Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of muscle thickness and pennate angle measurements of patients and control groups

From: The evaluation of muscle strength and architecture in type 1 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study

 

T1D Group

Control Group

p value

Rectus femoris

Muscle thickness

  

0.013a

 Mean ± S

1.8 ± 0.3

1.98 ± 0.26

 

 Median (Min – Max)

1.84(1.09 –2.5)

1.93(1.57– 2.72)

 

Vastus intermedius

Muscle thickness

  

0.047a

 Mean ± S

1.73 ± 0.35

1.92 ± 0.42

 

 Median (Min – Max)

1.80(0.9 – 2.48)

1.89(0.99 – 2.79)

 

Vastus intermedius

Pennate angle

  

 < 0.001b

 Mean ± S

13.19 ± 4.26

17 ± 3.95

 

 Median (Min – Max)

13(6 – 27)

17(10–24)

 

Vastus medialis

Muscle thickness

  

0.011b

 Mean ± S

1.94 ± 0.32

2.19 ± 0.43

 

 Median (Min – Max)

1.96(1.38–2.63)

2.1(1.56 – 3.88)

 

Vastus medialis

Pennate angle

  

 < 0.001b

 Mean ± S

17.56 ± 7.2

25.18 ± 7.34

 

 Median (Min – Max)

15.5(7–3)3

27(8–36)

 

Vastus lateralis

Muscle thickness

  

0.043a

 Mean ± S

1.58 ± 0.27

2.73 ± 0.31

 

 Median (Min – Max)

1.57(0.85 – 2.3)

1.75(1.22 – 2.5)

 

Vastus lateralis

Pennate angle

  

0.200a

 Median

11.93 ± 3.12

13.09 ± 3.95

 

 Median (Min – Max)

12(7–18)

13(7–23)

 
  1. S Standart deviation, Min Minimum, Max Maximum
  2. aIndependent Sample t-test.bMann Whitney U test