Skip to main content

Table 2 Baseline to follow-up

From: The effect of parathyroidectomy compared to non-surgical surveillance on kidney function in primary hyperparathyroidism: a nationwide historic cohort study

 

Non-PTX

PTX

 
 

Baseline

Follow-up

Baseline

Follow-up

p

All

(n = 1608)

(n = 1977)

 

P-Creatinine, μmol/L

79 (65;98)

79 (65;98) *

73 (63;87)

76 (65;90) *

< 0.001

eGFR, mL/min

69 (52;86)

69 (51;86) *

81 (66;95)

79 (63;93) *

< 0.001

eGFR < 60 mL/min

(n = 593)

(n = 344)

 

P-Creatinine, μmol/L

105 (90;127)

105 (88;126)

105 (91;129)

105 (88;130)

0.906

eGFR, mL/min

46 (36;54)

46 (37;56) *

51 (41;56)

50 (39;58) *

0.756

eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min

(n = 1015)

(n = 1633)

 

P-Creatinine, μmol/L

69 (60;77)

69 (60;80) *

70 (61;79)

72 (63;83) *

0.002

eGFR, mL/min

82 (71;92)

82 (70;92) *

86 (74;97)

84 (72;95) *

< 0.001

Mild Hypercalcemiaa

(n = 1159)

(n = 890)

 

P-Creatinine, μmol/L

77 (64;96)

78 (64;97) *

72 (62;85)

74 (64;88) *

0.001

eGFR, mL/min

72 (53;88)

72 (53;88) *

82 (67;95)

79 (65;92) *

< 0.001

Moderate-severe Hypercalcemiaa

(n = 342)

(n = 936)

 

P-Creatinine, μmol/L

84 (67;104)

83 (66;106)

74 (63;90)

77 (65;92) *

0.002

eGFR, mL/min

64 (47;80)

63 (46;81)

81 (64;95)

77 (62;92) *

0.008

  1. Results listed as median with interquartile range (25%;75%)
  2. p-values shows results of statistical tests comparing PTX-treated and non-PTX-treated, regarding the percentage difference from baseline to follow-up. p < 0.05 is considered as significant
  3. A significant within group change from baseline to follow-up is marked by *
  4. Baseline: Time of diagnosis
  5. Follow-up: 9–15 months after respectively time of diagnosis for non-PTX group and PTX for PTX group
  6. Abbreviations: PTX parathyroidectomy, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate
  7. aMild hypercalcemia is defined as plasma levels of ionized calcium above upper limit of normal but below 1.45 mmol/L. Moderate to severe hypercalcemia is defined as ionized calcium levels ≥1.45 mmol/L. Due to missing values of ionized calcium levels at baseline, number of subjects are slightly below the number stated in Fig. 1