Skip to main content
Download PDF

Recombinant growth hormone therapy in children with Turner Syndrome in Korea: a phase III Randomized Trial

BMC Endocrine Disorders volume 21, Article number: 243 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Short stature is the most consistent characteristic feature of Turner syndrome (TS). To improve final heights of children with TS effectively, it is important to provide them with early and appropriate treatment using growth hormone (GH). The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of a new recombinant human GH, Growtropin®-II (DA-3002, Dong-A ST Co., Ltd) versus a comparator (Genotropin®, Pfizer Inc.) for Korean children with TS.

Methods

This open-label, active-controlled, parallel-group, randomized controlled phase III trial was conducted at 11 hospitals in Korea. Eligible patients (n = 58) were randomized to two groups: 1) DA-3002 group (administrated with DA-3002 at 0.14 IU [0.0450–0.050 mg] /kg/day); and 2) comparator group (administrated with the comparator at 0.14 IU [0.0450–0.050 mg] /kg/day).

Results

The change from baseline in annualized height velocity (HV) after a 52-week treatment period was 4.15 ± 0.30 cm/year in the DA-3002 group and 4.34 ± 0.29 cm/year in the comparator group. The lower bound of 95% two-sided confidence interval for group difference in the change of annualized HV (− 1.02) satisfied the non-inferiority margin (− 1.5). The change in height standard deviation score (HtSDS) at 52-week was 0.70 ± 0.23 for the DA-3002 group and 0.66 ± 0.39 for the comparator group, showing no significant (p = 0.685) difference between the two groups. The change of skeletal maturity defined as change in bone age/change in chronological age between the two groups was not significantly different (1.25 ± 0.58 for the DA-3002 group and 1.47 ± 0.45 for the comparator group, p = 0.134). Changes from baseline in serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) after 52 weeks of treatment did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.565 and p = 0.388, respectively) either. The occurrence of adverse events was not statistically different between groups.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that the efficacy and safety of GH treatment with DA-3002 in children with TS are comparable with those of the comparator. It is expected to analysis the long-term effect of DA-3002 on the increase of final adult height in children with TS and possible late-onset complications in the future.

Trial registration

The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01813630 (19/03/2013).

Peer Review reports

Background

Turner syndrome (TS) is related to a defect in all or part of one X-chromosome that is missing or structurally altered. It occurs in one of 2500–3000 live-born females [1]. TS is characterized by short stature, dysmorphic features, loss of ovarian function, and cardiac abnormalities [2]. Among them, short stature is the most consistent characteristic feature of TS. Untreated girls with TS achieve an average adult height of ~ 140 cm [3, 4]. The growth rate of girls with TS is often decreased in the first 3 years of life. More than half of girls with TS will fall below the fifth percentile by 2 years of age [1, 5]. Failure to experience a pubertal growth spurt because of gonadal dysgenesis also contributes to a typical short stature.

Treatment with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) is a standard care for a girl with TS. It has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration since 1997 [6]. Growth hormone (GH) therapy is usually started as early as 2 years of life after a girl’s height is found to be below the fifth percentile for a healthy population in the same age cohort. Many studies have evaluated GH therapy in girls with TS and revealed that GH can increase adult height by 5–12 cm with good safety [6,7,8,9,10]. Longer duration of GH treatment with higher dose at earlier age showed further increase of final adult height [6, 11]. Earlier GH treatment to normalize stature before the onset of puberty can alleviate physical and psychosocial problems [6]. However, there was no established optimal age to start GH treatment that increase final adult height. Recent study showed that early initiation of GH by age 6 years without inconsistencies of treatment enable attainment of final adult height within normal range in girls with TS regardless of whether started during the toddler stage or not [12]. Childhood GH treatment also has beneficial effect on lipid profile and cardiovascular diseases in women with TS [13].

The present study was a one-year, open-label, multi-center, randomized controlled trial (RCT) of recombinant human GH administered to Korean girls with TS. The primary purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of daily subcutaneous rhGH, Growtropin®-II (DA-3002, Dong-A ST Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea) and compare effects between Growtropin®-II and Genotropin® (Pfizer Inc., New York, USA) in Korean children with TS. DA-3002 is a rhGH of liquid formulation that administered via a pen. Comprehensive efficacy and safety data of GH therapy are provided here.

Methods

Subjects

The following subjects were included in this study: (1) prepubertal children who were diagnosed with Turner syndrome through a chromosome test; (2) children with chronological age of 2 years to 12 years; (3) children whose annualized height velocity (HV) was less than 6 cm with bone age of 12 years or younger and height in the 10th percentile or less among Korean population of the same chronological age prior to the participation in the study;(11) (4) pre-adolescent children at Tanner stage I (Breast); (5) children with normal range of HbA1c level and normal thyroid function (possible even if the function was normal through hormone therapy); (6) children who had a record (e.g., hospital record, school health record, etc.) of official height at least 6 months before the start of this study (self-measurement record was not accepted) and who had not received an agent (rhGH, androgen, estrogen) that could affect growth after the height was recorded; (7) the child and parent (or legal custodian or legal guardian) signed a written consent form after listening to the explanation of this clinical study.

Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) children who had received growth hormones for 12 months or more in the past; (2) children who received estrogen for more than two months from outside in the fetal period; (3) children who had been treated with estrogen or adrenal androgens for 12 months or more in the past; (4) children who had Y component in the chromosome analysis and reproductive tissue (or gonads) not previously removed; (5) children who had clinically significant congenital or acute/chronic disease, including endocrine and metabolic diseases (e.g., diabetes, diabetic retinopathy, etc.), malignant tumor, central nervous system trauma (CNS Trauma), psychiatric disorder, active chronic infections (e.g., tuberculosis, etc.), acute respiratory failure, hypersensitivity to growth hormone preparations, and dwarfism due to brain tumor; (6) children taking amphetamines or other drugs that might interfere with growth hormone secretion or action (e.g., methylphenidate, pemoline, corticosteroid, estrogen, androgen); (7) children with a closed osteoepiphysis; (8) children who participated in other clinical studies within three months before the start of this study; (9) children who were evaluated as inappropriate by the clinical study investigator.

Methods

This open-label, active-controlled, parallel-group, randomized controlled phase III study was conducted at 11 hospitals in Korea from February 2013 to May 2018. This study was conducted in compliance with ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practices after obtaining approval from the institutional review board of each study site. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants and legally authorized representatives of patients since all participants were under 18 years of age. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01813630, date of registration: 19/03/2013).

Through screening tests (− 4 weeks to 0 weeks), subjects who were eligible based on inclusion and exclusion criteria were randomized to a treatment group or a comparator group. The treatment group received DA-3002 while the comparator group received Genotropin® at a dose of 0.14 IU (0.045–0.050 mg)/kg/day by subcutaneous injection for 52 weeks (Fig. 1). Each subject visited the institution at 13, 26, 39, and 52 weeks for measurements of height, weight, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) levels, thyroid function, hemoglobin A1c level, and other laboratory tests. Subjects also responded to a questionnaire on drug compliance and adverse events in person during visits of the institution or by telephone at the mid time point of each visit (6, 19, 32, and 45 weeks).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study design and disposition. a study design; b study disposition. SF: Screening failure, PD: Premature discontinuation

Full size image

Measurements

The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in annualized HV at 52 weeks between treatment and comparator groups. Secondary efficacy endpoints were change from baseline in height standard deviation score (HtSDS) at 52 weeks, changes of skeletal maturity at 26 and 52 weeks (changes in bone age/changes in chronological age) and changes from baseline in IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 levels at 26 and 52 weeks. Safety assessment consisted of clinical laboratory findings, growth hormone antibody formation, monitoring of vital signs, abnormal physical findings, and adverse events such as subjective and objective symptoms (including observation of local irritant reaction).

Statistics

Statistical analysis was performed using SAS statistical software ver. 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Results of descriptive statistics are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables and frequency or percentage for categorical variables. The primary efficacy endpoint was analyzed using the ANCOVA (Analysis of Covariance) model with treatment group as an effect and chronological age at baseline as a covariate. When the lower limit of 95% two-sided confidence interval (i.e., a 97.5% one-sided confidence interval) for the difference between the treatment group (DA-3002) and the comparator group (Genotropin®) in the ANCOVA model was greater than or equal to − 1.5, the treatment group was judged to be non-inferior to the comparator group. The secondary efficacy endpoint was analyzed using a two-sample t-test or the Wilcoxon rank sum test to assess differences between the treatment group and the comparator group. The number and incidence rate (%) of subjects who experienced Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and serious adverse Events (SAEs) were presented. The Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to determine whether there was a significant difference between groups. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Subjects’ characteristics and disposition

A total of 65 subjects with TS were screened from 11 hospitals. Of them, 58 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the treatment group (DA-3002, n = 28) or the comparator group (Genotropin®, n = 30). The distribution of subjects is shown in Fig. 1. There were seven children with screening failure due to withdrawal of consent in two subjects, violation of inclusion criteria in four subjects, and compliance with exclusion criteria in one subject. Karyotypes and clinical characteristics of study subjects with TS are summarized in Table 1. Only four subjects had a 45,X karyotype. More than half (n = 43 [74.1%]) of subjects were revealed to have mosaicism. Structural abnormalities of the X chromosome without mosaicism were found in 11 (19.0%) girls with TS. The proportion of particular karyotypes was comparable between treatment and comparator groups. The mean (±SD) age of subjects was 6.84 ± 2.62 years for the treatment group and 7.06 ± 2.96 years for the comparator group. Other baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups.

Table 1 Karyotypes, demographics and baseline characteristics
Full size table

Full analysis (FA) set was defined as all subjects who received at least one dose of the study drug with at least one measurement of the primary efficacy endpoint after randomization. It consisted of a total of 58 subjects (28 in the treatment group and 30 in the comparator group). Per-protocol (PP) set was defined as all subjects who completed all 52 weeks of this study without any major protocol violation. It consisted of 53 subjects (26 in the treatment group and 27 in the comparator group). Safety set included all subjects who received at least one dose of the study drug with at least one measurement of safety-related data after dosing by telephone or visit. It had 58 subjects (27 in the treatment group and 31 in the comparator group).

Efficacy results based on the PP set

The primary efficacy endpoint, change from baseline in HV at 52 weeks, was 4.15 ± 0.30 cm/year in the treatment group and 4.34 ± 0.29 cm/year in the comparator group. The difference in HV change from baseline between the two groups (treatment group - comparator group) was − 0.19 ± 0.41 cm/year [95% CI: − 1.02 to 0.64 cm/year]. The lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (i.e., 97.5% one-sided confidence interval) was − 1.02 cm/year, which was greater than the non-inferiority limit of − 1.5, proving that the treatment group was not inferior to the comparator group. In the case of changes from baseline in HV at 13, 26, and 39 weeks, both treatment and comparator groups showed statistically significant increases of HV from baseline at all time points after treatment (at 13, 26, and 39 weeks for both treatment group and comparator group, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Annualized HV at baseline, 13, 26, 39, and 52-week (cm/year) and change in annualized HV from baseline at 52-week. a: Annualized HV at baseline, 13, 26, 39 and 52-week; b: Change in annualized HV from baseline at 52-week. HV: height velocity; SE: Standard Error; * LS mean difference for between-treatment groups using ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor and CA at baseline as a covariate

Full size image

The change from baseline in HtSDS was 0.43 ± 0.22 in the treatment group and 0.42 ± 0.24 in the comparator group at 26 weeks. It was 0.70 ± 0.23 in the treatment group and 0.66 ± 0.39 in the comparator group at 52 weeks (Fig. 3). Both treatment and comparator groups showed statistically significant increases from baseline in HtSDS at all time points after treatment (all p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the treatment group and comparator group in the change of HtSDS at any time point (at 26 weeks and 52 weeks: p = 0.949 and p = 0.685, respectively).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Height standard deviation scores at baseline, 13, 26, 39, and 52 weeks and change in height standard deviation score for annualized height velocity from baseline at 52-week. a Height standard deviation scores at baseline, 13, 26, 39, and 52 weeks; b Change in height standard deviation score of annualized height velocity from baseline at 52-week

Full size image

The skeletal maturity defined as change in bone age/change in the chronological age was 0.84 ± 0.16 in the treatment group and 0.83 ± 0.14 in the comparator group at baseline. It was 1.44 ± 0.90 in the treatment group and 1.48 ± 0.90 in the comparator group at 26 weeks and 1.25 ± 0.58 in the treatment group and 1.47 ± 0.45 in the comparator group at 52 weeks. Both treatment and comparator groups showed statistically significant increases from baseline in skeletal maturity at all time points after treatment (treatment group: p = 0.004, comparator group: p = 0.002 at 26 weeks; treatment group: p = 0.004, comparator group: p < 0.001 at 52 weeks). There was no statistically significant difference in the skeletal maturity between two groups at any time point (at 26 weeks and 52 weeks, p = 0.864 and p = 0.134, respectively) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Comparison of skeletal maturity and changes in IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 levels from baseline. a Skeletal maturity (ratio of change in bone age/chronological age), b Change in IGF-1 level from baseline, c: Change in IGFBP-3 level from baseline. IGF-1: Insulin-like Growth Factor-1; IGFBP-3: Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding Protein-3. * Two sample t-test between treatment groups; **: Wilcoxon rank sum test between treatment groups

Full size image

In the case of changes from baseline for IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 levels, IGF-1 level change was 208.33 ± 98.22 ng/mL in the treatment group and 226.65 ± 138.93 ng/mL in the comparator group at 26 weeks. It was 206.59 ± 105.76 ng/mL in the treatment group and 222.60 ± 95.15 ng/mL in the comparator group at 52 weeks (Fig. 4). Both treatment and comparator groups showed statistically significant increases from baseline in IGF-1 levels at all time points after treatment (all p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in IGF-1 level change between two groups at any time point (at 26 weeks and 52 weeks, p = 0.824 and p = 0.565, respectively). In the case of change in IGFBP-3 level from baseline, IGFBP-3 change was 1.18 ± 0.82 μg/mL in the treatment group and 1.22 ± 1.06 μg/mL in the comparator group at 26 weeks. It was 1.30 ± 0.93 μg/mL in the treatment group, and 1.42 ± 1.31 μg/mL in the comparator group at 52 weeks. Both treatment and comparator groups showed statistically significant increases from baseline in IGFBP-3 levels at all time points after treatment (all p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in IGFBP-3 level change between two groups at any time point (at 26 weeks and 52 weeks, p = 0.838 and p = 0.388, respectively) (Fig. 4).

All analysis results of efficacy evaluation variables in the FA set were similar to those in the PP set.

Safety results based on the safety set

Adverse events (TEAEs) were found in 45 subjects (77.59%): 21 subjects in the treatment group (77.78%) and 24 subjects in the comparator group (77.42%). The difference between the treatment group and the comparator group was not statistically significant (p = 0.974) (Table 2). The number of subjects with adverse drug reactions related to the investigational product was one (1.72%), which was one subject (3.70%) in the treatment group. No ADRs occurred in the comparator group. The incidence of ADRs showed no statistically significant difference between two groups (p = 0.466). Preferred term of one adverse drug reaction that occurred in the treatment group was an injection site erythema. The severity was mild. The relevance with the investigational product was not assessable.

Table 2 Incidence rate of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Adverse Drug Reactions
Full size table

Serious adverse events occurred in 6 subjects (10.34%) in this clinical study: 3 subjects (11.11%) in the treatment group and 3 subjects (9.68%) in the comparator group. There was no statistically significant difference between the treatment group and the comparator group (p = 1.000). There were no serious adverse drug reactions, adverse events that resulted in permanent discontinuation of the investigational product, or adverse events that resulted in death during this clinical study.

Among items of clinical laboratory tests (hematology, blood chemistry, urinalysis, and thyroid function, etc.), most of the parameters, except total cholesterol and urine red blood cell (RBC), did not show statistically significant changes after treatment (Table 3). There was significant difference in total cholesterol of treatment group, which was due to change from abnormal to normal (p = 0.025). In the urinalysis, there was a significant difference in urine RBC after 52 weeks of treatment within the treatment group and the comparator group (treatment group: p = 0.008; comparator group: p = 0.034), that was the change from normal status to clinically significant hematuria in two cases of the treatment group All of them were reported as adverse events and judged to be unrelated to the investigational product. In the comparator group, one subject showed increased levels aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT). They were reported as adverse reactions (AST increased, ALT increased) and judged to be unrelated to the investigational product. These levels were normalized after the study was completed. Some subjects had normal thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels at baseline, but showed clinically significant abnormal levels after treatment with the investigational product. However, all of them were normal after the study was completed without treatment. All elevations were due to hypothyroidism history and reported as adverse events (blood TSH increased). All were considered to be unrelated to the investigational product. No subject showed a clinically significant abnormality in the free thyroxine (fT4) test at baseline or after treatment with the investigational product. In the antibody test, statistically significant difference from baseline was not found in both the treatment group and the comparator group at 26 weeks and 52 weeks (treatment group at 26 weeks and 52 weeks, p = 0.563 and p = 0.137, respectively; comparator group at 26 weeks and 52 weeks, p = 0.709 and p = 0.329, respectively). There was no difference in antibody test results between two groups at any time point (at 26 weeks and 52 weeks, p = 0.779 and p = 0.742, respectively).

Table 3 Laboratory results at baseline and week 52 in the treatment and comparative groups
Full size table

Among results of vital signs, there were statistically significant changes in systolic blood pressure within the comparator group and differences between the two groups at 13 weeks. However, these changes were temporary and had no clinical significance. There was no statistically significant difference at other time points. In diastolic blood pressure and pulse, there was also no statistically significant differences between the two groups and among different time points within each group.

Discussion

Growth in girls with TS is characterized by a slight to moderate intrauterine growth restriction, a decreased growth velocity during infancy and childhood, and failure to experience a pubertal growth spurt [14]. GH treatment is standard care for a girl with TS. It is usually started after the age of 2 years as soon as the girl’s height falls below the third to fifth percentile for the population in the same age cohort [6]. GH therapy aims at early catch-up growth in childhood so that normal height could be achieved before puberty [6, 7, 9, 15]. However, more than 20% of girls with TS receive a diagnosis in mid-childhood on investigation of short stature because their clinical presentation of TS such as broad shield like chest with widely spaced nipples, webbed neck, and low hairline can be mild or absent [14, 16, 17]. TS is the most common cause of genetic origin in otherwise healthy girls with a short stature except for those with a familial short stature or constitutional delay of puberty [1, 18]. For girls with a delayed diagnosis of TS, GH therapy is still recommended in most cases. A small gain in height might occur even after the age of 12 or adolescence because of delayed epiphyseal closure due to estrogen deficiency [19].

A study on the efficacy of recombinant human growth hormone in patients with TS was initiated in 1983 in the United States, leading to the approval of this agent by the Food and Drug Administration in 1997 [20]. GH therapy in the United States is generally initiated at FDA-approved dose of 1.125 IU/kg per week (0.375 mg/kg per week) and adapted according to growth velocity and IGF-1 levels of girls with TS [21]. In Korea, the approved dose (1.0–1.4 IU/kg per week) is similar to but slightly higher than that in United states. Several studies have used doses of GH higher than those approved by the FDA, giving a relatively small gain in height with higher IGF-I levels compare to those with the approved dose [22]. Individual responses to GH are variable according to different protocols such as age at start of GH treatment, dosing regimens, consistency of treatment, management of puberty, and adjuvant therapy [11, 12, 23]. GH treatment started in toddler showed early normalization of short stature, however growth failure can be prevented if GH treatment is started before six years of age without interruption [12]. Height and height SDS at the start of treatment are also related to growth response after GH treatment for TS [24,25,26]. Among them, GH dose is the most important predictor of HV in the first year of GH treatment for TS patients [27]. In the present study, subjects in both groups were administered an approved dose of GH (0.14 IU (0.045–0.050 mg)/kg/day). There were larger increases of HV and HtSDS during one year of GH treatment compared to those in a former Korean study [28]. Increased HV in the first year of GH treatment for girls with TS is the most important factor in predicting the final adult height [27]. In addition, there was no significant difference in the number of poor response subjects according to first-year HV between the present study and a previous study [29]. Previous studies and meta-analysis of beneficial effect of long term GH treatment have shown 5–7 cm and 1.22 HtSDS increase in final adult height (147.8–152.3 cm) [7, 8, 10, 24, 26, 30]. Some reports have indicated an increase of 8 to 10 cm in final adult height after receiving at least 6 years of GH therapy with delayed estrogen administration [20, 25]. However, delayed estrogen administration can be deleterious to bone, uterine, and psychosocial aspects, recent guideline recommend that estrogen treatment should began at 11 or 12 years of age in girls with high gonadotropin or low anti-Mullerian hormone [7, 31]. A recent Korean study has also shown noticeable increase of final adult height by 12 cm after 6 years of treatment, with half of patients having TS attaining normal heights [10]. Ahn et al. have shown that a younger age, a longer duration of GH treatment, and a larger dose can lead to an outstanding increase of final height [10].

Besides growth promotion effect, GH therapy in girls with TS has beneficial effect on lipid profile with cardioprotective value and lower prevalence of arterial hypertension [13, 32]. The present study also showed improved cholesterol without adverse effect on blood pressure, although there was a temporary elevation of systolic blood pressure that was not statistically significant. Women with TS are predisposed to cardiovascular diseases and congenital cardiovascular malformation since risk factors of cardiovascular diseases including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and insulin resistance are more often found in TS [6]. Echocardiography and MRI studies of GH treated-girls with TS have revealed normal left ventricular function without deleterious effect on aortic diameter or compliance [6]. Although GH therapy has a good safety profile in girls with TS, close monitoring of IGF1 levels, abnormal glucose tolerance, reduced insulin sensitivity, benign intracranial hypertension, scoliosis and other skeletal changes at intervals of 3–6 months-is recommended [6, 7]. Long-term GH therapy has variable effects on skeletal development including craniofacial features such as micrognathia, high-arched palate, short fourth metacarpals, genu valgum, Madelung wrist deformities, and short limbs in TS girls [13, 33, 34]. A recent study has shown high prevalence of retrognathism, skin adnexa abnormality, dense eyebrows, and long lashes with the occurrence of nail anomalies and/or ingrowing nails in girls with TS [13]. A lichen planus-like drug eruption associated with GH therapy has been reported in a child with TS [35, 36].

There is no consistent report on the difference of adult height according to karyotype [4, 37]. Recent French national study showed that growth retardation in TS tends to be more severe in patients with isochromosome or ring chromosome of X and in patients with a karyotype 45, X to a lesser extent than in patients with other karyotypes [37]. Loss of interstitial or terminal long-arm material of the X chromosome (Xq) can result in short stature and primary ovarian failure. In general, loss of the short arm of the X chromosome (Xp) will result in a short stature with typical skeletal changes observed in individuals with TS, in part as a result of haploinsufficiency of the short stature–homeobox (SHOX) gene located in the pseudoautosomal region (PAR1) of Y and Xp [38]. Approximately half patients with TS have a 45,X karyotype while the remaining patients have isochromosome Xq, mosaicism or structural abnormalities of the X chromosome [1, 39]. Contrast to studies of Sybert et al. and Stochholm et al. [1], mosaicism with structural abnormality of X chromosome was highly observed in subjects of the present study. Several studies in Korea have also shown a higher incidence of mosaicism [24]. The fact that mosaicism is often observed in patients with TS might be related to chromosome analysis that is frequently conducted, even for Korean patients with short stature who do not have other characteristic features of TS. This phenomenon occurs because many Korean parents are severely concerned about their children’s current and final heights. The high prevalence of mosaicism in patients with TS might have considerably increased the HV and final height in Korean studies [10]. Moreover, the polymorphism of genes associated with TS might play a role in individual response to GH [40, 41].

Conclusion

In conclusion, this clinical study demonstrated an excellent growth promoting effect of DA-3002 in children with short stature due to TS and confirmed its safety. Thus, DA-3002 is another effective option for patients with TS considering GH treatment without any safety concern. Early GH treatment with DA-3002 in TS patients is expected to increase HV and improve their final heights, although a long-term study is needed.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

ADR:

Adverse drug reaction

ALP:

Alkaline phosphatase

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

ANCOVA:

Analysis of Covariance

AST:

Aspartate aminotransferase

BMI:

Body mass index

CI:

Confidence interval

FA set:

Full-analysis set

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

fT4:

Free thyroxine

GH:

Growth hormone

HbA1c:

Haemoglobin A1c

HtSDS:

Height standard deviation score

HV:

Height velocity

IGF-1:

Insulin-like growth factor-1

IGFBP-3:

Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3

PP set:

Per-protocol set

RBC:

Red blood cell

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

rhGH:

Recombinant human GH

SAE:

Serious adverse event

SD:

Standard deviation

SDS:

Standard deviation scores

SE:

Standard error

TEAE:

Treatment-emergent adverse event

TS:

Turner syndrome

TSH:

Thyroid stimulating hormone

References

  1. Sybert VP, McCauley E. Turner’s Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1227–38. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra030360.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pinsker JE. Turner syndrome: updating the paradigm of clinical care. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(6):E994–1003. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-1245.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lyon AJ, Preece MA, Grant DB. Growth curve for girls with turner syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 1985;60(10):932–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.60.10.932.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rochiccioli P, David M, Malpuech G, Colle M, Limal JM, Battin J, et al. Study of final height in Turner’s syndrome: ethnic and genetic influences. Acta Paediatr. 1994;83(3):305–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.1994.tb18099.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Davenport ML, Punyasavatsut N, Stewart PW, Gunther DF, Sävendahl L, Sybert VP. Growth failure in early life: an important manifestation of turner syndrome. Horm Res. 2002;57(5–6):157–64. https://doi.org/10.1159/000058376.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bondy CA, Turner Syndrome study group. Care of Girls and Women with turner syndrome: a guideline of the turner syndrome study group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(1):10–25. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2006-1374.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gawlik A, Malecka-Tendera E. Transitions in endocrinology: treatment of Turner’s syndrome during transition. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;170(2):R57–74. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-13-0900.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Li P, Cheng F, Xiu L. Height outcome of the recombinant human growth hormone treatment in turner syndrome: a meta-analysis. Endocr Connect. 2018;7(4):573–83. https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-18-0115.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gravholt CH, Andersen NH, Conway GS, Dekkers OM, Geffner ME, Klein KO, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the care of girls and women with turner syndrome: proceedings from the 2016 Cincinnati international turner syndrome meeting. Eur J Endocrinol. 2017;177(3):G1–G70. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-17-0430.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahn JM, Suh JH, Kwon AR, Chae HW, Kim H-S. Final adult height after growth hormone treatment in patients with turner syndrome. Horm Res Paediatr. 2019;91(6):373–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000500780.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sas TCJ, de Muinck K-SSMPF, Stijnen T, Jansen M, Otten BJ, Gera Hoorweg-Nijman JJ, et al. Normalization of height in girls with turner syndrome after long-term growth hormone treatment: results of a randomized dose-response trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(12):4607–12. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.84.12.6241.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Quigley CA, Fechner PY, Geffner ME, Eugster EA, Ross JL, Habiby RL, et al. Prevention of growth failure in turner syndrome: long-term results of early growth hormone treatment in the “toddler turner” cohort. Horm Res Paediatr. 2021;94(1–2):18–35. https://doi.org/10.1159/000513788.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Irzyniec T, Jeż W, Lepska K, Maciejewska-Paszek I, Frelich J. Childhood growth hormone treatment in women with turner syndrome - benefits and adverse effects. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):15951. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52332-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Frias JL, Davenport ML, Committee on genetics, section on endocrinology. Health supervision for children with turner syndrome. Pediatrics. 2003;111(3):692–702. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.111.3.692.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shankar RK, Backeljauw PF. Current best practice in the management of turner syndrome. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2017;9(1):33–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042018817746291.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Massa G, Verlinde F, De Schepper J, Thomas M, Bourguignon JP, Craen M, et al. Trends in age at diagnosis of turner syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 2005;90(3):267–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2004.049817.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sävendahl L, Davenport ML. Delayed diagnoses of Turner’s syndrome: proposed guidelines for change. J Pediatr. 2000;137(4):455–9. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpd.2000.107390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Seo GH, Kang E, Cho JH, Lee BH, Choi J-H, Kim G-H, et al. Turner syndrome presented with tall stature due to overdosage of the SHOX gene. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2015;20(2):110–3. https://doi.org/10.6065/apem.2015.20.2.110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Bettendorf M, Inta IM, Doerr HG, Hauffa BP, Mehls O, Ranke MB. Height gain in Ullrich-turner syndrome after early and late growth hormone treatment start: results from a large retrospective German study and potential basis for an individualized treatment approach. Horm Res Paediatr. 2013;80(5):356–62. https://doi.org/10.1159/000356045.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rosenfeld RG, Attie KM, Frane J, Brasel A, Burstein S, Cara JF, et al. Growth hormone therapy of Turner’s syndrome: beneficial effect on adult height. J Pediatr. 1998;132(2):319–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3476(98)70452-4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Park P, Cohen P. The role of insulin-like growth factor I monitoring in growth hormone-treated children. Horm Res. 2004;62(Suppl 1):59–65. https://doi.org/10.1159/000080760.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. van Pareren YK, de Muinck Keizer-Schrama SM, Stijnen T, Sas TC, Jansen M, Otten BJ, et al. Final height in girls with turner syndrome after long-term growth hormone treatment in three dosages and low dose estrogens. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(3):1119–25. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2002-021171.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schweizer R, Ranke MB, Binder G, Herdach F, Zapadlo M, Grauer ML, et al. Experience with growth hormone therapy in turner syndrome in a single Centre: low Total height gain, no further gains after puberty onset and unchanged body proportions. Horm Res Paediatr. 2000;53(5):228–38. https://doi.org/10.1159/000023572.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim JH, Lee SS, Hong SY, Chung HR, Shin CH, Yang SW. Factors affecting final adult height in patients with turner syndrome. Clin Exp Pediatr. 2005;48(2):191–6.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pasquino AM, Pucarelli I, Segni M, Tarani L, Calcaterra V, Larizza D. Adult height in sixty girls with turner syndrome treated with growth hormone matched with an untreated group. J Endocrinol Investig. 2005;28(4):350–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03347202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Van den Broeck J, Massa GG, Attanasio A, Matranga A, Chaussain J-L, Price DA, et al. Final height after long-term growth hormone treatment in turner syndrome. J Pediatr. 1995;127(5):729–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70161-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ranke MB, Lindberg A, Chatelain P, Wilton P, Cutfield W, Albertsson-Wikland K, et al. Prediction of long-term response to recombinant human growth hormone in turner syndrome: development and validation of mathematical models. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(11):4212–8. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.85.11.6976.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim DH, Lee BC, Yang SY, Chung YY. Clinical effects of Eutropin (recombinant human growth hormone) in patients with turner syndrome. J Korean Soc Pediatr Endocrinol. 1998;3(2):172–83.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bakker B, Frane J, Anhalt H, Lippe B, Rosenfeld RG. Height velocity targets from the National Cooperative Growth Study for first-year growth hormone responses in short children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(2):352–7. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2007-1581.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rochiccioli P, Battin J, Bertrand AM, Bost M, Cabrol S, le Bouc Y, et al. Final height in turner syndrome patients treated with growth hormone. Horm Res. 1995;44(4):172–6. https://doi.org/10.1159/000184620.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Klein KO, Rosenfield RL, Santen RJ, Gawlik AM, Backeljauw PF, Gravholt CH, et al. Estrogen replacement in turner syndrome: literature review and practical considerations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103(5):1790–803. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2017-02183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bannink EMN, van der Palen RLF, Mulder PGH, de Muinck K-SSMPF. Long-term follow-up of GH-treated girls with turner syndrome: metabolic consequences. Horm Res. 2009;71(6):343–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000223419.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wójcik D, Beń-Skowronek I. Craniofacial morphology in children with growth hormone deficiency and turner syndrome. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;10(2):88. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10020088.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Yang S. Diagnostic and therapeutic considerations in turner syndrome. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2017;22(4):226–30. https://doi.org/10.6065/apem.2017.22.4.226.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Soares MQ, Mendonca EF. Lichen planus-like drug reaction associated with recombinant human growth hormone therapy in a child patient with turner syndrome. Dermatol Online J. 2016;22(3):13030/qt4k61f5jn. https://doi.org/10.5070/D3223030374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lin N, Lai K, Wang M. Lichenoid drug eruption in a child with turner syndrome: a rare adverse reaction of recombinant human growth hormone. Australas J Dermatol. 2018;59(4):e311–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajd.12857.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Fiot E, Zenaty D, Boizeau P, Haigneré J, Dos Santos S, Léger J. French turner syndrome study group. X-chromosome gene dosage as a determinant of impaired pre and postnatal growth and adult height in turner syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016;174(3):281–8. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-15-1000.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Clement-Jones M. The short stature homeobox gene SHOX is involved in skeletal abnormalities in turner syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9(5):695–702. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/9.5.695.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Stochholm K, Juul S, Juel K, Naeraa RW, Højbjerg GC. Prevalence, incidence, diagnostic delay, and mortality in turner syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(10):3897–902. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2006-0558.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Braz AF, Costalonga EF, Trarbach EB, Scalco RC, Malaquias AC, Guerra-Junior G, et al. Genetic predictors of long-term response to growth hormone (GH) therapy in children with GH deficiency and turner syndrome: the influence of a SOCS2 polymorphism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(9):E1808–13. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-1744.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Braz AF, Costalonga EF, Montenegro LR, Trarbach EB, Antonini SR, Malaquias AC, et al. The interactive effect of GHR-exon 3and −202 A/C IGFBP3 polymorphisms on rhGH responsiveness and treatment outcomes in patients with turner syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(4):E671–7. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-2521.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from Dong-A ST Co., Ltd. Institutions of this study have received free trial drug supply as investigational product from Dong-A ST. No honorarium, grant, or other form of payment was granted to any author to produce the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jinsup Kim and Min-Sun Kim contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, Hanyang University Medical Center, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

    Jinsup Kim

  2. Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea

    Min-Sun Kim & Dong-Kyu Jin

  3. Department of Pediatrics, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea

    Byung-Kyu Suh

  4. Department of Pediatrics, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea

    Cheol Woo Ko

  5. Department of Pediatrics, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, South Korea

    Kee-Hyoung Lee

  6. Department of Pediatrics, Medical Genetics Clinic and Laboratory, Asan Medical Center Children’s Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

    Han-Wook Yoo

  7. Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University Children’s Hospital, Seoul, South Korea

    Choong Ho Shin

  8. Department of Pediatrics, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, South Korea

    Jin Soon Hwang

  9. Department of Pediatrics, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

    Ho-Seong Kim

  10. Department of Pediatrics, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, South Korea

    Woo Yeong Chung

  11. Department of Pediatrics, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, South Korea

    Chan Jong Kim

  12. Department of Pediatrics, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, South Korea

    Heon-Seok Han

Authors
  1. Jinsup Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Min-Sun Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Byung-Kyu Suh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cheol Woo Ko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kee-Hyoung Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Han-Wook Yoo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Choong Ho Shin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jin Soon Hwang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ho-Seong Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Woo Yeong Chung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Chan Jong Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Heon-Seok Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Dong-Kyu Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.K. and M.S.K. contributed to write the full version of the present manuscript. D.K.J. contributed to conceptualization of the manuscripts. J.K., D.K.J., B.K.S., C.W.K., K.H.L., H.W.Y., C.H.S., J.S.H., H.S.K., W.Y.C., C.J.K., H.S.H. contributed to the acquisition and interpretation of the clinical data. The all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong-Kyu Jin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in compliance with ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practices after obtaining approval from the institutional review board of each study site. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants and legally authorized representatives of patients since all participants were under 18 years of age.

Consent for publication

Appropriate consent has been obtained.

Competing interests

The authors declare no financial competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, J., Kim, MS., Suh, BK. et al. Recombinant growth hormone therapy in children with Turner Syndrome in Korea: a phase III Randomized Trial. BMC Endocr Disord 21, 243 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-021-00904-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-021-00904-5

Keywords

BMC Endocrine Disorders

ISSN: 1472-6823

Contact us