Table 4 Logistic regression analyses of the risk of dyslipidemia

TSH

1

1

1

1

1.043(0.918–1.184)

1.163(1.073–1.260) #

0.967(0.816–1.145)

1.074(0.989–1.167)

1.037(0.864–1.243)

1.192 (1.060–1.340) #

1.059(0.830–1.351)

1.118(0.989–1.265)

1.391(1.066–1.814) #

1.349(1.114–1.634) #

1.678(1.193–2.360) #

1.215(0.986–1.497)

fT3

1

1

1

1

1.169(0.712–1.920)

1.230(0.847–1.787)

1.128(0.547–2.325)

1.190(0.772–1.832)

1.123(0.672–1.874)

1.412(0.964–2.068)

1.111(0.527–2.339)

1.279(0.824–1.984)

1.277(0.735–2.219)

1.643(1.098–2.459) #

1.276(0.580–2.810)

1.325(0.838–2.096)

fT4

1

1

1

1

1.205(0.982–1.478)

0.736(0.651–0.833) #

1.085(0.837–1.407)

0.858(0.752–0.979) #

1.268 (0.981–1.640)

0.615(0.524–0.722) #

0.989(0.704–1.389)

0.772(0.653–0.914) #

1.567(0.955–2.572)

0.414(0.284–0.604) #

0.648(0.287–1.465)

0.598(0.408–0.877) #

fT3/ fT4

1

1

1

1

0.829(0.636–1.081)

0.956(0.784–1.166)

0.753(0.512–1.107)

1.320(1.061–1.642) #

0.983(0.701–1.379)

1.244(0.981–1.579)

1.000(0.624–1.602)

1.442(1.114–1.867) #

0.703(0.203–2.433)

1.855(0.976–3.525)

0.290(0.037–2.280)

2.262(1.184–4.320) #