Skip to main content

Table 2 The association between Android/Gynoid fat mass and BMD in different gender

From: The association between body fat distribution and bone mineral density: evidence from the US population

 

Model

Android fat mass (kg)

Gynoid fat mass (kg)

Male

Female

Male

Female

Total femur BMD (g/cm2)

Model I

0.048 (0.043, 0.053) < 0.00001

0.059 (0.054, 0.063) < 0.00001

0.045 (0.041, 0.050) < 0.00001

0.042 (0.039, 0.045) < 0.00001

Model II

0.048 (0.042, 0.053) < 0.00001

0.050 (0.046, 0.054) < 0.00001

0.043 (0.038, 0.047) < 0.00001

0.035 (0.032, 0.038) < 0.00001

Model III

0.044 (0.037, 0.051) < 0.00001

0.044 (0.039, 0.049) < 0.00001

0.039 (0.034, 0.045) < 0.00001

0.030 (0.026, 0.033) < 0.00001

Femoral neck BMD (g/cm2)

Model I

0.035 (0.030, 0.041) < 0.00001

0.044 (0.040, 0.048) < 0.00001

0.036 (0.032, 0.041) < 0.00001

0.038 (0.035, 0.040) < 0.00001

Model II

0.035 (0.030, 0.040) < 0.00001

0.035 (0.031, 0.039) < 0.00001

0.034 (0.029, 0.038) < 0.00001

0.030 (0.027, 0.033) < 0.00001

Model III

0.034 (0.027, 0.041) < 0.00001

0.032 (0.027, 0.037) < 0.00001

0.030 (0.025, 0.036) < 0.00001

0.028 (0.024, 0.031) < 0.00001

Total spine BMD (g/cm2)

Model I

0.047 (0.041, 0.053) < 0.00001

0.043 (0.038, 0.048) < 0.00001

0.044 (0.039, 0.049) < 0.00001

0.033 (0.030, 0.037) < 0.00001

Model II

0.048 (0.042, 0.054) < 0.00001

0.035 (0.031, 0.040) < 0.00001

0.043 (0.037, 0.048) < 0.00001

0.026 (0.023, 0.030) < 0.00001

Model III

0.036 (0.029, 0.044) < 0.00001

0.025 (0.019, 0.031) < 0.00001

0.032 (0.026, 0.039) < 0.00001

0.020 (0.016, 0.025) < 0.00001

  1. All results were expressed as β (95% CI), P-value
  2. Model I: No covariates were adjusted
  3. Model II: Adjusted for Age and Race
  4. Model III: Adjusted according to Supplementary File 1