Skip to main content

Table 4 Biochemical variables of study participants by tertile of moderate FODMAP

From: Investigation of the association between habitual dietary FODMAP intake, metabolic parameters, glycemic status, and anthropometric features among apparently healthy overweight and obese individuals

Variable

Tertile of Moderate FODMAP

1st (N=112)

2nd (N=111)

3rd (N=112)

OR(CI)

P-value

OR(CI)

P-value

SBP (mmHg)

 Model I

1 REF

0.998 (0.982–1.014)

0.79

0.994 (0.978–1.010)

0.44

 Model II

0.995 (0.978–1.012)

0.56

0.992 (0.975–1.010)

0.37

 Model III

0.954 (0.919–0.991)

0.01

0.975 (0.940–1.012)

0.17

DBP (mmHg)

 Model I

1 REF

0.998 (0.976–1.021)

0.86

0.988 (0.966–1.011)

0.29

 Model II

0.997 (0.973–1.021)

0.79

0.988 (0.965–1.012)

0.33

 Model III

0.982 (0.942–1.024)

0.39

0.998 (0.957–1.040)

0.92

FBS (mg/dl)

 Model I

1 REF

0.987 (0.969–1.005)

0.16

1.008 (0.994–1.022)

0.26

 Model II

0.987 (0.968–1.006)

0.16

1.008 (0.994–1.024)

0.26

 Model III

0.987 (0.957–1.017)

0.37

1.007 (0.983–1.032)

0.55

TC (mg/dl)

 Model I

1 REF

0.999 (0.992–1.007)

0.86

1.000 (0.993–1.007)

0.96

 Model II

1.000 (0.992–1.007)

0.90

1.000 (0.993–1.008)

0.93

 Model III

0.999 (0.986–1.012)

0.87

1.009 (0.995–1.022)

0.19

TG (mg/dl)

 Model I

1 REF

1.003 (0.999–1.006)

0.10

1.002 (0.999–1.005)

0.22

 Model II

1.002 (0.999–1.005)

0.19

1.001 (0.998–1.005)

0.35

 Model III

1.000 (0.992–1.009)

0.94

1.007 (0.998–1.015)

0.11

HDL (mg/dl)

 Model I

1 REF

0.975 (0.948–1.003)

0.07

0 .990 (0.963–1.018)

0.47

 Model II

0.980 (0.953–1.009)

0.17

0.996 (0.968–1.024)

0.77

 Model III

0.949 (0.900–1.003)

0.051

0.982 (0.932–1.035)

0.50

LDL (mg/dl)

 Model I

1 REF

0.999 (0.991–1.007)

0.75

0.997 (0.989–1.006)

0.52

 Model II

0.999 (0.991–1.007)

0.78

0.998 (0.989–1.006)

0.57

 Model III

1.003 (0.989–1.017)

0.71

1.007 (0.9931.022)

0.33

Insulin (mIU/l)

 Model I

1 REF

0.976(0.946–1.007)

0.12

1.001 (0.981–1.021)

0.93

 Model II

0.979 (0.949–1.010)

0.19

1.003 (0.983–1.024)

0.77

 Model III

0.977 (0.928–1.028)

0.37

0.995(0.945–1.048)

0.84

HOMA-IR

 Model I

1 REF

0.872 (0.761–1.000)

0.05

1.018 (0.935–1.108)

0.68

 Model II

0.885 (0.772–1.016)

0.08

1.030 (0.943 -1.125)

0.51

 Model III

0.901 (0.735–1.104)

0.31

1.048 (0.871–1.260)

0.62

QUICKI

 Model I

1 REF

138.934 (0.026–751509.010)

0.26

3.388 (0.001–17835.160)

0.78

 Model II

63.428 (0.011–367537.748)

0.34

1.649 (0.000–9463.304)

0.91

 Model III

649.660 (0.000–3465157205.655)

0.41

1.091 (9.545E-8–12470267.859)

0.99

  1. The multivariate multinomial logistic regression was used for estimation of ORs and confidence interval (CI). Model I: crude, Model II: adjusted for age and sex, Model III: adjusted for age, BMI, sex, SES, physical activity and energy intake
  2. SBP Systolic Blood Pressure, DBP Diastolic Blood Pressure, TC Total Cholesterol, TG Triglyceride, HDL-C High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, LDL-C Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, HOMA-IR Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance, QUICKI Quantitative Insulin sensitivity Check Index, OR Odds ratio, CI Confidence interval
Back to article page

BMC Endocrine Disorders

ISSN: 1472-6823

Contact us