Skip to main content

Table 2 Showed the characteristics of the included studies

From: Magnitude of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in Saudi Arabia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Year of study

Year of publication

Type of study

Mean age

Proportion of female

Region

Type of DM

Screening technique

Total

Cases

Prevalence

Quality/10

Nielson et al. [31]

1996

1998

Cross sectional

50*

38*(of dn pat)

Riyadh

T2

Clinical

375

143

38.1

7

Akbar et al. [32]

1999

2000

Cross sectional

54.19

NA

Jeddah

T1 + T2

MNSI

237

132

55.7

6

NCS

237

58

24.4

Mojaddidi et al. [40]

2009

2011

Prospective

51.79

54.3

Al-Madinah

T1 + T2

DNS + DNI

263

165

62.7

9

NCS

263

43

16.4

Halawa et al. [8]

2007

2010

Cross sectional

52.10

33.4

Multicentre

T1 + T2

DN4

1039

619

59.6

9

Ahmed et al. [33]

2012

2014

Cross sectional

51.43

43.0

Jeddah

T2

Standardized assesment form

350

168

48.0

5

Wang et al. [34]

2010

2014

Cross sectional

59.50

38.2

Jeddah

T1 + T2

Clinical

552

110

19.9

8

Kasim et al. [35]

2012

2015

Cross sectional

51.50

58.0

Al-Madinah

T1 + T2

MDNS

100

20

20.0

7

Shesha et al. [36]

2013

2017

Cross sectional

45.40

41.5

Riyadh

T2

NSS/NDS

125

44

35.2

8

NCS

87

34

39.1

Algeffari et al. [24]

2013

2018

Cross sectional

56.90

66.7

Riyadh

T2

MNSI

242

84

34.7

8

Aljehani [37]

2019

2019

Cross sectional

50.62

62.7

Riyadh

T1 + T2

Clinical

469

324

69.1

8

Sendi at al. [38]

2019*

2020

Cross sectional

NA

54.7

Al-Madinah

T1 + T2

DN4

430

129

30.0

7

Almohaysen et al. [39]

NA

2020

Cross sectional

53.61

54.0

Al-Qassim

T2

MDNS

374

143

38.2

8

  1. *T1:Type-1DM, T2:Type-2DM,NCS: Nerve conduction study, MNSI: Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument, MDNS: Michigan Diabetic Neuropathy Score, DN4: DN4 assessment tool, NSS: Neurological symptom score, NDS: Neuropathy Disability Score