Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of arrhythmia indicators between the groups of EDM and MDM

From: Significant abnormal glycemic variability increased the risk for arrhythmias in elderly type 2 diabetic patients

 

n

Maximal heart rate (mean ± SD)

Minimal heart rate (mean ± SD)

Mean heart rate (mean ± SD)

APB [M(Q1, Q3)]

Couplets of A [M(Q1, Q3)]

AT [M(Q1, Q3)]

VPB [M(Q1, Q3)]

Couplets of V [M(Q1, Q3)]

VT [M(Q1, Q3)]

Mean QTc (s) (mean ± SD)

EDM

73

100.26 ± 13.73

51.84 ± 9.99

67.93 ± 9.82

135 (35,382)

2 (1,8)

1 (0,3)

25 (3,303)

0 (0,0)

0 (0,0)

0.47 ± 0.01

MDM

34

112.27 ± 20.75

56.82 ± 17.84

73.22 ± 9.03

7 (2,18)

0 (0,0)

0 (0,0)

1 (0,3)

0 (0,0)

0 (0,0)

0.45 ± 0.00

P

 

0.017

0.222

0.026

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

0.034

0.122

0.029

  1. The difference was compared by independent sample t test or rank sum test
  2. APB atrial premature beats, Couplets of A Couplets of atrial premature beats, AT atrial tachycardia, VPB ventricular premature beats, Couplets of V Couplets of ventricular premature beats, VT ventricular tachycardia