The new visceral adiposity index outperforms traditional obesity indices as a predictor of subclinical renal damage in Chinese individuals: a cross-sectional study

Table 5 Improvement in prediction for SRD after adding obesity indices

Obesity indices	NRI (95% CI)	P value	IDI (95% CI)	P value
Basic model	-	-	-	-
+ NVAI	0.392 (0.280, 0.503)	< 0.001	0.021 (0.014, 0.027)	< 0.001
+ CVAI	0.239 (0.121, 0.357)	< 0.001	0.015 (0.008, 0.022)	< 0.001
+ VAI	0.035 (-0.084, 0.153)	0.569	0.001 (-0.001, 0.002)	0.233
+ LAP	0.257 (0.140, 0.375)	< 0.001	0.010 (0.004, 0.015)	< 0.001
+ BMI	0.307 (0.189, 0.424)	< 0.001	0.023 (0.014, 0.032)	< 0.001
+ WC	0.240 (0.122, 0.358)	< 0.001	0.016 (0.009, 0.023)	< 0.001
+ ABSI	0.087 (-0.032, 0.205)	0.151	0.001 (-0.001, 0.002)	0.298
+ METS-VF	0.349 (0.234, 0.463)	< 0.001	0.017 (0.011, 0.023)	< 0.001

The basic model included sex, smoking status, drinking status, diabetes mellitus, heart rate, TBA, GPT, GOT, TC, LDL, serum UA and urine UA
ABSI A body shape index, BMI Body mass index, CVAI Chinese visceral adiposity index, IDI Integrated discrimination improvement, LAP Lipid accumulation product, METS-VF Metabolic score for visceral fat, NRI Net reclassification index, NVAI New visceral adiposity index, SRD Subclinical renal damage, VAI Visceral adiposity index, WC Waist circumference

ISSN: 1472-6823