Skip to main content

Table 3 Odds ratios (and 95% CIs) for overweight/obesity phenotypes (in MUHOW/O comparison to MHOW/O) across tertiles of MIND score in obese and overweight women (n = 229)

From: Association of Mediterranean-DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay (MIND) diet and metabolically unhealthy overweight/obesity phenotypes among Iranian women: a cross sectional study

Models

 

Tertiles of the MIND diet score

T1 (n = 77)

6<

T2 (n = 82)

6–8

P-value

T3 (n = 70)

8<

P-value

P- trend

 

OR (95%CI)

 

OR (95%CI)

  

Crude

Ref

1.52 (0.73−3.14)

0.25

1.63 (0.79−3.33)

0.18

0.26

Model 1

Ref

2.01 (0.86−4.71)

0.10

1.89 (0.86−4.17)

0.11

0.06

Model 2

Ref

2.13 (0.89−5.10)

0.08

1.87 (0.83−4.23)

0.12

0.04

  1. CI: Confidence Interval; OR: odds ratio; T: tertile
  2. P-values are reported base on the Binary logistic regression test
  3. p-values < 0.05 were considered as significant and 0.05, 0.06, and 0.07 was considered marginally significant
  4. Metabolically healthy is a reference group
  5. Model 1: Adjusted for age, energy intake, BMI and physical activity
  6. Model 2: Model 1 further adjustment with Marital status
Back to article page

BMC Endocrine Disorders

ISSN: 1472-6823

Contact us