Skip to main content

Table 2 The relationship between albuminuria and its possible predictors by bivariate analysis*

From: Predictors of microalbuminuria and its relationship with glycemic control among Type 2 diabetic patients of Jazan Armed Forces Hospital, southwestern Saudi Arabia

 

Control group

Microalbuminuria (cases)▲▲

Macro**

Sex

  Males

  Females

93 (46.0)

109 (54.0)

83 (43.1)

119.0(58.9%)

6 (20) ♥♥

24 (80)

Hypertension

  Present

  Absent

119 (58.9)

83 (41.1)

139 (68.8) ♥♥

63 (31.2)

23 (76.7)

07 (23.3)

eGFR

  ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2

  <90 mL/min/1.73 m2

143 (70.8)

59 (29.2)

125 (61.9)

77 (38.1)

16 (53.3)

14 (46.7)

High density lipoproteins (mg/dL)

  In target

  Above the target

96 (47.5)

106 (52.5)

101 (50.0)

101 (50.0)

15 (50)

15 (50)

Triglycerides

  In the target (˂150 mg/dL)

  Above target (≥ 150 mg/dL)

145 (71.8)

57 (28.2)

144 (71.3)

58(28.7)

21 (70)

9 (30)

Low density lipoproteins

  In the target (≥ 100 mg/dL)

  Above target (˂100 mg/dL)

83 (41.1)

119 (58.9)

86 (42.6)

116 (57.4)

12 (40)

18 (60)

ASCVID

  Less Than 10%

95 (47.0)

107 (53.0)

7 (23.3) ♥♥

  More than or equal 10%

107 (53.0)

95 (47.0)

23 (76.7)

HbA1C

  Less than 7 gm %

  ≥ 7 gm %

60 (29.7)

142 (70.3)

35 (17.3) ♥♥

167 (82.7)

2 (6.7) ♥♥

28 (93.3)

Smoking

  smoker or ex-smoker

  Non Smoker

18(8.9)

184 (91.1)

26 (12.9)

176 (87.1)

4 (13.3)

26 (86.7)

  1. , Control group with normal urine ACR, n, 202; ▲▲, Microalbuminuria (cases, n, 202); **, Macroalbuminuria, n,30; *, number and percent in parenthesis; At the target level (more than 40 in males and 50 in females) and not at the target level (less than 40 in males and 50 in females); ♥♥, significantly different from diabetic patients with normal urine ACR (P value of Chi-Square ˂0.05); , atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk