Skip to main content

Table 2 Parameters used in the tree model

From: Cost-effectiveness analysis for HbA1c test intervals to screen patients with type 2 diabetes based on risk stratification

 

Items

Type of distribution of PSA

Point estimate

Distribution parameters for PSA

Ref

Cost (USD)

Screening cost

Gamma

100

α =27.3, λ =1/292

 

Annual treatment fee among T2DM patients without complication

Gamma

3500

α =84,146, λ =1/3

[12]

Annual treatment fee among T2DM patients with complication

Gamma

8000

α =26,540, λ =1/22

[12]

Annual treatment fee among false positive patients with no medication

Gamma

1400

α =1752, λ =1/60

[12]

Discount rate

0.02

[14]

Utility

Utility for healthy population

1

 

[13]

Utility for T2DM patients without complication

0.785

[13]

Utility for T2DM patients with complication

0.638

[13]

Risk

Mortality rate among healthy population

Life Table

 

Relative risk towards mortality rate among T2DM patients with complications

LogNormal

5.61

Log (mean) = 1.65, SE = 0.08

[15]

Relative risk towards mortality rate among T2DM patients without complications

LogNormal

2.61

Log (mean) =0.95, SE = 0.14

[15]

Annual complication rate

Beta

0.014

α =2.27, β =160.3

[16]

Relative risk towards complication rate among T2DM patients with treatment

LogNormal

0.79

Log (mean) = −0.23, SE = 0.09

[17]