Skip to main content

Direct comparison two fixed-ratio combination glucagon-like peptide receptor agonist and basal insulin on glycemic and non glycemic parameters in type 2 diabetes

Abstract

Background

Two types of fixed-ratio combinations of basal insulin and a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) have been approved for use in type 2 diabetes. One is insulin degludec/liraglutide (iDergLira), and the other is insulin glargine/lixisenatide (iGlarLixi). Direct comparisons between these two combination is not available.

Methods

The retrospective study included 186 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) with inadequate glycemic control on metformin and basal insulin (degludec, glargine 100, glargine 300) who were switched to fixed-ratio combination GLP-1 RA and basal insulin. Patients were divided into two groups based on the basal insulin before study: group I (n = 86) treated with degludec were switched to iDegLira and patients group II (n = 99), treated with glargine were switched to iGlarLixi. The aim of this study was to directly compare the effects between two fixed – ratio combination on glycemic parameters and non glycemic parameters. Follow up was 6 months.

Results

Mean HbA1c decreased similarly (− 1.2% vs.-1.1%). Higher percentage patients in iDegLira group had reached the HbA1c < 7% after 6 months (22% vs. 18.2%, p < 0.05). The mean change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was comparable for the two groups, while mean decrease postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) level were lower in iGlarLixi group (2 vs 1.8 mmol/l, p > 0.05). Change in body weight was significant in iDegLira group (1.8 kg vs. 0.7 kg, p < 0.001). At the end of the study patients showed decrease in total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) for 0.2 mmol/L in iDegLira, 0.1 mmol/l in iGlarLixi, triglycerides decreased 0.3 mmol/l in both groups, high-density lipoprotein(HDL) increased 0.1 mm/l in iGlarLixi.

Conclusion

Our results showed that more patients with iDegLira had HbA1c less than 7% and these combination had better effect on weight loss. There was no difference observed in FPG and PPG, lipid profile and rate of hypoglycemia.

Peer Review reports

Background

Diabetes mellitus (DM) type 2 is a chronic, progressive disease, resulting in multiple pathophysiologic defects including insulin resistance, reduced beta cell function, increased hepatic glucose output, inappropriate glucagon secretion, and decreased incretin effect [1, 2]. Achieving and maintaining glycemic control is essential for reducing the risk of diabetes associated microvascular complications (retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy) and in many cases reducing the risk of macrovascular complications such as myocardial infarction [3].

The combination therapy with a long-acting basal insulin and a glucagon-like protein-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) in patients with type 2 DM is based on the solid understanding of their complementary mechanisms of actions, which potentiate each other by acting through different mechanisms in different tissues [4]. This approach is also supported by the full clinical data. For patients already being treated with basal insulin, the addition of a GLP-1RA to their therapeutic regimen is an option when intensification therapy is needed [2, 4, 5]. This combination therapy shows the same efficacy as the basal bolus treatment regimen with respect to the glycemic control, but with a lower risk of hypoglycemia and weight gain, and is obtained with a lower dose of insulin [2, 5].

There are two dual-agent products that are available combining basal insulin with GLP-1 RA, insulin degludec/liraglutide (iDegLira) and insulin glargine/lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) [6]. Both combinations are indicated for treatment of type 2 diabetes as an adjunct to lifestyle changes including diet and exercise, and are administered subcutaneously once daily. IDegLira is a fixed-ratio combination of a once-daily long-acting basal insulin degludec and a long acting, once-daily GLP-1 RA, liraglutide. IGlarLixi is a fixed-ratio combination of a once-daily long-acting basal insulin glargine and a short-acting, once-daily GLP-1 RA, lixisenatide. There are no trials directly comparing the two fixed ratio combination GLP-1RA and basal insulin products [6,7,8,9,10]. The primary end point of this study was to compare the effectivness of two fixed – ratio combinations (iDegLira and iGlarLixi) on glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). The secondary end points were changes in 2 hours postprandial glucose (PPG), fasting plasma glucose (FPG)), proportion of patients achieving HbA1c < 7% and change in non glycemic parameters: body weight and lipid parameters.

Methods

Study design and subjects

A total of 186 patients with type 2 DM were included in this retrospective study at the University Clinical Centre of the Republic Srpska in Banja Luka. Data were collected from patient medical records. The inclusion criteria were inadequate glycemic control on metformin and basal insulin (degludec, glargine 100, glargine 300). Inadequate glycemic control was defined as HbA1c ≥ 7.0%. Patients had to have been treated with a basal insulin for at least 6 months before study, with a stable regimen for at least 3 months. The permitted oral antihyperglycemic drugs at screening were metformin (≥1500 mg/day or maximal tolerated dose). Patients were divided into two groups based on the basal insulin before study. Patient group I (n = 86, 46 man and 50 women) treated with degludec as basal insulin before study, were switched to iDegLira. Patients group II (n = 99, 48 man and 51 women) treated with glargine 100 or 300 < 30 units as basal insulin before study, were switched to iGlarLixi dose 20 units:10 μg. IDegLira was self –administrated once daily, at approximately the same time each day. IGlarLixi was self –administrated once daily half an hour before breakfast. The starting dose of fixed combination was determined from the last basal insulin dose received before study. Every patient got titration algorithm by physician. Exclusion criteria were use of an oral agent other than the metformin and previous discontinuation of a GLP-1 RA due to safety, tolerability. All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964, as revised in 2013. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee. All subjects gave written informed consent for participation.

Clinical and biochemical measurements

For each patient the following demographic data were collected: gender, age, body height and weight. The following parameters were measured from baseline and after 6 months: FPG, 2 hours PPG, HbA1c, total cholesterol (TC), high -density cholesterol (HDL), low- density cholesterol (LDL), triglycerides. Hypoglycemia defined as glycemia less than 3.9 mmol/l. Hypoglycemia was recorded based on the information from self monitored glucose levels in the medical records.

Statistical analysis

Central tendencies, mesures of variability and relative numbers were used for descriptive statistical methods. The normality of the distribution of continuous data was examined by graphical and mathematical methods. To compare means between continuous variables between two groups we used T test (or Mann Whitney test), depending of data distribution. To comapare change from baseline to 6 months we used T tets for continuos variables. Mc Nemar test was uses to comapare change from baseline to 6 months for nominal data. Correlation between the observed variables was assessed using the Spearman or Person correlation. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using the SPSS Statistics.

Results

There were no difference in baseline and demographic characteristics between the treatments groups, Table 1. Patients were mean age of 60 years, were generally obese and had a mean duration of diabetes 10 years, Table 1.

Table 1 Baseline, demographics and disease characteristics, baseline and the end of study

Data are presented as % or mean ± SD. HbA1c-glycated hemoglobin A1c, FPG-fasting plasma glucose, PPG- postprandial glucose, DM-diabetes mellitus, BMI-body mass index, not significant.

Mean HbA1c decreased similarly in two treatments groups (−1.2% vs.-1.1%), Fig. 1. There were statistical differences in the change in HbA1c from baseline to 6 months in both groups, Table 1. Higher percentage patients in iDegLira group had reached the HBA1c < 7% after 6 months (22% vs. 18.2%, p < 0.05), Fig. 1. The mean change in FPG was comparable for the two groups, while mean decrease PPG level was lower in iGlarLixi group, but these difference no significance (2 vs 1.8 mmol/l, p > 0.05), Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Mean change in glycemic parameters

At the end of the study patients showed decrease in TC and LDL for 0.2 mmol/L in iDeg Lira and 0.1 mmol/l in iGlar Lixi, triglycerides for 0.3 mmol/l in both groups, increase HDL for 0.1 mm/l in iGlarLixi, Fig. 2

Fig. 2
figure 2

Mean change in lipid parameters

Changes in body weight were significant difference of 1.8 kg from baseline in iDegLira group, than 0.7 kg in iGlarLixi group (p < 0.001), Table 1. After 6 months in both groups were significantly less hypoglycemia episodes per week. In iDegLira group without hypoglycemia were 97.7%, in iGlarLixi 96%, with 1–2 hypoglycemia per week in iDegLira 2.3% and in iGlarLixi 3%. At the end of study there were no more than 2 hypoglycemia episodes per week in each group. There were not any participant drop outs during the study.

Discussion

Diabetes impacts multiple systems within the body, and achievement and maintenance of glycemic goals are important in preventing or at least delaying the development and progression of diabetes-associated complications [11]. To effectively treat type 2 diabetes, treatment intesification is often required using combinations of medications that address one or the more of the many pathologic processes associated with the disease [4, 5, 12]. The fixed-ratio combination therapy is appropriate for patients who are already taking either a basal insulin or a GLP-1 RA but still show insufficient glycemic control [13]. Patients who may particularly benefit from such a therapy include those who want to avoid the multiple injections required with prandial insulin in an insulin intensification regimen, as well as the frequent blood glucose testing needed to adjust prandial doses and lessen the risk of hyper/hypoglycemia [4, 5, 12, 13]. Combination therapy using the complementary mechanisms of action of basal insulin and GLP-1 RA targets seven of the many pathophysiologic defects in type 2 diabetes, adressing both FPG and PPG [5, 8, 12]. No head-to-head comparison has been done with fixed-ratio combinations and therefore it is not possible to make recommendations between the two for glycemic control alone [13,14,15].

With a mean diabetes duration od 10 years, mean BMI of 30 kg/m2 and already on two glucose lowering agens, population of this study represents a group of patients that is challenging to treat successfully in the clinical setting. These patients need more than one glucose-lowering drugs to maintain glycemic control.

Our results had showed higher proportions of patients with iDegLira reaching the HbA1c < 7% and greater reductions in HbA1c. Other studies had showed higher reduction HbA1c than our results [15, 16]. A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials indirectly compared iGlarLixi and iDegLira and showed the mean change in HbA1c was 1.50% after iGlarLixi treatment and 1.89% after iDegLira treatment. Evans et al. showed in indirect comparison the mean reduction in HbA1c was 0.44% greater with IDegLira compared to iGlarLixi, and a greater proportion of patients reached HbA1c < 7.0%. The results of this indirect treatment comparison demonstrate that, among patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on basal insulin, treatment with IDegLira resulted in a greater reduction of HbA1c and higher odds of reaching HbA1c < 7% compared with iGlarLixi [14]. Other meta analises showed similar results [11, 15, 16]. We didn’t find difference between iDegLira and iGlarLixi for change in FPG. Groups with iGlarLixi had marked decrease in PPG. Other meta analyses had showed favour od iDegLira for change in FPG, but iGlarLixi for PPG. IGlarLixi contain short acting GLP-1 RA with a predominant PPG lowering effect [5, 6, 16,17,18].

Better glycemic control did not associated with higher rate of hypoglycemia. We did not found significant difference in hypoglycemic episodes between groups. AT the end of study the number of hypoglycemia episodes was reduced in both groups. A lower incidence of hypoglycemia indicating that the fixed ratio combination may mitigate the increased risk of hypoglycemia often seen in long-standing DM. Other studies also showed good safety profile of fixed ratio combination therapy [12, 13].

Obesity in major risk factors for type 2 diabetes. Modest weight loss can minimize and reduce diabetes-associated complications [19]. In our study fixed combination iDegLira was superior in body weight and BMI reduction than iGlarLixi. Different GLP-1 RA have different effect on weight change. Differences in uptake across the blood–brain barrier (or in brain access through subfornical organs) have been postulated as an explanation [20,21,22,23]. Clinical trial data from patients receiving fixed-ratio combination showed a weight change of − 0,3 to − 0,7 kg for iGlarLixi and − 2 to − 2,7 kg for iDegLira [12, 13, 16, 17, 24].

Our results had showed improvements in lipid levels. Both preparation had showed the most effect on triglycerides level. Although, iDegLira more decrease TC and LDL, these differences were not significant. Other studies showed better lipid profil with fixed ratio combination [25,26,27,28,29,30]. Unlike other results which did not show diffrence in HDL level, our results alsoshowed increase in HDL level in iGlarLixi groups.

These retrospective design had some limitations, so potential confounding factors cannot be ruled out. Participants in clinical trials have more careful follow-up, titration guidelines are more aggressively enforced than in usually done in routine clinical practice. Therefore, further studies, like RCTs would be desirable.

Conclusion

Our results had showed that more patients with iDegLira had HbA1c less than 7% and these combination had better effect on weight loss. Both preparations had similar effect on FPG and PPG, benefit on lipid profile and similar rate of hypoglycemia.

Availability of data and materials

Original data sets and materials are not publicly available because of patient privacy protection but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

GLP-1RA:

Glucagon-like protein-1 receptor agonist

iDegLira:

Insulin degludec/liraglutide

iGlarLixi:

Insulin glargine/lixisenatide

BMI:

Body mass index

HbA1c:

Glycated haemoglobin A1c

FPG:

Fasting plasma glucose

PPG:

Postprandial glucose

TC:

Total cholesterol

HDL:

High density cholesterol

LDL:

Low density cholesterol.

References

  1. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, Diamant M, Ferrannini E, Nauck M, et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centred approach. Update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of diabetes. Diabetologia. 2015;5:429–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Holst JJ, Vilsbøll T. Combining GLP-1 receptor agonists with insulin: therapeutic rationales and clinical findings. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15(1):3–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Russell-Jones D, Dauchy A, Delgado E, Dimitriadis G, Frandsen HA, Popescu L, et al. Take Control: A randomized trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of self- versus physician-managed titration of insulin glargine 300 U/mL in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019;21(7):1615–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. David J, Fonseca V. When should fixed ratio basal insulin/glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists combination products be considered? J Diabetes Complicat. 2019;33(12):107473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Valentine V, Goldman J, Shubrook JH. Rationale for, initiation and titration of the basal insulin/GLP-1RA fixed-ratio combination products, IDegLira and IGlarLixi, for the Management of Type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Ther. 2017;8(4):739–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cai X, Gao X, Yang W, Ji L. Comparison between insulin degludec/liraglutide treatment and insulin glargine/lixisenatide treatment in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2017;18(17):1789–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nuffer W, Guesnier A, Trujillo JM. A review of the new GLP-1 receptor agonist/basal insulin fixed-ratio combination products. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2018;9(3):69–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Inman TR, Plyushko E, Austin NP, Johnson JL. The role of basal insulin and GLP-1 receptor agonist combination products in the management of type 2 diabetes. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2018;9(5):151–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Frances Artigas C, Stokes V, Tan GD, Theodorakis MJ. Insulin dose adjustments with add-on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists in clinical practice. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015;16(10):1417–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson SL, Trujillo JM. Basal insulin use with GLP-1 receptor agonists. Diabetes Spectr. 2016;29:152–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Blonde J, Anderson JE, Chava P, Dendy JA. Rationale for a titratable fixed-ratio coformulation of a basal insulin analog and a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist in patients with type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019;35:793–804.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Moreira RO, Cobas R, Coelho LA, RC. Combination of basal insulin and GLP-1 receptor agonist: is this the end of basal insulin alone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes? Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2018;10:26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Maiorino MI, Chiodini P, Bellastella G, Capuano A, Esposito K, Giugliano D. Insulin and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist combination therapy in type 2 diabetes: a systematic Review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(4):614–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Evans M, Billings LK, Håkan-Bloch J, Slothuus U, Abrahamsen TJ, Andersen A, et al. An indirect treatment comparison of the efficacy of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) and insulin glargine/lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on basal insulin. J Med Econ. 2018;21(4):340–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Home PD, Aroda VR, Blonde L, Guyot P, Shaunik A, Fazeli MR, et al. Efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi versus IDegLira in adults with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a systematic literature review and indirect treatment comparison. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020;22:2170–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rodbard HW, Buse JB, Woo V, Vilsbøll T, Langbakke IH, Kvist K, et al. Benefits of combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide are independent of baseline glycated haemoglobin level and duration of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18(1):40–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Handelsman Y, Muskiet MHA, Meneilly GS. Combining GLP-1 receptor agonists and basal insulin in older adults with type 2 diabetes: focus on Lixisenatide and insulin Glargine [published correction appears in Adv Ther. 2020;37(2):973]. Adv Ther. 2019;36(12):3321–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Harris K, Nealy KL. The clinical use of a fixed-dose combination of insulin Degludec and Liraglutide (Xultophy 100/3.6) for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Ann Pharmacother. 2018;52(1):69–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Review PMY. Obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Integr obesity. Diabetes. 2018;4(4). https://doi.org/10.15761/IOD.1000217.

  20. Apovian CM, Okemah J, O'Neil PM. Body weight considerations in the Management of Type 2 diabetes. Adv Ther. 2019;36(1):44–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shah M, Vella A. Effects of GLP-1 on appetite and weight. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2014;15(3):181–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Vilsbøll T, Christensen M, Junker AE, Knop FK, Gluud LL. Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on weight loss: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2012;10(344):d7771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Potts JE, Gray LJ, Brady EM, Khunti K, Davies MJ, Bodicoat DH. The effect of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists on weight loss in type 2 diabetes: a systematic Review and mixed treatment comparison Meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0126769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Aroda VR, Rosenstock J, Wysham C, Unger J, Bellido D, González-Gálvez G, et al. Efficacy and safety of LixiLan, a titratable fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine plus lixisenatide in type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal insulin and metformin: the LixiLan-L randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(11):1972–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Scicali R, Di Pino A, Ferrara V, Urbano F, Piro S, Rabuazzo AM, et al. New treatment options for lipid-lowering therapy in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Acta Diabetol. 2018;55(3):209–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hermansen K, Baekdal TA, During M, et al. Liraglutide suppresses postprandial triglyceride and apolipoprotein B48 elevations after a fat-rich meal in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15:1040–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Brath H, Abrahamian H, Karuza T, Mihaljevic R, Pfohl M. Austrian experience with Lixisenatide under real-life conditions: a prospective observational study. Diabetes Ther. 2019;10(2):451–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Giorgino F, Caruso I, Napoli R. Titratable fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine plus lixisenatide: a simplified approach to glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020;170:108478.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Melzer-Cohen C, Chodick G, Naftelberg S, Shehadeh N, Karasik A. Metabolic control and adherence to therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients using IDegLira in a real-world setting. Diabetes Ther. 2020;11(1):185–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zenari L, Da Porto A, De Moliner L, Lugli F, Guazzoni V, Groppelli G, et al. Real-world evaluation of glycemic outcomes and extra-glycemic parameters in diabetic patients treated with the combined formulation Degludec-Liraglutide (Ideglira). Diabetes Ther. 2021;12(1):197–209.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge and thank all participants for their cooperation and sample contributions.

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

IR, MB, MSD and DD were drafted this manuscript and collected the sample. IR, DD and MSD analyzed the data. IR and MSD are responsible for the integrity of the work as a whole. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivona Risovic.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964, as revised in 2013. All subjects gave written informed consent for participation.

The study was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of the University Clinical Center of the Republic of Srpska. The number of ethics committee approval is 01–19–123-2/21.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Risovic, I., Dumanovic, M.S., Bojic, M. et al. Direct comparison two fixed-ratio combination glucagon-like peptide receptor agonist and basal insulin on glycemic and non glycemic parameters in type 2 diabetes. BMC Endocr Disord 23, 28 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-023-01282-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-023-01282-w

Keywords