Skip to main content

Table 3 Biochemical variables of study participants by tertiles of high FODMAP

From: Investigation of the association between habitual dietary FODMAP intake, metabolic parameters, glycemic status, and anthropometric features among apparently healthy overweight and obese individuals

Variable

Tertile of High FODMAP

1st (N=112)

2nd (N=111)

3rd (N=112)

OR(CI)

P-value

OR(CI)

P-value

SBP (mmHg)

 Model I

1 REF

1.009 (0.993–1.025)

0.28

1.026 (1.008–1.044)

0.004

 Model II

1.006 (0.989–1.023)

0.48

1.025 (1.006–1.044)

0.009

 Model III

1.006 (0.978–1.035)

0.69

1.017 (0.982- 1.053)

0.33

DBP (mmHg)

 Model I

1 REF

1.006 (0.984–1.029)

0.57

1.025 (1.002–1.050)

0.03

 Model II

1.003 (0.979–1.0262)

0.83

1.021 (0.996–1.047)

0.098

 Model III

0.993 (0.959–1.028)

0.68

0.988 (0.946–1.032)

0.58

FBS (mg/dl)

 Model I

1 REF

1.003 (0.989–1.017)

0.70

1.003 (0.989–1.018)

0.64

 Model II

1.001 (0.964–1.039)

0.96

1.004 (0.970–1.039)

0.82

 Model III

1.005 (0.985–1.026)

0.61

1.015 (0.993–1.037)

0.17

TC (mg/dl)

 Model I

1 REF

1.019 (0.982–1.057)

0.32

1.002 (0.977–1.028)

0.85

 Model II

1.021 (0.983–1.060)

0.29

1.004 (0.979–1.030)

0.75

 Model III

0.999 (0.988–1.009)

0.78

0.996 (0.982–1.009)

0.50

TG (mg/dl)

 Model I

1 REF

0.995 (0.987–1.003)

0.18

0.998 (0.992–1.004)

0.52

 Model II

0.994 (0.987–1.002)

0.16

0.998 (0.991–1.004)

0.47

 Model III

0.999 (0.988–1.009)

0.78

0.996 (0.982–1.009)

0.50

HDL (mg/dl)

 Model I

1 REF

1.007 (0.980–1.035)

0.61

0.995 (0.967–1.023)

0.71

 Model II

1.009 (0.980–1.037)

0.55

0.992 (0.964–1.021)

0.60

 Model III

0.983 (0.943–1.024)

0.40

0.972 (0.923–1.024)

0.28

LDL (mg/dl)

 Model I

1 REF

1.006 (0.998–1.015)

0.14

1.003 (0.995–1.012)

0.46

 Model II

1.006 (0.997–1.014)

0.17

1.002 (0.994–1.011)

0.58

 Model III

1.000 (0.988–1.012)

0.99

0.995 (0.981–1.010)

0.51

Insulin (mIU/l)

 Model I

1 REF

1.000 (0.978–1.021)

0.96

0.994 (0.970–1.019)

0.64

 Model II

0.998 (0.977–1.020)

0.86

0.990 (0.965–1.015)

0.42

 Model III

1.041 (1.001–1.083)

0.04

1.010 (0.959–1.063)

0.71

HOMA-IR

 Model I

1 REF

1.010 (0.922–1.106)

0.83

0.993 (0.899–1.096)

0.88

 Model II

1.003 (0.915–1.099)

0.95

0.973 (0.878–1.078)

0.59

 Model III

1.159 (1.101-.1.351)

0.049

1.113 (0.919–1.348)

0.27

QUICKI

 Model I

1 REF

0.028 (3.890E-6–204.461)

0.43

3873.747 (0.002–6453005815)

0.25

 Model II

0.032 (3.437E-6–296.630)

0.46

338.839 (0.077–1494435.114)

0.17

 Model III

9.866E-7 (1.558E-12–0.625)

0.04

0.010 (3.245E-9–28934.052)

0.54

  1. The multivariate multinomial logistic regression was used for estimation of ORs and confidence interval (CI). Model I: crude, Model II: adjusted for age and sex, Model III: adjusted for age, BMI, sex, SES, physical activity and energy intake
  2. SBP Systolic Blood Pressure, DBP Diastolic Blood Pressure, TC Total Cholesterol, TG Triglyceride, HDL-C High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, LDL-C Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, HOMA-IR Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance, QUICKI Quantitative Insulin sensitivity Check Index, OR Odds ratio, CI Confidence interval
Back to article page

BMC Endocrine Disorders

ISSN: 1472-6823

Contact us