Skip to main content

Table 5 Values of indexes describing the diagnostic efficacy of particular UMRFs and their sets in UC and FL nodules

From: The predictive value of sonographic images of follicular lesions – a comparison with nodules unequivocal in FNA – single centre prospective study

Sonographic feature

Category of FNA

UC

FL

SEN

[%]

SPC

[%]

PPV

[%]

NPV

[%]

% of nodules

SEN

[%]

SPC

[%]

PPV

[%]

NPV

[%]

% of nodules

1 – hypoechogenicity

86.0

51.0

46.7

87.9

61.3

73.1

31.1

8.5

94.8

69.3

2 - solid echostructure

94.0

42.5

45.0

93.4

69.7

92.3

23.3

9.6

97.2

77.9

3 – (1 & 2)- hypoechogenicity of solid nodule

80.0

68.5

55.9

87.3

47.7

65.4

45.6

9.5

93.8

55.3

4 - taller-than-wide shape

30.0

86.5

53.6

71.3

18.7

23.1

88.2

14.6

97.8

12.7

5 - pathological vascularization

19.0

93.0

57.6

69.7

11.0

26.9

78.7

10.0

92.5

21.7

6 - suspicious margin

31.0

85.5

51.7

71.3

20.0

3.8

93.6

5.0

91.7

6.2

7 – calcifications (micro or macro)

28.0

86.5

50.9

70.6

18.3

34.6

88.5

20.9

93.9

13.4

7a – microcalcifications

13.0

98.0

76.5

69.3

5.7

7.7

95.3

12.5

98.7

5.0

7b – isolated macrocalcifications

15.0

88.5

39.5

67.6

12.7

26.9

93.2

25.9

93.6

8.4

Sets of sonographic features

A1 - >2 UMRFs of: 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7a

55.0

85.0

64.7

79.1

28.3

30.8

76.0

10.1

92.6

24.5

A2 - >2 UMRFs of: 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7

63.0

80.0

61.1

81.2

34.3

46.2

73.3

13.2

93.9

28.3

B1 - >2 UMRFs of: 1, 2, 4, 6, 7a (TIRADS)

46.0

87.5

64.8

76.4

23.7

23.1

87.5

14.0

92.8

13.4

B2 - >2 UMRFs of: 1, 2, 4, 6, 7

53.0

83.5

61.6

78.0

28.7

38.5

84.5

17.9

94.0

17.4

C - 3 with 4 or 6 or 7a (ATA)

46.0

87.0

63.9

76.3

24.0

19.2

87.8

12.2

92.5

12.7

D - >2 UMRFs of: 1, 2, 4, 7

43.0

90.0

66.2

75.9

21.0

38.5

87.5

21.3

94.2

14.6

  1. FL follicular lesion, UC unequivocal cytology, UMRFs ultrasonographic malignancy risk features