Table 4 Concordance between the risk of hypoglycemia strategy (HYPO) and the ADA/EASD and SED strategies in terms of patient classification
From: Meeting individualized glycemic targets in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes in Spain
HYPO | ||||
ADA/EASD | Low Risk (n(%)) | High Risk (n(%)) | Total (n(%)) | Pa,b |
Low Risk | 1583 (30.5) | 134 (2.5) | 1717 (33) | <0.0001 |
High Risk | 2282 (55.5) | 595 (11.5) | 2877 (67) | |
Total | 3865 (86) | 729 (14) | 4595 (100) | |
HYPO | ||||
SED | Low Risk (n(%)) | High Risk (n(%)) | Total (n(%)) | Pa,c |
Low Risk | 1463 (29.5) | 128 (2.5) | 1591 (32) | <0.0001 |
High Risk | 2804 (56.5) | 572 (11.5) | 3376 (68) | |
Total | 4267 (86) | 700 (14) | 4967 (100) | |