Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of direct meta-analysis

From: Comparisons of different exercise interventions on glycemic control and insulin resistance in prediabetes: a network meta-analysis

Variable

Group

k

SMD (95% CI)

Q

I2 (%)

P-value

Model

BMI

AET vs. CT

5

−0.1500 [− 0.4464 to 0.1465]

7.18

44.3

0.127

Fixed

 

AET + RT vs. CT

1

−0.2653 [− 0.6478 to 0.1172]

0.00

–

–

–

 

RT vs. CT

2

−0.2336 [− 0.6490 to 0.1818]

0.23

0.0

0.634

Fixed

 

AET vs. RT

1

0.2708 (− 0.2000 to 0.7416)

0.00

–

–

–

FBG

AET vs. CT

7

0.3310 [−0.4398 to 1.1018]

53.73

88.8

< 0.001

Random

 

AET + RT vs. CT

2

−0.7787 [−1.9115 to 0.3540]

5.10

80.4

0.02

Random

 

RT vs. AET

2

−0.4262 [− 1.3347 to 0.4824]

7.40

86.5

0.007

Random

 

RT vs. CT

4

0.0057 [− 0.9556 to 0.9671]

25.48

88.2

< 0.001

Random

HbA1c

AET vs. CT

5

−0.6739 [− 0.9424 to − 0.4055]

6.17

35.2

0.187

Fixed

 

AET + RT vs. CT

1

0.0245 [− 0.3563 to 0.4053]

0.00

–

–

–

 

RT vs. AET

2

0.1705 [− 0.1564 to 0.4975]

1.14

12.0

0.288

Fixed

 

RT vs. CT

2

−1.0014 [− 1.3582 to − 0.6446]

17.50

94.3

< 0.001

Random

Insulin

AET vs. CT

5

−0.1425 [−2.0375 to 1.7525]

100.54

96.0

< 0.001

Random

 

AET + RT vs. CT

1

−0.8934 [−1.9362 to 0.1494]

0.00

–

–

–

 

RT vs. AET

1

0.8907 [0.4146 to 1.3668]

0.00

–

–

–

 

RT vs. CT

3

−0.9305 [−2.0838 to 0.2228]

12.11

83.5

< 0.001

Random

HOMA-IR

AET vs. CT

4

−1.0353 [−2.2784 to 0.2078]

46.72

93.6

< 0.001

Random

 

AET + RT vs. CT

1

−0.5054 [−0.8925 to − 0.1183]

0.00

–

–

–

 

RT vs. AET

2

0.2969 [−0.4154 to 1.0091]

4.65

78.5

0.031

Random

 

RT vs. CT

3

−0.9836 [−2.2509 to 0.2837]

25.30

92.1

< 0.001

Random

  1. Abbreviations: AET aerobic exercise training, BMI body mass index, CI confidence interval, CT control training, FBG fasting blood glucose, HbA1c glycated hemoglobin, HOMA-IR homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance index, RT resistance training, SMD standardized mean difference
  2. CIs crossing the zero line represent no statistically significant difference between any interventions, and CIs that are either greater or lesser than 0 represent statistically significant differences. P < 0.05 indicates significant heterogeneity among included studies