Skip to main content

Table 3 Correlation between cardiometabolic phenotypes and different dietary pattern

From: Association of major dietary patterns and different metabolic phenotypes: a population-based study of northwestern Iran

Dietary patterns

MUHL

OR (95% CI)

MHO

OR (95% CI)

MUHO

OR (95% CI)

Unadjusted

Adjusted*

Unadjusted

Adjusted*

Unadjusted

Adjusted*

Animal dietary pattern

 1st tertile

1

1

1

1

1

1

 2nd tertile

1.09

(0.31, 3.78)

1.51

(0.30, 7.61)

1.29

(0.69, 2.40)

1.53

(0.78, 3.11)

0.85

(0.44, 1.75)

1.20

(0.56, 2.54)

 3rd tertile

0.76

(0.17,3.41))

1.67

(0.43, 6.47)

2.24

(1.17, 4.31)

3.14

(1.54, 6.42)

1.57

(0.79, 3.12)

2.61

(1.18, 5.76)

Healthy dietary pattern

 1st tertile

1

1

1

1

1

1

 2nd tertile

0.44

(0.11, 1.64)

0.56

(0.13, 2.38)

1.01

(0.53, 1.91)

1.23

(0.69, 2.44)

1.44

(0.74, 2.80)

2.11

(0.98, 4.51)

 3rd tertile

0.47

(0.11, 1.99)

0.42

(0.09, 1.97)

1.51

(0.80, 2.85)

1.35

(0.68, 2.69)

1.21

(0.60,2.43)

1.18

(0.53, 2.59)

Western dietary pattern

 1st tertile

1

1

1

1

1

1

 2nd tertile

1.82

(0.32, 10.20)

3.36

(0.81, 20.78)

0.55

(0.29, 1.05)

0.71

(0.35, 1.41)

0.46

(0.23, 0.91)

0.71

(0.33, 1.53)

 3rd tertile

3.79

(0.72, 19.88)

4.76

(0.81, 21.81)

0.92

(0.51, 1.91)

1.22

(0.59, 2.52)

0.71

(0.35,1.42)

1.02

(0.45, 2.29)

  1. Metabolically Healthy Lean (MHL) was considered as reference group
  2. MUHL: Metabolically Unhealthy Lean; MHO: Metabolically Healthy Obese; MUHO: Metabolically Unhealthy Obese. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval
  3. *Adjusted for age, sex, BMI, Physical activity, smoking status and energy intake