The new visceral adiposity index outperforms traditional obesity indices as a predictor of subclinical renal damage in Chinese individuals: a cross-sectional study

Table 4 Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of eight obesity indices for SRD

Obesity indices	AUC	95% CI	P value*	Cutoff point	Sensitivity	Specificity
NVAI	0.666	0.647, 0.685	-	0.95	45.40	81.64
CVAI	0.624	0.604, 0.644	< 0.001	82.25	66.35	55.16
VAI	0.594	0.574, 0.614	< 0.001	1.79	62.54	51.59
LAP	0.631	0.611, 0.651	0.016	55.75	38.41	81.40
BMI	0.630	0.611, 0.650	0.006	24.01	65.40	55.46
WC	0.624	0.604, 0.644	< 0.001	85.10	64.13	55.31
ABSI	0.558	0.537, 0.578	< 0.001	0.08	50.16	62.46
METS-VF	0.638	0.618, 0.658	0.005	6.63	58.10	64.46

ABSI A body shape index, AUC Area under the curve, BMI Body mass index, CI Confidence interval, CVAI Chinese visceral adiposity index, LAP Lipid accumulation product, METS-VF Metabolic score for visceral fat, NVAI New visceral adiposity index, SRD Subclinical renal damage, VAI Visceral adiposity index, WC Waist circumference
^*Comparison of AUC of NVAI with other obesity indices

ISSN: 1472-6823