Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
26 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
30 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Esayas Kebede Gudina |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
30 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
27 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kirsten Coppell |
28 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bibbi Smide |
10 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Esayas Kebede Gudina |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
10 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
23 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Esayas Kebede Gudina |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
23 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
27 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kirsten Coppell |
25 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bibbi Smide |
24 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Esayas Kebede Gudina |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
24 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
29 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kirsten Coppell |
26 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Esayas Kebede Gudina |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
26 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
16 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Esayas Kebede Gudina |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
16 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
20 Dec 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
20 Dec 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6823-11-19 |
You can find further information about peer review here.