Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Endocrine Disorders

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Long-term auxological and endocrinological evaluation of patients with 9p trisomy: a focus on the growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor-I axis

  • Stefano Stagi1Email author,
  • Elisabetta Lapi2,
  • Salvatore Seminara1,
  • Silvia Guarducci2,
  • Marilena Pantaleo2,
  • Sabrina Giglio2,
  • Francesco Chiarelli3 and
  • Maurizio de Martino1
BMC Endocrine Disorders201414:3

https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6823-14-3

Received: 11 June 2013

Accepted: 9 December 2013

Published: 8 January 2014

Abstract

Background

Trisomy 9p is an uncommon anomaly characterised by mental retardation, head and facial abnormalities, congenital heart defects, kidney abnormalities, and skeletal malformations. Affected children may also show growth and puberty retardation with delayed bone age. Auxological and endocrinological data are lacking for this syndrome.

Methods

We describe three girls and one boy with 9p trisomy showing substantial growth failure, and we evaluate the main causes of their short stature.

Results

The target height was normal in all families, ranging from 0.1 and -1.2 standard deviation scores (SDS). The patients had a low birth-weight (from -1.2 to -2.4 SDS), birth length (from -1.1 to -3.2 SDS), and head circumference (from -0.5 to -1.6 SDS). All patients presented with substantial growth (height) retardation at the time of 9p trisomy diagnosis (from -3.0 to -3.8 SDS).

The growth hormone stimulation test revealed a classic growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) in patients 1, 3, and 4. In contrast, patient 2 was determined to have a GH neurosecretory dysfunction (GHNSD). The plasma concentrations of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were low in all patients for their ages and sexes (from -2.0 to -3.4 SDS, and from -1.9 to -2.8 SDS, respectively).

The auxological follow-up showed that those patients who underwent rhGH treatment exhibited a very good response to the GH therapy, whereas patients 3 and 4, whose families chose not to use rhGH treatment, did not experience any significant catch-up growth.

Conclusions

GH deficiency appears to be a possible feature of patients with 9p trisomy syndrome. These patients, particularly those with growth delays, should be evaluated for GH secretion.

Keywords

Trisomy 9pGrowth HormoneGrowth hormone deficiencyPubertal delayGrowth delayShort StatureScoliosis

Background

Trisomy 9p is the fourth most frequent chromosome anomaly in live-born infants, after trisomies 21, 18, and 13 [1]. Since the original publication by Rethoré et al.[2], more than 150 patients with partial or complete 9p trisomy have been reported [1].

This disorder can occur because of a balanced chromosomal rearrangement between two chromosomes in one of the parents or as the result of a spontaneous (de novo) genetic change early in embryonic development occurring for unknown reasons [35].

In this disorder, part or all of the short arm (p) of chromosome 9 is duplicated [5]. In some cases, an extra (trisomic) segment of the long arm (q) of chromosome 9 may also be present [5].

The signs of this disorder are unusually similar among affected children, despite differing lengths of the duplicated segment. Patients with 9p trisomy exhibit mental retardation and characteristic head and facial abnormalities, such as microcephaly with large anterior fontanel and micrognathia, malformed protruding ears, hypertelorism, deep set eyes, and down slanting palpebral fissures [3, 5]. Congenital heart defects [6, 7], central nervous system abnormalities [8, 9], kidney abnormalities [3, 5], and skeletal malformations [10, 11] are also present.

With respect to facial features, duplication of 9pter-p11 is associated with milder dysmorphia, whereas duplication of 9p21.1-q22-32 is associated with more severe craniofacial features [12].

Affected infants may also show growth retardation and delayed bone age [5]. However, very rarely has growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) been reported [13].

Here, we studied the causes of short stature and investigated the GH insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) axis in patients with 9p trisomy during the follow-up of these patients, three of whom reached adult height.

Methods

Four Caucasian subjects with 9p trisomy syndrome (1 boy and 3 girls, mean age at the diagnosis of 9p trisomy syndrome 19.5 months [range: 0.2 – 45.0]) who presented consecutively at the Genetics and Molecular Medicine Unit of Anna Meyer Children's University Hospital in Florence and were brought to us for delayed growth and development were evaluated.

A diagnosis of 9p trisomy syndrome was made for all subjects between 1994 and 2009 based on the clinical phenotype assessed by an experienced medical geneticist in our hospital and was confirmed by chromosome analysis.

All subjects underwent an extensive endocrine work-up to rule out possible causes of growth failure that included IGF-I, free-thyroxin (FT4), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), cortisol, glucose, electrolytes, venous blood gas, haemoglobin level, total protein, serum albumin, coagulation profile, calcium, phosphorous, alkaline phosphatase, vitamin D (25OHD), parathyroid hormone (PTH) and anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) screening tests for coeliac disease.

At the time of the auxological evaluation, all patients had a height less than 2 standard deviations (SD) below the mean for the normal population and/or a subnormal growth velocity.

In the absence of specific growth charts, age-related reference values for height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) were used [14]. As described, height, height velocity (HV), and BMI were normalised for chronological age by conversion to standard deviation scores (SDS). SDS were calculated according to the following formula: patient value - mean of the age-related reference value/standard deviation of the age-related reference value [15].

In all subjects, we studied the GH response to GH stimulation tests (oral clonidine and/or arginine and/or GH releasing hormone (GHRH) + arginine test).

A GHD diagnosis was made based on auxological criteria (height and/or growth velocity 2 SD below the mean for the normal population) and a GH peak below 10 μg/L (below 20 μg/L after the GHRH + arginine test) after two tests were conducted on two separate occasions [16].

In the event of growth failure with low serum IGF-I and normal GH concentrations, after pharmacological treatment, assessment of spontaneous 12-hour (12 hr) GH secretion was performed [17]. In this case, GH profiling at 30-min intervals over 12 hr was performed. GH neurosecretory dysfunction (GHNSD) was diagnosed when the 12-hr integrated concentrations of GH were 3.2 μg/litre or less [17].

Pubertal stage was assessed according to Marshal and Tanner [18], and testicular volume was determined with the Prader orchidometer. The age of pubertal onset was defined as the age at durable Tanner B2 stage for females and a testicular volume of more than 4 ml for males (G2). The age at which the onset of puberty occurred was recorded as the average age between the previous clinic visit, when the child was still prepubertal, and the clinic visit when the child was G2/B2. The duration of puberty was recorded as the time from G2/B2 to G4/B4. The age at G4/B4 was assessed by averaging the ages at the previous clinic visit, when the child was G3/B3, and the clinic visit when the child was G4/B4. Pubertal growth was defined as growth occurring between the onset of puberty and the FH.

When the onset of puberty occurred, we studied the luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) response to gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) test, estradiol or total testosterone levels, and we performed in the females a pelvic ultrasound; at onset of puberty a normal GnRH test was defined as a peak LH value > 6 IU/L. However, during pubertal follow-up, estradiol or testosterone levels and/or pelvic ultrasound were also carried out.

Bone age (BA) was evaluated through radiographs of the left hand and wrist and then calculated according to the Greulich and Pyle method [19]. Predicted adult height (PAH) was determined using BA, calculated according the Greulich and Pyle method, and height, calculated according to the Bayley-Pinneau method [20]. Target height (TH) was estimated according the method of Hermanussen and Cole [21] by calculating the midparent height as an SDS and correcting this by a factor corresponding to the influence of assortative mating and parent-offspring correlations.

In these patients, anthropometric data were collected periodically (near every 6 months to 1 year). Near- and/or final height (FH) was commonly defined, recognising that children may continue to grow after achieving this definition, for patients in whom both the chronological age (CA) and BA were at least 14 yr for females and 16 yr for males [15]. Because 9p trisomy patients have been reported to continue to grow for a long time, the near-adult height (NAH) was defined for all female and male patients with a CA of at least 18 and 20 yr, respectively, with an HV < 1 cm/year for two consecutive years.

Intracranial imaging was obtained by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using precontrast coronal spin echo T1-weighted images, followed by post-gadolinium T1-weighted imaging.

The study was approved by the Anna Meyer Children’s University Hospital ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from the children’s parents.

Laboratory methods

Glucose, electrolytes, creatinine, venous blood gas, haemoglobin level, total protein, serum albumin, coagulation profile, calcium, phosphorous, alkaline phosphatase, 25OHD, and PTH were measured using standard tests.

Free-T4 and uTSH serum levels were determined by immunometric assays (ImmuliteTM 2000 Third Generation, DPC Diagnostic Products Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, USA). The within- and between-run coefficients of variation were less than 12.5% for uTSH and less than 7.5% for FT4.

The IgA-tTG antibody testing was performed using commercially available ELISA kits (The Binding Site Limited, Birmingham, UK). The ELISA was performed in duplicate for all of the sera samples, as per the manufacturer’s instructions.

The serum total IGF-I levels were measured using a solid-phase enzyme-labelled chemiluminescent immunometric assay on the Immulite 2000 automated immunoanalyser (Siemens Medical Solutions Diagnostics, Los Angeles, CA, USA) with an inter-assay coefficient of variation of ~4%. Serum GH was analysed by IMMULITE 2000 Growth Hormone, an automated chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay analyser. The intra-assay and inter-assay variability coefficients for this kit at the decision limits were 2.5% and 3.8%, respectively.

LH, FSH, cortisol, estradiol and total testosterone were measured by a chemiluminescent immunometric assay (Immulite 2000, Third Generation, DPC Diagnostic Products Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, USA). The intra-assay and inter-assay variability coefficients for this kit at the decision limits were 3.6%, 2.1%, 4.8%, 6.4% and 5.8% respectively.

Chromosome analysis

For the diagnosis of 9p trisomy, chromosome analysis using GTG-banding was performed according to standard procedures [22]. A total of 20 metaphases from stimulated peripheral blood cultures were analysed. Karyotypes were described according to the International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature [23].

Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions using a locus specific probe LSI 9p21, a subtelomeric (ST) probe for the short arm of chromosome 9 and a chromosome enumeration probe (CEP) 9 (Abbott Molecular/Vysis, USA).

When possible, CGH array analysis was performed using the Agilent Human Genome CGH Microarray Kit 44 K (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, California, USA). This platform is a high-resolution oligonucleotide-based microarray with a resolution of approximately 150 kb. Labelling and hybridisation were performed following the protocols provided by Agilent: 500 ng of purified DNA from the patient and 500 ng of control purified DNA of the same sex (Agilent) were double digested with RsaI and AluI enzymes (Agilent) for 2 h at 37°C, which resulted in products between 200 bp and 500 bp in length. Each digested sample was labelled for 2 h, minimising light exposure, using the Agilent Genomic DNA Labeling Kit, using Cy5-dUTP for the patient DNA and Cy3-dUTP for the reference DNA. Labelled products were column purified (Agilent) and prepared by combining the test and control samples according to the Agilent protocol. After probe denaturation and pre-annealing with 50 μg of human Cot-1 DNA (Invitrogen), hybridisation was performed at 65°C for 24 h in a rotating oven at 20 rpm. After two washing steps, the array slide was scanned with the Agilent C Scanner. The spot intensities were measured, and the image files were quantified using the Agilent Feature Extraction 10.5 software. Text outputs from the quantitative analyses were imported into Genomic Workbench Standard Edition 5.0 software (Agilent Technologies). Breakpoint positions were reported according to Hg 18, build 36 [24, 25].

Results

The main characteristics of our study are reported in Tables 1 and 2. Three patients were followed-up from the age of 9p trisomy diagnosis until their final or near final height (FH). One patient was followed-up for two years after the GHD diagnosis.
Table 1

General, auxological and endocrinological characteristics of our patients

Main characteristics

Case 1

Case 2

Case 3

Case 4

Sex (Female: Male)

F

F

M

F

Parental age, yrs^ (Mother: Father)

25:26

33:36

25:28

34:36

Target height, cm (SDS)

162.6 (0.1 SDS)

159 (-0.5 SDS).

166.8 (- 1.2 SDS)

159.5 (-0.5 SDS)

Gestation (weeks)

uncomplicated (41)

uncomplicated (40)

uncomplicated (40)

uncomplicated (39.4)

Birth-weight, gr (SDS)

2.650 (-2.4)

2.850 (-1.6)

3.140 (0.3 SDS)

2.370 (-1.6 SDS)

Birth-length, cm (SDS)

45 (-3.2)

46 (-2.4)

49 (-0.4 SDS)

45 (-2.4 SDS)

OFC, cm (SDS)

34 (-0.5)

-

33 (-1.1 SDS).

32 (-1.6 SDS)

Neuromotor development

Delayed

Moderately delayed

Delayed

Delayed

9p trisomy diagnosis

At birth

7 months

3 years 9 months

2 years 2 months

Chromosomal study

47,XX, t (9; 14) (q12; p11.1), +der (9)t(9;14) (q12; p11.1) [24]

46,XX,-9, dup (9) (p12; p22) [24]

46,XY, der (22)t(9;22)(p21; p12). [24]

46,XX, dup(9)(p24.3-p13.3)

Postnatal growth delay

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

GH stimulation tests (type)*

(C) - (A)

(A) - (C)

(GA) - (C)

(C) - (GA)

 

Basal GH level (ng/mL)

0.9 - 1.3

1.7 - 0.2

0.7 - 1.1

0.4 - 0.5

 

Peak GH level (ng/mL)

7.0 - 7.4

5.0 – 13.0

6.3 – 4.3

9.6 – 8.8

GH axis dysfunction type

GHD

GHNSD

GHD

GHD

GH treatment (Y:N)

Yes

Yes

No

No

Puberty onset, B2 or G2 (yrs)

11.2

14.5

14.8

-

 

B3 or G3

11.9

15.6

16.2

-

 

B4 or G4

12.9

16.9

17.5

-

Final height, cm (SDS)

156.9 (-0.9 SDS).

154.4 (-1.3 SDS)

157.5 (-2.6 SDS)

-

OFC: Occipito-Frontal head Circumference; GH: Growth Hormone; GHD: Growth Hormone Deficiency; GHNSD: Growth Hormone Neurosecretory Dysfunction.

* (A) = arginine; (C) = clonidine; (GA) = GHRH + arginine; ^At conception.

Table 2

Comparison of our patients’ phenotypes with those reported in the literature

Phenotype

Literature (%)

Case 1

Case 2

Case 3

Case 4

Downturned oral commissures

95%

+

+

+

+

Bulbous nose

95%

+

+

+

+

Malformed/low-set ears

70-80%

+

+

+

+

Strabismus

70-80%

  

+

-

Short philtrum

70-80%

+

+

+

+

Hypertelorism

70-80%

+

+

+

-

Microcephaly

70-75%

-

-

+

-

Brachycephaly

70-75%

+

+

+

-

Cleft lip/palate

5%

-

-

-

-

Enophthalmos

60-70%

+

-

-

-

Ogival palate

60-70%

ND

+

+

-

Down-slanting palpebral fissures

60-70%

+

+

+

+

Growth retardation

99%

+

+

+

+

Delayed skeletal maturation

99%

+

+

+

+

Delayed puberty

70-90%

-

+

+

ND

Low birthweight

50-70%

+

+

-

-

Clinodactyly

90%

+

+

+

+

Brachydactyly

90%

+

+

+

-

Nail hypoplasia

70-75%

+

-

+

+

Lordosis

60%

+

+

-

-

Kyphoscoliosis

60%

+

+

+

-

Short neck

60-70%

+

-

+

-

Single palmar crease

80-95%

+

+

+

-

Single crease of the fifth finger

30-50%

+

+

+

-

Mental retardation

60%

+

+

+

+

Language delay

90%

+

+

+

+

Hypotonia

60-70%

+

+

+

-

Agenesis/hypoplasia of the corpus callosum

< 30%

agenesis

hypogenesis

agenesis

ND

Epilepsy

< 30%

-

+

-

-

Ventriculomegaly

< 30%

+

-

-

-

Cerebral hypoplasia

< 30%

-

-

-

-

Cardiac anomalies

20%

-

 

-

-

Umbilical hernia

rare

-

 

-

-

Other signs

-

 

spondylolisthesis

urogenital anomalies

 

ND: not determined.

The family history was unremarkable for all of the subjects in this study. Three patients were only children of healthy non-consanguineous Italian parents. One female, the second child, had an older sister with coeliac disease. None of the parents had short stature or a positive history for pubertal delay, except for the mother of patient 1, whose menarche was at the age of 14. The target height was normal in all families, ranging from 0.1 SDS and -1.2 SDS.

There was no apparent parental age effect (Table 1). All patients were born at term following uncomplicated gestations. The patients had a low birth-weight (from -1.2 to -2.4 SDS), birth length (from -1.1 to -3.2 SDS), and head circumference (from -0.5 to -1.6 SDS).

The facial gestalt in our 9p trisomy syndrome was striking. Typically, all patients showed significant craniofacial characteristics, such as brachycephaly, hypertelorism, down-slanting palpebral fissures, a prominent nose with a globous tip, a wide philtrum, large low-set ears, and a short and broad neck (Figure 1). In addition, two patients experienced frequent infections of the upper airways, bronchitis, and bronchiolitis. Three patients exhibited kyphoscoliosis; of these patients, one also exhibited spondylolisthesis.
Figure 1

Some typical facial dysmorphisms of trisomy 9p syndrome. AP of case 1 at 7 years of age. The patient showed facial dysmorphisms typical of trisomy 9p syndrome, such as brachycephaly, hypertelorism, down-slanting palpebral fissures, broad prominent nose, and large low-set ears.

At the first evaluation, auxological data showed that all patients presented with substantial growth retardation at the time of 9p trisomy diagnosis for height (from -3.0 to -3.8 SDS), whereas the BMI was in the normal range (from 0.0 to -0.9 SDS). At the time of diagnosis, bone age, determined by Greulich and Pyle’s method, was always considerably delayed (from – 1 years at 2 years and 4 months, to -2 yrs 8 months at 5 years 6 months).

Endocrine evaluation revealed normal thyroid function, TSH and cortisol level. However, tTG was negative in all patients. Growth hormone stimulation tests revealed a classic GHD in patients 1, 3, and 4. In contrast, patient 2 was determined to have a GHNSD (Table 1). The plasma concentrations of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were low in all patients for their ages and sexes (from -2.0 to -3.4 SDS, and from -1.9 to -2.8 SDS, respectively). Patients 3 and 4 were not treated with rhGH as a result of their family’s decisions. None of the patients showed multiple pituitary hormone insufficiencies.

The MRI disclosed agenesis of the corpus callosum in patients 1 and 3, whereas patient 2 showed hypoplasia of the corpus callosum (Table 2). All patients showed normal hypophysis with respect to size and structure.

The auxological follow-up showed that all rhGH-treated patients (0.22 mg/kg per week subcutaneously) had a very good response to the GH therapy (Figure 2a and b), with an SDS-GV that increased remarkably during therapy, whereas patients 3 and 4 did not experience significant catch-up growth (Figure 2c and d). As expected, in rhGH-treated patients IGF-I (SDS) increased significantly after 12 and 24 months of treatment (1.1 ± 0.8 and 1.3 ± 1.1, respectively; P < 0.001).
Figure 2

Growth charts of the four patients. A) case 1, B) case 2, C) case 3, and D) case 4. The arrow indicates the age of onset of growth hormone treatment.

During the rhGH treatment, one patient exhibited a worsening of scoliosis, which however required only a medical treatment, whereas the degree of scoliosis was not changed in another rhGH treated patient or in a rhGH untreated patient.

Pubertal onset was always delayed, except in the patient 1 (Table 1), possibly due to a different age of the start of rhGH treatment. The hormonal pattern of the hypophysis-ovary axis was normal in the three patients who were evaluated. Endocrine evaluation at the age of onset of puberty revealed a pubertal response of gonadotropins in all patients, with normal estradiol or testosterone levels. The follow-up analysis of pubertal development was also normal in these patients. During follow-up, estradiol or testosterone levels were in accordance to the pubertal stages.

The final height was consistent with the target height for those patients who started rhGH treatment; however, patient 3 had a final height that was considerably lower than the target height. The extents of the height response and recovery appeared to be related to the earlier age of start of the rhGH treatment.

Finally, in all patients, diagnoses were made based on chromosomal studies. Array-CGH analysis was conducted only for patient 4 and demonstrated a large duplication of near 34 Mb del 9p24.3-p13.3 (Figure 3). The other three families refused the array-CGH analysis [26].
Figure 3

Molecular karyotyping was performed by array-CGH on the proband’s DNA using an Agilent 44 K array platform with a resolution of approximately 100 kb. Based on the physical mapping positions of the March 2006 Assembly (NCBI36/hg18) of the UCSC Genome Browser, this analysis showed a duplication of approximately 34 Mb that involved the 9p24.3-p13.3 region, with the breakpoint falling between 601,628 bp (first duplicated oligomer) and 34,638,095 bp (last duplicated oligomer).

Discussion

Since the first description of trisomy 9p in 1970, there has been a rapidly increasing recognition and reporting of new cases [3, 5]. In these patients, the spectrum of physical features is remarkably consistent, despite the varying sizes of the duplicated segments [27]. However, growth and endocrine function in patients with 9p trisomy syndrome have been scarcely evaluated [5, 13].

Our data confirm that delays in growth and development can be important features in many patients with 9p trisomy [1; 27]. Nevertheless, our study showed that growth abnormalities might imply a growth deficiency of both postnatal [27], and prenatal onset.

Our data further confirm that bone maturation was significantly delayed in all patients [27] and that many of them may continue to grow up to the age of 20 and thus may partially catch up, even if their adult height may be reduced in comparison with their target height, as was the case in patient 3, who was not treated with hrGH [28].

Interestingly, our data show that this syndrome may be associated with neurological abnormalities, such as hypogenesis or agenesis of the corpus callosum [1]. In fact, in two of our patients, we observed agenesis and hypogenesis of the corpus callosum, congenital midline cerebral abnormalities that are frequently observed together with a GH deficiency or other disorders of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis [2931]. Observations of brain malformations in these patients indicate that a brain MRI should be routinely considered in subjects with this disorder [1].

Our study strongly suggests that an impairment of the GH – IGF-I axis appears to be another possible feature of the trisomy 9p syndrome, and these patients should be tested for GH secretion, particularly patients with trisomy 9p syndrome with growth delay and midline cerebral malformations.

The response to GH treatment was good in patients 1 and 2; patient 2 exhibited a normal response to the GH stimulus tests and a neurosecretory pattern at the borderline of normality. So, GH treatment could also be considered to ameliorate the stature prognosis in patients with trisomy 9p and borderline values for the GH dynamic tests. Nevertheless, further studies will have to confirm the characteristics of the GH-IGF-I axis in patients with trisomy 9p syndrome.

Our study also confirms that patients with trisomy 9p syndrome show a delayed onset of puberty. In these patients, gonadotropin, thyroid and adrenal function appear to be normal. The cause of this disorder is not clear: it could be a peculiarity of the trisomy 9p syndrome, but it may also be attributable to the important delay in bone age, as evidenced in patients 2 and 3. Patient 1 had normal pubertal development, which is likely due to the precocious GH treatment, which normalised the bone age/chronological age ratio. In fact, a delayed onset of puberty, in the absence of gonadotropin deficiency, is a possible symptom in late-diagnosed cases of GH deficiency [32]. Therefore, an undiagnosed GH deficiency may partially explain the pubertal delay in these patients.

Patients with trisomy 9p syndrome also show common skeletal abnormalities, particularly scoliosis [10, 11], which usually develops during the second decade [27]. GH treatment has been described as a factor that increases the risk of the progression of scoliosis [33], even if the results of other studies do not permit one to conclude that a relation exists between GH treatment and scoliotic progression [34]. Therefore, children at risk for scoliosis require close monitoring during GH therapy [35], as our patients 2 and 3 (who had scoliosis and vertebral schisis). A worsening of scoliosis in response to GH treatment was especially apparent in patient 2; however, this patient was not required the stop GH treatment. Thus, patients with 9p trisomy and GH deficiency should also be carefully evaluated for this problem.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our study shows that GH deficiency or GHND may be diagnosed frequently, and an impairment of the GH-IGF-I axis may be another feature of patients affected by trisomy 9p syndrome, suggesting a possible cause of their growth and puberty delays. In our rhGH-treated patients, this therapy turned out to be effective. However, further studies are necessary to evaluate growth and puberty patterns in this syndrome.

The parents of the patients provided written informed consent for publication of individual clinical details.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Health’s Sciences, Paediatric Endocrinology Unit, University of Florence, Anna Meyer Children’s University Hospital
(2)
Genetics and Molecular Medicine Unit, Anna Meyer Children’s University Hospital
(3)
Department of Paediatrics, University of Chieti

References

  1. Temtamy SA, Kamel AK, Ismail S, Helmy NA, Aglan MS, El Gammal M, El Ruby M, Mohamed AM: Phenotypic and cytogenetic spectrum of 9p trisomy. Genet Couns. 2007, 18: 29-48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Rethoré MO, Larget-Piet L, Abonyi D, Boeswillwald M, Berger R, Carpentier S, Cruveiller J, Dutrillau B, Lafourcade J, Penneau M, Lejeune J: Sur quatre cas de trisomie pour le bras court du chromosome 9: individualisation d’une nouvelle entite morbide. Ann Genet. 1970, 13: 217-232.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Huret JL, Leonard C, Forestier B, Rethore MO, Lejeune J: Eleven new cases of del(9p) and features from 80 cases. J Med Genet. 1988, 25: 741-749. 10.1136/jmg.25.11.741.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Seghezzi L, Maraschio P, Bozzola M, Maserati E, Tupler R, Marchi A, Tiepolo L: Ring chromosome 9 with a 9p22.3-p24.3 duplication. Eur J Pediatr. 1999, 158: 791-793. 10.1007/s004310051206.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Schinzel A: Catalogue of unbalanced chromosome aberrations in man. 2001, New York: W de Gruyter Berlin, 2Google Scholar
  6. Morrissette JJ, Laufer-Cahana A, Medne L, Russell KL, Venditti CP, Kline R, Zackai EH, Spinner NB: Patient with trisomy 9p and a hypoplastic left heart with a tricentric chromosome 9. Am J Med Genet. 2003, 123A: 279-284. 10.1002/ajmg.a.20293.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Nakagawa M, Kato H, Aotani H, Kondo M: Ebstein’s anomaly associated with trisomy 9p. Clin Genet. 1999, 55: 383-385.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Federico A, Tomasetti P, Zollino M, Diomedi M, Dotti MT, De Stefano N, Gualdi GF, Neri G, Gigli GL: Association of trisomy 9p and band heterotopia. Neurology. 1999, 53: 430-432. 10.1212/WNL.53.2.430.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Stern JM: The epilepsy of trisomy 9p. Neurology. 1996, 47: 821-824. 10.1212/WNL.47.3.821.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Schinzel A: Trisomy 9p, a chromosome aberration with distinct radiologic findings. Radiology. 1979, 130: 125-133.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Wilson GN, Raj A, Baker D: The phenotypic and cytogenetic spectrum of partial trisomy 9. Am J Med Genet. 1985, 20: 277-282. 10.1002/ajmg.1320200211.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Haddad BR, Lin AE, Wyandt H, Milunsky A: Molecular cytogenetic characterisation of the first familial case of partial 9p duplication (p22p24). J Med Genet. 1996, 33: 1045-1047. 10.1136/jmg.33.12.1045.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Fujita H, Shimazaki M, Takeuchi T, Hayakawa Y, Oura T: 47,+(9q-) in unrelated three children with plasma growth hormone deficiency. Hum Genet. 1976, 31: 271-282. 10.1007/BF00270857.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cacciari E, Milani S, Balsamo A, Spada E, Bona G, Cavallo L: Italian cross-sectional growth charts for height, weight and BMI (2 to 20 yr). J Endocrinol Invest. 2006, 29: 581-593.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Stagi S, Galli L, Cecchi C, Chiappini E, Losi S, Gattinara CG, Gabiano C, Tovo PA, Bernardi S, Chiarelli F, de Martino M: Final height in patients perinatally infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. Horm Res Paediatr. 2010, 74: 165-171. 10.1159/000281018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bercu BB, Shulman D, Root AW, Spiliotis BE: Growth hormone (GH) provocative testing frequently does not reflect endogenous GH secretion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1986, 63: 709-716. 10.1210/jcem-63-3-709.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ghizzoni L, Mastorakos G, Vottero A, Ziveri M, Ilias I, Bernasconi S: Spontaneous growth hormone (GH) secretion is not directly affected by ghrelin in either short normal prepubertal children or children with GH neurosecretory dysfunction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004, 89: 5488-5495. 10.1210/jc.2004-0225.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH: Clinical longitudinal standards for height, weight, height velocity, weight velocity, and stages of puberty. Arch Dis Child. 1976, 51: 170-179. 10.1136/adc.51.3.170.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Greulich WW, Pyle SI: Radiographic Atlas of Skeletal Development of the Hand and Wrist. 1959, Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
  20. Bayley N, Pinneau SR: Tables for predicting adult height from skeletal age: revised for use with the Greulich-Pyle hand standards. J Pediatr. 1952, 40: 423-441. 10.1016/S0022-3476(52)80205-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hermanussen M, Cole J: The calculation of target height reconsidered. Horm Res. 2003, 59: 180-183. 10.1159/000069321.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Claussen U, Michel S, Mühlig P, Westermann M, Grummt UW, Kromeyer-Hauschild K, Liehr T: Demystifying chromosome preparation and the implications for the concept of chromosome condensation during mitosis. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2002, 98: 136-146. 10.1159/000069817.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Shaffer L, Slovak M, Cambell L, ISCN: An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. 2009, Basel: KargerGoogle Scholar
  24. Bussani Mastellone C, Giovannucci Uzielli ML, Guarducci S, Nathan G: Four cases of trisomy 9p syndrome with particular chromosome rearrangements. Ann Genet. 1991, 34: 115-119.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, Clark S, Poole I, Kowbel D, Collins C, Kuo WL, Chen C, Zhai Y, Dairkee SH, Ljung BM, Gray JW, Albertson DG: High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat Genet. 1998, 20: 207-211. 10.1038/2524.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Shaffer LG, Bejjani BA: Medical applications of array CGH and the transformation of clinical cytogenetics. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2006, 115: 303-309. 10.1159/000095928.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hacihanefioğlu S, Güven GS, Deviren A, Silahtaroğlu AN, Yosunvkaya Fenerci E, Ozkiliç A, Yüksel A: Trisomy 9p syndrome in two brothers: with new clinical findings and review of the literature. Genet Couns. 2002, 13: 41-48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gustavson KH, Wahlström J: Trisomy 9p syndrome and XYY syndrome in siblings. Clin Genet. 1977, 11: 67-72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mehta A, Hindmarsh PC, Mehta H, Turton JP, Russell-Eggitt I, Taylor D, Chong WK, Dattani MT: Congenital hypopituitarism: clinical, molecular and neuroradiological correlates. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009, 71: 376-382. 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03572.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Haeusler G, Frisch H, Guchev Z, Hadziselimovic F, Neuhold A, Vormittag W: Hypoplasia of the corpus callosum and growth hormone deficiency in the XXXXY syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1992, 44: 230-232. 10.1002/ajmg.1320440221.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Cameron FJ, Khadilkar VV, Stanhope R: Pituitary dysfunction, morbidity and mortality with congenital midline malformation of the cerebrum. Eur J Pediatr. 1999, 158: 97-102. 10.1007/s004310051026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Rappaport R, Czernichow P: Disorders of growth and prolactin secretion. Pediatric Endocrinology. Physiology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Aspects. Edited by: Bertrand J, Rappaport R, Sizonenko PC. 1993, Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 220-Google Scholar
  33. Wang ED, Drummond DS, Dormans JP, Moshang T, Davidson RS, Gruccio D: Scoliosis in patients treated with growth hormone. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997, 17: 708-711.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Vidil A, Journeau P, Soulie A, Padovani JP, Pouliquen JC: Evolution of scoliosis in six children treated with growth hormone. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2001, 10: 197-200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Clayton PE, Cowell CT: Safety issues in children and adolescents during growth hormone therapy–a review. Growth Horm IGF Res. 2000, 10: 306-317. 10.1054/ghir.2000.0175.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6823/14/3/prepub

Copyright

© Stagi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement