Skip to main content

Table 3 Quality assessment using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studiesa

From: Association between type 2 diabetes (T2D) and tooth loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Selection

Comparability

Outcome

Study score

Representativeness of The exposed cohort

Selection of the non-Exposed cohort

Ascertainment of exposure

Demonstration that the outcome of interest was not present at start of the study

Comparability of Cohorts on the basis of design or analysis

Assessment of outcome

Was follow- up

Long enough

For the outcome to occur?

Adequacy of follow up of cohorts

Yoo, et al., 2019

*

*

*

*

 

*

*

*

7/9

Joshipura, et al. 2018

*

*

*

  

*

*

*

6/9

Oluwagbemigun, et al. 2015

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

 

7/9

Liljestrand, et al. 2015

*

*

*

  

*

*

*

6/9

Greenblatt, et al. 2016

*

*

*

*

 

*

*

*

7/9

Zhang, et al. 2021

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

8/9

  1. aStudy score less than 4 indicates low quality, a score of 4 to 6 represents poor to moderate, and a score 7 or higher indicates as a good quality