Skip to main content
Download PDF

Prevalence of diabetes mellitus among non institutionalized elderly in Monastir City

BMC Endocrine Disorders volume 12, Article number: 15 (2012) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Diabetes is a major public health problem worldwide. This problem is particularly relevant to the elderly. The prevalence of each condition increase with age. The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) among elderly; we also examined socio-economic factors and life style that are likely to be associated with DM.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2008–2009, and used a multistage cluster sampling method to select a representative sample among non institutionalized elderly in Monastir City. A total of 598 elderly aged 65 to 95 years were included.

Results

The prevalence of DM was 27.4% (29.2% in males’ vs 26.5% in females). Elderly with DM showed higher prevalence of hypertension, obesity and abdominal obesity. DM prevalence decreased with advancing ages in both men and women. Urban residents had a higher prevalence than did their rural counterparts. In multivariate analysis, DM was associated with abdominal obesity (OR [95% CI], 2.6 [1.1-6]; p <0.01), co-existing diseases (3.8 [2.4-6]; p <0.01), and hypertension (2.7 [1.6-4.5] ; p <0.01).

Conclusion

The study highlights the DM problem in Tunisia. An ageing population together with social, economic and lifestyle changes have led to a dramatic increase in DM. These data emphasize the urgent need for a comprehensive integrated population-based intervention program to ameliorate the growing problem of DM.

Peer Review reports

Background

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major public health problem which can cause serious complications, it’s amongst the five leading causes of death worldwide [1, 2]. This problem is particularly relevant to the elderly. The prevalence of each condition increase with age. But the characteristic of the epidemiology of DM is the variability in the prevalence among different populations, especially in the elderly population. Previous surveys from Mediterranean older populations suggested that DM is present in epidemic proportions throughout the region as in Italy of 22.8% [3], in Crete of 27% [4], in Athens metropolitan region of 25.4% among males compared to 31% among females [5] and in Cyprus of 26% among males compared to 18% among females [6].

In Tunisia, despite an aging population, only a limited and fewer Tunisian studies have focused exclusively on the elderly. Tunisia is a country in transition. The elderly population aged more than 60 years has been rapidly increasing, from 5.5% in 1966 to 9.3% in 2004 of the country’s estimated population of 9910872 inhabitants. This percentage is expected to rise to almost 20% by the year 2040 [7]. Life expectancy at birth was 72.1 years in 2005, a figure that is envisaged to rise to 75.5 years in 2014 and nearly 77 years in 2029. However, the vast social and economic developments in Tunisia since 1956 have led to cultural changes including unhealthier eating habits, decreased physical activity and manifestation of a wide range of no communicable diseases [8]. DM is one of the most prevalent conditions (9% in the year 2005), and has become a health challenge in Tunisia [9]. According to World Health Organization’s, DM is one of the top continuing risk factors for cardiovascular disease in the world [2]. DM is one of the major contributors of metabolic syndrome due to its pathophysiological link to other cardiovascular risks, such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, unhealthier diet, sedentarity lifestyles and smoking habits [10].

The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of DM among elderly aged 65 years and older. We also examined socio-economic factors and life style that are likely to be associated with DM.

Methods

Study area and population

Monastir is a governorate located in the center ouest of Tunisia, 165 km from Tunis and includes 13 delegations. Monastir is a typical Mediterranean region with a total population of about 494900 inhabitants. The study was conducted in collaboration with World Health Organisation and the United Nations Population Fund. The data collection conducted between December 2008 and February 2009. The protocol for the study was approved by ethics committee of the University Hospital of Monastir and Ministry of health and all participants provided written informed consent. The present study is a part of the study undertaken in Monastir City to investigate social, health behaviours and health status of people aged more than 65 years and living in their home. The sampling methods were detailed elsewhere [11]. Briefly, Sample design was a representative cross sectional community-based study, using multistage, stratified, cluster sampling. The sampling scheme was designed by the National Institute of Statistics; stratification was made according to the 13 delegations and urban/rural environments. First we identified the districts, then we selected randomly a cluster of household with a probability of select proportional to the size of this population and all individuals aged more than 65 years were recruited into the sample. A total of 598 people aged more than 65 years living in their home in Monastir City were included in the analysis. Prior to screening, the participants were informed about the need of the study to maximise response rates. Twenty two persons selected refused to participate in the study given a non response rate of 3.7%. To facilitate data collection three medical doctors were recruited and trained on the study methodology. The questionnaire was developed, translated from French into Arab then pre-tested and validated in a pilot study by the National Institute of Public Health. The exclusion criteria were individuals aged less than 65 years and elderly present the day of the visit in the surveyed household found to be a visitor or do not usually leave there.

Subject evaluation

Socio-demographic data (age, sex, marital and educational status). Information on habits (smoking, physical activity, activity of daily living), health status of elderly person were obtained via home-based personal interview. The structured questionnaire was followed by a physical examination to measure blood pressure, anthropometric variables and capillary glycemia (CG). DM was defined as those using medication for treatment of DM during the previous two week and who had previously informed by a medical doctor that they had DM [12]. Arterial hypertension was defined based on the JNC-7 cut-off point of 140 mmHg and above for systolic blood pressure and/or 90 mmHg and above for diastolic blood pressure [13], or using antihypertensive drug therapy in the previous 2 weeks. Body weight and height were directly measured using standard technique [14], Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated as weight (in kilograms) divided by squared height (in meters squared). Participants were categorized according World Health Organization criteria, as normal (< 25 kg/m2), overweight (25–29.9 kg/ m2) and obese (≥ 30 kg/m2). Waist Circumference (WC) was measured with the tape midway between the lowermost rib margin and the iliac crest. Abdominal obesity was defined by a WC greater than 102 cm for men and greater than 88 cm for women [14]. CG was measured with a glucometer (Accu-Check) in a blood sample obtained from the fingertip. Participants were classified into two groups based on CG normal: CG <11.1 mmol/L or elevated with a CG concentration ≥11.1 mmol/L at screening [2, 15]. CG greater or equal to 11.1 mmol/L was used for predicting undiagnosed diabetes in which diabetes was not diagnosed. Smokers were defined as those who were smoking at least one cigarette per day during the past year or not. Physical activity was defined as walking for at least 1 h per day or not. The diagnosis of dependency in Activity of Daily Living was made according to Katz scale and classified individuals as follows: a score of 6 points indicates full function, a score of 4 or 5 as moderate impairment and a score ≤ 3 indicates severe functional impairment [16]. Hospital admission over the year immediately preceding the survey was defined as a dichotomous variable: ≥one hospital admission in previous year or <1. Polypharmacy was defined as the use of three or more drugs recorded according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system [17]. We set the cut-off at three or more different drugs, because it is one of the most frequently used. Pills containing a fixed association of two active substances were counted as only one drug. Co-morbidities were defined as coexisting three or more chronic diseases.

Statistical analysis

The data were extracted from “Epi data” and imported to SPSS 13 statistical software packages (SPSS Inc; http://www.spss.com). Results are expressed for continuous variables as mean ± standard deviation (M ± SD) and for qualitative variables as frequencies. Student t test or the Mann–Whitney U-test was used to estimate differences between mean values. Comparison of frequencies was performed by chi-squared test with the Yates correction when needed. Multiple logistic regression were used to examine the association between DM as a dependent variable and age, gender, hypertension, abdominal obesity, education, place of residence and co-morbidities as independent variables (a probability value of p <0.05 was considered statistically significant).

Results

Study sample characteristics

A total of 598 individuals (202 men and 396 women aged more than 65 years participated in the study. The mean age was 72.3 ± 7.4 years (range 65–95 years).

According to BMI 19.9% were normal, 31.1% were overweight and 49% were obese; according to WC cut-off points 73.2% had abdominal obesity.

Prevalence of diabetes mellitus

DM prevalence was 27.4% (164/598). The prevalence was not different between men (29.2%, 59/202) and women (26.5%, 105/396). DM prevalence decreased with advancing ages in both men and women. Diabetic persons are younger than non diabetic persons (71.2 ± 6.9 vs 72.6 ± 7.2 years, p = 0.04). Urban residents had a higher prevalence than did their rural counterparts. The prevalence of DM rose with in increase in educational level in both men and women, but the difference was not significant. The prevalence was not different between married and single (29.8% vs 22.2% for men) and (27.4% vs 25.7% for women), Table 1.

Table 1 Prevalence of diabetes mellitus among women and men according to socio-demographic characteristics
Full size table

Associations between DM and risk factors are presented in Table 2. Men and women with higher BMI and abdominal obesity had a higher prevalence of DM. The BMI and WC were significantly higher in diabetic participants than in non diabetic subjects (32.4 ± 7 vs 29.4 ± 6 kg/m2, p <0.001; 107.7 ± 12 vs 101 ± 12 cm, p <0.001, respectively). Table 2 showed a strong association between hypertension and DM. Men and women with hypertension had a higher prevalence of DM. The physical activity, dependency and smoking status (results not showing) of the interviewees did not present any association with DM. Glycemic control was higher in diabetic participants, CG ≥11.1 mmol/L was present in 52% of the individuals with DM and 5.5% of non diabetic participants, p <0.0001. Of those who are non diabetic, 5.5% (24/434) had a CG ≥11.1 mmol/l. In both sexes, the prevalence of DM increased progressively with the number of drugs used and coexisting illnesses. However, the number of hospital admission in preceding year is positively but not significantly associated with DM (Table 2).

Table 2 Prevalence of diabetes mellitus among women and men according to cardiac risk factors and lifestyle in participants
Full size table

In multivariate analysis, DM was associated with abdominal obesity (OR [95% CI], 2.6[1.1-6]; p <0.01), co-morbidities (3.8 [2.4-6]; p <0.01), and hypertension (2.7 [1.6-4.5]; p <0.01) (Table 3).

Table 3 Logistic regression models of predictors of awareness of DM among adults aged 65 and older in Monastir City (n = 531)
Full size table

Discussion

The data obtained from this community based study report an overall prevalence of DM of 27.4% (164/598) in Monastir City. Clearly, a substantially higher prevalence than that has been reported by previous study for Tunisia [18, 19]. Compared to other surveys that used WHO diagnostic criteria, prevalence of DM in elderly living in their home in Monastir City is higher than in Thailand [20], Nepal [21], Greece [22], Spain [23], French [24], and Canadian [25], lower than in Egypt [26], in Saudi Arabia [27], United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Oman [28], India and Singapore [29, 30], and similar to that in US [31], and Mayotte [32]. The observed increase in DM prevalence obtained from our study is likely to be explained by several factors. First, our subjects are selected in older age group (more than 65 years), as it is well known that diabetes prevalence increases with age [2]. Second, another possible reason is the fact that risk factors for developing DM are also increasing in Tunisia, particularly, obesity and sedentary life with lack of physical activity [8]. Third, the diagnosis of DM obtained from our study, was based on the new criteria endorsed by the ADA and adopted by WHO in 1998 [33]. The possible other causes to explain higher prevalence of DM in the centre region is probably urbanization (more than 80% individuals live in urban areas) with less physical activity and higher rates of obesity. The data obtained from our study indicate a rural/urban differences in prevalence with a higher prevalence of DM among Tunisian living in urban areas of 29.2% compared to rural Tunisian’s of 15.9% (p <0.001). Rural populations with more traditional lifestyles exhibit lower rates of DM risk factors and DM, whereas urban populations, and particularly those of a higher socioeconomic status, have a higher rate of both risk factors and DM. It is clear that various environmental and lifestyle factors can increase the likelihood that a genetically susceptible individual will develop diabetes in old age.

Furthermore, apparently, the reported figures from this study is alarming, demonstrating an epidemic of DM striking the Tunisian elderly population. Our study showed a higher prevalence of DM among males of 29.6% compared to 26.5% in females. DM prevalence increased with age, peaking among those less than 70 years of age and then decreasing. The age-and gender- specific prevalence of DM are relatively similar to those of several cohorts [26, 27, 34]. However the present study found that the DM prevalence declined after age 70 years. It is possible that the earlier onset of DM with a high prevalence and a high incidence of cardiovascular disease and myocardial infarction resulted in a greater premature mortality in diabetic individuals, and that this contributed to the decline in the prevalence of diabetes after 70 years of age in Tunisian subjects [11, 25]. It is no clear whether insulin clearance or genetic background played a role. The proportions (5.5%) predicting undiagnosed DM, were relatively lower than those of some developing countries [26, 27]. WHO currently recommends that diabetes be diagnosed by measuring venous fasting blood glucose [33], in this study, in view of its practical application, agility, rapidity and safety we used CG for identifying undiagnosed DM. The CG test is considered to be a convenient screening method in low resource communities. However the discriminatory capacity would like be improved by a second confirmatory venous blood glucose test [15, 35].

The DM prevalence increased in those with higher educational level in both women and men, but the difference was not significant, this is consistent with the findings from other developing countries [20], but is in contrast to the developed countries, where the prevalence was higher in those with a lower educational level [36]. Confirming the literature data, the study revealed that several cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, obesity and abdominal obesity are more common in diabetic than non diabetic subjects. Abdominal obesity and hypertension were the main predictors for DM, even after adjustment on potential confounding factors. The present study showed that 48% of male Tunisian with obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2), studied in this survey are diabetic demonstrating an association between higher rates of DM with obesity. This association was also evident among female subjects. The positive relationship between obesity and DM was well recognized [37–39]. It is well documented that obesity is a strong risk factor for the development of DM as shown by several studies [40, 41]. There is also an age related increase in obesity, particularly central obesity, and a reduction in physical activity, both of which can be associated with abnormal glucose metabolism. According to Diabetes Prevention Program, for every kilogram of weight loss, there was a 16% reduction in risk, adjusted for changes in diet and activity [42]. In fact, the Diabetes Prevention Program found that modifications of diet and activity were more effective in older people than in younger patients in preventing the development of DM. It is believed that obesity contributes to the development of DM by elevating levels of non esterified free fatty acids, hormones, adipocytokines, and other substances that increase insulin resistance. Obesity-related elevation in proinflammatory molecules, including tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 are also believed to contribute to the development of both DM and metabolic syndrome [43, 44]. The prevalence of overweight and obesity among patients with DM are both extremely high. Obesity or abdominal obesity is frequently associated with other cardiometabolic factors such as hypertension, lipid disorders. These factors may be clustered as metabolic syndrome, which is well known to seriously increase the cardiovascular risk [45, 46]. In the present study, those with diagnosed DM tended to have a higher prevalence of high blood pressure in both men and women. Individuals with DM had more concomitant cardiovascular risk. The rapid transition and changes of lifestyles involving dietary intake (high fat caloric dense food, low in complex carbohydrates, refined sugar and salt) and decreasing physical activity have take a place in the past 20 years in Tunisia. The urbanization had negative consequences on lifestyle aspects of Tunisians [8]. This suggests that there is a need to improve the awareness of health and use of regular activity and Mediterranean diet to prevent or reduce the cardiovascular risk. For those reasons, the promotion of healthier eating habits may protect elderly and contribute to improved health and quality of life. The Mediterranean diet is a healthy dietary pattern that has already shown its cardioprotective effects [47]. The Mediterranean diet is characterized by high consumption of monounsaturated fatty acids (Olive oil), and encourages daily consumption of fruits, vegetables, whole grain cereals with low animal-fat consumption. Recently, a meta-analysis, performed in 50 studies, with an overall incorporated population of approximately one-half million subjects, revealed the beneficial effect of the Mediterranean diet. The researchers showed that adherence to the Mediterranean diet have a positive effect on human health through the beneficial effect on abdominal obesity, lipids levels, glucose metabolism and blood pressure. Results indicate that adherence to Mediterranean diet may attenuate the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and, consequently the increasing burden of DM and cardiovascular diseases [48]. Pathophysiological mechanisms include antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of the functional foods included in the Mediterranean diet [48].

Physical activity is well recognized as cardiometabolic protect factor [6]. However, physical activity was not associated with DM in our study. This surprising finding may be explained by the small number of elderly who practice regular physical activity (less than 4%). Increasing numbers of diseases and drugs are associated with high prevalence of DM. The number of hospital admission in preceding year was also positively associated with DM. Elderly diabetic patients often require multiple medications to adequately and appropriately treat their diabetes and associated comorbidities. It is also, well documented that co-existing illnesses and take multiple drugs can adversely impact glucose metabolism [49].

It is important to acknowledge that estimation of the prevalence of DM in elderly population and formulation of effective treatments strategies is only the first step. It is clear that the magnitude of the problem of DM among the elderly poses a major economic challenge to health care systems. We believe that higher public health organization, health planners, clinicians and public health practitioners in developing countries must formulate a program targeting high risk group to implement a preventive strategy in modifying lifestyle by increasing physical activity, reducing obesity, adopting healthier eating habits and raising diabetic’s awareness of their disease to reduce morbidity and mortality [50].

Limitations

This study has some limitations. First, the use of self-report data to estimate the prevalence of diabetes is problematic, as it potentially undercounts those in whom diabetes has not been diagnosed and over-counts those wrongly said to have diabetes. Our estimates would therefore be conservative. Second, we did not perform plasma glucose measures tests, which are more sensitive than random capillary glycemia and thus would have resulted in a higher estimate of previously unrecognized diabetes. In addition, our epidemiological estimates of unawareness of diabetes states were based on a single measurement of CG, which may have led to overestimation and should be interpreted with caution. Another limitation of our study is related to the cut-off values used for the BMI, WC, which were established in studies mostly performed in Caucasian populations and, thus, may or may not be valid in Tunisian elderly population. The strengths of this study include its population-based sampling frame and the availability of clinical measurements, To our knowledge, this is the first study in Tunisian population to report the prevalence of DM and risk factors among adults 65 years and older. Such information may be helpful to health care decision makers.

Conclusions

DM is very common in elderly Tunisian subjects and is frequently associated with other cardiovascular risk factors, mainly obesity and hypertension. An ageing population together with social, economic and lifestyle changes have led to a dramatic increase in DM. These data emphasize the needs to inform the general public and health planner. There is an urgent need for a comprehensive integrated population-based intervention program to ameliorate the growing problem of DM. The above information suggests that lifestyle modifications might be of value in the DM prevention in older people.

Abbreviations

DM:

Diabetes Mellitus

CG:

Capillary Glycemia

WC:

Waist Circumference

BMI:

Body Mass Index.

References

  1. King H, Aubert RE, Herman WH: Global burden of diabetes, 1995–2025: prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections. Diabetes Care. 1998, 21: 1414-1431. 10.2337/diacare.21.9.1414.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H: Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004, 27: 1047-1053. 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosso D, Campagna S, Di Stefano F, Romano G, Maugeri D, Maggi SMotta M, Catanzaro S, Carnazzo G: Prevalence of diabetes mellitus in a sample of the elderly population of the city of Catania. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 1998, 27: 223-235. 10.1016/S0167-4943(98)00114-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lionis C, Bathianaki M, Antonakis N, Papavasiliou S, Philalithis A: A high prevalence of diabetes mellitus in a municipality of rural Crete. Greece Diabet Med. 2001, 18: 768-769.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Panagiotakos DP, Pitsavos C, Chrysohoou C, Stefanadis C: The epidemiology of Type 2 diabetes mellitus in Greek adults: the ATTICA study. Diabet Med. 2005, 22: 1581-1588. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01731.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Panagiotakos DB, Polystipioti A, Polychronopoulos E: Prevalence of diabetes (type 2) and physical activity status in elderly men and women, from Cyprus (the MEDIS Study). Asia Pac J Pub Health. 2008, 19: 22-28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tunisian National Institute of Statistics: Information about population census. , Available at : http://www.ins.nat.tn

  8. Aounallah-Skhiri H, Traissac P, El Ati J, Eymard-Duvernay S, Landais E, Achour N, Delpeuch F, Ben Romdhane H, Maire B: Nutrition transition among adolescents of a south-Mediterranean country: dietary patterns, association with socio-economic factors, overweight and blood pressure. A cross-sectional study in Tunisia. Nutr J. 2011, 10: 38-10.1186/1475-2891-10-38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ben Romdhane H, Ben Ali S, Skhiri H, Traissac P, Bougatef S, Maire B, Delpeuch F, Achour N: Hypertension among Tunisian adults: results of the TAHINA project. Hypertens Res. 2011, 198:

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tyrovolas S, Zeimbekis A, Bountziouka V, Voutsa K, Pounis G, Papoutsou S, Metallinos G, Ladoukaki E, Polychronopoulos E, Lionis C, Panagiotakos DB: Factors associated with the prevalence of diabetes mellitus among elderly men and women living in Mediterranean Islands. The MEDIS study. Rev Diabet Stud. 2009, 6: 54-63. 10.1900/RDS.2009.6.54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hammami S, Mehri S, Hajem S, Koubaa N, Frih MA, Kammoun S, Hammami M, Betbout F: Awareness, treatment and control of hypertension among the elderly living in their home in Tunisia. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2011, 11: 6-10.1186/1471-2261-11-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. American Diabetes Association: Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2007, 30: S42-S47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL, Jones DW, Materson BJ, Oparil S, Wright JT, Roccella EJ, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Joint National Committee on Prevention Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee: The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003, 289: 2560-2572. 10.1001/jama.289.19.2560.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. WHO World Health Organization: Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. 1997, WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao X, Zhao W, Zhang H, Li J, Shu Y, Li S, Cai L, Zhou J, Li Y, Hu R: Fasting capillary blood glucose: an appropriate measurement in screening for diabetes and pre-diabetes in low-resource rural setting. J Endocrinol Invest. 2012, in press

    Google Scholar 

  16. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW: Studies of illness in the aged The index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA. 1963, 185: 94-99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. WHO: . 2010, http://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/ accessed January 18

  18. Kammoun M, Hajem S, Gueddana N, Achour N, Slimane H: Diabetes, hypertension, obesity in elderly study about 981 aged 65 years and over. Rev Geriatrie. 2006, 31: 477-486.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Laouani KC, Hamouda H, Ben Naceur MH, Ghannem H, Toumi S, Ajmi F: Hight blood pressure for people aged more than 60 years in the district of Sousse. Tunis Med. 2004, 82: 1001-1005.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Aekplakorn W, Abbott-Klafter J, Premgamone A, Dhanamun B, Chaikittiporn C, Chongsuvivatwong V, Suwanprapisa T, Chaipornsupaisan W, Tiptaradol S, Lim SS: Prevalence and management of diabetes and associated risk factors by regions of Thailand: Third National Health Examination Survey 2004. Diabetes Care. 2007, 30: 2007-2012. 10.2337/dc06-2319.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sharma SK, Ghimire A, Radhakrishnan J, Thapa L, Shrestha NR, Paudel N, Gurung K, R M , Budathoki A, Baral N, Brodie D: Prevalence of hypertension, obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome in Nepal. Int J Hypertens. 2011, 2011: 821971-

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Triantafyllou A, Douma S, Petidis K, Doumas M, Panagopoulou E, Pyrpasopoulou A, Tsotoulidis S, Zamboulis C: Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in an elderly population in Greece. Rural Rem Health. 2010, 10: 1225-

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rosado Martín J, Martínez López MA, Mantilla Morató T, Dujovne Kohan I, Palau Cuevas FJ, Torres Jiménez R, García Puig J, en representación del grupo MAPA; (RECAVA): Prevalence of diabetes in an adult population in the region of Madrid (Spain). The Madrid Cardiovascular Risk study. Gac Sanit. 2012, 26 (3): 243-250. 10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.09.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bourdel-Marchasson I, Helmer C, Barbeger-Gateau P, Peuchant E, Février B, Ritchie K, Dartigues JF: Characteristics of undiagnosed diabetes in communitydwelling French elderly: the 3 C study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007, 76: 257-264. 10.1016/j.diabres.2006.09.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rockwood K, Tan MH, Phillips S, Mcdowell I: Prevalence of diabetes mellitus in elderly people in Canada: report from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. Age Ageing. 1998, 27: 573-577. 10.1093/ageing/27.5.573.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Herman WH, Aubert RE, Ali MA, Sous ES, Badran A: Diabetes mellitus in Egypt: risk factors, prevalence and future burden. East Mediterr Health J. 1997, 3: 144-148.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Al-Nozha MM, Al-Maatouq MA, Al-Mazrou YY, Al-Harthi SS, Arafah MR, Khalil MZ, Khan NB, Al-Khadra A, Al-Marzouki K, Nouh MS, Abdullah M, Attas O, Al-Shahid MS, Al-Mobeireek A: Diabetes mellitus in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2004, 25: 1603-1610.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Al-Shookri A1, Khor GL2, Chan YM1, Loke SC1, Al-Maskari M: Type 2 diabetes in the sultanate of Oman. Mal J Nutr. 2011, 17: 129-141.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Qing Q, Hu J, Tuomilehto T, Nakagami T, Balkau B, Borch-Johnsen K, Ramachandran A, Mohan V, Iyer SR, Tominaga M, Kiyohara Y, Kato I, Okubo K, Nagai M, Shibazaki S, Yang Z, Tong Z, Fan Q, Wang B, Chew SK, Tan BY, Heng D, Emmanuel S, Tajima N, Iwamoto Y, Snehalatha C, Vijay V, Kapur A, Dong Y, Nan H, Gao W, Shi H, Fu F, DECODA Study Group: Age- and sex-specific prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose regulation in 11 Asian cohorts. Diabetes Care. 2003, 26: 1770-1780. 10.2337/diacare.26.6.1770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Porapakkham Y, Pattaraarchachai J, Aekplakorn W: Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension and diabetes mellitus among the elderly: the 2004 National Health Examination Survey III, Thailand. Singapore Med J. 2008, 49: 868-873.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Diabetes Statistics: . , American Diabetes Association, , Available at : http://www.diabetes.org

  32. Solet J-L, Baroux N, Pochet M, Benoit-Cattin T, De Montera A-M, Sissoko D, Favier F, Fagot-Campagna A: Prevalence of type 2 diabetes and other cardiovascular risk factors in Mayotte in 2008: The MAYDIA study. Diabe Met. 2011, 37: 201-207. 10.1016/j.diabet.2010.09.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ: Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabe Met. 1998, 15: 539-553. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199807)15:7<539::AID-DIA668>3.0.CO;2-S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lintott CJ, Hanger HC, Scott RS, Sainsbury R, Frampton C: Prevalence of diabetes mellitus in an ambulant elderly New Zealand population. Diabetes Res Clinl Pract. 1992, 16: 131-136. 10.1016/0168-8227(92)90084-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rush E, Crook N, Simmons D: Point-of-care testing as a tool for screening for diabetes and pre-diabetes. Diabet Med. 2008, 25: 1070-1075.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Barceló A, Peláez M, Rodriguez-Wong L, Pastor-Valero M: The prevalence of diagnosed diabetes among the elderly of seven cities in Latin America and the Caribbean: the health wellbeing and aging (SABE) Project. J Aging Health. 2006, 18: 224-239. 10.1177/0898264305285728.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Warsy AS, El-Hazmi MAF: Diabetes mellitus, hypertension and obesity-Common multi-factorial disorders in Saudis. East Mediterr Health J. 1999, 5: 1236-1242.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Franklin J, Thanavaro J, Ellis P: Body mass index as a guide for diagnosing prediabetes and diabetes. J Nurse Pract. 2011, 7: 634-640. 10.1016/j.nurpra.2011.03.032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Nemesure BWSY, Hennis A, Leske MC, BES Study Group for the BES Study Group: The relationship of Body Mass Index and waist-hip ratio on the 9-Year Incidence of diabetes and hypertension in a predominantly African-origin population. Ann Epidemiol. 2008, 18: 657-663. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.02.006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Foucan L, Hanley J, Deloumeaux J, Suissa S: Body Mass Index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) as screening tools for cardiovascular risk factors in Guadeloupean women. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002, 55: 990-996. 10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00430-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen KT, Chen CJ, Gregg EW, Engelgau MM, Narayan KM: Prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Taiwan: ethnic variation and risk factor. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2001, 51: 59-66. 10.1016/S0168-8227(00)00200-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hamman RF, Wing RR, Edelstein SL, Lachin JM, Bray GA, Delahanty L, Hoskin M, Kriska AM, Mayer-Davis EJ, Pi-Sunyer X, Regensteiner J, Venditti B, Wylie-Rosett J: Effect of weight loss with lifestyle intervention on risk of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006, 29: 2102-2107. 10.2337/dc06-0560.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Thompson AM, Zhang Y, Tong W, Xu T, Chen J, Zhao L, Kelly TN, Chen CS, Bazzano LA, He J: Association of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction with metabolic syndrome, prediabetes and diabetes in adults from Inner Mongolia, China. BMC Endocr Disord. 2011, 11: 11-16. 10.1186/1472-6823-11-11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Khaodhiar L, Cummings S, Apovian CM: Treating diabetes and prediabetes by focusing on obesity management. Curr Diab Rep. 2009, 9: 348-354. 10.1007/s11892-009-0055-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Isomaa B, Almgren P, Tuomi T, Forsén B, Lahti K, Nissén M, Taskinen MR, Groop L: Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2001, 24: 683-689. 10.2337/diacare.24.4.683.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. McDonald M, Hertz RP, Unger AN, Lustik MB: Prevalence, awareness, and management of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes among United States adults aged 65 and older. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009, 64: 256-263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Tyrovolas S, Polychronopoulos E: Lessons from studies in middle-aged and older adults living in mediterranean islands: the role of dietary habits and nutrition services. Cardiol Res Pract. 2011, 1: 901651-

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kastorini CM, Milionis HJ, Esposito K, Giugliano D, Goudevenos JA, Panagiotakos DB: The effect of Mediterranean Diet on Metabolic Syndrome and its components a meta-analysis of 50 studies and 534,906 individuals. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011, 57: 1299-1313. 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.073.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Munger MA: Polypharmacy and combination therapy in the management of hypertension in elderly patients with co-morbid diabetes mellitus. Drugs Aging. 2010, 27: 871-883. 10.2165/11538650-000000000-00000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Chockalingam A, Chalmers J, Lisheng L, Labarthe D, MacMahon S, Martin I, Whitworth J: Prevention of cardiovascular diseases in developing countries: agenda for action (statement from a WHO-ISH Meeting in Beijing, October 1999). J Hypertens. 2000, 18 (12): 1705-1708. 10.1097/00004872-200018120-00001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to the staff and participants of the Association of Elderly Protection in Monastir, especially her President Pr Noureddine Bouzouaia and Monsieur Tahar Bayoudh. We highly acknowledge the contribution by the participating doctors: Sondos Dimassi, Najeh Benamor and Nadia Hammami. The study was supported by grants from World Health Organisation (EMRO), additionally; the study has been supported by the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Tunisian section. The anonymous reviewers are also thanked for their excellent comments for an earlier draft of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Nutrition and Vascular Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia

    Sonia Hammami, Sounira Mehri, Nadia Koubaa & Mohamed Hammami

  2. Internal Medicine Department, University Hospital “F. Bourguiba”, Monastir, Tunisia

    Sonia Hammami

  3. National Institute of Public Health Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia

    Said Hajem

  4. Geriatric and Gerontology Unit, University of Ain Shams, Ain Shams, Egypt

    Hala Souid

Authors
  1. Sonia Hammami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sounira Mehri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Said Hajem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nadia Koubaa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hala Souid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mohamed Hammami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonia Hammami.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Authors’ contributions

SH contributed to the conception and design of this study, general supervision of the research group, interpretation of data, and drafting the manuscript. SM contributed to analysis and revising the article critically. SHa contributed to the conception and design of this study, analysis and interpretation of data. NK participated in the recruitment of study subjects and collection epidemiological data HS revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. MH revising the article critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hammami, S., Mehri, S., Hajem, S. et al. Prevalence of diabetes mellitus among non institutionalized elderly in Monastir City. BMC Endocr Disord 12, 15 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6823-12-15

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6823-12-15

Keywords

  • Diabetes
  • Elderly
  • Prevalence
  • Tunisia
  • Non institutionalized

BMC Endocrine Disorders

ISSN: 1472-6823

Contact us