozin for high uric acid and Microalbuminuria in diabetes mellitus complicated with metabolic syndrome. Alter Ther Health Med. 2022;28(6):14.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Koshino A, Schechter M, Sen T, Vart P, Neuen BL, Neal B, et al. Interleukin-6 and cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: new insights from CANVAS. Diabetes Care. 2022;45(11):2644–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Janić M, Cankar M, Šmid J, France Štiglic A, Jerin A, Šabovič M, et al. Empagliflozin-Metformin combination has antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties that correlate with vascular protection in adults with type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Res. 2022;2022:6796470.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Nandula SR, Kundu N, Awal HB, Brichacek B, Fakhri M, Aimalla N, et al. Role of Canagliflozin on function of CD34+ ve endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021;20(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Garvey WT, Van Gaal L, Leiter LA, Vijapurkar U, List J, Cuddihy R, et al. Effects of canagliflozin versus glimepiride on adipokines and inflammatory biomarkers in type 2 diabetes. Metabolism. 2018;85:32–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bai Xiaogang, Wang Jing, Bai Ting, Li Xia. Clinical study of dapagliflozin combined with sitagliptin in the treatment of brittle type 2 diabetes. Drug Eval Res. 2021;44(1):157–60.

  27. Gohari S, Reshadmanesh T, Khodabandehloo H, Karbalaee-Hasani A, Ahangar H, Arsang-Jang S, et al. The effect of EMPAgliflozin on markers of inflammation in patients with concomitant type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease: the EMPA-CARD randomized controlled trial. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022;14(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ge T, Yang Y, Zhao Y. A study of the efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan plus dapagliflozin combination treatment in pulmonary arterial hypertension due to left heart disease. Perfusion. 2023;38(8):1697–704.

  29. Huang Y, Lu W, Lu H. The clinical efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022;14(1):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Latva-Rasku A, Honka M-J, Kullberg J, Mononen N, Lehtimäki T, Saltevo J, et al. The SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin reduces liver fat but does not affect tissue insulin sensitivity: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with 8-week treatment in type 2 diabetes patients. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(5):931–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Xue L, Yuan X, Zhang S, Zhao X. Investigating the effects of dapagliflozin on cardiac function, inflammatory response, and cardiovascular outcome in patients with STEMI complicated with T2DM after PCI. Evid-Based Complement Altern Med. 2021;2021:9388562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang H, Liu Z. Effects of Dapagliflozin in combination with metoprolol sustained-release tablets on prognosis and cardiac function in patients with acute myocardial infarction after PCI. Comput Math Methods Med. 2022;2022:5734876.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Song B, Zhang H, Zhou B. Effects of Dapagliflozin on myocardial remodeling, inflammatory factors, and cardiac events in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology. 2023:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-023-02590-7.

  34. Shi M, Zhang H, Wang W, Zhang X, Liu J, Wang Q, et al. Effect of dapagliflozin on liver and pancreatic fat in patients with type 2 diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Diabetes Complications. 2023;37(10): 108610.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kahl S, Gancheva S, Straßburger K, Herder C, Machann J, Katsuyama H, et al. Empagliflozin effectively lowers liver fat content in well-controlled type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, phase 4, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(2):298–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kobrynska O, Didushko O. options of correcting insulin resistance and proinflammatory cytokine levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Prob Endocrine Pathol. 2022;79(1):36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sposito AC, Breder I, Soares AA, Kimura-Medorima ST, Munhoz DB, Cintra RM, et al. Dapagliflozin effect on endothelial dysfunction in diabetic patients with atherosclerotic disease: a randomized active-controlled trial. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021;20:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Benedikt M, Mangge H, Aziz F, Curcic P, Pailer S, Herrmann M, et al. Impact of the SGLT2-inhibitor empagliflozin on inflammatory biomarkers after acute myocardial infarction–a post-hoc analysis of the EMMY trial. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023;22(1):166.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang D, Liu J, Zhong L, Li S, Zhou L, Zhang Q, et al. The effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on biomarkers of inflammation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Pharmacol. 2022;4779:1045235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Senn JJ, Klover PJ, Nowak IA, Mooney RA. Interleukin-6 induces cellular insulin resistance in hepatocytes. Diabetes. 2002;51(12):3391–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Fu J, Xu H, Wu F, Tu Q, Dong X, Xie H, et al. Empagliflozin inhibits macrophage inflammation through AMPK signaling pathway and plays an anti-atherosclerosis role. Int J Cardiol. 2022;367:56–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yang L, Liang B, Li J, Zhang X, Chen H, Sun J, et al. Dapagliflozin alleviates advanced glycation end product induced podocyte injury through AMPK/mTOR mediated autophagy pathway. Cell Signal. 2022;90: 110206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Xu C, Wang W, Zhong J, Lei F, Xu N, Zhang Y, et al. Canagliflozin exerts anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting intracellular glucose metabolism and promoting autophagy in immune cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2018;152:45–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lee T-M, Chang N-C, Lin S-Z. Dapagliflozin, a selective SGLT2 Inhibitor, attenuated cardiac fibrosis by regulating the macrophage polarization via STAT3 signaling in infarcted rat hearts. Free Radical Biol Med. 2017;104:298–310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Xu L, Ota T. Emerging roles of SGLT2 inhibitors in obesity and insulin resistance: Focus on fat browning and macrophage polarization. Adipocyte. 2018;7(2):121–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Magno AL, Herat LY, Carnagarin R, Schlaich MP, Matthews VB. Current knowledge of IL-6 cytokine family members in acute and chronic kidney disease. Biomedicines. 2019;7(1):19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Su H, Lei C-T, Zhang C. Interleukin-6 signaling pathway and its role in kidney disease: an update. Front Immunol. 2017;8:405.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Feigerlová E, Battaglia-Hsu S-F. IL-6 signaling in diabetic nephropathy: From pathophysiology to therapeutic perspectives. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2017;37:57–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Araújo LS, Torquato BGS, da Silva CA, dos Reis Monteiro MLG, dos Santos Martins ALM, da Silva MV, et al. Renal expression of cytokines and chemokines in diabetic nephropathy. BMC Nephrol. 2020;21(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Durlacher-Betzer K, Hassan A, Levi R, Axelrod J, Silver J, Naveh-Many T. Interleukin-6 contributes to the increase in fibroblast growth factor 23 expression in acute and chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2018;94(2):315–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. An Z, Qin J, Bo W, Li H, Jiang L, Li X, et al. Prognostic value of serum interleukin-6, NF-κB plus MCP-1 assay in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Dis Markers. 2022;2022:4428484.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Tyrrell DJ, Goldstein DR. Ageing and atherosclerosis: vascular intrinsic and extrinsic factors and potential role of IL-6. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18(1):58–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Mascareno E, El-Shafei M, Maulik N, Sato M, Guo Y, Das DK, et al. JAK/STAT signaling is associated with cardiac dysfunction during ischemia and reperfusion. Circulation. 2001;104(3):325–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ridker PM, Devalaraja M, Baeres FM, Engelmann MD, Hovingh GK, Ivkovic M, et al. IL-6 inhibition with ziltivekimab in patients at high atherosclerotic risk (RESCUE): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. The Lancet. 2021;397(10289):2060–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Booz GW, Day JN, Baker KM. Interplay between the cardiac renin angiotensin system and JAK-STAT signaling: role in cardiac hypertrophy, ischemia/reperfusion dysfunction, and heart failure. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2002;34(11):1443–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Genovese MC, Burmester GR, Hagino O, Thangavelu K, Iglesias-Rodriguez M, John GS, et al. Interleukin-6 receptor blockade or TNFα inhibition for reducing glycaemia in patients with RA and diabetes: post hoc analyses of three randomised, controlled trials. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020;22(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Choi S-E, Choi K-M, Yoon I-H, Shin J-Y, Kim J-S, Park W-Y, et al. IL-6 protects pancreatic islet beta cells from pro-inflammatory cytokines-induced cell death and functional impairment in vitro and in vivo. Transpl Immunol. 2004;13(1):43–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Marasco MR, Conteh AM, Reissaus CA, Cupit JE, Appleman EM, Mirmira RG, et al. Interleukin-6 reduces β-cell oxidative stress by linking autophagy with the antioxidant response. Diabetes. 2018;67(8):1576–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. da Silva Krause M, Bittencourt A, de HomemBittencourt PI, McClenaghan NH, Flatt PR, Murphy C, et al. Physiological concentrations of interleukin-6 directly promote insulin secretion, signal transduction, nitric oxide release, and redox status in a clonal pancreatic-cell line and mouse islets. J Endocrinol. 2012;214(3):301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Rehman K, Akash MSH, Liaqat A, Kamal S, Qadir MI, Rasul A. Role of interleukin-6 in development of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Crit Rev™ Eukaryotic Gene Express. 2017;27(3):229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Ridker PM, Rane M. Interleukin-6 signaling and anti-interleukin-6 therapeutics in cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 2021;128(11):1728–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Garbers C, Heink S, Korn T, Rose-John S. Interleukin-6: designing specific therapeutics for a complex cytokine. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. 2018;17(6):395–412.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the collaborators for their patience and cooperation through the study.

Funding

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Student Research Center, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran

    Sepehr Gohari

  2. Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Faramarz Ismail-Beigi

  3. Endocrine Research Center, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Mahsa Mahjani

  4. Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Saeed Ghobadi

  5. Physiology Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

    Alireza Jafari

  6. Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Mousavi Hospital, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran

    Hassan Ahangar

  7. Department of Systems Science and Industrial Engineering, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY, USA

    Sheida Gohari

Authors
  1. Sepehr Gohari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Faramarz Ismail-Beigi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mahsa Mahjani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Saeed Ghobadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alireza Jafari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hassan Ahangar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sheida Gohari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors reviewed the manuscript. SEP.G: Concept, Design, Methodology, Literature review, Data extraction, Project administration; Writing (original draft). F.IB: Concept, Supervision and Expert opinion, Critical revision, Writing (editing). M.M: Concept, Design, Data extraction, Literature review, Writing (original draft). SA.G: Concept, Methodology, Revision. A.J: Software analysis, Validation, Revision, Writing (original draft). H.A: Critical revision, Supervision. Sh. G: Data Curation, Writing (editing), Revision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahsa Mahjani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

We have searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases using the terms below, PubMed for example (Updated to November 2023). Table S1. PICO inclusion criteria. Table S1. Meta-regression analysis of demographic and clinical variables on IL-6 lowering effect of SGLT2 inhibitors. Figure S1. Forest plot of the effect of SGLT2 inhibitor drugs on interleukin-6 based on the trial duration. Figure S2. Forest plot of the effect of SGLT2 inhibitor drugs on interleukin-6 based on the level of HbA1c. Figure S3. Relationship between level of HbA1c and interleukin-6 lowering effect of SGLT2 inhibitors. SGLT2 inhibitor: Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors. Figure S4. Relationship between male sex and interleukin-6 lowering effect of SGLT2 inhibitors. SGLT2 inhibitor: Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors. Figure S5. Relationship between age and interleukin-6 lowering effect of SGLT2 inhibitors. SGLT2 inhibitor: Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors. Figure S1. Risk of bias quality assessment results using ROB-2 tool. Figure S2. Funnel plot with pseudo 95% confidence limits demonstrating the SMD of interlukin-6 for each trial against their corresponding SEs. SMD: Standardized mean difference, SE: Standard error. Egger regression test had the p-value of 0.061. Figure S3. Galbraith plot to assess heterogeneity of the effects of SGLT2 inhibitor drugs on interleukin-6. SGLT2 inhibitor: Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors. Figure S4. The sensitivity analysis of the included studies using the leave-one-out (Left) and cumulative (Right) approaches. Table S1. Sensitivity analyses to assess the effect of different correlation coefficients on the main results.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gohari, S., Ismail-Beigi, F., Mahjani, M. et al. The effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on blood interleukin-6 concentration: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Endocr Disord 23, 257 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-023-01512-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-023-01512-1

Keywords

BMC Endocrine Disorders

ISSN: 1472-6823

Contact us