Skip to main content

Differentiation of insulinoma from accessory spleen by 99mTc-labelled heat-denaturated red blood cell scintigraphy: case report

Abstract

Background

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare tumors harboring overexpression of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) on their cell membrane. Because some organs, such as the spleen, adrenal glands and liver, physiologically express SSTR, it might be challenging to distinguish some pancreatic NETs located in the pancreatic tail from the accessory spleen next to the splenic hilum. In this manuscript, we report a case with hypoglycemia attack and 2 different masses displayed by Gallium 68-tetraazacyclododecane tetraacetic acid-octreotate (68Ga-DOTATATE) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT).

Case presentation

A 63-year-old woman presented to the hospital with confusion and profuse sweating. Biochemical diagnosis of insulinoma was established. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT revealed two masses with increased tracer uptake located adjacent to the splenic hilum and inferior pole of the spleen which were initially reported as two separate accessory spleens. Then, 99mTc-labelled heat-denaturated red blood cell (99mTc-HDRBC) scintigraphy-single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT was performed to distinguish a NET in the pancreatic tail from accessory spleen at the splenic hilum. Enhanced tracer uptake remained in the inferior pole of spleen, but not in the splenic hilum. The lesions were suggestive of insulinoma in the pancreatic tail and an accessory spleen adjacent to the inferior pole of the spleen.

Conclusion

Approximately 10% of the population have an accessory spleen which can show similar imaging characteristics with pancreatic NETs, especially if located in the pancreatic tail. In our presented case, 99mTc-HDRBC scintigraphy-SPECT/CT is a useful nuclear medicine method to differentiate a NET in the pancreatic tail from accessory spleen at the splenic hilum which may avoid unnecessary surgeries in the presence of enhanced tracer uptake or vice versa.

Peer Review reports

Key messages

99mTc-HDRBC scintigraphy-SPECT/CT is a useful nuclear medicine method to differentiate a NET in the pancreatic tail from accessory spleen at the splenic hilum which may avoid unnecessary surgeries in the presence of enhanced tracer uptake or vice versa.

Background

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare tumors harboring overexpression of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) on their cell membrane and insulinoma is the most common functioning NET, with an incidence of 1–4 cases per a million person years [1, 2]. Insulinomas are generally benign lesions which can be curative in most patients following surgical resection [3], indicating the preoperative localization of the lesions as one of the mandatory steps in the management of patients with insulinoma. Similar to other 68Gallium (Ga)-labeled analogs of octreotide, such as tetraazacyclododecane-tetraacetic acid (DOTA)-d-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide (DOTATOC) and DOTA-1-Nal3-octreotide (DOTANOC), DOTA-d-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotate (DOTATATE) is a radiopharmaceutical which binds to SSTR type 2, while having less affinity for SSTR type 3 and 5, compared to the other two radiopharmaceuticals [4].

68Ga-DOTA-d-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotate (68Ga-DOTATATE) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is an important imaging modality in diagnosis, localizing and staging of NETs [5]. It might be challenging to distinguish some pancreatic NETs located in the pancreatic tail from the accessory spleen next to the splenic hilum, since some organs, such as the spleen, adrenal glands and liver, physiologically express SSTR [6]. In this manuscript, we report a case with hypoglycemia attack and 2 different masses with close proximity to the spleen which were initially reported as accessory spleen by 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT.

Case presentation

A 63-year-old Caucasian woman with a 15-year history of hypertension presented to the emergency department with confusion and profuse sweating. She noted that her symptoms had first appeared mildly 5 years prior to admission. Both her parents had a history of hypertension and no history of any endocrinopathies. Physical examination revealed unremarkable findings, except a clouded consciousness. Her capillary blood glucose level was 45 mg/dL and a dextrose 5% infusion was started immediately. Within a short period of time, her consciousness was restored and capillary glucose level increased up to 110 mg/dL.

In the first hour after cessation of dextrose infusion, symptomatic hypoglycemia (plasma glucose: 31 mg/dL) developed and simultaneous insulin and C-peptide levels were found to be elevated, 41 μIU/ml (1.9–23 μIU/ml) and 12.7 ng/mL (0.9–7.1 ng/mL), respectively. The levels of antibodies to insulin were normal. Biochemical diagnosis of insulinoma was established and consequently, an abdominal CT was performed. No pathological findings were observed and an endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) was planned, however it could not be performed due to some technical issues. As a result, 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT was performed. It revealed two masses with increased tracer uptake located adjacent to the splenic hilum and inferior pole of the spleen with the diameter of 1.6 cm and 1.8 cm, respectively. The lesions were initially reported as two separate accessory spleens due to their close proximity to the spleen and significantly elevated maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) within the lesions (SUVmax: 75.3 and 40.3, respectively) (Fig. 1). Then, 99mTc-labelled heat-denaturated red blood cell (99mTc-HDRBC) scintigraphy-single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT was performed to distinguish a NET in the pancreatic tail from accessory spleen at the splenic hilum. Enhanced tracer uptake remained in the soft tissue lesion located in the inferior pole of the spleen, but not in the splenic hilum (Fig. 2). The lesions were suggestive of insulinoma in the pancreatic tail and an accessory spleen adjacent to the inferior pole of the spleen.

Fig. 1
figure 1

68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT images, revealing two masses with intense tracer uptake in the pancreatic tail/splenic hilum (a) and in the inferior pole of the spleen (b)

Fig. 2
figure 2

99mTc-HDRBC scintigraphy images, showing no tracer uptake in the pancreatic tail/splenic hilum (a), but remaining tracer uptake in the inferior pole of the spleen (b)

A hemipancreatectomy was planned; however, due to some intraoperative complications, splenectomy was also performed in addition to hemipancreatectomy. The histopathological findings revealed a grade 1 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor with a maximum diameter of 16 mm and a Ki-67 proliferative index of 1% together with unremarkable splenic and accessory splenic tissue. On the first postoperative day, dextrose infusion was stopped and her plasma glucose level maintained within normal range during the hospital stay.

Discussion

Accessory spleens arise from the left side of the dorsal mesogastrium during the embryological period and set apart from the main body of the spleen, most commonly located next to splenic hilum [7]. Approximately 10% of the population have an accessory spleen and the prevalence may increase up to 40% in patients undergoing autopsies [7, 8]. Accessory spleens can show similar imaging characteristics with pancreatic NETs, especially if located in the pancreatic tail [9]. In our case, biochemical diagnosis of insulinoma has been established; however, 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT demonstrated two masses located adjacent to the splenic hilum and inferior pole of the spleen, both considered as accessory spleens with similar tracer uptake.

99mTc-HDRBC scintigraphy has been a beneficial imaging technique to detect gastrointestinal bleeding and to display the functional splenic tissue, [9] i.e., the differentiation of accessory spleen from NETs of pancreatic tail, estimating the function of auto-transplanted splenic tissue and determining the presence of a residual splenic tissue after splenectomy [10,11,12]. Therefore, it may be a reasonable imaging option to distinguish splenic tissue from NETs or their metastases, contributing to the differential diagnosis of unclear 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT findings. The basic mechanism of this imaging technique is based on denaturated red blood cell uptake by the functioning spleen for the removal of abnormal erythrocytes.

The protocol for preparing red blood cells had been described as: drawing patient blood into a heparinized syringe, transferring it to a vacutainer tube followed by incubating five minutes with gentle mixing, adding EDTA solution and mixing again, centrifuging five minutes, withdrawing RBC after the cell fraction is separated from plasma, adding to saline-99mTc pertechnetate solution and incubating for 15 min at 49 °C [13]. Scintigraphy and SPECT are required to be performed 30 min after the injection of prepared 99mTc-labeled denaturated RBC with a high sensitivity and specificity when used together [14].

In a case series reported by Werner et al.,10 patients had been evaluated to whom 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and 99mTc-HDRBC scintigraphy-SPECT/CT were performed [10]. In 5 patients, surgery was discarded for the diagnosis because of the elevated tracer uptake within the lesions which were suggestive of the splenic tissue. One patient underwent surgery due to the absence of tracer uptake in 99mTc-HDRBC scintigraphy-SPECT/CT and NET metastasis was shown histopatologically. In the remaining four patients, negative findings on 99mTc-HDRBC scintigraphy-SPECT/CT has been considered as false negative and the most probable cause of DOTATOC accumulation has been still assumed to be a splenic tissue. The authors discussed about the two possible causes regarding the false negative imaging by 99mTc-HDRBC scintigraphy-SPECT/CT which were the relatively small sizes of the lesions and respiratory-dependent excursions due to their close proximity to the diaphragm.

Conclusions

As described in our presented case, 99mTc-HDRBC scintigraphy-SPECT/CT is a useful nuclear medicine method to differentiate a NET in the pancreatic tail from accessory spleen at the splenic hilum which may avoid unnecessary surgeries in the presence of enhanced tracer uptake or vice versa.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

DOTA:

Tetraazacyclododecane-tetraacetic acid

DOTANOC:

DOTA-1-Nal3-octreotide

DOTATATE:

DOTA-d-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotate

DOTATOC:

DOTA-d-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide

EUS:

Endoscopic ultrasonography

Ga:

Gallium

NETs:

Neuroendocrine tumors

PET/CT:

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography

SPECT:

Scintigraphy-single-photon emission computed tomography

SSTRs:

Somatostatin receptors

99mTc-HDRBC:

99mTc-labelled heat-denaturated red blood cell

References

  1. Oronsky B, Ma PC, Morgensztern D, Carter CA. Nothing But NET: A Review of Neuroendocrine Tumors and Carcinomas. Neoplasia (United States). 2017;19:991–1002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Okabayashi T, Shima Y, Sumiyoshi T, Kozuki A, Ito S, Ogawa Y, et al. Diagnosis and management of insulinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:829–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Service FJ, Mcmahon MM, O’brien PC, Ballard DJ. Functioning Insulinoma—incidence, recurrence, and long-term survival of patients: a 60-year study. Mayo Clin Proc. 1991;66:711–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Virgolini I, Ambrosini V, Bomanji JB, Baum RP, Fanti S, Gabriel M, et al. Procedure guidelines for PET/CT tumour imaging with 68Ga-DOTA- conjugated peptides: 68Ga-DOTA-TOC, 68Ga-DOTA-NOC, 68Ga-DOTA-TATE. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:2004–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schreiter NF, Brenner W, Nogami M, Buchert R, Huppertz A, Pape UF, et al. Cost comparison of 111In-DTPA-octreotide scintigraphy and 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT for staging enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:72–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boy C, Heusner TA, Poeppel TD, Redmann-Bischofs A, Unger N, Jentzen W, et al. 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT and somatostatin receptor (sst1-sst5) expression in normal human tissue: correlation of sst2 mRNA and SUV max. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:1224–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Halpert B, Gyorkey F. Lesions observed in accessory spleens of 311 patients. Am J Clin Pathol. 1959;32:165–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Läuffer JM, Baer HU, Maurer CA, Wagner M, Zimmermann A, Büchler MW. Intrapancreatic accessory spleen: a rare cause of a pancreatic mass. Int J Pancreatol. 1999;25:65–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Armas RR. Clinical studies with spleen-specific radiolabeled agents. Semin Nucl Med. 1985;15:260–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Werner C, Winkens T, Freesmeyer M. Splenic scintigraphy for further differentiation of unclear 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT findings: strengths and limitations. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2016;60:365–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sharma R, Mondal A, Kashyap R, Chakravarty SK, Sawroop K, Singh T. Radiolabeled denatured RBC scintigraphy in autologous splenic transplantation. Clin Nucl Med. 1996;21:534–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Massey MD, Stevens JS. Residual spleen found on denatured red blood cell scan following negative colloid scans. J Nucl Med. 1991;32:2286–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Srivastava SC, Rao CL. Radionuclide-labeled red blood cells: current status and future prospects. Semin Nucl Med. 1984;14:68–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Serrano-Vicente J, Infante-Torre JR, García-Bernardo L, Moreno-Caballero M, Martínez-Esteve A, Rayo-Madrid JI. Bazo accesorio intrapancreático. Falso positivo con 99mTc-Octreotide. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 2017;36:53–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank our nursery staff for their valuable contributions to the management of our patient.

Funding

N/A

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Concept, design and definition of intellectual content – EG, DK, AS and Sİ, literature search and manuscript preparation – EG and MS, manuscript editing and manuscript review- BÇ, ZC and AS. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emre Gezer.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

N/A

Consent for publication

A written consent was signed by the patient for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest whatsoever arising out of the publication of this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gezer, E., Çetinarslan, B., Karakaya, D. et al. Differentiation of insulinoma from accessory spleen by 99mTc-labelled heat-denaturated red blood cell scintigraphy: case report. BMC Endocr Disord 21, 6 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-020-00671-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-020-00671-9

Keywords