Skip to main content

Table 4 Relationship between ALT/HDL-C ratio and the incident diabetes in different models

From: The nonlinear correlation between alanine aminotransferase to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and the risk of diabetes: a historical Japanese cohort study

Variable

Model I (HR.,95% CI, P)

Model II (HR,95% CI, P)

Model III (HR,95% CI, P)

GAM (HR,95% CI, P)

ALT/HDL-C ratio

1.05 (1.04, 1.05) < 0.001

1.03 (1.02, 1.04) < 0.001

1.01 (1.00, 1.02) 0.049

1.01 (1.00, 1.02) 0.0318

ALT/HDL-C ratio (per SD)

1.65 (1.55, 1.74) < 0.001

1.38 (1.28, 1.50) < 0.001

1.11 (1.00, 1.24) 0.049

1.12 (1.00, 1.25) 0.0318

ALT/HDL-C ratio (quartile)

 Q1

ref

ref

ref

ref

 Q2

2.11 (1.19, 3.73) 0.031*

1.66 (0.94, 2.95) 0.249*

1.27 (0.71, 2.26) 0.999*

1.27 (0.70, 2.31) 0.999*

 Q3

4.44 (2.63, 7.47) < 0.001*

2.65 (1.54, 4.58) 0.001*

1.81 (1.04, 3.14) 0.105*

1.87 (1.04, 3.35) 0.110*

 Q4

10.68 (6.52, 17.50) < 0.001*

4.69 (2.70, 8.13) < 0.001*

2.24 (1.25, 4.02) 0.021*

2.52 (1.34, 4.74) 0.013*

 P for trend

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

0.001

0.001

  1. Model I: we did not adjust for other covariants
  2. Model II: we adjusted for gender, age, ethanol consumption, smoking status, habit of exercise, BMI, and SBP
  3. Model III: we adjusted for gender, age, ethanol consumption, smoking status, habit of exercise, BMI, SBP, AST, GGT, TC, TG, HbA1c, and FPG
  4. GAM: we adjusted for gender, age, ethanol consumption, smoking status, habit of exercise, BMI, SBP, AST, GGT, TC, TG, HbA1c, and FPG. However, continuous covariates were adjusted as nonlinearity
  5. HR Hazard ratio, CI Confidence interval, Ref Reference, SD Standard deviation, ALT/HDL-C ratio Alanine aminotransferase to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio
  6. *represents that the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was applied