Skip to main content

Table 3 Stepwise approach to examine zinc/iron ratio as an independent predictor of a new diagnosis of diabetes

From: Is dietary zinc protective for type 2 diabetes? Results from the Australian longitudinal study on women’s health

 

Quintile of zinc to iron ratio

 
 

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q5

P

Number of women

1785

1784

1784

1784

1784

 

Zinc/Iron ratio [median(min, max)]

0.69 (0.28, 0.77)

0.84 (0.77, 0.90)

0.95 (0.90, 1.00)

1.06 (1.00, 1.12)

1.21 (1.12, 1.75)

 

Number of diabetics

60

72

71

65

65

 

Odds ratio

      

• Age adjusted

1.00

1.21 (0.85 to 1.71)

1.19 (0.84 to 1.70)

1.09 (0.76 to 1.56)

1.09 (0.76 to 1.56)

0.885

• Age & non-dietary factors adjusted

1.00

0.91 (0.61 to 1.33)

0.91 (0.62 to 1.34)

0.73 (0.49 to 1.09)

0.74 (0.50 to 1.10)

0.073

• Age, non-dietary and dietary factors adjusted

1.00

0.76 (0.50 to 1.16)

0.71 (0.46 to 1.11)

0.54 (0.33 to 0.86)

0.50 (0.30 to 0.83)

0.003

• Age, non-dietary and dietary factors adjusted plus alcohol intake and use of supplements

1.00

0.75 (0.50 to 1.14)

0.72 (0.46 to 1.12)

0.54 (0.34 to 0.87)

0.50 (0.30 to 0.83)

0.004

  1. Non-dietary factors were BMI; smoking status; HRT; exercise group; and history of arthritis, CHD, hypertension, asthma and depression.
  2. Dietary factors were energy-adjusted fiber, iron and fat.