Skip to main content

Table 3 Odds ratios for metabolic syndrome according to the quartiles of variable indices

From: Comparison of waist to height ratio and body indices for prediction of metabolic disturbances in the Korean population: the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008–2011

 

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Males

    

Model 1

    

 BMI

3.0 (2.4–3.7)

6.0 (5.0–7.4)

17.3 (14.2–21.0)

 FM index

3.7 (3.0–4.6)

7.9 (6.4–9.7)

16.5 (13.5–20.3)

 TFM index

2.2 (1.8–4.8)

4.0 (3.4–4.8)

9.6 (8.1–11.5)

 WHtR

4.4 (3.4–5.7)

11.5 (9.0–14.7)

44.3 (34.6–56.7)

Model 2

    

 BMI

3.5 (2.8–4.3)

7.7 (6.2–9.5)

28.3 (22.7–35.1)

 FM index

3.8 (3.0–4.7)

8.1 (6.6–10.0)

20.0 (16.1–24.8)

 TFM index

2.5 (2.1–3.1)

4.7 (3.9–5.7)

12.3 (10.2–14.9)

 WHtR

4.0 (3.1–5.2)

9.6 (7.5–12.3)

36.1 (28.0–46.4)

Females

    

Model 1

    

 BMI

3.8 (3.1–4.7)

9.9 (8.2–12.0)

27.1 (22.3–32.8)

 FM index

3.2 (2.7–3.9)

7.7 (6.5–9.2)

18.7 (15.6–22.2)

 TFM index

2.6 (2.2–3.1)

5.5 (4.7–6.5)

14.9 (12.7–17.5)

 WHtR

6.2 (4.6–8.5)

33.0 (24.5–44.4)

129.3 (95.7–174.6)

Model 2

    

 BMI

3.4 (2.7–4.2)

8.3 (6.7–10.2)

25.8 (20.8–32.0)

 FM index

3.5 (2.8–4.3)

7.0 (5.8–8.6)

18.4 (15.0–22.4)

 TFM index

2.2 (1.8–2.6)

4.1 (3.4–4.9)

12.4 (10.3–14.9)

 WHtR

4.3 (3.1–6.0)

18.0 (13.3–24.5)

58.5 (42.9–79.9)

  1. Model 1 was unadjusted, whereas model 2 was adjusted for age, mean daily alcohol intake, smoking, and physical activity. Variables were expressed as odds ratio (95 % confidence interval), and odds ratios were calculated for Q1
  2. Abbreviations: BMI body mass index; FM fat mass; TFM trunk fat mass; WHtR waist to height ratio; CI confidence interval; Q1 first quartile; Q2 second quartile; Q3 third quartile; Q4 fourth quartile
  3. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.001 for all analyses