Skip to main content

Table 4 Associations of two polymorphism models in the CD160 gene with GD before and after adjusting for confounders

From: Associations between CD160 polymorphisms and autoimmune thyroid disease: a case-control study

Comparison models Unadjusted estimates Adjusted estimatesa
OR (95%CI) P values OR (95%CI) P values
rs744877
 Allele Model 0.84 (0.71–0.98) 0.027 0.84 (0.71–0.98) 0.030
 Dominant Model 0.74 (0.60–0.91) 0.005 0.74 (0.60–0.92) 0.005
 Recessive model 0.98 (0.69–1.37) 0.886 0.98 (0.70–1.39) 0.923
 Homozygous model 0.83 (0.58–1.19) 0.315 0.84 (0.58–1.20) 0.339
 Additive model 0.72 (0.58–0.90) 0.004 0.72 (0.58–0.90) 0.004
rs3766526
 Allele Model 1.16 (0.96–1.39) 0.122 1.14 (0.95–1.38) 0.160
 Dominant Model 1.14 (0.91–1.41) 0.250 1.12 (0.90–1.40) 0.295
 Recessive model 1.60 (0.92–2.79) 0.096 1.54 (0.88–2.70) 0.130
 Homozygous model 1.65 (0.94–2.88) 0.081 1.57 (0.89–2.77) 0.116
 Additive model 1.09 (0.87–1.36) 0.462 1.08 (0.86–1.36) 0.502
  1. GD Graves’ disease, OR Odds ratio, 95%CI 95% confidence interval; a Age and gender were adjusted in the multivariate logistic regression analyses)