Pakistanis living in Oslo have lower serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels but higher serum ionized calcium levels compared with ethnic Norwegians. The Oslo Health Study

Vitamin D deficiency and secondary hyperparathyroidism as defined by low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (s-25(OH)D) and elevated serum parathyroid hormone (s-iPTH) are common in immigrants from the Indian subcontinent to Western countries [1, 2], including Norway [3]. Some researchers have found lower bone mineral density (BMD) in immigrated Asian Indians and Pakistanis with a low vitamin D status compared with the Caucasian host population [4, 5]. In Oslo, however, Pakistani immigrants (30–60 years) do not differ in bone mineral density from ethnic Norwegians [6, 7], despite lower serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (s-25(OH)D).

It has been speculated whether vitamin D deficient populations may have a modified vitamin D endocrine system involving a compensatory increase in 1-α-hydroxylase activity and thereby increased serum levels of the active vitamin D hormone (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D) in response to their secondary hyperparathyroidism. This would maintain their serum calcium levels and probably protect against bone loss, by enhancing intestinal calcium absorption and renal tubular calcium reabsorption.

Some small studies have reported higher BMD [8], and higher [9] or similar serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (s-1,25(OH)₂D) [10] in African-Americans compared with Caucasians, despite lower s-25(OH)D in African-Americans. Serum ionized calcium (s-Ca²⁺) was similar in African-Americans and Caucasians [9].

In a small US study (n = 18), vitamin D deficient Asian Indian immigrants also had considerably higher s-1,25(OH)₂D when compared with Caucasians (n = 27) [1], suggesting a compensatory mechanism in the vitamin D endocrine system. S-Ca²⁺ was similar in the Asian Indians and the Caucasians.

In earlier studies from Norway, lower s-25(OH)D but similar 1,25(OH)₂D were observed in pregnant and premenopausal Pakistani women in Oslo compared with ethnic Norwegian women [7, 11]. Pakistani and Norwegian women had similar s-Ca²⁺ [7]. In contrast to these older studies, the Oslo Health Study 2000–2001 is a much larger, population-based study including samples of the general population. It covers a wide age range, and it also includes men. It has thus far been found in the Oslo Health Study that although Pakistanis living in Oslo have a very high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and secondary hyperparathyroidism compared with ethnic Norwegians [3], the two ethnic groups do not differ substantially in bone turnover [12] or bone mineral density [6]. Based on this knowledge our research questions were: Do persons with Pakistani background living in Oslo have increased s-1,25(OH)₂D when compared with ethnic Norwegians, in order to compensate for low s-25(OH)D? And, as a consequence of altered vitamin D metabolism, does s-Ca²⁺ differ between Pakistanis and Norwegians?

The data were collected as part of the Oslo Health Study (HUBRO), a cross-sectional population-based multipurpose study conducted in 2000–2001, inviting all individuals in the city of Oslo aged 30, 40, 45, 59, 60, 75 and 76 years. The overall attendance rate was 46% (n = 18,770), varying from 36% in 30 years old to 55% in 59–60 years old individuals. The material and methods, including respondent rates, are described in detail elsewhere [13]. As a substudy of HUBRO, bone mineral density and vitamin D status were measured in the period May 2000 to January 2001. The participants recruited for the substudy were random samples of individuals born in Norway (quoted as Norwegians) aged 45, 60, and 75 years, as well as random samples of individuals born in Pakistan (quoted as Pakistanis) of all age groups in the Oslo Health Study. The participants were invited in a random order throughout the study period regardless of ethnic background. For the current data analysis, we excluded those not having their serum vitamin D metabolites measured, and the oldest age group (75–76 years), as there were only three Pakistanis in this age group.

As previously described [12], of the 1281 Norwegians of age 45–60 who were invited to the substudy, 674 (53%) participated, and 584 (46%) had s-25(OH)D analyzed. Of the 608 Pakistanis of age 30–60 who were invited to the substudy, 237 (39%) participated, and 176 (29%) had s-25(OH)D analyzed. An important reason for these discrepancies was that the data collection for the substudy was discontinued January 15^th, 2001, and was thus not performed on those who should have met before, but met after January 15^th. However, background characteristics (smoking, BMI, and age) of those who participated in the substudy did not differ from those who met after this date.

In addition, we excluded two Norwegian women and one Pakistani woman due to primary hyperparathyroidism as defined by s-iPTH ≥ 8.5 pmol/L and serum levels of ionized calcium (s-Ca²⁺) > 1.35 mmol/L, and we excluded one subject due to very low s-iPTH combined with high s-Ca²⁺ (iPTH < 2.0 pmol/L and Ca²⁺ > 1.35 mmol/L), which possibly indicate malignancy. In addition, two subjects had unknown PTH status due to missing values, and 33 subjects had unknown s-1,25(OH)₂D due to missing values. Thus, the final sample for analysis consisted of a total of 94 Pakistani men and 67 Pakistani women of age 30, 40, 45, and 59–60 years, and 290 Norwegian men and 270 Norwegian women of age 45 and 60 years; in total 721 subjects.

We found that Pakistanis living in Oslo had low s-1,25(OH)₂D accompanying their low s-25(OH)D, which may imply a substrate-limited production of 1,25(OH)₂D. Thus, Pakistanis, who have a 4–5-fold higher prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and secondary hyperparathyroidism than ethnic Norwegians, do not seem to compensate for their vitamin D deficiency by increasing their production of 1,25(OH)₂D. Interestingly, we found higher s-Ca²⁺ in Pakistanis compared with Norwegians. A limitation of the study was non-fasting blood samples, which could influence s-iPTH and s-Ca²⁺ levels. However, adjustment for time since last meal did not alter the observed levels of these metabolites.

It has not been established how the endocrine system handles subclinical vitamin D deficiency, and to which degree this may vary according to ethnic background, age, or body composition. Some studies have observed a compensatory increased production of 1,25(OH)₂D following reduced s-25(OH)D. Thus Vieth et al. [15] observed an inverse relationship between s-25(OH)D and s-1,25(OH)₂D in elderly. Several other studies have reported the same inverse association in African-Americans [9, 10] and in Asian Indians [1]. However, a usual finding when studying vitamin D deficient subjects of the elderly Caucasian population is a positive relationship between s-25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)₂D, implying that when s-25(OH)D is low, production of the active hormone may be restricted by lack of substrate [16]. This seemed to be the situation also in our population of adult Pakistanis and Norwegians. The association seemed to be stronger in Pakistanis, who had a higher prevalence of vitamin D deficiency. It is possible that a slight reduction in vitamin D stores may increase compensatory production of 1,25(OH)₂D at higher concentrations of s-25(OH)D, but that this does not happen when levels are very low such as in our sample of Pakistanis.

It is not clear whether possible alterations in the vitamin D endocrine system may be due to genetic/biologic or lifestyle factors, or a combination of these. Obesity may be a contributing factor, as an inverse association between s-25(OH)D and BMI [17–20] or percentage body fat [21] has been reported. A US study on 302 healthy subjects found lower s-1,25(OH)₂D in obese compared with non-obese men and women, although the obese subjects had lower s-25(OH)D and higher s-iPTH [22]. The Pakistanis living in Oslo have a high prevalence of obesity as well as a high waist hip ratio for their BMI compared with other ethnic groups [23]. Thus, ethnic differences in the vitamin D endocrine system could, at least partly, be attributable to differences in body size. When studying subjects of Asian background living in Oslo, we observed an increased prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in overweight compared with normal-weight women of Pakistani and other Asian background, but not in men [24].

We are not aware of any published data which have shown that s-1,25(OH)₂D is inversely associated with BMI in subjects from the Indian subcontinent. In this study, we observed an inverse association between BMI and s-1,25(OH)₂D in Norwegians but not in Pakistanis. This was, however, apparent only when comparing obese subjects (BMI > = 30) to non-obese (not shown). Differences in BMI or waist hip ratio could not explain the ethnic differences we found in s-1,25(OH)₂D.

The Pakistanis had low s-25(OH)D, relatively lower s-1,25(OH)₂D, and high s-iPTH, but they had normal s-Ca²⁺ when expressed as adjusted to pH 7.40. Although s-Ca²⁺ is strictly hormonally regulated within a narrow range, the levels were statistically significantly higher in the Pakistanis than in the Norwegians. The results may reflect true higher s-Ca²⁺ in Pakistanis, or a different pH in Norwegians and Pakistanis. If true s-Ca²⁺ were similar, our results may arise from a higher pH in the Pakistanis, leading to overestimation of s-Ca²⁺ values when adjusting the results to a lower pH of 7.40. A more alkaline environment would imply a protection against bone resorption in the Pakistanis. Vaitkevicius et al. found similar plasma pH in African-Americans and Caucasian Americans but lower urinary acid and calcium excretion in African-Americans, and they suggested that alkali administration may be equally important as calcium administration for bone mineralization [25]. Several unidentified factors may contribute to a differing pH and calcium metabolism between ethnic groups. Systemic acidosis is produced by a variety of factors such as menopause, heavy exercise, or dietary acid load, and it is known to induce long-term activation of osteoclasts, in order to release calcium and phosphate into the circulation as a buffer [26]. However, this is not in accordance with our findings on pH in venous serum samples, which suggest a slightly lower pH in Pakistanis. If the observed levels in the serum samples reflect true pH in serum, this would imply that the true ethnic difference in s-Ca²⁺ is even higher than that observed. A true ethnic difference in blood pH has not been established, and would require more sophisticated methods such as measurement of arterial blood gases.

S-Ca²⁺ was not associated with serum levels of vitamin D metabolites in our study, but s-Ca²⁺ was strongly inversely associated with s-iPTH in both ethnic groups, suggesting that secondary hyperparathyroidism is induced by low s-Ca²⁺, regardless of ethnic background. However, at any s-iPTH level, Pakistanis had higher s-Ca²⁺. This may suggest a higher set point of calcium in Pakistanis, involving a higher PTH secretion as a response to s-Ca²⁺ [27]. The differences may also be due to lifestyle factors – such as the dietary acid load, or a combination of several factors. The implications of a higher s-Ca²⁺ for bone metabolism and bone health in Pakistani immigrants need to be further studied.

Immigrants with Pakistani background living in Oslo, who had low s-25(OH)D and high s-iPTH, also had significantly lower s-1,25(OH)₂D compared with ethnic Norwegians. Although obesity was inversely related to s-1,25(OH)₂D in Norwegians, the lower s-1,25(OH)₂D in Pakistanis could not be explained by BMI. Interestingly, s-Ca²⁺ was higher in Pakistanis than in ethnic Norwegians for any s-iPTH in the normal range, also when controlling for age. The explanation for this is unclear given current knowledge of calcium metabolism.