Skip to main content

Table 4 Odds ratio of hyperuricemia in different groups according to NEAP

From: Higher dietary acid load is associated with hyperuricemia in Chinese adults: a case-control study

Variates

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

NEAP (mEq/d)

4.14~

44.76~

59.22~

76.01~

n

73

72

72

73

Case group

25

32

40

46

Control group

48

40

32

27

Crude effect

 OR

Ref.

1.54

2.40

3.27

 95% CI

(0.93 ~ 2.53)

(1.7 ~ 3.38)

(2.31 ~ 4.62)

p-value

0.210

0.011

0.001

p for trend

< 0.001

Adjusted for age and sex

 OR

Ref.

1.60

2.53

3.59

 95% CI

(0.99 ~ 2.58)

(1.79 ~ 3.58)

(2.51 ~ 5.13)

p-value

0.176

0.007

< 0.001

p for trend

< 0.001

Adjusted for multiple variates

 OR

Ref.

1.68

2.67

4.03

 95% CI

(1.17 ~ 2.41)

(1.85 ~ 3.86)

(2.76 ~ 5.88)

p-value

0.150

0.007

< 0.001

p for trend

< 0.001

  1. Abbreviation: PRAL Potential renal acid load, OR Odd ratio, CI Confidence interval, Q1 the First quartile, Q2 the Second quartile, Q3 the Third quartile, Q4 the Fourth quartile. *Multiple variates included age, sex, BMI, diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, smoking, drinking and chronic disease