From: Nutrient patterns and risk of diabetes mellitus type 2: a case-control study
Tertiles of nutrient patterns | P for trend | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | T2 | T3 | ||
Nutrient pattern 1 | ||||
Median score | -0.94 | -0.13 | 0.93 | |
T2D /control | 78 / 72 | 78 / 72 | 69 / 81 | |
Model 1* | 1.00 (Ref) | 1.00 (0.71–1.50) | 0.79 (0.51–1.20) | 0.412 |
Model 2† | 1.00 (Ref) | 0.93 (0.55–1.57) | 0.81 (0.49–1.41) | 0.218 |
Nutrient pattern 2 | ||||
Median score | -0.91 | -0.08 | 0.84 | |
T2D /control | 73 / 76 | 73 / 75 | 79 / 74 | |
Model 1* | 1.00 (Ref) | 1.00 (0.59–1.38) | 1.31 (0.89–1.92) | 0.287 |
Model 2† | 1.00 (Ref) | 0.91 (0.48–1.41) | 1.09 (0.54–1.67) | 0.850 |
Nutrient pattern 3 | ||||
Median score | -0.96 | -0.13 | 0.99 | |
T2D /control | 75 / 75 | 84 / 77 | 66 / 73 | |
Model 1* | 1.00 (Ref) | 1.12 (0.81–1.61) | 0.94 (0.61–1.34) | 0.387 |
Model 2† | 1.00 (Ref) | 0.87 (0.50–1.49) | 0.52 (0.30–0.89) | 0.039 |