Skip to main content

Dietary insulin index and load and cardiometabolic risk factors among people with obesity: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

Background

The hypothesis of the effect of the insulinogenic effects of diet on the development of cardiometabolic disorders has been suggested, but limited data are available for adults with obesity. This study aimed to determine the association of dietary insulin index (DII) and dietary insulin load (DIL) with cardiometabolic risk factors among Iranian adults with obesity.

Methods

The study was conducted with a total of 347 adults aged 20–50 years in Tabriz, Iran. Usual dietary intake was assessed through a validated 147-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). DIL was computed using published food insulin index (FII) data. DII was calculated by dividing DIL by the total energy intake of each participant. Multinational logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between DII and DIL and cardiometabolic risk factors.

Results

Mean age of participants was 40.78 ± 9.23 y, and mean body mass index (BMI) was 32.62 ± 4.80 kg/m2. Mean of DII and DIL was 73.15 ± 37.60 and 196,242 ± 100,181. Participants with higher DII had higher BMI, weight, waist circumference (WC), and blood concentrations of triglyceride (TG) and Homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) (P < 0.05). After taking potential confounders into account, DIL was positively associated with MetS (OR: 2.58; 95% CI: 1.03–6.46), and high blood pressure (OR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.13–6.56). Moreover, after adjustment for potential confounders, moderate DII was associated with increased odds of MetS (OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.36–4.21), high TG (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.17–5.02), and high blood pressure (OR: 1.88; 95% CI: 1.06–7.86).

Conclusion

This population-based study revealed that adults with higher DII and DIL associated with cardiometabolic risk factors and consequently, replacement of high with low DII and DIL may have reduce the risk of cardiometabolic disorders. Further studies with longitudinal design are required to confirm these findings.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of mortality worldwide and its treatment remains very challenging [1]. As highlighted in the literature, several factors such as obesity, hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and hypertension play important roles in the origin of CVDs [2, 3]. While some risk factors of CVDs such as genetic, gender, and age are uncontrollable [4,5,6], there are behavioral risk factors such as low physical activity, smoking, obesity, and poor dietary habits, which account for more than 70% of the risk of CVDs [7,8,9,10]. Evidence is emerging that a healthy dietary pattern characterized by foods lower in refined sugars and starches and higher in dietary fiber, mainly soluble fiber, may be related to better health status, including better glucose control and lower CVD risk factors such as total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglyceride (TG) [11, 12]. Given the role of diet, in CVDs, finding a dietary factor that might be involved in this condition is of great interest.

Nowadays it is well established that dietary carbohydrate is the main factor that impacts postprandial glucose levels and therefore plays an essential role in postprandial insulin secretion [13]. Several studies have revealed that high-carbohydrate diets, which cause high levels of blood insulin and glucose, directly related to insulin resistance, body fat stores, and unfavorable lipid profiles [14,15,16,17,18,19]. These diets have been shown to raise fasting TG levels, mainly by increasing hepatic synthesis of very low-density lipoprotein, and reduce high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels [20]. The insulinogenic effect of diet is usually estimated by the glycemic load (GL) and glycemic index (GI) [21]. The GI is a quantitative assessment of a food’s carbohydrate content according to their ability to raise postprandial blood glucose [21]. The consumption of high GI diets leads to postprandial hyperinsulinemia, which has been related to diabetes, obesity and other CVDs risk factors, such as increased TC, and TGs and reduced HDL-C levels [18, 22,23,24]. However, it should also be noted that dietary GI and GL does not reflect the effect of other dietary factors such as dietary protein and fats. Nevertheless, these factors produced a significant insulin response [25, 26].

Holt et al. [27] compared postprandial insulin responses of different foods and introduced insulin indices such as insulin load (DIL) and dietary insulin index (DII) for each food according to its insulinemic influence in relation to white bread as reference. While the GI provides valuable data about the glycemic potential of foods, DII determine the insulinogenic properties of several foods to measure the postprandial insulin response induced by fat, carbohydrate, and protein consumption, is more appropriate index compared with the GI for examining relations with several chronic diseases [27,28,29,30,31]. A cross-sectional study that investigated 203 overweight/obese adolescents has documented that higher DII and DIL were related to higher risk of metabolically unhealthy obese [32]. Moreover, a study among Iranian adults indicated that DII and DIL had no association with the risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS) [33]. Investigating the relationship of DII with chronic diseases is mainly related to obesity since stimulating more insulin release results in increased body fat mass by decreasing fat oxidation and elevating carbohydrate oxidation. Despite the relationship of DIL and DII with numerous chronic diseases reported in previous studies [27,28,29, 34], as far as we know, no study has investigated the association between DIL, DII, and cardiometabolic risk factors among adults with obesity. So, the aim of the current study was to assess the relationship between DII, DIL and cardiometabolic risk factors in a sample of adults with obesity.

Materials and methods

Study population

The current research is a cross-sectional study performed in 347 healthy adults (145 females and 202 males) aged 18–50 years, in Tabriz and Tehran cities of Iran. The sampling was performed using convenience method through announcements. In our study population, subjects with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/ m2 without prior history of drug or alcohol abuse, any presence of inflammations and infections, cardiovascular or renal disorders, hypertension, thyroid diseases, and diabetes mellitus were invited to participate in the study and were interviewed by a trained dietitian. Individuals of age < 18 years old or a history of weight change (> 5 kg) in the last 6 months, lactation and pregnancy were excluded from this study. To compute the sample size, the association between dietary quality indices and obesity was considered as a key dependent variable. The sample size calculation, using G-power software was based on the correlation coefficient (r) of 0.25, α = 0.05, and power 80%, the minimum sample size was 290 and considering 15% drop-out, the final sample size was 347 adults [35]. The study was received the approval of the ethics committee (Registration: IR.TBZMED.REC.1402.011) of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. All participants signed the informed consent form.

Demographic, anthropometric and biochemical assessment

General information about demographic characteristics (e.g., educational level, gender, history of smoking, marital status, and age) were obtained by using questionnaires by a trained dietitian using face-to-face interview. The IPAQ was used to measure the physical activity levels of the participants. All anthropometric measures were carried out on same day for each participant by an expert researcher. Body weight was measured using a Seca scale (Seca, Germany) with a sensitivity of 0.1 kg and height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm, using a stadiometer. BMI was measured as weight divided by squared height (kg/m2). Waist circumference (WC) was measured in the standing position at midway level between lower rib margin and iliac crest using a constant tension tape to the nearest 0.1 cm. Waist Hip ratio was measured as WC divided by hip circumference. Fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) were measured by BIA analyzer (Tanita, BC-418 MA, Tokyo, Japan). Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured twice after the participants had been at rest for at least 15 min in the seated position by using a standardized mercury sphygmomanometer, and the average of the two measurements was used in all analyses. After 10–12 h of fasting, venous blood samples were taken into tubes between 7:00 am and 9:00 am. The samples were then separated by centrifugation at 4600 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C, and were frozen at -80 °C, in a freezer until analysis. HDL-C, TG, and TC serum levels were assessed by enzymatic method (Pars Azemoon Co., Tehran, Iran). Furthermore, LDL-C calculated using the Friedewald’s equation [36]. Serum levels of insulin were assayed using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (Bioassay Technology Laboratory, Shanghai City, China), in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions. Homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) were calculated using the formula.

Dietary assessment

The validated semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) of 147 food items was applied to collect data on dietary intake [37]. An expert nutritionist asked the study subjects to select the amount and frequency of the consumption of each food during the former year on an annual, monthly, weekly, or daily basis. Then, portion sizes of foods were also converted to gram using household measures. Because the Iranian Food Composition Table (FCT) provides a few data to analyze foods for nutrients and energy, we used the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) FCT.

Calculation of DII and DIL

The food insulin index; for each food item was obtained from published studies developed by Holt et al. [27], Bell et al. [38], and Bao et al. [39]. The food insulin index is an algorithm for ranking foods and estimates the incremental insulin area under the curve (AUC) over two hours in response to the intake of a 1000-kJ portion of the test food divided by the AUC after intake of a 1000-kJ portion of the reference food. To calculate DIL, we first estimated the insulin load of each food using the following equation: Insulin load of a given food = insulin index of that food × energy content of that food (KJ/d). By summing up the insulin load of each food item, DIL was measured for each subject. Then, we computed the DII for each subject by dividing DIL by total energy consumption.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 21.0 (Armonk, NY, IBM Corp) and p-values < 0.05) were used to show statistical significance. DIL and DII were adjusted for energy with the use of the residual method, before categorizing into quartiles. All subjects were categorized according to quartiles of DII and DIL scores. The first quartile of DII and DIL was taken as the reference category. Qualitative and quantitative variables were described as percentages and Mean ± SD, respectively. The X2 test was used to evaluate the distribution of categorical variables across quartiles of DII and DIL and One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to compare the continuous variables across quartiles of DII and DIL. The multinomial logistic regression was applied to determine the association between quartiles of DII, DIL and cardiometabolic risk factors and also sex, age, education, physical activity level, marital status, BMI, and energy consumption as covariates.

Results

Participant characteristics

The mean ± SD age of the subjects (145 females and 202 males) was 40.78 ± 9.23 years and BMI was 32.62 ± 4.80 kg/m2. Mean of DII and DIL was 73.15 ± 37.60 and 196,242 ± 100,181. Baseline characteristics of the individuals across quartiles of DII and DIL are accessible in Table 1. Although most baseline variables were similar in the quartiles of DII and DIL, participants in the last quartile of DIL compared with participants in the first quartile were older and had higher intake of fat, carbohydrate, and protein (P < 0.05). Participants in the top quartile of DII compared with participants in the bottom quartile had higher BMI, weight, and higher intake of fat, carbohydrate, and protein (P < 0.05). As shown in Table 2, we did not observe any statistically significant difference in biochemical parameters across quartiles of DIL (P > 0.05). However, those in the top quartile of DII had higher WC, DBP and HOMA-IR concentration when compared with those in the bottom quartile (P < 0.05). Also, participants in the second quartile of DII had higher blood TG concentration when compared with those in the first quartile (P < 0.05).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of study population across quartiles of energy-adjusted DIL and DII (n = 347)
Table 2 Anthropometric and biochemical measures across quartiles of energy-adjusted DIL and DII (n = 347)

Association between DII and DIL and cardiometabolic risk factors

Multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for cardiometabolic risk factors across quartiles of DII and DIL have been indicated in Table 3. In the adjusted model 1, participants in the top quartile of the DIL tended to have 2.58-fold higher odds for MetS compared with participants in the lowest quartile (OR: 2.58; 95% CI: 1.03–6.46). Moreover, in adjusted model 1, we found that those in the top quartile of the DIL had the higher odds of high blood pressure compared with participants in the bottom quartile (OR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.13–6.56). However, no significant association was observed between other cardiometabolic risk factors and DIL. No significant relationship was observed between DII and risk of MetS. Nevertheless, after adjusted potential confounders, participants in the top quartile of DII had greater risks for having MetS compared with those in the first quartile (OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.36–4.21). In the case of blood TG, in the unadjusted model (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.15–5.78) and after adjustment for potential confounders (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.17–5.02), those in the highest quartile of DII had significantly higher risks for higher TG levels compared with participants in the lowest quartile. Moreover, after adjustment for potential confounders such as age, gender, education, occupation, marital status, and physical activity, participants in the last quartile of DII had higher risks of elevated blood pressure compared with those in first category (OR: 1.88; 95% CI: 1.06–7.86), although this relationship did not remain after the full multivariate adjustment (OR: 1.52; 95% CI: 0.91–5.53).

Table 3 Odd ratio and 95% confidence interval for having different cardiometabolic risk factors according to quartiles of energy-adjusted DIL and DII (n = 347)

Discussion

To our best of knowledge, the current cross-sectional study is the first try to focus on the relationship of DIL and DII assessed by FFQ and cardiometabolic risk factors among Iranian adults with obesity. Our results revealed that a higher DIL score might be positively related to greater risks of MetS, and higher blood pressure. Also, a higher DII score might be related to higher odds of MetS, higher TG concentrations, and higher blood pressure. Furthermore, there was no significant relationship between DII, DIL and higher WC, higher TC, and lower HDL-C either after or before taking potential covariates into account. Individuals with a higher DII score had higher BMI, weight, WC, blood concentrations of TG, and HOMA-IR.

Notwithstanding different approaches for assessing the insulinemic potential of foods, DII and DIL have attracted much international attention in recent decade [27, 39]; results from several studies have revealed that these indices are more truthful insulin response predictors to a mixed meal than other approaches [27, 40, 41]. Previous observational studies have examined the relationship between DIL and DII, cardiometabolic risk factors, type 2 diabetes mellitus, CVD, MetS, but the results of these studies has been controversial [42,43,44]. This may be due to that insulin resistance status and BMI seemed to modify the relationship between DIL, DII, and metabolic disorders [44, 45]. Nevertheless, no study has so far explored DII or DIL in relation to cardiometabolic risk factors as an outcome among Iranian adults with obesity. Insulin resistance and its associated abnormalities are important risk factor for development of complication in people with obesity so early detection and intervention are important, previous studies have reported that a diet that increased insulin level may increase metabolic risk factors [46, 47]. In the current study, significant positive relations were observed between DII and DIL and risk of MetS and higher blood pressure. This may be the result of oscillations of insulin secretion which is controlled by several factors including neuronal inputs, hormones, and nutrients [39, 48]. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the association of DII and DIL with risk of metabolic diseases. A diet with high DII and DIL may increase central obesity by reducing insulin sensitivity, which may, in turn, decrease lipolysis, resulting in augmented fat storage and therefore an increased risk of MetS [49]. Furthermore, as potentially high insulinemic foods have a high rate of absorption, digestion, and conversion to glucose, these foods would quickly increase the blood glucose and blood insulin and, therefore, decrease glucose excursion [50]. Anjom-Shoae et al. [44] showed no significant relationship between DII, DIL, and risk of obesity. Hyperinsulinemia has proposed increasing sympathetic nervous system activity, which increases heart rate, sodium retention, cardiac output, and consequently blood pressure [51]. Indeed, diets with high fructose are related to higher blood pressure and increases in sympathetic tone [52, 53], whereas increased glucose consumption is also related to increases in basal heart rate [54]. In addition, a meta-analysis by Evans et al. [55] showed that a reduction in GI was effective at reducing SBP and DBP. Some of the underlying mechanistic pathways are illustrated in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The mechanistic pathways of dietary DII and DIL in developing obesity and obesity related co-morbidities

We found that higher DII was meaningfully associated with higher risk of higher TG, even after adjustment for several covariates. Earlier studies have reported that GL or GI positively predict plasma TGs [56,57,58]. In line with our study, Nimptsch et al. [59] shown that DII was not related to glycated hemoglobin, and LDL-C, but a significant relationship was seen between DII with TG levels and HDL-C levels. In another study, by Joslowski et al. [60] a higher DIL and DII were related to higher body fat % in adulthood. Furthermore, two clinical trials reported that the diets with low GI had favorable effects on MetS components [61, 62]. It is proposed that a high DII and DIL during a long time period may increase insulin growth factor-1 and insulin secretion that may lead to body fat formation [60]. Low fat and high carbohydrate consumption have been related to higher TG and lower HDL-C levels [63, 64]. Another study reported that DII was related to enhance postprandial blood glucose without increased odds of hypoglycemia [65]. Nevertheless, a cross-sectional study found no relationship between the DII and glycemic control in adults [59]. The inconsistency might be attributed to different tools used for assessment of dietary intake, different confounders, and different study populations. Moreover, different food processing conditions in different cultures can be additional cause for the inconsistency. Intake of bread and rice that are insulinogenic foods is high in Iranian population and may another reason for this difference. Iranians receive approximately 62% of their energy intake from carbohydrates, which is significantly higher than other populations [66]. High insulinemic foods cause rapid rise and reduction in blood insulin and glucose [50]. This can decrease satiety and increased risk of obesity [67]. Mean DII and DIL scores in the present study were 73.15 and 196,242, respectively. DII scores in this study are close to other studies. For example, in the study by Nimptsch et al. [59] median DII was 42.8 in women and 41.7 in men. Nevertheless, DIL scores are much higher than other similar studies. This difference can be described by different approaches to calculate DII and DIL scores in different studies. For instance, similar studies used each serving of food while in this study; each gram of a given food was used in standard formula to calculate DII and DIL.

Strengths and limitations

Several strengths of this study include an adjustment for several potential covariates in the analysis, being the first study among adults with obesity, and using a validated FFQ for constructing DII and DIL. However, several limitations should be noted. The present study was carried out in a cross-sectional design, which is prone to misclassification, selection bias, and response bias and would not allow us to infer causality. Although we used a validated FFQ, reporting of dietary consumption can still be subject to measurement error and recall bias. Therefore, the results of this study may not represent all adults with obesity. Although we have adjusted for several lifestyle factors, it is possible that mistakes in evaluating covariates may have led to residual confounding of the relations. Moreover, we did not observe a significant association between DII and DIL and odds of high WC, which may be due to the study only included obese individuals. Finally, in this study, LDL-C was calculated using Friedewald’s formula. This may subsequently leads to underestimation of calculated LDL-C.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this population-based study revealed that adults with higher DII and DIL associated with cardiometabolic risk factors such as MetS, high TG, and hypertension and consequently, replacement of high with low DII and DIL may have reduce the risk of cardiometabolic disorders. Further studies with longitudinal design are required to confirm these findings.

Availability of data and materials

All of the data are available with reasonable request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Murray CJ, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2197–223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ninomiya JK, et al. Association of the metabolic syndrome with history of myocardial infarction and stroke in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Circulation. 2004;109(1):42–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gallegos-Gonzalez G, et al. Association between stress and metabolic syndrome and its mediating factors in university students. Am J Health Behav. 2021;45(6):1091–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mansur AdP, Favarato D. Mortalidade por doenças cardiovasculares no Brasil e na região metropolitana de São Paulo: atualização 2011. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia. 2012;99:755–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Farhangi MA, et al. Interaction between vascular endothelial growth factor-A (rs2010963) gene polymorphisms and dietary diversity score on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with metabolic syndrome. Lifestyle Genomics. 2020;13(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta A, et al. Expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, survivin, enhancer of zeste homolog-2, Cyclooxygenase-2, p53 and p16 molecular markers in Gall bladder carcinoma. J Carcinog. 2021;20:7–11.

  7. Sardarinia M, et al. Risk factors for incidence of cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality in a middle eastern population over a decade follow-up: Tehran lipid and glucose study. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(12):e0167623.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Guerra ZC, et al. Associations of acculturation and gender with obesity and physical activity among Latinos. Am J Health Behav. 2022;46(3):324–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Milan Z, et al. Leisure-time physical activity and all-cause mortality: a systematic review Revista de Psicología del Deporte. J Sport Psychol. 2022;31(1):1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen S, Zhou Z, Ren K. Influence of Sports Value on adolescent participation and preference of sci-tech experience activities. Revista de Psicología del Deporte. 2021;30:4.

  11. Wang X, et al. Fruit and vegetable consumption and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. BMJ. 2014;29;349:g4490.

  12. Souza RG, et al. Nuts and legume seeds for cardiovascular risk reduction: scientific evidence and mechanisms of action. Nutr Rev. 2015;73(6):335–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu T, et al. Fructose, glycemic load, and quantity and quality of carbohydrate in relation to plasma C-peptide concentrations in US women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;80(4):1043–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Papakonstantinou E, et al. Short-term effects of a low glycemic index carob-containing snack on energy intake, satiety, and glycemic response in normal-weight, healthy adults: results from two randomized trials. Nutrition. 2017;42:12–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tay J, et al. Effects of an energy-restricted low‐carbohydrate, high unsaturated fat/low saturated fat diet versus a high‐carbohydrate, low‐fat diet in type 2 diabetes: a 2‐year randomized clinical trial. Diab Obes Metabol. 2018;20(4):858–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Giovannucci E, Michaud D. The role of obesity and related metabolic disturbances in cancers of the colon, prostate, and pancreas. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(6):2208–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Larsson SC, Orsini N, Wolk A. Diabetes mellitus and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(22):1679–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu S, et al. A prospective study of dietary glycemic load, carbohydrate intake, and risk of coronary heart disease in US women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71(6):1455–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gast KB, et al. Insulin resistance and risk of Incident Cardiovascular events in adults without diabetes: Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(12):e52036.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Parks EJ, Hellerstein MK. Carbohydrate-induced hypertriacylglycerolemia: historical perspective and review of biological mechanisms. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71(2):412–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Augustin LS, et al. Glycemic index, glycemic load and glycemic response: an International Scientific Consensus Summit from the International Carbohydrate Quality Consortium (ICQC). Nutr Metabolism Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;25(9):795–815.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Denova-Gutiérrez E, et al. Dietary glycemic index, dietary glycemic load, blood lipids, and coronary heart disease. J Nutri Metabol. 2010;2010:170680.

  23. Radhika G, et al. Dietary carbohydrates, glycemic load and serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations among south indian adults. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63(3):413–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Şenormancı G, et al. Gene variants and serum levels of synaptic vesicle and presynaptic plasma membrane proteins in alcohol dependence and their relationship with impulsivity and temperament. Arch Clin Psychiatr (São Paulo). 2021;48:99–104.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Moghaddam E, Vogt JA, Wolever TM. The effects of fat and protein on glycemic responses in nondiabetic humans vary with waist circumference, fasting plasma insulin, and dietary fiber intake. J Nutr. 2006;136(10):2506–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nuttall FQ, Gannon MC. Plasma glucose and insulin response to macronutrients in nondiabetic and NIDDM subjects. Diabetes Care. 1991;14(9):824–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Holt S, Miller J, Petocz P. An insulin index of foods: the insulin demand generated by 1000-kJ portions of common foods. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66(5):1264–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sadeghi O, et al. Dietary insulin index and dietary insulin load in relation to metabolic syndrome: the Shahedieh cohort study. J Acad Nutr Dietetics. 2020;120(10):1672–86. e4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mirmiran P, et al. Dietary insulin load and insulin index are associated with the risk of insulin resistance: a prospective approach in tehran lipid and glucose study. J Diab Metabol Disord. 2015;15(1):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kamolthip R, et al. Relationships among physical activity, health-related quality of life, and weight stigma in children in Hong Kong. Am J Health Behav. 2021;45(5):828–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Leman MA, Claramita M, Rahayu GR. Predicting factors on modeling health behavior: a systematic review. Am J Health Behav. 2021;45(2):268–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hajhashemy Z, et al. Association of dietary insulin index and dietary insulin load with metabolic health status in iranian overweight and obese adolescents. Front Nutr. 2022;9:821089.

  33. Ghorbaninejad P, et al. Higher dietary insulin load and index are not associated with the risk of metabolic syndrome and obesity in iranian adults. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75(7):e14229.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hajhashemy Z, et al. Dietary insulin index and insulin load in relation to hypertriglyceridemic waist phenotype and low brain derived neurotrophic factor in adults. Front Nutr. 2022;9:980274.

  35. Murray AE, et al. Dietary quality in a sample of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Ireland; a cross-sectional case control study. Nutr J. 2013;12:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18(6):499–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mirmiran P, et al. Reliability and relative validity of an FFQ for nutrients in the Tehran lipid and glucose study. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13(5):654–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bell KJ, et al. Algorithms to improve the prediction of postprandial insulinaemia in response to common foods. Nutrients. 2016;8(4):210.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Bao J, et al. Prediction of postprandial glycemia and insulinemia in lean, young, healthy adults: glycemic load compared with carbohydrate content alone. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;93(5):984–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sung K-C, et al. Obesity and incidence of diabetes: Effect of absence of metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, inflammation and fatty liver. Atherosclerosis. 2018;275:50–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hyder KM, et al. Effects of muscle–specific exercises compared to existing interventions on insulin resistance among Prediabetes Population of South India. J Nat Sci Biology Med. 2021;12(2):230.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Mozaffari H, et al. Associations between dietary insulin load with cardiovascular risk factors and inflammatory parameters in elderly men: a cross-sectional study. Br J Nutr. 2019;121(7):773–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Teymoori F, et al. The association between dietary glycemic and insulin indices with incidence of cardiovascular disease: Tehran lipid and glucose study. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Anjom-Shoae J, et al. Association between dietary insulin index and load with obesity in adults. Eur J Nutr. 2020;59(4):1563–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Tabung FK, et al. Long-term change in both dietary insulinemic and inflammatory potential is associated with weight gain in adult women and men. J Nutr. 2019;149(5):804–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Okosun IS, et al. Surrogate indexes of insulin resistance and risk of metabolic syndrome in non-hispanic White, non-hispanic black and mexican american. Diab Metabol Syndrome Clin Res Rev. 2020;14:3–9.

  47. Ludwig DS. The glycemic index: physiological mechanisms relating to obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. JAMA. 2002;287(18):2414–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Grundy SM, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute scientific statement. Circulation. 2005;112(17):2735–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kahn SE, Hull RL, Utzschneider KM. Mechanisms linking obesity to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Nature. 2006;444(7121):840–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hellström PM. Satiety signals and obesity. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2013;29(2):222–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Shah M, Adams-Huet B, Garg A. Effect of high-carbohydrate or high-cis-monounsaturated fat diets on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of intervention trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85(5):1251–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ha V, et al. Effect of fructose on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials. Hypertension. 2012;59(4):787–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Xavier J, et al. Ayahuasca prevents oxidative stress in a rat model of depression elicited by unpredictable chronic mild stress. Arch Clin Psychiatr (São Paulo). 2021;48:90–8.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Brown CA, et al. Maternal heart rate variability and fetal behavior in hypertensive and normotensive pregnancies. Biol Res Nurs. 2008;10(2):134–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Evans CE, et al. Glycemic index, glycemic load, and blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;105(5):1176–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. McKeown NM, et al. Dietary carbohydrates and cardiovascular disease risk factors in the Framingham offspring cohort. J Am Coll Nutr. 2009;28(2):150–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Murakami K, et al. Dietary glycemic index and load in relation to metabolic risk factors in japanese female farmers with traditional dietary habits. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83(5):1161–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Gani IH, Al-Obaidi Z. MgO NPs catalyzed the synthesis of novel pyridin-3-yl-pyrimidin-2-yl-aminophenyl-amide derivatives and evaluation of pharmacokinetic profiles and biological activity. Front Materials. 2023;10:1057677.

  59. Nimptsch K, et al. Dietary insulin index and insulin load in relation to biomarkers of glycemic control, plasma lipids, and inflammation markers. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(1):182–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Joslowski G, et al. Prospective associations of dietary insulin demand, glycemic index, and glycemic load during puberty with body composition in young adulthood. Int J Obes. 2012;36(11):1463–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Esposito K, et al. Effect of a Mediterranean-style diet on endothelial dysfunction and markers of vascular inflammation in the metabolic syndrome: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2004;292(12):1440–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Azadbakht L, et al. Beneficial effects of a Dietary Approaches to stop hypertension eating plan on features of the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(12):2823–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Willett W, et al. Assessment of questionnaire validity for measuring total fat intake using plasma lipid levels as criteria. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154(12):1107–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Liu S, et al. Dietary glycemic load assessed by food-frequency questionnaire in relation to plasma high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol and fasting plasma triacylglycerols in postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;73(3):560–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Bell KJ, et al. Validation of the food insulin index in lean, young, healthy individuals, and type 2 diabetes in the context of mixed meals: an acute randomized crossover trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;102(4):801–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Maryam B, Ahmad E. Quantity and quality of carbohydrate intake in Iran: a target for nutritional intervention 2012.

  67. Llewellyn CH, et al. Satiety mechanisms in genetic risk of obesity. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(4):338–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all of the study participants. This study protocol has been approved by the ethics committee of the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (Grant number: 71424).

Novelty statement

The present study was the first comprehensive study with a large sample size to assess the relationship between dietary insulin index and load with MetS in apparently healthy obese adults in Iran.

Funding

Present study has been financially supported by a grant from Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. The funders had no role in hypothesis generation, recruiting and designing the study. Their role was only financial supporting.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors approved the final version of the article. MAF, AMA and ZN designed the study and served as supervisors for this research. MV contributed in statistical analysis, and manuscript writing and revision. ZN and MAF were involved in data collection and revision. BH was involved in data collection and patients’ recruitment.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All subjects provided a written informed consent before participation in the study. The study protocol was approved and registered by the ethics committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (Registration: IR.TBZMED.REC.1402.011). Also, we confirm that all methods were performed in accordance with Declarations of Helsinki guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vajdi, M., Ardekani, A.M., Nikniaz, Z. et al. Dietary insulin index and load and cardiometabolic risk factors among people with obesity: a cross-sectional study. BMC Endocr Disord 23, 117 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-023-01377-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-023-01377-4

Keywords