Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
3 Jun 2021 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
20 Jun 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Nahid Zarifsanaiey |
15 Jul 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maartje De Wit |
15 Jul 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
6 Aug 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
10 Sep 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Nahid Zarifsanaiey |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
20 Jun 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
15 Sep 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
24 Sep 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maartje De Wit |
16 Oct 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Nahid Zarifsanaiey |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
16 Oct 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
9 Feb 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
10 Feb 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maartje De Wit |
24 Feb 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Nahid Zarifsanaiey |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
24 Feb 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
4 Mar 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Nahid Zarifsanaiey |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
4 Mar 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
6 Mar 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Nahid Zarifsanaiey |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
6 Mar 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
14 Mar 2022 | Editorially accepted | |
22 Mar 2022 | Article published | 10.1186/s12902-022-00988-7 |
You can find further information about peer review here.