Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 15 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nicholas Jospe |
| 26 Jan 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lynne Levitsky |
| 10 Feb 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Wilson |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 10 Feb 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 13 Feb 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Wilson |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 13 Feb 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 23 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nicholas Jospe |
| 27 Feb 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lynne Levitsky |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 7 Mar 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Wilson |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 7 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 17 Mar 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Thomas Wilson |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 17 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 20 Mar 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
| 20 Mar 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6823-6-2 |
You can find further information about peer review here.