Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality assessment of included studies, using New-Castle Ottawa scale

From: Circulating levels of adropin and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Author

Selection Bias

Comparability

Outcome

Score

Quality

Representativeness of sample

Sample size

Non-respondents

Ascertainment exposure

Comparability

Assessment outcome

Statistical test

Addai et al. (2018) [96]

--

--

--

**

--

--

*

3

Low

Aydın et al. (2022) [99]

--

--

--

**

--

**

*

5

Moderate

Eshaghi et al. (2021) [100]

*

--

--

**

--

**

*

6

Moderate

Hosseini et al. (2016) [27]

*

--

--

**

*

**

*

7

Good

Hu et al. (2018) [94]

*

*

--

**

**

**

*

9

Good

Kutlu et al. (2019) [95]

*

--

--

**

--

--

*

4

Low

Li, B et al. (2020) [93]

*

--

--

**

**

**

*

8

Good

Li, N et al. (2021) [101]

--

--

--

**

--

**

*

5

Moderate

Li, S et al. (2019) [91]

*

--

--

**

**

**

*

8

Good

Palizban et al. (2019) [92]

*

--

--

**

--

**

*

6

Moderate

Shah et al. (2021) [102]

*

--

--

**

--

**

*

6

Moderate

Shelest et al. (2018) [97]

--

--

--

**

--

**

*

5

Moderate

Wu et al. (2014) [24]

*

--

--

**

**

**

*

8

Good

Zang et al. (2018) [98]

*

--

--

**

**

**

*

8

Good

Zhang et al. (2020) [103]

*

--

--

**

--

**

*

6

Moderate