Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pegvisomant for the treatment of acromegaly: a systematic review and economic evaluation

Original Submission
5 Sep 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shlomo Melmed
18 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Philippe Chanson
2 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - D Moore
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shlomo Melmed
29 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Philippe Chanson
3 Sep 2009 Author responded Author comments - D Moore
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Sep 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Sep 2009 Author responded Author comments - D Moore
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Sep 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
2 Oct 2009 Author responded Author comments - D Moore
Resubmission - Version 7
2 Oct 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
8 Oct 2009 Editorially accepted
8 Oct 2009 Article published 10.1186/1472-6823-9-20

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page