Skip to main content

Table 3 Relationship between FBG and obesity

From: Visceral fat area and body fat percentage measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis correlate with glycometabolism

 

β (95% CI) p-value

 

VFA (cm2)

BFP(%)

WC (cm)

BMI (kg/m2)

Total

2.221 (1.879, 2.564) < 0.001

0.306 (0.246, 0.365) < 0.001

0.606 (0.511, 0.700) < 0.001

0.175 (0.143, 0.208) < 0.001

Normal

8.983 (7.454, 10.511) < 0.001

1.476 (1.197, 1.755) < 0.001

2.872 (2.446, 3.297) < 0.001

0.800 (0.653, 0.948) < 0.001

Pre-Diabetes

6.112 (4.848, 7.376) < 0.001

0.880 (0.664, 1.095) < 0.001

2.019 (1.675, 2.363) < 0.001

0.552 (0.433, 0.670) < 0.001

T2DM

0.380 (−0.245, 1.005) 0.234

0.072 (−0.028, 0.172) 0.157

− 0.055 (− 0.228, 0.118) 0.531

−0.068 (− 0.127, − 0.009) 0.023

  1. Age, sex, HBP, TG, TC, LDL-c, HDL-c and SUA were adjusted. SUA Serum uric acid, HbA1c Glycosylated hemoglobin, FBG Fasting blood glucose, HBP High blood pressure, HDL-c High density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-c Low density lipoprotein cholesterol, TC Total cholesterol, TG Triglyceride, BMI Body mass index, VFA Visceral fat area, BFP Body fat percentage, WC Waist circumference, T2DM Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Back to article page

BMC Endocrine Disorders

ISSN: 1472-6823

Contact us