Skip to main content

Table 3 Effect on sex hormones

From: Effects of GLP1RAs on pregnancy rate and menstrual cyclicity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Study Group

No. of Studies/subgroups

Heterogeneity

Effects Estimate(95% CI)

P Value

TT (SMD)

10

P < 0.001, I2 = 77.3%

-0.39 (-0.78, -0.002)

P = 0.049

 GLP1RA + MET vs MET

3

P = 0.008, I2 = 79.4%

-0.63 (-1.81, 0.55)

P = 0.293

 GLP1RA vs MET

7

P = 0.009, I2 = 65%

-0.15 (-0.53, 0.24)

P = 0.465

 GLP1RA vs Placebo

2

P = 0.001, I2 = 90.2%

-1.02 (-2.27, -0.23)

P = 0.110

fT(SMD)

5

P = 0.102, I2 = 45.5%

-0.16 (-0.59, 0.27)

P = 0.463

 GLP1RA + MET vs MET

2

P = 0.671, I2 = 0%

-0.23 (-0.83, 0.36)

P = 0.444

 GLP1RA vs MET

3

P = 0.109, I2 = 54.8%

0.16 (-0.57, 0.89)

P = 0.665

 GLP1RA vs Placebo

1

Not Applicable

-0.66 (-1.19, -0.13)

P = 0.015

DHEAS (SMD)

7

P = 0.002, I2 = 67.1%

-0.40 (-0.82, 0.01)

P = 0.058

 GLP1RA + MET vs MET

2

P = 0.375, I2 = 0%

-0.76 (-1.44, -0.08)

P = 0.029

 GLP1RA vs MET

6

P = 0.557, I2 = 0%

-0.08 (-0.35, 0.18)

P = 0.542

 GLP1RA vs Placebo

1

Not Applicable

-1.43 (-1.99, -0.87)

P < 0.001

SHBG (WMD)

9

P = 0.099, I2 = 37.5%

4.42 (2.18, 6.67)

P < 0.001

 GLP1RA + MET vs MET

3

P = 0.665, I2 = 0%

10.19 (6.29, 14.09)

P < 0.001

 GLP1RA vs MET

7

P = 0.203, I2 = 29.5%

3.07 (0.63, 5.51)

P = 0.014

 GLP1RA vs Placebo

1

Not Applicable

5.40 (-0.25, 11.05)

P = 0.061

FAI(WMD)

7

P = 0.019, I2 = 58.4%

-1.55 (-2.59, -0.51)

P = 0.004

 GLP1RA + MET vs MET

1

Not Applicable

-3.50 (-5.39, -1.61)

P < 0.001

 GLP1RA vs MET

5

P = 0.037, I2 = 60.8%

-0.04 (-2.41, 2.32)

P = 0.973

 GLP1RA vs Placebo

2

P = 0.570, I2 = 0%

-1.74 (-2.05, -1.43)

P < 0.001